Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riqster

(13,986 posts)
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 09:58 AM Oct 2013

Steubenville Rape Grand Jury indicts another scumbucket.

http://bluntandcranky.wordpress.com/2013/10/24/steubenville-rape-grand-jury-indicts-another-scumbucket/

Snips:
"This is why the grand jury was needed. Steubenville, as a town, tried its best to deny and cover up its predilection for sex crimes, and got busted due to the initial efforts of a blogger and a posse of hackers. Two of the perps thereafter got jailed, but those who engaged in the cover-up initially escaped punishment.

Today’s scumbucket rape-enabler is the 20-year old daughter of the school employee who was indicted recently. From the article:

Hannah Rhinaman, 20, was indicted on two counts of receiving stolen property and one count of grand theft, Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine said in a statement."


More at the link.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Steubenville Rape Grand Jury indicts another scumbucket. (Original Post) riqster Oct 2013 OP
Good, JimboBillyBubbaBob Oct 2013 #1
Sounds like she was indicted for charges that are unrelated to the rape. Sheldon Cooper Oct 2013 #2
The article stated that her charges were related to the rape, riqster Oct 2013 #3
I realize that she is not the rapist. Sheldon Cooper Oct 2013 #5
I meant the article referenced in the blog post. riqster Oct 2013 #6
good gopiscrap Oct 2013 #4

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
2. Sounds like she was indicted for charges that are unrelated to the rape.
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 10:13 AM
Oct 2013

Her father's been indicted for obstruction of justice in the case.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
3. The article stated that her charges were related to the rape,
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 10:23 AM
Oct 2013

Just not related to her father's. Keep in mind, the GJ is investigating possible cover-ups and actions/ inactions related to the rape: not saying that this woman or her father were rapists themselves.

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
5. I realize that she is not the rapist.
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 10:38 AM
Oct 2013

I don't agree that the article is as clear as you are saying it is.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
6. I meant the article referenced in the blog post.
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 11:54 AM
Oct 2013
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/10/23/21097355-steubenville-teen-rape-case-ohio-grand-jury-indicts-daughter-of-school-employee?lite. Here it is again.

"The charges occurred when she was an employee of Steubenville City Schools. However, the charges are separate and unrelated to the previous indictment issued against her father, William Rhinaman, on October 7"

It does NOT say unrelated to the rape, which is what you said. Just that their charges are not related to each other.

Both of these individuals were indicted by a grand jury empaneled to investigate other crimes committed in connection with the rape.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Steubenville Rape Grand J...