Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 03:05 PM Sep 2013

One thing to harp about results of inaction in Syria, but why give a 'greenlight' to the rebels?

________________________

David Corn ‏@DavidCornDC 1m
Power: failure to act will give a "greenlight to other outrages" that will force us to act then. #Syria

Why doesn't the administration publicly spell out what they believe will be the effect and consequence of leveling the ground with their Syrian strikes for these people . . .?

Estimates of collateral damage? “Lower than a certain number which I would rather share with you in a classified setting,” Joint Chiefs Chairman Martin Dempsey told lawmakers.


. . . and, is Powers saying this military intervention is really about regime-change?

US Mission to the UN ‏@USUN 27m
.@AmbassadorPower: Syria is important because its people–in seeking freedom & dignity–have suffered unimaginable horror these last 2.5 years

related:

Syrian rebels say they'll pounce on Assad's forces if US attacks
http://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-fg-syria-rebels-20130906,0,7217125.story

Brutality of Syrian Rebels Posing Dilemma in West
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/05/world/middleeast/brutality-of-syrian-rebels-pose-dilemma-in-west.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One thing to harp about results of inaction in Syria, but why give a 'greenlight' to the rebels? (Original Post) bigtree Sep 2013 OP
If the NYTimes decides to publish an old video from 2012, lots of people in the ruling class have to jakeXT Sep 2013 #1
so, that's all cleared up then bigtree Sep 2013 #2
I meant the tide is shifting, if even the Judith Miller paper is doing everything they can to stop a jakeXT Sep 2013 #3
ha! bigtree Sep 2013 #4

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
1. If the NYTimes decides to publish an old video from 2012, lots of people in the ruling class have to
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 03:21 PM
Sep 2013

be against it, I assume.

the Times video is not doing any favors for the campaign to sell it. It hardly matters that the executions reportedly occurred more than a year ago, in the spring of 2012—not this past April, as the Times initially claimed, while offering no explanation for its embarrassing mistake and correction.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/09/06/syria-video-turns-the-debate-on-u-s-intervention.html

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
2. so, that's all cleared up then
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 03:28 PM
Sep 2013

. . . they're all freedom fighters now, conforming with 'international norms?'

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
3. I meant the tide is shifting, if even the Judith Miller paper is doing everything they can to stop a
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 03:34 PM
Sep 2013

war

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One thing to harp about r...