Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 12:32 AM Sep 2013

7 Saudis Set to Be Executed by Crucifixion and Firing Squad for Juvenile Jewelry Heist

Last edited Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:41 AM - Edit history (1)

7 Saudis Set to Be Executed by Crucifixion and Firing Squad for Juvenile Jewelry Heist

(TheBlaze/AP) — Speaking over a smuggled cellphone from his prison cell, one of seven Saudis set to be put to death Tuesday by crucifixion and firing squad for armed robbery appealed for help to stop the executions.

...

“I killed no one. I didn’t have weapons while robbing the store, but the police tortured me, beat me up and threatened to assault my mother to extract confessions that I had a weapon with me while I was only 15,” he said. “We don’t deserve death.”
...

Last Saturday, he said, Saudi King Abdullah ratified the death sentences and sent them to Abha. Authorities set Tuesday for the executions. They also determined the methods.

The main defendant, Sarhan al-Mashayeh, is to be crucified for three days. The others are to face firing squads.

...

Several people were reported crucified in Saudi Arabia last year. Human rights groups have condemned crucifixions in the past, including cases in which people are beheaded and then crucified. In 2009, Amnesty International condemned such an execution as “the ultimate form of cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment.”

...

Eric Goldstein, deputy Middle East director at Human Rights Watch, concluded: “It will be outrageous if the Saudi authorities go ahead with these executions…It is high time for the Saudis to stop executing child offenders and start observing their obligations under international human rights law.”

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/03/04/shock-7-saudis-set-to-be-executed-by-crucifixion-and-firing-squad-for-juvenile-jewelry-heist/

Edit: Same AP story, slightly different wording at the end, is posted at the Guardian: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/mar/05/saudi-seven-crucifixion-armed-robbery Unfortunately, the link to TheBlaze is the one that's going around twitter now so I used that. My apologies.

145 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
7 Saudis Set to Be Executed by Crucifixion and Firing Squad for Juvenile Jewelry Heist (Original Post) Catherina Sep 2013 OP
But they are our allies nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #1
Do you believe anything Glenn Beck's rag has to say. He's not anyone to trust to tell the truth. lumpy Sep 2013 #37
gee. the AP carried that nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #100
Here you go, argue with Amnesty International as well nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #103
Our allies pscot Sep 2013 #2
Again do you trust anything, the bliovator Glenn Beck would say in his filthy rag, The Blaze ? lumpy Sep 2013 #38
Do you have any information to show that the poster was familiar with "The Blaze" AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2013 #85
Exactly. polly7 Sep 2013 #93
The Blaze!!!!!! ???????? longship Sep 2013 #3
The Guardian has the same article. Brewinblue Sep 2013 #16
Note: if you have information from a shitty source, it really doesn't take THAT much longer eridani Sep 2013 #24
DU property values ? LOL lumpy Sep 2013 #41
We do have a reputation for being way ahead of the MSM on news items eridani Sep 2013 #44
The link in Catherina's OP suggests that the story is dual-sourced to both The Blaze and HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #17
No, I just question the source, as one should with The Blaze. longship Sep 2013 #33
The Blaze ran the AP wire story nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #141
I was corrected earlier in this thread. longship Sep 2013 #143
I posted that far more as education nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #145
they use crucifixion on their own people cvoogt Sep 2013 #4
the Saudis really suck, but the Blaze is not credible JI7 Sep 2013 #5
The story is 100% credible and verified. Catherina Sep 2013 #18
i know they execute, but the amnesty one says it's for rape, your OP is another story saying it's JI7 Sep 2013 #20
Because the Amnesty excerpt is about a past crucifixion. It's not the first one Catherina Sep 2013 #39
THE BLAZE???? Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #6
and the thing is there are credible sources about how bad SAudi Arabia is JI7 Sep 2013 #12
Oh, yeah, the Saudis have a brutal judicial system Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #21
What does the OP have to do with Obama? n/t hughee99 Sep 2013 #22
The OP is finding every possible story to resist Obama's Syrian proposal Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #26
I've never seen anyone say the Saudi's supplied the rebels with Sarin, though it's completely polly7 Sep 2013 #31
Oh, was it Israel supplying the sarin in the stories you saw? Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #43
Uhhhh, no. polly7 Sep 2013 #45
But that's about Assad having chemical weapons. Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #46
I'm assuming that IF the rebels used gas, they could have gotten it from pretty much polly7 Sep 2013 #47
100% correct. *it is not known*, and "secret classified evidence" is for kindergarten. delrem Sep 2013 #49
Yep. nt. polly7 Sep 2013 #53
And the Saudis are one group supplying them, and thus the need to paint them in the worst light. Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #50
It shouldn't be good enough for anyone who actually DOES care polly7 Sep 2013 #52
In '03 you'd be explaining those a,b,c's to a bush-bot, but it's '13 and it's an obama-bot. delrem Sep 2013 #57
"it's an obama-bot" - I'm not an "it." Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #60
well, y'know, a bot's a bot. delrem Sep 2013 #63
So that makes you an Assad-bot then? n/t Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #69
No, it makes me a disbeliever in war propaganda for yet another target on the PNAC list. delrem Sep 2013 #71
But you're fine with anti-Saudi war propaganda? Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #75
You lie. Nobody is promoting war on Saudi Arabia. delrem Sep 2013 #76
I never lie. The Saudis are supporting the Syrian rebels. Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #78
The US is supporting the Syrian rebels, and using Saudi Arabia/Qatar/Turkey as fronts. delrem Sep 2013 #81
Assad's character can be clearly seen in his use of sarin gas against the rebels. Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #83
Sorry that shining a light on Saudi misbehavior offends your sensibilities. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2013 #119
Watching DU turn into Propaganda Central offends my sensibilities. Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #121
Right. Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #58
??? Ok .. but thank you very much! You, too:) nt. polly7 Sep 2013 #61
You are aware that there are multiple anti-regime factions? TheMadMonk Sep 2013 #80
Yes, I posted a link to an article explaining the major groups yesterday. Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #82
Here's one link that says they did, but it attributes the tragedy to an accident. Uncle Joe Sep 2013 #129
Thanks for this, Uncle Joe. polly7 Sep 2013 #140
People who stand foursquare alongside the House of al Saud are fucked up. delrem Sep 2013 #48
So I'm standing foursquare alongside the House of al Saud because Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #62
Sigh. I think you're underinformed w.r.t. to the douchebag House of al Saud. delrem Sep 2013 #66
Assad's sarin victims can't smell the sewer of the House of Al Saud anymore. Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #68
That's pure CT, since there's no proof of your assertion. delrem Sep 2013 #77
CT is the notion the rebels gassed themselves on August 21. Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #79
And the tens of thousands of Syrians who died because the Saudis paid for this revolution? Comrade Grumpy Sep 2013 #122
So Assad using chemical weapons is justified or can't be answered? Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #124
Here, via amnesty international nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #102
Amnesty International is reporting on my standing foursquare with the Saudis? How do I rate? Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #112
The blaze got one right like a damn broken clock nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #113
I don't give a good goddamn if the Blaze got anything right. Promoting that piece of shit Glenn Beck Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #115
Well, be consistent and do not, under any circumstance, nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #117
Your concern moves me. n/t Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #118
What? I am not willing to disregard a story nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #120
Catherina had a choice. She chose The Blaze. Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #123
It's far from sudden nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #125
Well, that's good to know, though I don't see how you have been informing us of Saudi crucifixions Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #126
Good to know, how about you? nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #128
My horror is not at an AP story. My ire is at a link to the goddamned fucking Blaze. Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #130
And I already told you nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #132
So if the link to the AP story had been to Stormfront, that would be fine with you? Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #133
Stormfront and AP are like water and oil nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #134
Word salad, all to say that a link to an AP story via Stormfront would be fine with you. Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #135
Word salad nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #136
FYI before I go nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #137
As I just went and saw, they do link to AP stories at Stormfront. Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #139
I'll mark you down for a yes, then. Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #138
Who's standing foursquare alongside the Saudis? Violet_Crumble Sep 2013 #84
Oh...Kay delrem Sep 2013 #86
And you'd agree that Syria has nothing to do with Saudis crucifying people? Violet_Crumble Sep 2013 #87
Yes, I totally agree. delrem Sep 2013 #91
LMAO! So your gross generalization about standing foursquare Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #89
Looks like this story was posted as ammunition against the push to do something about the lumpy Sep 2013 #54
Are you, or your kin, signing up? nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #114
You snark but the "70% are pro-Assad" poll came from RW sites. joshcryer Sep 2013 #73
As so many are recently fond of saying: Dead is dead, does not matter how you die The Straight Story Sep 2013 #7
And the Saudis would fund our 'excursion" into Syria for snappyturtle Sep 2013 #8
At least those executed were criminals (as far as we know). lumpy Sep 2013 #51
The Saudis don't do crucifixion the way most of us think of it jmowreader Sep 2013 #67
Brutal monsters. polly7 Sep 2013 #9
Sickening! SammyWinstonJack Sep 2013 #10
Oh for god's sake. lumpy Sep 2013 #55
Exactly. Wars in the ME are never about oil, pipelines, and imperialist power. delrem Sep 2013 #72
Once again go argue with amnesty nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #104
at least the Saudis are our allies in trying to free Syria from tyranny Douglas Carpenter Sep 2013 #11
Well, if the Saudi dinasty is so interested in freeing people from tyranny... ocpagu Sep 2013 #144
Got a link that doesn't go to Glenn Beck's website? Tx4obama Sep 2013 #13
It's an AP story, here it is in the Guardian UK Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #95
the Blaze is owned by Glenn Beck JI7 Sep 2013 #14
Monsters! These are our "allies". hrmjustin Sep 2013 #15
They've all been shot. jsr Sep 2013 #19
Is it possible the Guardian, The Associated press pumped up the reporting to make it look lumpy Sep 2013 #59
Well, if you heard that Saudi Arabia is taking steps to be humane, it must be true! delrem Sep 2013 #74
That Al Jazeera report also says one was originally sentenced to 'crucifixion' muriel_volestrangler Sep 2013 #88
How about Amnesty International nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #111
Them's our buddies! Iggo Sep 2013 #23
The Blaze is a POS rag, but the AP does confirm the original story... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #25
Reading the headline, I thought they were going to both crucify AND shoot the same people. n/t hughee99 Sep 2013 #27
That is correct - see #88 muriel_volestrangler Sep 2013 #90
It's ok, they used guns. ForgoTheConsequence Sep 2013 #28
Our noble allies who want to pay us to send "Christians to Beirut; Alawites to the grave" n/t eridani Sep 2013 #29
I think I might prefer a firing squad Warpy Sep 2013 #30
This is part of Obama's "coailition of the willing" on Syria. David__77 Sep 2013 #32
Holy fuck I didn't even know gopiscrap Sep 2013 #34
That's bullshit. No crucifixions. longship Sep 2013 #35
You seem to be wrong on that. polly7 Sep 2013 #36
Sorry. I want better sources on this. longship Sep 2013 #40
For pete's sake .... all you have to do is a quick search on it. polly7 Sep 2013 #42
It is hard to trust news organizations these days since so many are politicaly biased. lumpy Sep 2013 #64
The problem with this story is multiple things. longship Sep 2013 #70
You are simply uninformed. From May of this year, Amnesty International Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #96
I will once again send you to Amnesty's site nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #107
Gawd. Those Saudis really are crazy. longship Sep 2013 #109
They have been for a few decades nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #142
Iran is big on hanging--they use construction cranes instead of scaffolds. MADem Sep 2013 #131
Once again, amnesty international nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #106
The sentences included crucifixions! Brewinblue Sep 2013 #99
Here, via amnesty international nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #105
See Comment #19. They were NOT beheaded and NOT crucified - they were shot. Tx4obama Sep 2013 #56
I guess that is an easier death. When I think, not so long ago, that the US death sentences lumpy Sep 2013 #65
Here's a case from May of this year. Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #97
Death is death. The method doesn't matter Renew Deal Sep 2013 #92
The crucifixtion is 'for the family' as they usually behead, sew the head back on Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #98
I'm sooo glad I wasn't born in Saudi Arabia. What a total RW authoritarian conservative hellhole Zorra Sep 2013 #94
Obama and the US have limitless tolerance for Sauid atrocity, abuse of gay people, women, and Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #101
U.S. Allies malletgirl02 Sep 2013 #116
I hope they have enough money left after the crucifixions to pay for the attack on Syria. rug Sep 2013 #108
We invaded the wrong country tabasco Sep 2013 #110
I thought they had ALREADY been beheaded, way back on March 13th 99th_Monkey Sep 2013 #127

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
37. Do you believe anything Glenn Beck's rag has to say. He's not anyone to trust to tell the truth.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:27 AM
Sep 2013

The Blaze, Glenn Becks Baby

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
38. Again do you trust anything, the bliovator Glenn Beck would say in his filthy rag, The Blaze ?
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:29 AM
Sep 2013
 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
85. Do you have any information to show that the poster was familiar with "The Blaze"
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 05:31 AM
Sep 2013

as originating with Glenn Beck.

Some and maybe all of us know who Glenn Beck is. How many of us are familiar with The Blaze?

You refer to The Blaze as a "filthy rag," and it may be. Is there a list somewhere which identifies all the filthy rag publications by Glenn Beck and others of his ilk?

polly7

(20,582 posts)
93. Exactly.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 09:09 AM
Sep 2013

I did a search on Saudi crucifixion and that was the first link that came up for me. I only know the Blaze is Beck's because I happened to catch a poster saying so .... here, a month or so ago. Otherwise, I'd never have had a clue.

I think people are missing the point here. Imo, any evil and nasty thing the Saudi's are doing is fair game ...... they're funding terrorists who are waging war against the people of Syria, not just Assad forces. Yet the U.S. is considering bombing over those same people - Kerry says, the Saudi's and others would bankroll it. Since when did it become alright to partner with human rights abusers to cause suffering in sovereign nations? This has absolutely NOTHING to do with humanitarian caring about anyone. Articles like this make it perfectly clear.

longship

(40,416 posts)
3. The Blaze!!!!!! ????????
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 12:40 AM
Sep 2013

Here! Learn about The Blaze:

TheBlaze, (formerly titled GBTV), is a libertarian news, information, and entertainment television network (and affiliated properties) founded by talk radio personality Glenn Beck. The majority of its programming is broadcast from its headquarters in Dallas, Texas at the historic Studios at Las Colinas. Other programming are usually in New York City, New York.


From Wiki.

It's nothing more than Glenn Beck bullshit, lying, rubbish.

I suggest that you self-delete this trash.

Brewinblue

(392 posts)
16. The Guardian has the same article.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 12:48 AM
Sep 2013

It's off the AP wire in Cairo.

Not sure why OP chose to use The Blaze as the source, it truly is a sick, fucked up site.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
24. Note: if you have information from a shitty source, it really doesn't take THAT much longer
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 12:58 AM
Sep 2013

--to google a more credible source. Let's not be sloppy with this--it brings down DU property values.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
44. We do have a reputation for being way ahead of the MSM on news items
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:36 AM
Sep 2013

That's "property values" of a sort.

 

HardTimes99

(2,049 posts)
17. The link in Catherina's OP suggests that the story is dual-sourced to both The Blaze and
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 12:49 AM
Sep 2013

to the AP (also no paragon of journalistic excellence but still a widely accepted surce). When I clicked to go to the Blaze, its own by-line suggested that same dual-sourcing (from its own sources and wire-service reports).

Since you're taking issue with the sourcing, are you claiming that the substance of the story is fabricated from whole cloth?

longship

(40,416 posts)
33. No, I just question the source, as one should with The Blaze.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:17 AM
Sep 2013

But I am bandwidth limited here. So I have to go with what I can see. I make mistakes occasionally. Mea culpa.

However, regardless of source, this story has a stink to it, especially since Glenn Beck has published it. I remain skeptical until this has been vetted.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
141. The Blaze ran the AP wire story
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:43 AM
Sep 2013

That is not a Blaze story, but an AP story that the Blaze chose to run, together with oh the Guardian, for example.

There are rules on how subscribers to the AP wire use their stories, and the AP are fanatical to protect their IP. Incidentally, the same applies to Reuters and AFP for example.

The Union Trib, my paper of record, is worst than the Blaze, and they also use wire stories regularly. Glen Beck's project is mostly a news aggregator, with a few native stories.

If I see a wire story, don't care what the site is. What matters is who is the news originator, not the aggregator.

I realize people who do not work in media realize this.

longship

(40,416 posts)
143. I was corrected earlier in this thread.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:49 AM
Sep 2013

I am glad to recant my skepticism, but horrified by the consequences.

As always.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
145. I posted that far more as education
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:54 AM
Sep 2013

We are so happy when we get our own photos of principals. Running an AP photo of oh Nancy Pelosi can get expensive as hell. A wire story, it can get painful

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
18. The story is 100% credible and verified.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 12:49 AM
Sep 2013

Here, have the Guardian link instead:

Saudi seven face crucifixion and firing squad for armed robbery

One of group to be executed, speaking from cell on smuggled phone, says most of ring were juveniles at time of thefts

....

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/mar/05/saudi-seven-crucifixion-armed-robbery


Or take Amnesty's word about the crucifixions

...

His severed head was then sewn back on to his body, which was later hung from a pole in a public place, an act known in Saudi Arabia as a crucifixion.

“Amnesty International opposes all executions, as a violation of the right to life and the ultimate form of cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment,” said Malcolm Smart, Director of Amnesty International’s Middle East and North Africa Programme. “In this case, the crucifixion of the condemned man’s body after his beheading adds to the sense of degradation and is repugnant.”

Very little is known about Muhammad al-Shammari’s trial. Death sentences in Saudi Arabia are invariably imposed and carried out after secret unfair trials.

...

http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/saudi-arabian-man-beheaded-and-crucified-20091208

JI7

(89,247 posts)
20. i know they execute, but the amnesty one says it's for rape, your OP is another story saying it's
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 12:52 AM
Sep 2013

for theft.

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
39. Because the Amnesty excerpt is about a past crucifixion. It's not the first one
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:29 AM
Sep 2013

I was just using that to show what Amnesty had to say as it was linked in the article.

Here's another one from May.


Five Yemeni men were beheaded and “crucified” this morning in the city of Jizan, while a Saudi Arabian man was executed in the south-western city of Abha.

“Saudi Arabia’s increased use of this cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment is deeply disturbing and the authorities must halt what is a horrifying trend,” said Philip Luther, Amnesty International’s Middle East and North Africa director.

“The Kingdom must immediately establish a moratorium on executions with a view to abolishing capital punishment.”

Pictures today emerged on social media appearing to show five decapitated bodies hanging from a horizontal pole with their heads wrapped in bags.

The beheading and “crucifixion” took place in front of the University of Jizan where students are taking exams.

....

http://www.amnesty.org/en/news/saudi-arabia-five-beheaded-and-crucified-amid-disturbing-rise-executions-2013-05-21

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
6. THE BLAZE????
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 12:42 AM
Sep 2013

So this is what the Obama hate has come to. People are dragging back bullshit from Glenn Beck's vanity press.

What's next, Catherina? Links to Stormfront? I mean, Jesus Damn Christ already.

JI7

(89,247 posts)
12. and the thing is there are credible sources about how bad SAudi Arabia is
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 12:46 AM
Sep 2013

but i guess people are so used to dramatizing , sensationalizing things that it's not enough so resort to things like this.

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
26. The OP is finding every possible story to resist Obama's Syrian proposal
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:01 AM
Sep 2013

One current (and repeatable) theory among people denying that Assad gassed the rebels is that the Saudis supplied rebels with sarin. They could then gas themselves and their families, blame Assad, and draw America into the civil war.

Obama is of course carrying the Saudis' water in this scenario, so by painting the Saudis in the worst light, it's meant to reflect onto him.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
31. I've never seen anyone say the Saudi's supplied the rebels with Sarin, though it's completely
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:07 AM
Sep 2013

possible. But did you know they sent their death row prisoners to fight Assad or be beheaded? Why do they want to inject such desperation and brutality into what started as a peaceful uprising by the actual people of Syria? Why would Kerry say they'd bankroll the whole thing? And we're supposed to believe any of this has a single thing to do with people being gassed? Uhhhh ..... no. They're vultures, with their bloody eyes on Iran.

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
43. Oh, was it Israel supplying the sarin in the stories you saw?
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:35 AM
Sep 2013

After all, someone had to get the sarin gas to the rebels so they could kill their own families. Sarin doesn't grow on trees.

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
46. But that's about Assad having chemical weapons.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:40 AM
Sep 2013

That doesn't get chemical weapons into the hands of the rebels so they can carry out a false flag attack. Believe me, those stories are around.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
47. I'm assuming that IF the rebels used gas, they could have gotten it from pretty much
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:42 AM
Sep 2013

any of the people supplying them with all of their other weapons. Or even from one of the stockpiles. I don't know who used the gas, which is why I said IF. You don't know either.

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
50. And the Saudis are one group supplying them, and thus the need to paint them in the worst light.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:47 AM
Sep 2013

I do know this: the guy who ended the Iraq War and is ending our involvement in Afghanistan and kept our involvement in Libya to the bare minimum is saying Assad did it. Many others have walked into a room with the classified evidence and come out saying Assad did it. Elizabeth Warren says Assad did it.

That's good enough for me for now.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
52. It shouldn't be good enough for anyone who actually DOES care
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:56 AM
Sep 2013

about the people of Syria in a position to decide the fate of millions. Though it doesn't make any difference to me who used the gas, horrible as it was, and my heart goes out to everyone it hit ... there still is no legal cause for a foreign military strike, but for the UN members and others who are basing their decision on having proof, it had better be indisputable. Is it??? Not from what I've been reading. Not by a long shot.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
57. In '03 you'd be explaining those a,b,c's to a bush-bot, but it's '13 and it's an obama-bot.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 02:02 AM
Sep 2013

That's the sorriest sentence that I've ever written.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
63. well, y'know, a bot's a bot.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 02:15 AM
Sep 2013

People distinguish themselves from bots by deviating from the script given (in this case) to warmongering bots.

I haven't seen that.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
71. No, it makes me a disbeliever in war propaganda for yet another target on the PNAC list.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 03:31 AM
Sep 2013

But you'll NEVER admit to having clue one about PNAC, and you'll NEVER admit that you're pushing the PNAC war agenda.

You stop at disseminating war propaganda.

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
75. But you're fine with anti-Saudi war propaganda?
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 03:50 AM
Sep 2013

Because that's what this thread is: anti-Saudi war propaganda.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
76. You lie. Nobody is promoting war on Saudi Arabia.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 03:54 AM
Sep 2013

It's like your feet don't set down in this universe - --

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
78. I never lie. The Saudis are supporting the Syrian rebels.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 03:56 AM
Sep 2013

Painting them in the worst possible light is what this thread is about. It's anti-Saudi war propaganda.

I never lie.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
81. The US is supporting the Syrian rebels, and using Saudi Arabia/Qatar/Turkey as fronts.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 04:04 AM
Sep 2013

Nobody is proposing war against the USA, or Saudi Arabia. The USA and Saudi Arabia are the *aggressors*, and NOBODY ATTACKED THEM. When people explain the character of these powers, the USA and the House of al Saud, etc., who started and are ramping up a war of aggression against a country that *did not attack them*, that isn't "war propaganda".

Here's my conclusion: you're so heavily invested in warmongering newspeak and its twisted "logic" that I can't converse with you, since we don't speak the same language. So this is my last response to you.



Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
83. Assad's character can be clearly seen in his use of sarin gas against the rebels.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 04:09 AM
Sep 2013

Au revoir! La Resistance lives on! We'll always have Paris!

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
121. Watching DU turn into Propaganda Central offends my sensibilities.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 05:51 PM
Sep 2013

You think any of this "light shining" would be here, otherwise?

 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
80. You are aware that there are multiple anti-regime factions?
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 04:04 AM
Sep 2013

Factions which hate each other every bit as much as they hate the ruling regime.

I find it perfectly credible that one might use their rivals in this way, or for one of the factions from entirely outside the country to use the locals.

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
82. Yes, I posted a link to an article explaining the major groups yesterday.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 04:08 AM
Sep 2013

But as far as the Israel- or Saudi-supplied stories, I'm just reporting what I have actually seen people arguing in places.

Uncle Joe

(58,349 posts)
129. Here's one link that says they did, but it attributes the tragedy to an accident.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 06:23 PM
Sep 2013


http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/09/02/syr2-s02.html

MPN published an article with interviews with opposition fighters on the ground in Ghouta. Its two authors are Jordanian freelance journalist Yahya Ababneh and Dale Gavlak, a longtime correspondent for the Associated Press, based in Amman, Jordan for more than two decades, who currently reports for AP and National Public Radio, as well as MPN.

Those interviewed included Abu Abdel-Moneim, whose son was among 13 opposition fighters killed in a tunnel used to store what were apparently chemical weapons.

Abdel-Moneim said the weapons were supplied by a Saudi named Abu Ayesha, who leads a rebel battalion. He described some of the weapons as having a “tube-like structure,” while others were like a “huge gas bottle.” They were stored in tunnels, while the opposition fighters themselves slept in nearby mosques and private homes.

(snip)

An opposition leader in Ghouta told MPN that the Al Nusra Front, one of the main Islamic fundamentalist militias operating in Syria, had custody of the chemical weapons. “They do not share secret information. They merely used some ordinary rebels to carry and operate this material,” he said. “We were very curious about these arms. And unfortunately, some of the fighters handled the weapons improperly and set off the explosions.”





polly7

(20,582 posts)
140. Thanks for this, Uncle Joe.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:37 AM
Sep 2013

I remember seeing a picture of one of the crude-looking tubes but haven't seen this. It makes the whole 'how ridiculous to think it could have been anyone but Assad argument' a bit weak. When Saudi Arabia is willing to send its death row inmates to Syria to make things worse, I can't imagine why they wouldn't be arming them with anything and everything, no matter how horrific.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
48. People who stand foursquare alongside the House of al Saud are fucked up.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:45 AM
Sep 2013

Obvious as that is, some people have to be clued in.

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
62. So I'm standing foursquare alongside the House of al Saud because
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 02:13 AM
Sep 2013

I'm pointing out that Catherina had drug this piece of shit article back from the piece of shit Blaze and that ignoramus Glenn Beck in an attempt to "both sides do it" balance out Assad's atrocity?

Yeah, that's pretty much a bullshit claim, delrem. Thanks for playing, though.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
66. Sigh. I think you're underinformed w.r.t. to the douchebag House of al Saud.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 02:22 AM
Sep 2013

But if you like to out on a limb defending those douches, go for it Mr. Boffin.

For the rest of us, we're informed. And in the case of Saudi Arabia and the House of al Saud, that info comes kinda like wading into a sewer and having to analyze the muck on the bottom, in order to understand why the USA is relying on such muck to front for it in a war. It isn't easy, Mr. Boffin. Not easy at all. So I can understand your reluctance.

But sheeee..... CAN'T YOU FUCKIN' WELL SMELL IT???

delrem

(9,688 posts)
77. That's pure CT, since there's no proof of your assertion.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 03:55 AM
Sep 2013

That's pure CT, and it's pure war propaganda, because most certainly it is being used as pretext for war.

Get the difference?

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
79. CT is the notion the rebels gassed themselves on August 21.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 03:58 AM
Sep 2013

Something for which absolutely no evidence has been presented. But Obama has evidence of Assad's culpability, and people as wide ranged as Elizabeth Warren and John Boehner accept it as conclusive.

So your assertion that "there's no proof" of Assad's guilt? That's pure war propaganda.

I got the difference.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
122. And the tens of thousands of Syrians who died because the Saudis paid for this revolution?
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 05:51 PM
Sep 2013

The Saudis have spent billions trying to overthrow Assad.

Hell, they're even offering to pay us to do it for them.

At the same time they engage in deplorable human right abuses themselves.

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
124. So Assad using chemical weapons is justified or can't be answered?
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 05:57 PM
Sep 2013

It would be wrong for us to enforce an international norm because the Saudis have dirty crucifying hands?

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
112. Amnesty International is reporting on my standing foursquare with the Saudis? How do I rate?
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 04:49 PM
Sep 2013

Is it possible you cannot see my bone of contention here is Catherina linking to the Goddamned Blaze and that unrepentantly?

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
113. The blaze got one right like a damn broken clock
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 04:50 PM
Sep 2013

After they picked the AP wire from Cairo, with The Guardian as well

I got one suggestion fer ya, use trash thread if it insults your sensibilities, or better yet, ignore poster.

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
115. I don't give a good goddamn if the Blaze got anything right. Promoting that piece of shit Glenn Beck
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 04:57 PM
Sep 2013

has no place here at DU. Ever. Under any circumstance.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
117. Well, be consistent and do not, under any circumstance,
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 05:32 PM
Sep 2013

turn on msnbc either, since they were talking to one of their reporters.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
120. What? I am not willing to disregard a story
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 05:47 PM
Sep 2013

Just because an inconvenient source carried it. If you are so gung ho, turn off your tv as well.

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
123. Catherina had a choice. She chose The Blaze.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 05:54 PM
Sep 2013

She had another choice and still does: remove the link to the Blaze and replace it. She didn't.

Your sudden concern with Saudi crucifixions is noted.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
125. It's far from sudden
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 06:07 PM
Sep 2013



And the blaze is the AP wire story.

Now, in a slight change, when are you, yes you, enlisting? You are the one pushing for war, not the OP

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
126. Well, that's good to know, though I don't see how you have been informing us of Saudi crucifixions
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 06:13 PM
Sep 2013

up to now. Or beheading. Your sudden interest in informing us about them is noted. Better?

I have a brother in the military. War touches me. Thanks again for all of your concern in this matter.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
128. Good to know, how about you?
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 06:19 PM
Sep 2013

And in case you wonder in my youth I was a humanitarian worker. This interest is far from sudden.

What do you want to know of Batallon 100 of the Salvadoran Military? How about the Guatemalan SF troops and their less than nice and humane behavior with the Maya? (Actual genocide, like by the actual definition in the latter case).

It was all but nice. So your horror at an AP story is disingenuous at best.

It's an inconvenient truth...the Wahhabi regime is SA is horrific, with a human rights record that would make Rios Mont blush.

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
130. My horror is not at an AP story. My ire is at a link to the goddamned fucking Blaze.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 06:27 PM
Sep 2013

I am being as clear, direct, and pointed about that as I know how to be. Your ability to miss that point is astounding.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
132. And I already told you
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 06:37 PM
Sep 2013

Trash thread, ignore poster and turn msnbc off as well.

How much more direct can I be?



The rest of us are adults and can figure this shit up. Personally I am against censorship. But that is just me.

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
133. So if the link to the AP story had been to Stormfront, that would be fine with you?
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 06:50 PM
Sep 2013

I'll keep that in mind.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
134. Stormfront and AP are like water and oil
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 06:55 PM
Sep 2013

Mostly Stormfront considers the AP a Jewish controlled cabal.

The Blaze, with all it's Beck related issues, actually behaves like a media outlet and runs the wire, for the same reason the UT does. FYI, the Blaze is moderate compared to my local paper of record.

As I said, we all can figure this shit out. But the AP, I s'pose you don't realize this, has rules as to how their material can be used by other media, or they stop feeding that outlet. And yes, the AP is fanatical about protecting their IP, again, don't exect you to know this.

So pretty much, blaze, ap wire, the Chicago Trib, the Guardian, it matters not

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
135. Word salad, all to say that a link to an AP story via Stormfront would be fine with you.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 07:02 PM
Sep 2013

Or correct me if I'm wrong. Censoring links to Stormfront is OK with you here at DU. Yes or no?

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
136. Word salad
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 07:07 PM
Sep 2013

The last refuge of the scoundrel.

I am media. I just explained to you why it matters little where you find a story from the AP wire, or Reuters or AFP for that matter.

You can't deal with that, it's fine. I don't have to keep this conversation going, or consider you any longer part of the universe of people I interact with in this place.

Have a wonderful life pushing for another war of choice. Good bye.

Oh and please proceed with the insults Sir.

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
138. I'll mark you down for a yes, then.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 07:13 PM
Sep 2013

Links to Stormfront are fine with you.

By the way, just on a lark, I popped over to Stormfront. They have links directly to the AP as well as CNN and other news groups they no doubt would consider mouthpieces for international Jewry. So the question I put to you is a relevant one, despite your squid ink denials. Feel free to correct me on your position on links to Stormfront any time you like. Goodbye for now!

Violet_Crumble

(35,961 posts)
84. Who's standing foursquare alongside the Saudis?
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 05:28 AM
Sep 2013

Much as their real life Game of Thrones style judicial system leaves me feeling sick, I'm a huge fan of the Saudi Peace Plan. I don't think that puts me in the 'foursquare alongside' category', anymore than my suspicion that the OP posted that in some weird attempt to do a SEE? SEE HOW EVIL THOSE CRUCIFYING BOMBING SYRIA SUPPORTING SAUDIS ARE!!! thing slips me into that category.

Anyone who isn't aware of what Saudi Arabia gets up to (while I've never seen the OP post on things like this before there's been a lot in the media over time and a lot posted by other DUers) would be few and far between so I am very suspicious of the motives of the OP in posting this. I totally oppose any attacks on Syria and still don't know if it was Assad or the rebels who carried out the gassing, but I don't see any connection between this OP or the Hillary Clinton gets bestowed with Saudi gifts one and Syria.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
86. Oh...Kay
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 05:48 AM
Sep 2013

Of course the Syrian war has nothing to do with the Saudi Peace Plan, which to my mind is a lovely piece of paper but isn't likely to influence any situation. The Palestinians are fucked and Kerry's theatrics are, like, zero on the event horizon - and he knows it. He's not an "honest broker" there, either.

But that's about the Saudi Peace Plan, Violet, not about the House of al Saud, or about how the House of al Saud along with the whoever emir of Qatar for a time has fronted for the USA in this so-called "Syrian civil war". I *don't* have to explain about "Friends of Syria", or the entire history - because you're well read.

I'm not a black 'n whiter. I'm a particularizer, and I try to be a careful generalizer, and I think when the topic is as particular as this, a US run up to a bombing campaign in the middle of the aforementioned "Syrian civil war", it's fair for me to expect that any of my statements e.g. "standing foursquare alongside the Saudis" would be taken only in that particular sense.

Violet_Crumble

(35,961 posts)
87. And you'd agree that Syria has nothing to do with Saudis crucifying people?
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 05:56 AM
Sep 2013

Because I pointed out the Saudi Peace Plan to show that shit people can sometimes come up with really good things. Whether it's an accident or not, I really don't care. So I don't see any connection between the Saudi judicial system and its support of a US attack on Syria. Both are shit, but different sorts of shit...

delrem

(9,688 posts)
91. Yes, I totally agree.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 06:04 AM
Sep 2013

Demonization and Deification, the most go-to generalizations, are never sound.

Thanks for reminding me.

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
89. LMAO! So your gross generalization about standing foursquare
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 05:59 AM
Sep 2013

with the Saudis is only meant to be applied to this particular situation?



Go on, pull the other one...

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
54. Looks like this story was posted as ammunition against the push to do something about the
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:58 AM
Sep 2013

atrocities in Syria. Everything is being dragged out of the attic to prevent anything from being done about it.

joshcryer

(62,269 posts)
73. You snark but the "70% are pro-Assad" poll came from RW sites.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 03:43 AM
Sep 2013

StormFront in particular is one of the sites that source it and is one of the highest hits on Google.

So yes, some DUers are using cites attributable to StormFront.

The reality is that a lot of pro-Assad twitter followers are racist scum.

I don't know why anyone would follow them.

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
7. As so many are recently fond of saying: Dead is dead, does not matter how you die
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 12:42 AM
Sep 2013

We execute people the US and they are just as dead.

snappyturtle

(14,656 posts)
8. And the Saudis would fund our 'excursion" into Syria for
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 12:43 AM
Sep 2013

putting people to death with gas.

Personally, I would choose gas over crucifixion.

Edit: Now that I have first seen the other posts, I guess this
report could be bogus. I'm not familiar with the Blaze.
Anyway, I still stand by my choice!

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
51. At least those executed were criminals (as far as we know).
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:52 AM
Sep 2013

Apparently it was reported in the UK's Guardian newspaper.

jmowreader

(50,553 posts)
67. The Saudis don't do crucifixion the way most of us think of it
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 02:25 AM
Sep 2013

I thought they were going to nail this poor bastard to a cross and leave him to bake for three days, and you probably do too. Nope: the Saudis behead the poor bastard, sew his head back on, and hang him from a horizontal pole for three days so his family can agonize over his demise longer.

Somehow, I think this is worse, at least for the family.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
9. Brutal monsters.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 12:43 AM
Sep 2013
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/mar/05/saudi-seven-crucifixion-armed-robbery

Saudi seven face crucifixion and firing squad for armed robbery
One of group to be executed, speaking from cell on smuggled phone, says most of ring were juveniles at time of thefts

Associated Press in Cairo



delrem

(9,688 posts)
72. Exactly. Wars in the ME are never about oil, pipelines, and imperialist power.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 03:33 AM
Sep 2013

Never have been, never will be. Believe me, because I say it.
Wars in the ME are always about truth, democracy, freedom, God and the american way.

 

ocpagu

(1,954 posts)
144. Well, if the Saudi dinasty is so interested in freeing people from tyranny...
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 12:51 AM
Sep 2013

... why don't they start by deposing themselves?

jsr

(7,712 posts)
19. They've all been shot.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 12:51 AM
Sep 2013
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2013/03/201331221118103218.html

The Associated Press news agency quoted a resident who witnessed the execution as saying that the seven were shot dead by a firing squad, a first in the kingdom, which traditionally has beheaded convicts sentenced to death.

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
59. Is it possible the Guardian, The Associated press pumped up the reporting to make it look
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 02:09 AM
Sep 2013

in the worst possible light? Glenn Beck's Blaze is not to be trusted with the truth about anything, of course. I had heard that Saudi Arabia are taking steps to use more humane methods of punishment.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
74. Well, if you heard that Saudi Arabia is taking steps to be humane, it must be true!
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 03:44 AM
Sep 2013

I've heard that members of the House of al Saud tend to congregate at hot spots like Las Vegas and Monaco where they blow their countries assets and inheritance on the most disgusting debauchery, and they park their yachts off the French Riviera when they're slumming. I've heard that the extreme fundamentalist wahhabism that they inflict on the their Saudi *subjects* doesn't apply to themselves, except during special photo-ops when they pretend to be keepers of some Islamic flame, and that in the most cynical fashion on the face of this planet they use religion as a means of social control.

I've heard that their operative, Bandar Bush, is a war criminal who funds al Qaeda amongst other criminal organizations, and operates with untold billions of cash stolen from the people -- in order to enforce and expand the Saudi dictatorship. That Banda Bush is "the go-to man" for the US Syrian war.

But hey, you heard that the House of al Saud has learned about the term 'humane', and so all is fine.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,306 posts)
88. That Al Jazeera report also says one was originally sentenced to 'crucifixion'
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 05:59 AM
Sep 2013
The original sentences called for death by firing squad and crucifixion.


AP said:

Several people were reported to have been crucified in Saudi Arabia last year. Human rights groups have condemned crucifixions in the past, including cases in which people are beheaded and then crucified. In 2009, Amnesty International condemned such an execution as "the ultimate form of cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment".


Amnesty International said:

Late last week, we found out about seven young Saudi Arabian men who were scheduled to be executed on March 5th, by firing squad. More shockingly, one of the men, Sarha Al Mashayekh was sentenced to crucifixion following death. Yes, you read that right, crucifixion; the excruciating method of execution used by the Romans, amongst others, around 2000 years ago. Today in Saudi Arabia, this would involve the upper body (along with the separated head if beheaded) being tied to a pole in a public square. The idea is that this gruesome sight acts as a deterrent to other would-be criminals.

http://www2.amnesty.org.uk/blogs/urgent-action-network-blog/horrible-histories-or-grim-reality-saudi-arabia-and-death-penalty


So, no, neither AP, The Guardian, nor even the Blaze pumped it up.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
25. The Blaze is a POS rag, but the AP does confirm the original story...
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:00 AM
Sep 2013

The sentence was imposed back in March and postponed.

I haven't looked any further to see if it was actually carried out.

On edit:

I see above that they have been executed-- for robbing a jewelry store while in their teens.

How civilized of the Saudis that they have advanced to the firing squad. Another 50 years and they might get to lethal injection to kill their teenaged thieves.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,306 posts)
90. That is correct - see #88
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 06:00 AM
Sep 2013

In the order of 'shoot, then crucify'. It's along the lines of displaying chopped-off heads on poles.

Warpy

(111,245 posts)
30. I think I might prefer a firing squad
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:03 AM
Sep 2013

to having my hands chopped off, the other brutal punishment for theft.

longship

(40,416 posts)
35. That's bullshit. No crucifixions.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:21 AM
Sep 2013

That's Glenn Beck conflation. It's what happens when one cites The Blaze.

Apparently.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
36. You seem to be wrong on that.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:23 AM
Sep 2013

Saudi Arabia follows a strict interpretation of Islamic sharia law under which people convicted of murder, rape or armed robbery can be executed, usually by sword.

Several people were reported to have been crucified in Saudi Arabia last year. Human rights groups have condemned crucifixions in the past, including cases in which people are beheaded and then crucified. In 2009, Amnesty International condemned such an execution as "the ultimate form of cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment".

Abha is located deep in the south-western province of Asir. Southerners face systematic discrimination and people there are perceived as second-class citizens compared with those in the most powerful central region, where the capital and Saudi Arabia's holy shrines of Mecca and Medina are located. Political analyst Mohammed al-Qahtani said the central region gets the best services and treatment.

"The verdict is very harsh, given all the circumstances of detention and trial with no access to lawyers, but part of the problem is selectivity," he said. "If one person belonged to political heavyweight regions, the verdict wouldn't have been harsh," he added. "The south is marginalised."

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/mar/05/saudi-seven-crucifixion-armed-robbery

longship

(40,416 posts)
40. Sorry. I want better sources on this.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:29 AM
Sep 2013

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. If Saudis are crucifying, that's huge news. I would expect that it wouldn't be limited to AP, Guardian and Glenn Beck's The Blaze. I would expect that the latter two picked it off the AP "wire", so we only have one source and two conflations.

I'll wait for confirmation.

The Saudis are still pigs.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
42. For pete's sake .... all you have to do is a quick search on it.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 01:32 AM
Sep 2013

Crucifixion is still used as a rare method of execution in some countries.

Saudi Arabia

Several people have been executed by crucifixion in Saudi Arabia in the 2000s, although on occasion they were first beheaded and then crucified. Most recently, in March 2013, a robber was set to be executed by being crucified for three days.[97]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crucifixion




The use of capital punishment in Saudi Arabia is based on Sharia (or Islamic law) and is prominent internationally because of the wide range of crimes which can result in the death penalty and because it is usually carried out by public beheading. In 2011, the Saudi government reported 26 executions in the country.[1]Foreigners are not exempt.

Methods and scope[edit source | editbeta]

Saudi Arabia has a criminal justice system based on a hardline and literal form of Sharia law due to Islam being the official state religion.
The death penalty can be imposed for a wide range of offences[2] including murder, rape, false prophecy, armed robbery, repeated drug use, apostasy,[3] adultery,[4] witchcraft and sorcery[5] and can be carried out by beheading with a sword,[6] or more rarely by firing squad, and sometimes by stoning.

The 345 reported executions between 2007 and 2010 were all carried out by public beheading.[7] The last reported execution for sorcery took place in 2012.[8] There were no reports of stoning between 2007 and 2010,[7] but between 1981 and 1992 there were four cases of execution by stoning reported.[9]

Crucifixion of the beheaded body is sometimes ordered.[5] For example, in 2009, the Saudi Gazette reported that "An Abha court has sentenced the leader of an armed gang to death and three-day crucifixion (public displaying of the beheaded body) and six other gang members to beheading for their role in jewelry store robberies in Asir."[10] (This practice resembles gibbeting, in which the entire body is displayed).

In 2003, Muhammad Saad al-Beshi, whom the BBC described as "Saudi Arabia's leading executioner", gave a rare interview to Arab News.[3] He described his first execution in 1998: "The criminal was tied and blindfolded. With one stroke of the sword I severed his head. It rolled metres away...People are amazed how fast [the sword] can separate the head from the body."[3] He also said that before an execution he visits the victim's family to seek forgiveness for the criminal, which can lead to the criminal's life being spared.[3] Once an execution goes ahead, his only conversation with the prisoner is to tell him or her to recite the Muslim declaration of belief, the Shahada.[3] "When they get to the execution square, their strength drains away. Then I read the execution order, and at a signal I cut the prisoner's head off," he said.[3]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_Saudi_Arabia

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
64. It is hard to trust news organizations these days since so many are politicaly biased.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 02:17 AM
Sep 2013

I have heard that Saudi criminal punishment has been a cruel process though out the ages and that they are wanting to join the rest of the world who are casting off those cruel practices. This country has given up some of those cruel practices and many people would like to see elimination of the death penalty. I for one.

longship

(40,416 posts)
70. The problem with this story is multiple things.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 02:33 AM
Sep 2013

I have never heard of crucifixion being used anywhere, not even Saudi Arabia.

I have heard of stonings, beheadings, and other horrible things. (The stonings seem to be aimed at women for some reason -- maybe they got caught driving or going to school or something, but I demure.)

But any claim to crucifixion in the 21st century has to stand a higher level of skepticism. The Sauds have given up beheadings, apparently because they have no more experts in the field of chopping off people's heads with a sword. And the last stoning I heard about was in Afghanistan -- a woman, for adultery... in public.

Crucifixion is a bad way to die. It can take days, and days. Forget the Biblical stories about a bad afternoon. I cannot believe this is true. And if it is true, I want to see it echoed beyond an AP wire.

I am skeptical.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
96. You are simply uninformed. From May of this year, Amnesty International
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 10:31 AM
Sep 2013

Saudi Arabia: Five beheaded and ‘crucified’ amid ‘disturbing’ rise in executions

Saudi Arabia must halt a “disturbing” rise in death penalty usage that has resulted in at least 47 state killings in the country already this year, Amnesty International urged after six more people were executed today.

Five Yemeni men were beheaded and “crucified” this morning in the city of Jizan, while a Saudi Arabian man was executed in the south-western city of Abha.

“Saudi Arabia’s increased use of this cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment is deeply disturbing and the authorities must halt what is a horrifying trend,” said Philip Luther, Amnesty International’s Middle East and North Africa director
http://www.amnesty.org/en/for-media/press-releases/saudi-arabia-five-beheaded-and-crucified-amid-disturbing-rise-executions-20

I'm not going to post one, but a person can find videos if a person is playing the skeptic with human rights issues.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
131. Iran is big on hanging--they use construction cranes instead of scaffolds.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 06:35 PM
Sep 2013

It's easier to set up a "show" in the town square, to let everyone know what happens to people when they step outside the lines.

Brewinblue

(392 posts)
99. The sentences included crucifixions!
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 11:07 AM
Sep 2013

Even if they were shot, they may well have been crucified either pre or post-mortem. Post-mortem crucifixion appears to be an optional part of the Saudi mode of execution.

From Wikipedia:

Saudi Arabia[edit source | editbeta]
Several people have been executed by crucifixion in Saudi Arabia in the 2000s, although on occasion they were first beheaded and then crucified. Most recently, in March 2013, a robber was set to be executed by being crucified for three days.

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
65. I guess that is an easier death. When I think, not so long ago, that the US death sentences
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 02:21 AM
Sep 2013

were carried out by electric chair...now to eliminate the death penalty entirely.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
97. Here's a case from May of this year.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 10:34 AM
Sep 2013

21 May 2013

Saudi Arabia: Five beheaded and ‘crucified’ amid ‘disturbing’ rise in executions



Saudi Arabia must halt a “disturbing” rise in death penalty usage that has resulted in at least 47 state killings in the country already this year, Amnesty International urged after six more people were executed today.

Five Yemeni men were beheaded and “crucified” this morning in the city of Jizan, while a Saudi Arabian man was executed in the south-western city of Abha.

“Saudi Arabia’s increased use of this cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment is deeply disturbing and the authorities must halt what is a horrifying trend,” said Philip Luther, Amnesty International’s Middle East and North Africa director.
http://www.amnesty.org/en/for-media/press-releases/saudi-arabia-five-beheaded-and-crucified-amid-disturbing-rise-executions-20


Year after year, story after story, fact after fact.

Renew Deal

(81,855 posts)
92. Death is death. The method doesn't matter
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 07:52 AM
Sep 2013

What does I matter if its crucifixion, bullets, or chemical weapons?

At least that's what we've heard from a bunch of people here lately.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
98. The crucifixtion is 'for the family' as they usually behead, sew the head back on
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 10:36 AM
Sep 2013

and crucify the body for display. Heads on pikes. Our allies. They'd pay us to invade Syria, or so says John Kerry.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
94. I'm sooo glad I wasn't born in Saudi Arabia. What a total RW authoritarian conservative hellhole
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 10:13 AM
Sep 2013

that place is.

Ick.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
101. Obama and the US have limitless tolerance for Sauid atrocity, abuse of gay people, women, and
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 12:26 PM
Sep 2013

minorities absolutely acceptable when done by the Saudis. Kerry acts as if we should look to them as moral models, as some sort of standard we should meet. His creepy adoration of the Saudis lets me know Kerry would deal with evil itself for a buck.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
127. I thought they had ALREADY been beheaded, way back on March 13th
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 06:18 PM
Sep 2013
"Seven Saudi men convicted of theft, looting and armed robbery were beheaded on Wednesday, according to the country's official news agency, more than a week after their families and a rights group appealed to the king for clemency."


http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57573995/beheadings-not-crucifixion-for-alleged-saudi-thieves/
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»7 Saudis Set to Be Execut...