Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 06:08 PM Sep 2013

U.S. Forest Service set to decide on fracking in George Washington National Forest

George Washington National Forest is more than just one of the largest expanses of pristine land in the East. It’s the leafy cradle of the Shenandoah, James and Potomac rivers, a source of drinking water for millions of people in greater Washington.

The forest — nearly 2 million acres of natural splendor straddling Virginia and West Virginia — might also hold another treasure: natural gas trapped under a deep layer of rock called the Marcellus Shale.

By the end of the month, the U.S. Forest Service is expected to decide whether to ban or allow the controversial method of drilling called hydraulic fracturing under the forest’s new, 15-year management plan. The decision will settle a raging dispute between conservationists and the oil and gas industry.

The oil and gas industry argues that it would be unfair for the government to “slam the door” on hydraulic fracturing in the forest for such a long period of time, and points out that natural gas is a cleaner fuel than coal. Conservationists say the drilling method, also referred to as fracking, could contaminate water at its source. The process involves drilling a deep vertical well, then bending it horizontally so millions of gallons of water and toxic chemicals can be blasted into the earth to fracture shale and release gas.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/us-forest-service-set-to-decide-on-fracking-in-george-washington-national-forest/2013/09/07/cb7228aa-1644-11e3-a2ec-b47e45e6f8ef_story.html?Post+generic=%3Ftid%3Dsm_twitter_washingtonpost

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Forest Service set to decide on fracking in George Washington National Forest (Original Post) The Straight Story Sep 2013 OP
The answer is no. LWolf Sep 2013 #1
Why not? It's a Toofer. Jackpine Radical Sep 2013 #2
Of course they'll approve it. Obama never turns down the 1%. forestpath Sep 2013 #3
Oh FRACK NO! n/t hootinholler Sep 2013 #4
Fuck NO. I'm about 4 miles from there. Kiss clean, non toxic well water goodbye. williesgirl Sep 2013 #5

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
2. Why not? It's a Toofer.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 06:15 PM
Sep 2013

Not only will it produce profitable natural gas, it will contaminate the water supply for millions of people, driving up the price of bottled water.

Buy Evian!

 

forestpath

(3,102 posts)
3. Of course they'll approve it. Obama never turns down the 1%.
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 06:18 PM
Sep 2013

Even if it destroys the environment and poisons the rest of us. They come first.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.S. Forest Service set t...