Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pes MSNBC: Fucking GOP controlled House just voted (Original Post) gopiscrap Sep 2013 OP
Obama and the Democrats will put a stop to it n/t leftstreet Sep 2013 #1
Yes. In these times the proper response would be to INCREASE expenditures on food for the poor, but Jackpine Radical Sep 2013 #2
We have to deal with this repuke talking point warrant46 Sep 2013 #24
so this wasn't lob.ster for someone to EAT grasswire Sep 2013 #28
So true but the sheep don't know that warrant46 Sep 2013 #29
I heard the Senate version also cuts SNAP G_j Sep 2013 #6
yep n2doc Sep 2013 #25
that may be, but this is still bullshit gopiscrap Sep 2013 #7
You're probably being sarcastic, but if you think POTUS wants this CakeGrrl Sep 2013 #10
Fing aholes- ruffburr Sep 2013 #3
I expect them to spontaneously combust soon frazzled Sep 2013 #4
Here's where I feign shock. Nt Barack_America Sep 2013 #5
The House Republicans needs to be desginated as a terrorist organization along with the rest of the Koko Ware Sep 2013 #8
You want the President to start a civil war? Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #15
If a civil war needs to end the domination of the extremely minority party, then so be it. Koko Ware Sep 2013 #16
Fascist much? Do us a favor -- don't tell people you're on our side. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #17
Keep your guns away from me, and we'll be fine. Koko Ware Sep 2013 #18
I have less than zero interest in violence for political ends. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #19
And neither should you. Koko Ware Sep 2013 #20
Did you post that with a moveable type printing press? Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #22
They could vote to send a search party for cheese on the moon. WilliamPitt Sep 2013 #9
And there is never such reThuglican spectacle about cutting the defence and security budget mazzarro Sep 2013 #11
No kidding, our priorities as a nation are fucked. gopiscrap Sep 2013 #12
It is said . . . Brigid Sep 2013 #13
Yup I agree gopiscrap Sep 2013 #14
While the fucking oil companys hoover up the cash. DiverDave Sep 2013 #21
Lobster Boy Looms Large In Food Stamp Debate warrant46 Sep 2013 #23
Why does anyone care what people buy with their food stamps? JaneyVee Sep 2013 #31
You have to understand the semi illiterate base they pander to warrant46 Sep 2013 #32
... and yet, they will be abe to sleep at night etherealtruth Sep 2013 #26
At least , FOR ONCE, No Dems voted for it n2doc Sep 2013 #27
"PROLIFE" JaneyVee Sep 2013 #30

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
2. Yes. In these times the proper response would be to INCREASE expenditures on food for the poor, but
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 06:19 PM
Sep 2013

we all know the realities of the current poisonous political environment, and I salute BO and the Dems for holding the line.

warrant46

(2,205 posts)
24. We have to deal with this repuke talking point
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 07:47 PM
Sep 2013


From Angeli's in Menominee MI

Yes this is real and its Very Very Big on Facebook and also has been seen on TV

http://www.snopes.com/photos/signs/receipt.asp

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
28. so this wasn't lob.ster for someone to EAT
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 07:58 PM
Sep 2013

It was sold for 50 cents on the dollar for cash.

So, critics can't claim that SNAP recipients are eating lobster and steak.

In reality, a crook scammed the system and made money. A crooki.

You know, like the banksters do every day.

Do we cut corporate welfare because the banksters took down our economy?

No.

warrant46

(2,205 posts)
29. So true but the sheep don't know that
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 08:03 PM
Sep 2013

They are only shown pictures by the Repukes of large corpulent recipients "stealing" their hard earned $$$ to feast on luxury items for their own gluttony

G_j

(40,367 posts)
6. I heard the Senate version also cuts SNAP
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 06:27 PM
Sep 2013

but by something like 4 billion.

on edit: I tried to find more about the Senate's take on this, but haven't. I do think I heard this right though (NPR).

gopiscrap

(23,760 posts)
7. that may be, but this is still bullshit
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 06:29 PM
Sep 2013

we need to be able to care for our poor and hungry...what does this say about us as a people?

CakeGrrl

(10,611 posts)
10. You're probably being sarcastic, but if you think POTUS wants this
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 06:31 PM
Sep 2013

you're dead wrong.

Yes, the currently Dem-controlled Senate will stop it.

And if we lose THAT majority in 2014, President Obama will veto it, despite some of you believing otherwise.

But let a Republican take the WH with this Tea Party House of Representatives?

See ya.

ruffburr

(1,190 posts)
3. Fing aholes-
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 06:24 PM
Sep 2013

If they do not at this point get sent the way of the Whig party i'll be very amazed and ashamed of many of my countrymen/women, GOTV

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
4. I expect them to spontaneously combust soon
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 06:25 PM
Sep 2013

Really, as a group. I have this image in my head of them slashing food stamps, shutting down the government in a fit of pique over a law that has been passed for four years and approved by the Supreme Court, defaulting on the nation's debts ... and then suddenly erupting, en masse, in flames.

 

Koko Ware

(107 posts)
8. The House Republicans needs to be desginated as a terrorist organization along with the rest of the
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 06:30 PM
Sep 2013

Republicans.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
15. You want the President to start a civil war?
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 06:37 PM
Sep 2013

Because that is what you're effectively asking for him to do, utilize the criminal and military power of the US against a political party. Yes, they're vacuous, ill-spirited and invested in blind policies but what you advocate would be the end of the nation.

 

Koko Ware

(107 posts)
16. If a civil war needs to end the domination of the extremely minority party, then so be it.
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 06:41 PM
Sep 2013

I'm sure this civil war will be short once the 'baggers runs out of ammo they've been hoarding trying to fire accurately (and failing to do so) to the liberals. Then it will be overrun. That will take all of 15 minutes. Really. Just a rubber mallet aimed directly to the top of their head is required.

The minority party needs to learn its limitations and stick with it. If the Republican Party wants to dominate, then get the fucking votes out and become the majority party (which is highly unlikely ever again).

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
19. I have less than zero interest in violence for political ends.
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 06:51 PM
Sep 2013

Hence the nature of my advice to not advocate for political violence. I will, however, note with great satisfaction and no small measure of relief that you do not own firearms. Nor should you.

 

Koko Ware

(107 posts)
20. And neither should you.
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 07:01 PM
Sep 2013

I say smelt your damn guns and go buy a musket as the Constitution allows if you need a gat.

 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
9. They could vote to send a search party for cheese on the moon.
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 06:31 PM
Sep 2013

It's DOA.

What you're seeing is a fundraising drive.

Period.

mazzarro

(3,450 posts)
11. And there is never such reThuglican spectacle about cutting the defence and security budget
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 06:32 PM
Sep 2013

Democrats especially the leadership make it more disgusting by not regularly highlighting such rank hypocrisy on the part of the reThuglicans.

Brigid

(17,621 posts)
13. It is said . . .
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 06:35 PM
Sep 2013

that any society is about 9-10 meals from anarchy. The GOP might want to keep that in mind.

DiverDave

(4,886 posts)
21. While the fucking oil companys hoover up the cash.
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 07:04 PM
Sep 2013

I swear, when people cannot afford to feed their children, there is gonna be a fucking bloodbath.

warrant46

(2,205 posts)
23. Lobster Boy Looms Large In Food Stamp Debate
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 07:13 PM
Sep 2013
http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2013/09/19/223796325/lobster-boy-looms-large-in-food-stamp-debate

This is part of the reason the Pukes motivate their base


Before Fox News turned its cameras on him, Jason Greenslate was an anonymous Southern California beach bum, hanging with his surfer pals, playing in a demonstrably awful band and, in his words, "livin' the ratt life."

He doesn't work and gets $200 a month in food stamp assistance that he sometimes uses to buy lobster. Which he did, unapologetically.
"It's free food," said Greenslate, a dead ringer for the infamous slacker in the film Fast Times at Ridgemont High. "It's awesome."
And so was born, in the conservative media crucible, the GOP's new face of American indolence.

For House Republicans, who this week will try for the second time in three months to cut farm bill funding for the federal nutrition program, it's a hard anecdote to resist.
 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
31. Why does anyone care what people buy with their food stamps?
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 08:08 PM
Sep 2013

I'd rather see them eating ultra healthy food like lobster than a receipt full of junk food and non nutritional food.

warrant46

(2,205 posts)
32. You have to understand the semi illiterate base they pander to
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 08:29 PM
Sep 2013

It starts as

"You can't afford it, but your taxes pay for these lazy bums to live it up"

It's motivated by jealousy and hatred and it works.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pes MSNBC: Fucking GOP c...