Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 08:54 AM Sep 2013

We went to war in Iraq over the WRONG suspicion they had WMD, we toppled Gaddafi after he gave up

Nukes...

If any leader thinks we can be deterred from killing them because they give up nukes or WMD, they have been sadly disabused of that notion.

Now we aren't sure Assad gave the command to use CW but we need to punish or get rid of him to show an example to Iran and N. Korea to deter them. See how ridiculous that sounds to think we will be deterred from anything when you are on our hit list?

The PNAC has had an agenda for years and they will follow it using whatever justification they can. But really its not about deterrence. If what happened to Saddam Hussein didn't stop all of Middle East "defiance", what kind of worse example do we need to make of Syria to "stop" the rest?

Maybe it IS about causing chaos and turmoil in the Middle East so they can control whatever they want to control. It's just oddly suspicious to me how our bombs keep killing Arabs. No wonder they hate us.

So good intentions? My ass. I don't believe them anymore.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We went to war in Iraq over the WRONG suspicion they had WMD, we toppled Gaddafi after he gave up (Original Post) dkf Sep 2013 OP
"I don't believe them anymore", me either! k&r Little Star Sep 2013 #1
Mission Accomplished = Crude Oil at 28-Month High on Heightened Syria Tensions = Saudi's Profits $$$ Coyotl Sep 2013 #2
Military intervention The Wizard Sep 2013 #3
Perhaps it's time to start saying "They," not "We" leftstreet Sep 2013 #4
Why should we stop when we're omnipotent. Progressive dog Sep 2013 #5
I thought I could believe Obama ...I was wrong ...and I will never believe the US gov again. L0oniX Sep 2013 #6
K&R nt Mnemosyne Sep 2013 #7
 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
2. Mission Accomplished = Crude Oil at 28-Month High on Heightened Syria Tensions = Saudi's Profits $$$
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 09:09 AM
Sep 2013

The profiteers have already won this "war"!

Crude Oil at 28-Month High on Heightened Syria Tensions = Saudi's Profits Enormous
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023616321

The Wizard

(12,549 posts)
3. Military intervention
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 11:04 AM
Sep 2013

is the road map to being a former empire. And lest anyone believes the United States isn't an empire, why do we have such a large military footprint around the globe?

Progressive dog

(6,920 posts)
5. Why should we stop when we're omnipotent.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 11:33 AM
Sep 2013

For forty plus years we let the Libyans keep the dictator that they wanted. It took us those forty years to convince the Libyans to overthrow their dictator, in spite of our omnipotence. During that time, the Libyan government actually did commit terrorist acts against the USA and allies, they actually did try to attack US ships in international waters, they actually do have oil, but somehow our omnipotence didn't extend to overthrowing a petty dictator in a tiny country.
Our omnipotence does extend to the UN too.

On 17 March 2011 the UN Security Council passed Resolution 1973 with a 10–0 vote and five abstentions. The resolution sanctioned the establishment of a no-fly zone and the use of "all means necessary" to protect civilians within Libya.
We even got our French puppet government to do most of the work for us.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We went to war in Iraq ov...