Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

iamthebandfanman

(8,127 posts)
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 04:14 AM Sep 2013

Since posting opinions of RW Nuts about syria

has become the fad here on DU...

heres one from a progressive republican on 'intervention' :

"Any country whose people conduct themselves well can count upon our hearty friendship. If a nation shows that it knows how to act with reasonable efficiency and decency in social and political matters, if it keeps order and pays its obligations, it need fear no interference from the United States. Chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention by some civilized nation, and in the Western Hemisphere the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an international police power. "

- Theodore Roosevelt (6 December 1904)

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

delrem

(9,688 posts)
1. Thank fuckin' god that the world has moved on from 1904.
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 04:17 AM
Sep 2013

Else the whole world would be subject to US dictatorship.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
3. Sorry, I don't speak your language.
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 04:27 AM
Sep 2013

eta. in 1904 TR didn't confront the same situation as 2013.
Your deplorable suggestion has no connection to 2013.
Your deplorable suggestion sucks.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
9. He was a big cheerleader for American imperialism with his "big stick"
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 05:05 AM
Sep 2013

Though pretty progressive on domestic issues. Sounds a lot like Democrats used to be, no?

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
14. He was a Colonialist.
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 06:35 AM
Sep 2013

Last edited Fri Sep 6, 2013, 07:08 AM - Edit history (1)

That is the same thing as a Fascist, at least it is to anyone with dark skin.

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
6. "If a nation shows that it knows how to act with reasonable efficiency and decency in social and
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 04:38 AM
Sep 2013

political matters, if it keeps order and pays its obligations..."

Like the U.S. for the past decade?

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
8. White, western aristocratic male waxes poetic about "civilized society" in the early 20th century...
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 04:41 AM
Sep 2013

hmmmm.....hmmmm....hmmmmmmm

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
13. We've had two horrific World Wars since TR's day . . .
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 06:33 AM
Sep 2013

The first one, he wanted us to join almost from day one. The second he was not around to witness, but would undoubtedly have been great guns for as well (on which side it's hard to say). TR was an unabashed White Supremacist and Colonialist. International law has moved on greatly since his day, and we are all much better off for that fact. Under the guiding principles you describe above, Saddam Hussein would have found it quite easy to justify his invasion of Kuwait, and no one would have had grounds to complain about anything George W. Bush did to Afghanistan and Iraq.

International law today recognizes only two justifiable reasons for one sovereign nation to attack or invade another:

1. In self defense.

2. In accordance with a decision by the United Nations' Security Council that military action is required.

We ignore those conditions at our own peril.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Since posting opinions of...