General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSocial Security and Medicare CUTS MAY BE COMING. Here's Why.
It's autumn, when a politician's fancy turns to thoughts of a Grand Bargain.
Right now it looks as if the two sides are at an impasse. But the President's "no negotiations" posture only applies to the debt ceiling, and his budget still includes the "chained CPI" cut to Social Security. The Republicans who are attempting to force a showdown over Obamacare are still railing against the programs they call "entitlements."They're all looking for a face-saving deal, and Social Security and Medicare could very well become that deal's Ground Zero.
Winter's Boehner
Autumn. The leaves begin to turn. The birds get ready to fly south. And an unpopular, shapeshifting lobbying group which takes many names and forms - the "American Comeback Initiative," The Can Kicks Back, AmericaSpeaks, and our favorite, Budgetball ("The Fountainhead Meets Deathrace 2000") - renews its PR campaign against "entitlements" for the disabled and aging. Or, as the rest of the nation knows them, Social Security and Medicare.
Like harbingers of a hard winter, anti-entitlement spokesmen Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles have returned to the nation's capital. These constituentless advocates for a widely disliked set of policies were given their usual unwarranted level of press coverage. Somewhat messianically, Simpson told Politico that "we have to be in reserve" in case politicians "put their country at risk" - by failing to impose the destructive austerity policies favored by Bowles and Simpson's backers. "But don't use our names," adds Simpson, "because that might be too volatile. We're both on the witness protection program now."
Only the relentlessly narcissistic Simpson could claim to be "on the witness protection program" while giving an interview to Politico. And his talking points have been receiving equally widespread exposure. The catch phrases crafted by Simpson's sponsors were used by John Boehner when he spoke about entitlements last month in Idaho. "I made up my mind that we weren't going to kick the can down the road anymore," he told the audience at a Boise fundraiser. It's all part of a wider Washington offensive. As another recent Politico news item reported, "Fix the Debt is ramping back up its lobbying efforts as government funding fights become the topic du jour on Capitol Hill."
cont'
http://crooksandliars.com/richard-rj-eskow/social-security-and-medicare-cuts
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Frankie the Bird
(70 posts)of its original size.
And we'd still kick butt.
There is no need to act like the world police, because we're not.
It's time for the defense industry to be converted to something more useful to the world, not harmful to the world.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)madrchsod
(58,162 posts)any politician who decides to fuck with medicare and ss is signing their election defeat.
leftstreet
(38,740 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)No waiting to see what's in final deal because we don't know what Obama will actually do since he hasn't done it yet.
What a travesty. SS should NEVER have been offered up in any way shape or form. The door has been opened and the Republicans are not likely to let it close again, especially since a Dem opened it in the first place. <shakes head sadly>
Vanje
(9,766 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)I'll just don my best pair of comfortable walking shoes, the only ones...the ones with the holes in them, and shamble on down to the soup kitchen. I'm sure they will be open since nobody is planning to cut their funding.
It will all work out for us just as long as we believe and keep on voting.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)If I simply ignore the fact that it's the 856th cut that I've suffered,
it only hurts half as much.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)That sucks.
I am not planning on sitting around and waiting for my little check to be bargained away.
Funny how we have money to start a war with Syria, but on the other hand the government has to cheat seniors out of our rightful benefits.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)It cracks me up when it is election time how all our Dem politicians crawl up on the convention stage and boast their humble working class backgrounds, yet they are trying to pull off this b.s.!!!
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)well, here you go then ---> It was
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)I was just commiserating.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)thanks for letting me know
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Proponents for a war with Syria (see warbaggers) say that those missals are already purchased ordinance so it won't cost that much.
They fail to acknowledge that those missals would have to be replaced, and the missals most likely will cost more than the original ones.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Segami
(14,923 posts)as long as its YOUR grandma doing the eating and NOT THEIRS!
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)And will get no support of any kind from me.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Vanje
(9,766 posts)No Deal!
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Hydra
(14,459 posts)I'd like to ask the BOG how chained CPI is not on the table again, since they claim that was never a goal of the WH.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Hydra
(14,459 posts)I have their most epic troll on ignore, and I quite forgot he existed until someone brought him up the other day.
I did like having a direct pipeline to WH talking points, but luckily I haven't met anyone outside of DU who actually thinks or believes what they do, so it's probably irrelevant.
Frankie the Bird
(70 posts)Inquiring minds wants to know.. PM me if you want...
Hydra
(14,459 posts)I'll see if I can't answer you more properly later.
Skittles
(169,350 posts)I was thinking of another name that made more Sense.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)I have mental ignore for them, but they post the batch talking points. I found them to be the best source for what I'd hear from the WH within 3 days :p
kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)People wonder how a handful of portrait waving zealots have managed to take over this place. Unmaintained or blank jury blacklists is behind a lot of it.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)But as Coffee proved, they come back under different names if they get pizza delivery.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)RC
(25,592 posts)Frivolous alerts would plummet.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Skittles
(169,350 posts)but my GAWD there are some BIG F***ING BABIES HERE
Vanje
(9,766 posts)Though one or two of them sometimes links or promotes an article or backs up a point of view .
It is rare
Most of those denizens hurl bald insults, and THAT is all.
We're not dealing with intellectual giants here.
They didnt know why Summers was a problem .(But they sure were on top of the very small fact that Summers was not yet nominated!) One strong backer of the President posted that objection to Summers nomination was based on "abject hatred", but when pressed, admitted that she , herself didnt know anything about Summers.
They dont know or care enough to opine about TPP .
Not much opinion or apparent knowledge about NSA , but HUGE LOADS of opinion and observations about Snowden, and Greenwald.
One stalwart Bog regular posted that her concern about Obama's economic policies was at 2.5%. She didnt consider Summers appointment an important issue, yet it didnt stop her from posting voluminously in threads about Summers nomination to FED.
Its important to consider in reading and posting at DU, that some of these people have heads that are filled with nothing but styrofoam peanuts, and recycled insults. Some seem to be online random nonsense generators.
- Again, Its not all the Boggers, I'm talking about here, but more than a few very active posters.
I usually dont post negative observations about whole groups of my fellow DUers, and try to keep away from grouping people as "BoG" people or cheer-leaders, or whatever,
but
Conservatives.
They are.
And I dont coddle conservatives on my DU.
Skittles
(169,350 posts)they would NOT accept this kind of stuff from any other Democrat
I hope we can put that lame ass excuse to bed.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)I don't think grand means great for everyone, I think it means historically large impact.
I suspect every president wants to do something that makes an important difference.
I don't know the president, so I am left to suspect Obama is human.
The motivations of my leader may be grand, but that thing of starting bilateral consideration by compromising in a big way scares the hell out of me.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)I say NO!!!!!!!!!
duffyduff
(3,251 posts)"Means testing" is welfare, and it would destroy SS and Medicare.
Vanje
(9,766 posts)If Medicare and SS become "means tested", people who deserve and need these programs would be denigrated for using them, as foodstamps users are denigrated now.
We all pay a % of our paycheck into SS, but its capped. SO a person with a huge income pays less % of his check than I , a person with meager income, do.
Remove the caps.
Let Mr. Rich pay the same % into SS as I do.
We all get to collect when we retire, same as we do now.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)And slash the military and the size of its mission.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)That's the objective. Push SS and Medicare into privatization.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)super rich fucks don't have to pay into SS on income above a
certain amount. That could EASILY be raised, thus generating
abundant revenue for SS Fund into the future.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)I would even support a progressive FICA tax rate!
Vanje
(9,766 posts)avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Raise the cap and get more Americans back to work so they are contributing. The solution is a no-brainer.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)...and to the ignored person who responded ...you are on ignore for a good reason. Enjoy your BOG.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)I would support it!
SS and Medicare are for all the people.
No one has to shuffle into a welfare office, hat in hand, hoping their neighbors don't see em, with a sheaf of papers to prove they're a pauper, so they can get the benefits of a program they paid into.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)LongTomH
(8,636 posts)It will certainly be the breaking point for the GOP. Young people are not impressed with Reaganism or Clintonism. I'm seeing polls here that show that even the elderly are finally realizing that the Republicans are not their friends.
If the Democratic contingent in Congress doesn't block this, it may be their downfall as well. I would expect some Blue Dog Democrats to lose their seats in 2014 anyway.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)1ProudAtheist
(346 posts)Is only capable of screwing over those who elected him, never those who oppose him. Obama will find a way to piss off loyal democrats and progressives while kissing the butts of Pukes. Same old story, just a different verse.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)If the Dem party moves back to its core principles then progressives will be part of it. Go against labor and SS and Medicare and you can kiss progressives and what's left of the real Dems goodby.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)not worthy of the ground that the real personality cult Dems walk on?
TBF
(35,552 posts)socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)I included Simpson-Bowles.
http://www.workerspower.net/budget-friction-in-washington-a-tocsin-for-things-to-come
Uncle Joe
(64,138 posts)Thanks for the thread, Segami.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Skittles
(169,350 posts)Chained CPI should NEVER even be MENTIONED by a Democrat - it is ABSOLUTE GARBAGE
http://money.usnews.com/money/retirement/articles/2013/04/29/how-the-chained-cpi-affects-social-security-payments
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)without seeing chained CPI floated again.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)And even those who are not up next year know we Dems have a long memory.
Sam
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Even if it won't pass.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Does the Grand Bargain include massive cuts to the unnecessary military/intelligence industrial complex?
eridani
(51,907 posts)It is based on the notion that you can substitute hamburger for steak. Old peopl's budgets are dominated by health care expenses, and THERE ARE NO SUBSTITUTES for needed health care!!
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)There's an extra 93 billion the pentagon has sitting around for this fiscal year alone that has gone unused. How about we use that money to end the sequester that is taking food out of the mouths of this nations most needy. Why are we discussing more cuts? Cuts to more programs for our most vulnerable? Our nation is wealthy. We have the money. We could raise taxes on the very rich, on corporations and make modest cuts to our insanely bloated defense and use that money to restore the spending needed for social programs. It sickens me that the discussion is about more cuts. Democrats should be pushing back. The sequester needs to end. We need stimulus spending to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure, properly fund our schools and needed social programs. Where is the sacrifice from the wealthy, corporations or the MIC?