Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTruthdig article about the healthcare.gov intro and the anti-leak culture at the WH
By Bill Boyarsky
President Barack Obamas pursuit of leakers recalls McCarthy era witch hunts, which paralyzed government with fear, turned bosses into mind-control cops and set colleagues against one another. Its not a stretch to wonder whether the same climate, discouraging dissent and independent thinking, is partially responsible for the troubled launch of Obamacare.
The extent of the leaker hunt was revealed June 20 in a story by Marisa Taylor and Jonathan S. Landay of the McClatchy Washington Bureau. They said the effort, the Insider Threat Program, has reached far beyond national security departments into most federal agencies nationwide, including the Peace Corps, the Social Security Administration, and the Education and Agriculture Departments. Social Security is a major component of the Health and Human Services Department, which runs the Affordable Care Act.
Government bosses are given wide latitude to search for leakers, the journalists wrote. Government documents reviewed by McClatchy illustrate how some agencies are using that latitude to pursue unauthorized disclosures of any information, not just classified material, Landay and Taylor disclosed. They also show how millions of federal employees and contractors must watch for high risk persons or behaviors among co-workers and could face penalties including criminal charges for failing to report them. Indications of suspicious behavior include stress, divorce and financial problems.
.....(snip).....
Without mentioning the infamous old senator, Ezra Klein of The Washington Post described an operation filled with workers afraid of getting in trouble, a McCarthyism symptom.
In a Wonkblog post, Klein and Evan Soltas wrote, The problem here isnt just technological. Its managerial. The White Houses senior staffup to and including the presidentwas blindsided. Staffers deep in the process knew that HealthCare.gov wasnt ready for primetime. But those frustrations were hidden from top-level managers. Somewhere along the chain the information was spun, softened, or just plain buried. In another post, they wrote, staff was terrified to speak on the record, or even on background. ... .....................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/is_obamas_take_on_mccarthyism_to_blame_for_obamacare_troubles_20131028
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 634 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Truthdig article about the healthcare.gov intro and the anti-leak culture at the WH (Original Post)
marmar
Oct 2013
OP
Mass
(27,315 posts)1. Not anti-leaks, controlled leaks rather.
I do not think there has been a white house giving as many unattributed sources when they felt like it, trial balloons or otherwise.
But it is also true that the talking points are sometimes Kafkaian and this has been the case for the rollout of ACA.
However, I am not sure that invoking McCarthy makes much sense in this context. It seems to me that most of this is more like a knee-jerk protection reaction, probably created by the out of proportion RW and media attacks.
marmar
(77,091 posts)2. "I am not sure that invoking McCarthy makes much sense in this context"
I agree. That's one reason I left the article's actual headline out of the subject line of the OP.