Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kaiser Chart: The Requirement to Buy Coverage Under the Affordable Care Act (Original Post) flpoljunkie Sep 2013 OP
There's a penalty for not buying prescription BlueToTheBone Sep 2013 #1
Anybody vet the "key facts"? The $12-15K number for Bronze cov'g looks high. Scuba Sep 2013 #2
Have read the Silver Plan is the 'best bang for the buck.' flpoljunkie Sep 2013 #4
Silver plan definitely best for people who qualify for both subsidies and cost-sharing frazzled Sep 2013 #7
I was wondering about ACA vs. Medicare BadgerKid Sep 2013 #3
Kick! (nt) NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #5
"There is no penalty for being without health insurance" bunnies Sep 2013 #6
If you're in that income category, you qualify for free medicaid bhikkhu Sep 2013 #8
Not in my state. bunnies Sep 2013 #10
Wow- just looked up the state policies on that bhikkhu Sep 2013 #11
Crazy isnt it? bunnies Sep 2013 #12
kick n/t Adsos Letter Sep 2013 #9

BlueToTheBone

(3,747 posts)
1. There's a penalty for not buying prescription
Thu Sep 26, 2013, 01:18 PM
Sep 2013

drug insurance too. Put in place by the pukes when they forced us to buy insurance to buy drugs that could NOT be negotiated.

flpoljunkie

(26,184 posts)
4. Have read the Silver Plan is the 'best bang for the buck.'
Sun Sep 29, 2013, 11:10 AM
Sep 2013

The Bronze Plan has higher deductible costs. The deductible applies for hospital stays, out patient procedures and non-generic drugs.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
7. Silver plan definitely best for people who qualify for both subsidies and cost-sharing
Sun Sep 29, 2013, 12:35 PM
Sep 2013

Please note:

Q. Can I get help with my out-of-pocket expenses, like deductibles?

A. People with incomes between 100 percent of the federal poverty line ($23,550 for a family of four) and 250 percent ($58,875 for a family of four) are also eligible for cost-sharing reductions, which means you’ll pay less for items including deductibles and co-payments, and you’ll have lower out-of-pocket maximums.
There is a big caveat: you can qualify for the reductions only if you buy a silver plan. When choosing a silver plan — and compare them closely, because they will differ — the exchange Web site will automatically show what you will pay, with the cost-sharing reductions included, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Even if you’re tempted by the bronze plans’ lower premiums, remember you’ll probably end up paying more for out-of-pocket costs. For people who qualify for both premium and cost-sharing subsidies, the silver plan will usually be the better deal, Ms. Fish-Parcham said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/28/your-money/health-insurance/a-guide-to-the-new-health-insurance-exchanges.html?pagewanted=1&hp&_r=0

BadgerKid

(4,559 posts)
3. I was wondering about ACA vs. Medicare
Fri Sep 27, 2013, 07:21 AM
Sep 2013

and found this link: http://www.medicare.gov/about-us/affordable-care-act/affordable-care-act.html

Are things in motion to let Medicare fade away (like over a 20 year span) as today's new Medicare recipients pass on?

EDIT: And no, I'm not trying to sneak in some RW talking point. As it is, some people already pay an insurance premium plus SS tax. ACA doesn't aim to change that. But if a person can qualify for subsidies under ACA, why have separate pots of money?

 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
6. "There is no penalty for being without health insurance"
Sun Sep 29, 2013, 12:30 PM
Sep 2013

Youre just totally fucked if you get sick. But, chances are that if youre in this bracket for financial reasons, youre totally used to it by now. Carry on.

bhikkhu

(10,725 posts)
8. If you're in that income category, you qualify for free medicaid
Sun Sep 29, 2013, 12:46 PM
Sep 2013

...which my family does, for the next couple of years. After that (kids moving out) we still qualify for subsidized coverage, which we can actually afford. Accidents or illness will still get us into co-pays or out-of-pocket limits, but its a whole lot better than the current unlimited liability that would probably lead to bankruptcy or the loss of our house.

I think, overall, the set-up is pretty fair and affordable. I started planning for the costs a couple of years ago. A co-worker (with no kids and a wife who works) will have to pay $200 a month for coverage, which he can't afford as they bought two nice cars recently on payments...

 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
10. Not in my state.
Sun Sep 29, 2013, 12:52 PM
Sep 2013

Im under 65 and have no kids. The only way for me to get medicaid is for the state to rule me disabled. Until that happens, I can either pay full price for a plan on the exchange, which would be almost $300 a month, or I can go without. Many of us are in this position. It sucks.

Im truly glad that it will help so many people. But without single payer, millions (especially poor people) will still go without.

bhikkhu

(10,725 posts)
11. Wow- just looked up the state policies on that
Sun Sep 29, 2013, 02:15 PM
Sep 2013

I'm in Oregon myself, so its hard for me to imagine a state (especially one with a democratic governor) banning the formation of a state exchange and sending back the funding, but that is what they did...

There is a federal-level exchange being set up for people in states where the local governments are blocking progress, but I don't see where that is operational yet to see the costs. Hopefully you'll have better options soon, though.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Kaiser Chart: The Requir...