General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKerry: Syria attack to be 'unbelievably small' (No, not the Onion, Borowitz, etc.)
I. Can't. Stand. These. People. Anymore.
Kerry's right: it's un believable.
From The Guardian, emphases mine:
The US secretary of state has said that President Bashar al-Assad has one week to hand over his entire stock of chemical weapons to avoid a military attack. But John Kerry added that he had no expectation that the Syrian leader would comply.
...
Kerry said the Americans were planning an "unbelievably small" attack on Syria. "We will be able to hold Bashar al-Assad accountable without engaging in troops on the ground or any other prolonged kind of effort in a very limited, very targeted, short-term effort that degrades his capacity to deliver chemical weapons without assuming responsibility for Syria's civil war. That is exactly what we are talking about doing unbelievably small, limited kind of effort."
So let me be clear," he continued. "The United States of America, President Obama, myself, others are in full agreement that the end of the conflict in Syria requires a political solution."
...
Kerry said he did not know if Obama would release further intelligence proving the culpability of Assad in the chemical weapons attack, saying the administration had already released an unprecedented amount of information.
Of course, Kerry and Obama are telling McCain et al that this will be a sweeping, expansive effort.
I just can't stand this anymore. Saying anything to anyone without shame has now become acceptable.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)We're going to drop Nerf footballs one foot into Syrian territory. If that's too dangerous, then we'll pretend we're Assad and order a pizza to his house.
OK? Can we? Please?
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)the only response has to be like the GOP's mindset responses.
Dash87
(3,220 posts)Yeah, we're going there.
cali
(114,904 posts)The shit coming out of his mouth is unbelievable.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/09/09/201512/pentagon-adjusts-plans-for-more.html
Pentagon adjusts plans for more intense attacks on Syria
Posted on Monday, September 9, 2013
By DAVID S. CLOUD | Tribune Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON The Pentagon is preparing for a longer bombardment of Syria than it originally had planned, with a heavy barrage of missile strikes followed soon after by more attacks against targets that the opening salvos missed or failed to destroy, officials said.
The planning for intense attacks over a three-day period reflects the growing belief in the White House and the Pentagon that the U.S. needs more firepower to inflict even minimal damage on Syrian President Bashar Assad's forces, which have been widely dispersed over the last two weeks, the officials said.
Two U.S. officers said the White House asked for an expanded target list in recent days to include many more than the 50 or so targets on the initial list. As a result, Pentagon planners are weighing whether to use Air Force bombers, in addition to five warships now on patrol in the eastern Mediterranean Sea, to launch cruise missiles and air-to-surface missiles from hundreds of miles offshore, well out of range of Syrian air defenses.
Syria is also within range of an aircraft carrier strike group in the Red Sea, which includes one cruiser and three destroyers, all capable of firing cruise missiles.
durablend
(7,460 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)to understand how war plans are drawn up at the top.... the Pentagon has plans ranging from a very small personal attack on Assad to a WW3 scenario and every thing end between....
leveymg
(36,418 posts)unless you have some particular reason to believe that you understand it better. That isn't readily apparent on its face.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)If you don't wont to confronted with it. dont post it!
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)There's degrading and "degrading".
This is friggin' degrading.
The Link
(757 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Does this thing have an "off" switch?
enough
(13,259 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Keep twisting his words. He obviously was refering to the scale of the operation.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)jsr
(7,712 posts)warrant46
(2,205 posts)Either that or his kidneys are not functioning. He looks Bloated
pscot
(21,024 posts)Divernan
(15,480 posts)Cancer patients are warned that the steroids they take to prevent an allergic reaction to the chemo can create a puffy "moon face" and make them put on weight;
warrant46
(2,205 posts)I don't like his push on Syria-- However I certainly don't wish him physical pain and suffering
Divernan
(15,480 posts)If he has major health issues, he is not in shape to handle the pressures and stress of negotiating life & death; war % peace matters.
warrant46
(2,205 posts)He didn't look like this a few months ago
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)But yall are willing to allowAssad to use WDM's again ,,,,, what wrong with this picture?
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Most of us have reached the conclusion that a US military attack on Syria will simply further splinter an already fragmented command and control over the military. Like throwing fuel on a fire. The use of chemical weapons by both sides would be more not less likely after an attack on the regime.
So, please don't attribute to any of us a willingness to allow the renewed use of CWs, when that is what we are trying to prevent.
Your comments aren't constructive.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)when some one post something and its logic is flawed , you are saying no one should point it out?
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)He seriously does not look like himself, and that droopy/off-kilter right eye says to me he might have some nerve issues going on.
jsr
(7,712 posts)truth2power
(8,219 posts)on that photo. He really looks grotesque there. But there's a more normal photo futher downthread.
warrant46
(2,205 posts)jsr
(7,712 posts)John Kerrys face looks different: Exhaustion, illness, Botox?
truth2power
(8,219 posts)Theresa is more ill than the public has been told. If so, that would account for his appearance. Couldn't blame him.
Butterbean
(1,014 posts)all locked in a room together, duking it out on their own with nobody else involved, it's not small enough for me.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Autumn
(45,066 posts)I find it very perplexing that I know more about the Pentagons plans than he does. Unless he's lying.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)It reminds me of those telemarketers that have a binder with tabs and whatever the prospect objects to, they flip to that tab and start reading.
P: What are you selling?
JK: I'm not selling anything. Just wanted to make you aware of an unbelievable offer!
P: No thank you. We don't want any more wars. We already have 2.
JK: (flips to "war" tab) Oh it's not a war. It's just a shot across the bow. An unbelievably small shot across the bow. And you act now it's free -- the Saudis will pay for the whole thing.
P: Wasn't the Iraq war going to be free too?
JK: ummm...one second...(there is not tab for that one)...um, did I mention "no boots on the ground"?
"Unbelievable" is the word for it.
Cronus Protagonist
(15,574 posts)These days it's a currency that's not wanted in the world markets.
Crimson76
(79 posts)Little Star
(17,055 posts)hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Of a marine in a zodiac tossing a grenade onto a beach and speeding off.
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)deutsey
(20,166 posts)before running away.
Divernan
(15,480 posts)Evidently Kerry, on Obama's tight rein, is treating the rest of the world with the same condescending & insulting belief in its gullibility as Obama attempts with the American public. Note to the White House: here's a quarter - buy a clue. Only the bots are gullible enough to believe or trust your war-obsessed spin machine.
Solly Mack
(90,764 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)and down time, instead of jetting off to England. He needs to step back a little, consider his message instead of engaging in more salesmanship--no matter how anyone feels about the proposed action, gaffes and "rhetorical" peace proposals don't do us any good.
NCarolinawoman
(2,825 posts)"O would some power the gift to give us to see ourselves as others see us."
Hopefully, he can take a break somehow and step away.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Eh...
KG
(28,751 posts)MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)I suppose there is a statistical chance that a single thing they say about their war plans may be true, given how many things they've said about it, but all the conflicting things have to therefore be UNTRUE by extension.
When are we allowed to start calling these untrue things LIES? And when are we allowed to start calling the people who say these untrue things LIARS?
I don't see why Obama is rushing us into war with Syria.
rock
(13,218 posts)Did you ever see how a person with a gun drives a nail?
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)Who determines what "entire" means?
When UN inspectors couldn't find WMD in Iraq, Rummy said that was evidence of Saddam's deception.
truth2power
(8,219 posts)described Kerry as a "tiresome, cadaverous, horseface" trying to sell the American people this bill of goods.
Gave me a little chuckle to start off my day. One has to find humor wherever one can these days.
David__77
(23,372 posts)This is getting weirder and weirder.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)Then you stroke it a couple of times and it gets bigger, you get more excited and stroke it some more and it gets bigger still. Then there is an exquisite explosion full of gratifying pleasure and you are left with a mess in your hands.
Please, Mr Secretary, no one wants to see your missile, for God's sake just control yourselves and keep it in your pants before somebody gets hurt, or you go blind (to human casualties to include children).
And resist the urge to continue taking that supplement that keeps stiffening your war resolve!
markiv
(1,489 posts)Ian_rd
(2,124 posts)We don't want to help the rebels, many of whom are terrorists. So the attack will be "unbelievably small" so it doesn't give them an advantage. But if it's so small, it also won't hurt the Assad government. And if it doesn't hurt the government, then it will not actually have any punitive effect. And also therefore not serve as a deterrent against further use of chemical weapons.
But oh shit, now that we already SAID we'd do it, we have to or we'll look weak. No matter that it was stupid to say it in the first place.
This "when in doubt, bomb someone" bullshit is currently on display for its idiocy.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)l
(actual size)