General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Military's Latest Rape-Case Mess
(snip)
The night of April 14, 2012, began as a "toga and yoga" party at the off-campus Annapolis hangout of the academy's football team. (The men wore togas, the women yoga pants.) By most accounts, the ensuing party got wild. The next morning, the female midshipman awoke at the house with a sore back, a coconut-rum hangover--and no recollection of what had happened. She learned that three male midshipmen, all Navy footballers, were boasting to friends and on social media that they'd had sex with her; the case hinges on whether she was too drunk to consent. The accuser pressed the case only reluctantly, after another female midshipman had said she planned to report what happened. The defendants, Tra'ves Bush, 22, of Johnston, S.C.; Eric Graham, 21, of Eight Mile, Ala.; and Joshua Tate, 21, of Nashville, have denied wrongdoing, saying any sex was consensual. News organizations have declined to name the accuser, now a 21-year-old senior at the academy, as they do in most such cases.
The hearing was brutal. While the defense lawyers attacked her with graphic, repetitive questions, the accuser sometimes gripped her meditation beads, a gift from her sexual-assault counselor. The lawyers wanted to know if she wore underwear to the party, how wide she opens her mouth during oral sex and if she "grinds" when dancing. They asked her if she "felt like a ho" the morning after (although Commander Robert Monahan Jr., the hearing officer, drew the line when a defendant's lawyer asked if she carried condoms in her purse). "This is harassment," Susan Burke, her civilian attorney, told military prosecutors during a break. "It has to stop!"
The inquisition took place during an Article 32 hearing. That's the section of the Uniform Code of Military Justice requiring a "thorough and impartial investigation" into any charge that could lead to a court-martial. Unlike civilian proceedings, which are presented in secret by prosecutors, Article 32 hearings are public, and defense lawyers can cross-examine accusers, sometimes harshly. Intended to keep military prosecutors from steamrolling defendants, it can force sexual-assault victims to endure long rounds of intensely personal questioning before the trial.
Eugene Fidell, an expert in military justice at Yale, says the military needs to make its hearings shorter--and fairer. "They're a waste of time, money and are--particularly in cases like this--a vehicle for oppression of witnesses," he says. "This case raises serious questions about whether Article 32 hearings have become an engine of injustice."
Navy officials will decide in the next several weeks whether the case should proceed to a full court-martial.
Read more: http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2151156,00.html#ixzz2eRxerwNH
question everything
(47,476 posts)This is really unbelievable. To my opinion.
(even if has nothing to do with Syria or NSA..)
chervilant
(8,267 posts)What has to happen to make people recognize that date rape is a heinous, disgusting, damaging crime?!? Do we have to come up with salacious headlines to get people to read these threads?!
Those animals will have to live with the stigma of raping an inebriated woman. Suffice to say, that's small solace to the midshipman they raped, and any other women they choose to assault.
question everything
(47,476 posts)and for the Republicans to insist on sticking an ultrasound probe inside a woman's body, and now, to show a crude commercial about "sticking" a cartoon "uncle Sam" between a woman's legs, just show how violent they are about women. How they do not think that women's voices, complaints and demands deserve any serious attention.