Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 01:03 PM Sep 2013

ConAgra's sprayable butter: 0 fat, 0 calories, and 0 truth

SAN FRANCISCO (CN) - ConAgra's sprayable butter is not the same thing as nonstick cooking sprays such as Pam, making its nonfat, no-calorie claims contestable in court, a federal judge ruled in a class action.

Lead plaintiff Erin Allen sued ConAgra in March, claiming it uses "unrealistically" small serving sizes to understate the amount of fat and calories in its Parkay Spray.

Conagra advertises the spray as having "0 fat" and "0 calories," though one bottle contains 93 grams of fat and 832 calories, Allen said in her class action.

The Food and Drug Administration allows companies to label products as "fat-free" if they contain less than 0.5 grams of fat per serving, and "0 calories" if they have fewer than 5 calories per serving, according to Allen's complaint.

Parkay Spray lists its serving sizes as 0.2 grams, or one spray, for cooking, and 1.0 grams, or five sprays, for topping. This would give an 8-oz, bottle 1,130 one-spray servings and 226 five-spray servings.

The problem, Allen claims, is that consumers do not use such artificially small serving sizes, especially when it comes to butter, so ConAgra's claims are false and misleading.

http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/09/10/60986.htm
ConAgra which grosses $20 billion in annual sales, sought dismissal, claiming the complaint is pre-empted by the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) and the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act (NLEA) of 1990. It claims it complies with those laws.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ConAgra's sprayable butter: 0 fat, 0 calories, and 0 truth (Original Post) The Straight Story Sep 2013 OP
I hope Allen wins. The artificially small servings are a joke. denverbill Sep 2013 #1
no zero calorie food truly is zero cal RedCappedBandit Sep 2013 #2
They will lie about anything. xfundy Sep 2013 #3
I've always been skeptical of so-called "Zero Calorie" spray butters and margarines. Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2013 #4

denverbill

(11,489 posts)
1. I hope Allen wins. The artificially small servings are a joke.
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 01:10 PM
Sep 2013

CoffeeMate advertises itself as healthy because it has 0 transfat, even the the 2nd ingredient on it's ingredient list is transfat. It's serving size (1 tsp IIRC) won't even make coffee look slightly brown. You need about 2 tbls to lighten even weak coffee.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,181 posts)
4. I've always been skeptical of so-called "Zero Calorie" spray butters and margarines.
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:05 PM
Sep 2013

Granted, I'm something of an addict when it comes to butter and margarine and I apply it most liberally on anything possible. But I don't for a minute believe that the "Zero calorie" spray is actually zero calories. Otherwise, what is it supposed to be? Water?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ConAgra's sprayable butte...