General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSince posting opinions of RW Nuts about syria
has become the fad here on DU...
heres one from a progressive republican on 'intervention' :
"Any country whose people conduct themselves well can count upon our hearty friendship. If a nation shows that it knows how to act with reasonable efficiency and decency in social and political matters, if it keeps order and pays its obligations, it need fear no interference from the United States. Chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention by some civilized nation, and in the Western Hemisphere the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an international police power. "
- Theodore Roosevelt (6 December 1904)
delrem
(9,688 posts)Else the whole world would be subject to US dictatorship.
iamthebandfanman
(8,127 posts)darn that fascist dictator Teddy Roosevelt!
delrem
(9,688 posts)eta. in 1904 TR didn't confront the same situation as 2013.
Your deplorable suggestion has no connection to 2013.
Your deplorable suggestion sucks.
eridani
(51,907 posts)Though pretty progressive on domestic issues. Sounds a lot like Democrats used to be, no?
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)Last edited Fri Sep 6, 2013, 07:08 AM - Edit history (1)
That is the same thing as a Fascist, at least it is to anyone with dark skin.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)Snake Plissken
(4,103 posts)David__77
(23,383 posts)...
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)political matters, if it keeps order and pays its obligations..."
Like the U.S. for the past decade?
markpkessinger
(8,395 posts)Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)hmmmm.....hmmmm....hmmmmmmm
fasttense
(17,301 posts)myrna minx
(22,772 posts)Wow.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)The first one, he wanted us to join almost from day one. The second he was not around to witness, but would undoubtedly have been great guns for as well (on which side it's hard to say). TR was an unabashed White Supremacist and Colonialist. International law has moved on greatly since his day, and we are all much better off for that fact. Under the guiding principles you describe above, Saddam Hussein would have found it quite easy to justify his invasion of Kuwait, and no one would have had grounds to complain about anything George W. Bush did to Afghanistan and Iraq.
International law today recognizes only two justifiable reasons for one sovereign nation to attack or invade another:
1. In self defense.
2. In accordance with a decision by the United Nations' Security Council that military action is required.
We ignore those conditions at our own peril.