Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 09:13 AM Sep 2013

The Left Pushes Back

http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/18902-the-left-pushes-back

We're witnessing a 3-act play in America, and it's called "The Great Rejection of the Reagan Revolution." For more than 30 years, we've witnessed failed policy after failed policy, executed by both Democrats and Republicans, which have done nothing to help working class Americans, and everything to increase the power of corporate America and of the wealthy elite.

As result, Americans have figured out the truth behind the Reagan Revolution: Whether practiced by Republicans or Democrats, the Reagan Revolution is one giant scam. In Act One of "The Great Rejection of the Reagan Revolution," we've seen the rejection of Reagan-inspired Grenada-like Bush-era policies of pre-emptive strikes, and just about every aspect of the so-called "Bush doctrine."

...

In Act Two of "The Great Rejection of the Reagan Revolution," Americans have rejected the Reagan Revolution policy of "deregulating the gangsters" that have allowed Wall Street big banks to grow out of control, and that caused the financial collapse of 2008.

...

Because Reagan stopped enforcing the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, when Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act was passed, commercial banks were allowed to merge with investment banks to form the massive "too big to fail" banks that dominate Wall Street today and that have dealt near death-blows to our economy. To close out Act Two of this play, Americans rejected both of these Reaganomics mainstays, and also repudiated one of their principal cheerleaders, Larry Summers.



Time for Act III - rejection of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Left Pushes Back (Original Post) Scuba Sep 2013 OP
k/r marmar Sep 2013 #1
Why don't we start enforcing Sherman again? Chan790 Sep 2013 #2
Good questions. I was wondering that too. nt silvershadow Sep 2013 #3
It's still out there, but we gotta stick with our priorities... Buns_of_Fire Sep 2013 #7
Because we can't vote Goldman Sachs out of office. n/t L0oniX Sep 2013 #10
. rhett o rick Sep 2013 #17
k and r niyad Sep 2013 #4
If we don't, who will? tblue Sep 2013 #5
It would be great to see media regulation back on the table. go west young man Sep 2013 #6
The Telecommunication Deregulation Act ended my career in commercial radio. OnyxCollie Sep 2013 #13
K&R with pleasure! Greybnk48 Sep 2013 #8
Most important Act: Top tax rates must be doubled at least also. ErikJ Sep 2013 #9
It is no coinsdence Cryptoad Sep 2013 #12
I will agree with you there. And that's no threat. Just sayin. nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #18
It took THIRTY YEARS!!!!!!!!! Precisely Sep 2013 #11
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Sep 2013 #14
We still need to admit the Cold War is over... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #15
Yea where is that big benefit from no more cold war? Less spying ...nope! Extra money because... L0oniX Sep 2013 #20
I am convinced the spy agencies are protecting the 1% at this point.... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #21
K&R pscot Sep 2013 #16
Time to kick the damn conservatives out of the party and reject the TPP. nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #19
Kick And Recommend cantbeserious Sep 2013 #22
K&R..........nt Enthusiast Sep 2013 #23
Time for Act III LWolf Sep 2013 #24
 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
2. Why don't we start enforcing Sherman again?
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 09:16 AM
Sep 2013

Was it repealed? Does it have to be reauthorized? Or is DoJ simply not doing it for some reason?

Buns_of_Fire

(17,175 posts)
7. It's still out there, but we gotta stick with our priorities...
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 10:39 AM
Sep 2013

First, we must rid ourselves of all these lefty, pinko-commie mary-gew-wanna smokers. They don't have as many lawyers as the too-big-to-do-anything-to crowd, and they throw their money away instead of channeling it to useful endeavors -- like buying politicians.

 

go west young man

(4,856 posts)
6. It would be great to see media regulation back on the table.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 10:38 AM
Sep 2013

The 1996 Telecommunications Act hurt us all.

http://www.wifp.org/FCCandMediaDemocracy.html

Until recently, the FCC has sought to uphold its commitment to the First Amendment to ensure "the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources." In 1996, many of the previous actions to protect the consolidation of the media were overturned. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 was the first significant change in FCC law in more than 60 years. The new law sought to open competition in the communications market. Not surprisingly, the law was looked favorably upon by media corporations. It led to a wave of mergers, and actually decreased competition in the market. Instead of many groups providing media services, consolidation brought the number of participants down to only a handful of companies. The Act brought on a 1/3 decline in commercial radio stations (a loss of 1,700 stations). Although the Act was supposed to lead to a decrease in consumers' cable cost, cable prices have actually increased 30% since the law was put into effect. Now 7 companies, including AOL/Time Warner and Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation, own 75% of the market . The Telecommunications Act actually contradicted its intention of increasing media choices. Instead, it harmed competition and media democracy. The free market did not promote a diverse group of media companies as promoters of the Act predicted. In fact, the Telecommunications Act encouraged consolidation.

 

ErikJ

(6,335 posts)
9. Most important Act: Top tax rates must be doubled at least also.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:22 AM
Sep 2013

Top income tax rate must be doubled from current 39% to at least 70% like before Reagan, and the Capital Gains and Dividend top tax rate raised from current 20% to at least 36% like before Reagan, and preferably the same as the top income tax rate. As they say, a dollar is a dollar.
If the top tax rates arent raised the income/wealth gap will increase even more,......... we will have to continue trimming the social services to "balance the budget",........... Wall street and banks will remain unstable ,........ and worst, they will continue buying and bribing Washington to eventually reverse all the previous acts.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
12. It is no coinsdence
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:53 AM
Sep 2013

It is no coincidence that oiur most robust Economy and Middle Class existed when the Max Effective Income Tax rate was over 50% !

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
15. We still need to admit the Cold War is over...
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 12:34 PM
Sep 2013

We are still acting like Capitalism = Freedom while the rest of the world has moved on and is laughing at us for being so backward.

Example? VW is building a car that gets 240 mpg that is unavailable here because our auto makers are in bed with the oil companies and the laws protect that profit driven collusion in the name of Capitalism. They have suckered the American market into believing 35 mpg is as good as it gets.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
20. Yea where is that big benefit from no more cold war? Less spying ...nope! Extra money because...
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 12:20 AM
Sep 2013

we don't need all the nukes and world police ...nope. Fuck ...we would have been better off by keeping the cold war going. At least we wouldn't be able to get away with this world police bully shit ...and the spies would still be looking at Russia and East Germany instead of spying on all of us ...except for cointelpro which was micro small and mild compared to what the NSA and DHS is doing now.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
21. I am convinced the spy agencies are protecting the 1% at this point....
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 12:36 AM
Sep 2013

They are looking for specific things that could reveal their plans for us.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Left Pushes Back