Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 11:19 AM Sep 2013

International joint statement on Syria

THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 6, 2013
Joint Statement on Syria


The Leaders and Representatives of Australia, Canada, France, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States of America made the following statement on the margins of the Group of 20 Nations Leader’s Meeting in Saint Petersburg, Russia:

The international norm against the use of chemical weapons is longstanding and universal. The use of chemical weapons anywhere diminishes the security of people everywhere. Left unchallenged, it increases the risk of further use and proliferation of these weapons.

We condemn in the strongest terms the horrific chemical weapons attack in the suburbs of Damascus on August 21st that claimed the lives of so many men, women, and children. The evidence clearly points to the Syrian government being responsible for the attack, which is part of a pattern of chemical weapons use by the regime.

We call for a strong international response to this grave violation of the world’s rules and conscience that will send a clear message that this kind of atrocity can never be repeated. Those who perpetrated these crimes must be held accountable.

Signatories have consistently supported a strong UN Security Council Resolution, given the Security Council's responsibilities to lead the international response, but recognize that the Council remains paralyzed as it has been for two and a half years. The world cannot wait for endless failed processes that can only lead to increased suffering in Syria and regional instability. We support efforts undertaken by the United States and other countries to reinforce the prohibition on the use of chemical weapons.

We commit to supporting longer term international efforts, including through the United Nations, to address the enduring security challenge posed by Syria’s chemical weapons stockpiles. Signatories have also called for the UN fact finding mission to present its results as soon as possible, and for the Security Council to act accordingly.

We condemn in the strongest terms all human rights violations in Syria on all sides. More than 100,000 people have been killed in the conflict, more than 2 million people have become refugees, and approximately 5 million are internally displaced. Recognizing that Syria’s conflict has no military solution, we reaffirm our commitment to seek a peaceful political settlement through full implementation of the 2012 Geneva Communique. We are committed to a political solution which will result in a united, inclusive and democratic Syria.

We have contributed generously to the latest United Nations (UN) and ICRC appeals for humanitarian assistance and will continue to provide support to address the growing humanitarian needs in Syria and their impact on regional countries. We welcome the contributions announced at the meeting of donor countries on the margins of the G20. We call upon all parties to allow humanitarian actors safe and unhindered access to those in need.

European signatories will continue to engage in promoting a common European position.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/09/06/1236783/-International-joint-statement-on-Syria
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
International joint statement on Syria (Original Post) ProSense Sep 2013 OP
9 of the G20 members did not sign on FarCenter Sep 2013 #1
BRICS vs NATO Junkdrawer Sep 2013 #2
hardly an endorsement on President Obama's call for a military strike cali Sep 2013 #3
Where did ProSense say this statement is an endorsement of a military strike? Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #6
I posted photos of Kerry in an OP, and someone claimed it was an attempt to justify a strike. ProSense Sep 2013 #7
Then what exactly is its significance? Just another strongly-worded statement? Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #8
It's a newsworthy statement from half the countries at the G20 Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #9
Every statement has to be made controversial. n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #10
They forgot Poland! nt geek tragedy Sep 2013 #4
DU rec...nt SidDithers Sep 2013 #5
Kick! n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #11
Wow. Excellent statement. They touched all the bases. They call for a strong DevonRex Sep 2013 #12
Yup. n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #14
Good luck with that. jessie04 Sep 2013 #17
So you think they will attack us with chemical weapons? Really? n-t Logical Sep 2013 #20
No,the next chemical weapons against his own people. jessie04 Sep 2013 #21
The issue is, you and others think "civilized world" means the USA. n-t Logical Sep 2013 #22
LOL, "woo" meaning we disagree with you about the war? n-t Logical Sep 2013 #19
Rah Rah Rah! RetroLounge Sep 2013 #13
k&r... spanone Sep 2013 #15
AH, finally a coalition of the willing! BelgianMadCow Sep 2013 #16
Thank you. n/t Lucinda Sep 2013 #18
I glad the US signed on, I hope the other hold us to it and stop us from going to war. morningfog Sep 2013 #23
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
1. 9 of the G20 members did not sign on
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 11:39 AM
Sep 2013

Argentina, Brazil, China, European Union, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia, South Africa

Which together have most of the population of the G20.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
3. hardly an endorsement on President Obama's call for a military strike
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 11:47 AM
Sep 2013

though I'm sure YOU think it is.

After all, when I said this:

"I do think that U.S. policies and intervention in the middle east played a role in the minds of those who perpetrated the attacks and those who supported them."


You bizarrely claimed over and over again that I said:

"that the 9/11 attacks were not about policy".

Up is down and bombing Syria is a humanitarian action, right?

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
6. Where did ProSense say this statement is an endorsement of a military strike?
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 12:04 PM
Sep 2013

You just pulled that one out of your ass.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
9. It's a newsworthy statement from half the countries at the G20
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 12:50 PM
Sep 2013

A lot of people are talking about Syria right now, so when this statement comes out it will make headlines.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
12. Wow. Excellent statement. They touched all the bases. They call for a strong
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 06:46 PM
Sep 2013

international response to the Syrian government use of chemical weapons. They say that the evidence clearly points to the Syrian government as the perpetrator. That should put an end to the woo here on DU once and for all.

 

jessie04

(1,528 posts)
17. Good luck with that.
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 08:03 PM
Sep 2013

I have stated that I supported the President's plans.

Its real fun here to have an opinion different than most. You can't even support the President without being reamed.

No problem though .... they may feel different when Assad sends the next chemical weapon...or the ones after that.

 

jessie04

(1,528 posts)
21. No,the next chemical weapons against his own people.
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 08:30 PM
Sep 2013

And he will if the civilized world doesn't act. No reason for him not to.

BelgianMadCow

(5,379 posts)
16. AH, finally a coalition of the willing!
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 07:50 PM
Sep 2013

or arm-twisted, lied to and spied upon!

I bet this will be a prominent part of Obama's adress on Tuesday.

on edit: I'm pretty glad my country isn't on that list. That being said, Belgium's defense minister was among the "NATO defense ministers that all agreed Assas was to blame".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»International joint state...