General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsReports of multiple shooters seems to be the norm
Last edited Mon Sep 16, 2013, 01:40 PM - Edit history (1)
In almost any single-shooter mass-shooting type incident at a school or office building or other spread-out location, it will credibly appear, to some perfectly reasonable persons, that there are multiple shooters.
The shooter moves around. Cops return fire. An off-duty cop somewhere returns fire. Doors slam. Furniture is over-turned. And witnesses combine eye-witness and second hand information -- co-worker says they saw the guy "in there" and another says they saw a guy "over that-away" and you saw the guy out there. After cops get inside they batter locked doors from their hinges with a ram or even little explosive devices. And, of course, as silly as this sounds, echoes.
So it is no way surprising that we always get early reports of multiple shooters. And it is very correct for police to chase down all such leads.
Also, a math thing. There will always be erroneous early reports. If there is, in fact, a shooting and only one shooter then all erroneous reports of # of shooters will be on the upside.
re: Navy Yard shooter(s). The police say there is a shooter dead and they are looking for two other persons they'd like to know more about. It is likely, IMO, that the number will settle at one. But they have to follow the leads -- properly so -- of men other than the shooter reported being seen with guns.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,181 posts)Remember the "second-shooter" at Sandy Hook, who was nothing more than a father who had rushed towards the school because his daughter was inside?
Remember the "bomb at the JFK library" during Boston?
Anyone remember reports of a bomb at the State Department during September 11th?
All sorts of crazy stuff gets reported as fact at the very onset of these breaking stories, only to be discredited later in the day. Unfortunately, the conspiracy theorists won't recognize this and will obsess about these stories as if they were ever actually true, and claim a coverup because of it.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Boston bombers, DC snipers, etc.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,181 posts)But almost all the time there are many initial reports that are later completely discredited.
Your mention of the DC Snipers is an excellent example. Remember how everyone was obsessed about looking for white vans, and the shooters actually were driving around in a brown sedan?
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)seeking. Both are people seen somewhere with a gun.
Since there were park police, us marshals, dc police, probably some military folks, and heavens knows who else it confusing stuff.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,181 posts)Where some CCW holder starts shooting at the other shooter. Imagine the chaos coming out of that situation and trying to determine who is the "bad guy".
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)The ccw holder started to clear leader, instead he thought it over and restrained Loughner. He admitted he might have shot the good guy who first engaged Loughner
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)but fires on the Mall. The fires on the Mall thing kept on being repeated for about 45 minutes, even though it would have been absurdly easy to send someone over to the Mall and notice there were no fires there.
otohara
(24,135 posts)about our exceptional nation when it comes to guns
DanTex
(20,709 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)Seems like at least once a month there is one.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)not including this latest one.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2013/06/14/2116461/there-have-been-14-mass-shootings-in-the-six-months-since-newtown/
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Early on is not that uncommon in many other types of disasters either
Lex
(34,108 posts)unreliable due to the stress of the situation. I'm sure he's described all kind of ways with all kinds of color clothes so people begin to think it's 2 or more shooters.