Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWingnutty Judicial Watch founder Klayman calls for overthrow of U.S. government
Another one for the conservatives hate democracy and America file:
---
Judicial Watch founder Larry Klayman reiterated his call today for an anti-Obama rebellion and Egyptian-style coup, writing in Renew America that Americans should gather en masse in Washington D.C. to remove President Obama from office. Klayman maintains that since neither Congress nor the courts will remove Obama, a popular uprising is needed to cleanse the nation of the half-Muslim, anti-white, socialist fraud in the White House before the nation goes under for the final count.
If the Egyptians can do this with regard to another radical Muslim, former president Mohamed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood, then can't we Americans do it with Obama? Klayman asks, calling for conservatives working with his new group, Freedom Watch, to organize an Occupy Washington movement in which millions of people will stand in front of the White House and other national treasures and demand that Barack Hussein Obama leave.
And, when we do converge on and Occupy Washington in the millions on a date to be announced for the week before Thanksgiving, the people may think about chanting: Mr. President (to use the term loosely), put the Quran down, get up off your knees and come out with your hands up!
[Obama] will finally know that his time has come to leave his perverted, Islamic concept of Mecca, our nation's hallowed capital, Klayman concludes. I do not advocate violence, but it is time we show Obama that we mean business. He would be well advised to ride off into his Islamic sunset, link up with 72 virgins and party on at his expense not ours!
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/klayman-mr-president-put-quran-down-get-your-knees-and-come-out-your-hands#sthash.YI1qK4XD.dpuf
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1100 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wingnutty Judicial Watch founder Klayman calls for overthrow of U.S. government (Original Post)
Adenoid_Hynkel
Sep 2013
OP
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)1. You Know, Sir, He Molested His Own Children....
http://wonkette.com/485407/judicial-watch-founderclinton-nemesis-larry-klayman-might-have-touched-his-children-in-their-swimsuit-areas
From Appeals Court Judge Mary Boyle, July 26,2012
{¶25} The issues raised by Klayman involve credibility assessments made by the magistrate. Klayman challenges these findings. The magistrate heard evidence from the childrens pediatrician who reported allegations of sexual abuse to children services, and from a social worker at children services who found that sexual abuse was indicated. Although the social workers finding was later changed to unsubstantiated when Klayman appealed, the magistrate explained that the supervisor who changed the social workers finding did not testify. The magistrate pointed out that he was obligated to make his own independent analysis based upon the parties and the evidence before him. In doing so, the magistrate found on more than one occasion act in a grossly inappropriate manner with the children. His conduct may not have been sexual in the sense that he intended to or did derive any sexual pleasure from it or that he intended his children would. That, however, does not mean that he did not engage in those acts or that his behavior was proper.
{¶26} The magistrate further found it significant that although Klayman denied any allegations of sexual abuse, he never denied that he did not engage in inappropriate behavior with the children. The magistrate further found it notable that Klayman, for all his breast beating about his innocence * * * scrupulously avoided being questioned by anyone from or from the Sheriffs Department about the allegations, and that he refused to answer any questions, repeatedly invoking his Fifth Amendment rights, about whether he inappropriately touched the children. Even more disturbing to the magistrate was the fact that Klayman would not even answer the simple question regarding what he thought inappropriate touching was. The magistrate stated that he could draw an adverse inference from Klaymans decision not to testify to these matters because it was a civil proceeding, not criminal.
From Appeals Court Judge Mary Boyle, July 26,2012
{¶25} The issues raised by Klayman involve credibility assessments made by the magistrate. Klayman challenges these findings. The magistrate heard evidence from the childrens pediatrician who reported allegations of sexual abuse to children services, and from a social worker at children services who found that sexual abuse was indicated. Although the social workers finding was later changed to unsubstantiated when Klayman appealed, the magistrate explained that the supervisor who changed the social workers finding did not testify. The magistrate pointed out that he was obligated to make his own independent analysis based upon the parties and the evidence before him. In doing so, the magistrate found on more than one occasion act in a grossly inappropriate manner with the children. His conduct may not have been sexual in the sense that he intended to or did derive any sexual pleasure from it or that he intended his children would. That, however, does not mean that he did not engage in those acts or that his behavior was proper.
{¶26} The magistrate further found it significant that although Klayman denied any allegations of sexual abuse, he never denied that he did not engage in inappropriate behavior with the children. The magistrate further found it notable that Klayman, for all his breast beating about his innocence * * * scrupulously avoided being questioned by anyone from or from the Sheriffs Department about the allegations, and that he refused to answer any questions, repeatedly invoking his Fifth Amendment rights, about whether he inappropriately touched the children. Even more disturbing to the magistrate was the fact that Klayman would not even answer the simple question regarding what he thought inappropriate touching was. The magistrate stated that he could draw an adverse inference from Klaymans decision not to testify to these matters because it was a civil proceeding, not criminal.
Raven
(13,891 posts)2. In the last sentence: wishing for
Obama's death.
Boomerproud
(7,952 posts)3. He must have run out of Clintons to sue.
We live in times. I just want to hide sometimes and hope it all goes away.
atreides1
(16,079 posts)4. Let him be in the front leading!!!
That way he'll be the first "Martyr" created...