Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAlways and Everywhere: The New York Times and the Enduring “Threat” of Isolationism
from TomDispatch:
Always and Everywhere
The New York Times and the Enduring Threat of Isolationism
By Andrew J. Bacevich
The abiding defect of U.S. foreign policy? Its isolationism, my friend. Purporting to steer clear of war, isolationism fosters it. Isolationism impedes the spread of democracy. It inhibits trade and therefore prosperity. It allows evildoers to get away with murder. Isolationists prevent the United States from accomplishing its providentially assigned global mission. Wean the American people from their persistent inclination to look inward and who knows what wonders our leaders will accomplish.
The United States has been at war for well over a decade now, with U.S. attacks and excursions in distant lands having become as commonplace as floods and forest fires. Yet during the recent debate over Syria, the absence of popular enthusiasm for opening up another active front evoked expressions of concern in Washington that Americans were once more turning their backs on the world.
.....(snip).....
Reflecting on where isolationism leads, Jennifer Rubin, the reliably bellicose Washington Post columnist, was quick to chime in, denouncing those hesitant to initiate another war as infantile. American isolationists, she insisted, were giving a green light to aggression. Any nation that counted on the United States for protection had now become a sitting duck, with Eastern Europe (and) neighbors of Venezuela and Israel among those left exposed and vulnerable. News reports of Venezuelan troop movements threatening Brazil, Colombia, or Guyana were notably absent from the Post or any other media outlet, but no matter -- you get the idea.
.....(snip).....
Over at the New York Times, similar concerns, even if less hysterically expressed, prevailed. According to Times columnist Roger Cohen, President Obamas reluctance to pull the trigger showed that he had deferred to a growing isolationism. Bill Keller concurred. America is again in a deep isolationist mood. In a column entitled, Our New Isolationism, he decried the fears and defeatist slogans of knee-jerk isolationism that were impeding military action. (For Keller, the proper antidote to isolationism is amnesia. As he put it, Getting Syria right starts with getting over Iraq.)
.....(snip).....
Actually, Americans should beware those who conjure up phony warnings of a new isolationism to advance a particular agenda. The essence of that agenda, whatever the particulars and however packaged, is this: If the United States just tries a little bit harder -- one more intervention, one more shipment of arms to a beleaguered ally, one more line drawn in the sand -- we will finally turn the corner and the bright uplands of peace and freedom will come into view. .....................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175764/tomgram%3A_andrew_bacevich%2C_bashing_%22isolationists%22_while_at_war_in_the_world/#more
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 664 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Always and Everywhere: The New York Times and the Enduring “Threat” of Isolationism (Original Post)
marmar
Oct 2013
OP
bemildred
(90,061 posts)1. They like having an empire. That paying for it sucks for the public does not concern them. nt
jsr
(7,712 posts)2. Yeah. We need the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) more than ever.