General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew Air Force Planes Go Directly to 'Boneyard'
New cargo planes on order for the U.S. Air Force are being delivered straight into storage in the Arizona desert because the military has no use for them, a Dayton Daily News investigation found.
A dozen nearly new C-27J Spartans from Ohio and elsewhere have already been taken out of service and shipped to the so-called boneyard at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson. Five more are expected to be built by April 2014, all of which are headed to the boneyard unless another use for them is found.
The Air Force has spent $567 million on 21 C-27J aircraft since 2007, according to purchasing officials at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. Sixteen had been delivered by the end of September.
The Air Force almost had to buy more of the planes against its will, the newspaper found. A solicitation issued from Wright-Patterson in May sought vendors to build more C-27Js, citing Congressional language requiring the military to spend money budgeted for the planes, despite Pentagon protests.
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2013/10/07/new-air-force-planes-go-directly-to-boneyard.html?comp=700001075741&rank=4
Uncle Joe
(58,445 posts)Thanks for the thread, Ichingcarpenter.
TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)also use the "Boneyard" to store aircraft until they are needed. Perhaps the aircraft were ordered at a time when things were hot and heavy in Iraq or Afghanistan? You just never know when peace will break out and make your weapons and other military assets unneeded!
Silly old peace......
Buddha_of_Wisdom
(373 posts)and the real reason MIC needs to stop spending money on defense and sell the older planes in storage to third world countries with zero logisitics support....
coldmountain
(802 posts)The Coast Guard is looking to benefit from the Air Forces retirement of the C-27J Spartan transport aircraft.
Twenty-one of the aircraft were set to be decommissioned at the end of the fiscal year. The National Defense Authorization Act carved out seven for the Forest Service for firefighting activities.
That leaves 14 potentially available for the Coast Guard, said Vice Adm. John Currier, the services vice commandant, during a House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure hearing.
They would serve as search-and-rescue aircraft, along with the new HC-144A Ocean Sentry, built by EADS North America.
http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/archive/2013/August/Pages/SurplusC-27JSpartansCouldMeanBigWindfallforCoastGuard.aspx
neverforget
(9,437 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)But beyond the cost of a plane is the continued cost of crewing it, maintaining it, etc. for a mission that doesn't exist and for which there are no funds.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)Doncha know....
trof
(54,256 posts)Engines are assembled in Indianapolis.
Props come from Connecticut.
Glass cockpit is mostly an L-3 product, made in florida, arizona, california and michigan.
they cost $53 million each.
Owl
(3,644 posts)bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)Owl
(3,644 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)Would that happen to be John Boehner's Ohio?
The same John Boehner who has been popping up on my teevee and blubbering about wasteful Dem spending?
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)Brother Buzz
(36,478 posts)Airplanes and tanks, too:
Congress buys tanks Army doesn't want
Lima, Ohio, is home to only Abrams factory
4/29/2013
WASHINGTON Built to dominate the enemy in combat, the Armys hulking Abrams tank is proving equally hard to beat in a budget battle.
Lawmakers from both parties have devoted nearly a half-billion dollars in taxpayer money over the last two years to building improved versions of the 70-ton Abrams.
But senior Army officials have said repeatedly, No, thanks.
Its the inverse of the federal budget world these days, in which automatic spending cuts are leaving sought-after pet programs struggling or unpaid.
Yet in the case of the Abrams tank, theres a bipartisan push to spend an extra $436 million on a weapon the experts explicitly say is not needed.
<more>
Read more at http://www.toledoblade.com/Politics/2013/04/29/Congress-buys-tanks-Army-doesn-t-want.html#26ELEY3r7j5mow7e.99
Auggie
(31,204 posts)Brother Buzz
(36,478 posts)I just find it interesting both contracts benefit Ohio, Boehner's home state. Coincidence?
Auggie
(31,204 posts)is how that money could be used in Ohio to promote more constructive endeavors -- infrastructure repair, non-military manufacturing, alternate energies, etc.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)Brother Buzz
(36,478 posts)tammywammy
(26,582 posts)Your argument is why it's still in production though the Pentagon has vehemently said they don't want it. IMHO I think the Abrams will ultimately be obsolete with roll out of the GCV and JLTV.
Brother Buzz
(36,478 posts)My post was a jab at that idiot, W:
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)When I read what you said, I must have automatically adjusted the sentence.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)TransitJohn
(6,932 posts)Thanks.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)jmowreader
(50,566 posts)It's one that has at least one part built in each of our 435 congressional districts.
Strange thing about this plane: not only is it pretty much an Italian aircraft, it's also a baby C-130...the Air Force keeps screaming that they have enough C-130s thank you very much, so why the hell did Congress think buying these was a good idea?
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Yeah, yeah it is.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)we're becoming completely dysfunctional.
The wheels are coming off.
ThoughtCriminal
(14,049 posts)Meanwhile, there's a shortage of fire tankers:
http://www.denverpost.com/ci_23474790/national-shortage-large-air-tankers-constrains-firefighting-efforts
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Kennah
(14,337 posts)benld74
(9,911 posts)tsuki
(11,994 posts)uponit7771
(90,367 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)nt.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)using ONLY parts manufactured in the US,
not only would we have created MORE good paying jobs,
but the American People would have something useful to show for their money for DECADES instead of just sending it straight down the toilet.
It really isn't about The MONEY.
It IS about HOW it is spent (or thrown away).
NickB79
(19,274 posts)The West is gonna keep burning for years (decades?) to come as climate change dries out the forests and allows beetle populations to explode and kill trees.