Wed Oct 30, 2013, 11:25 PM

Inevitable?

3 votes, 1 pass \| Time left: Unlimited
	As inevitable as last time.
	1 (33%)
	Even more inevitable than last time.
	2 (67%)
	All your votes are belong to her.
	0 (0%)
	1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

15 replies, 1197 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

15 replies	Author	Time	Post
Inevitable? (Original post)	MannyGoldstein	Oct 2013	OP
what?	gopiscrap	Oct 2013	#1
As inevitable as last time. I wouldn't be surprised if the 3rd-Way types don't already have someone	AnotherMcIntosh	Oct 2013	#2
It worked very well.	jsr	Oct 2013	#8
This one's not progressive enough for you? Okay, this one is hard core progressive we promise.	liberal_at_heart	Nov 2013	#15
I welcome our Hillary Supporter Overlords!	leftstreet	Oct 2013	#3
One of your best polls yet, Manny.	Cali_Democrat	Oct 2013	#4
Nope.	Rex	Oct 2013	#5
Manny, Manny, Manny.	William769	Oct 2013	#6
Indubitably	BKH70041	Oct 2013	#7
Other: "You will be assimilated."	KamaAina	Oct 2013	#9
You mad, bro?	MADem	Oct 2013	#10
Bu... Bu... But I can't.	MannyGoldstein	Oct 2013	#11
Don't look to me, look to Elizabeth Warren. She's told you how the world "really" works as far as	MADem	Nov 2013	#12
Whoever it is, it will be more of the same. nt	Demo_Chris	Nov 2013	#13
Maybe not ....	Samantha	Nov 2013	#14

Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)

Thu Oct 31, 2013, 12:12 AM

gopiscrap (22,871 posts)

1. what?

Reply to this post

Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)

Thu Oct 31, 2013, 12:15 AM

AnotherMcIntosh (11,064 posts)

2. As inevitable as last time. I wouldn't be surprised if the 3rd-Way types don't already have someone

in the wings to play the here's-the-alternative-to-HRC-empty-suit-who-sounds-like-a-good-candidate. It worked last time.

Reply to this post

Response to AnotherMcIntosh (Reply #2)

Thu Oct 31, 2013, 02:36 PM

jsr (7,712 posts)

8. It worked very well.

Reply to this post

Response to AnotherMcIntosh (Reply #2)

Fri Nov 1, 2013, 01:37 AM

liberal_at_heart (12,081 posts)

15. This one's not progressive enough for you? Okay, this one is hard core progressive we promise.

wink, wink, nudge, nudge.

Reply to this post

Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)

Thu Oct 31, 2013, 12:27 AM

leftstreet (34,851 posts)

3. I welcome our Hillary Supporter Overlords!

Reply to this post

Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)

Thu Oct 31, 2013, 02:27 PM

Cali_Democrat (30,439 posts)

4. One of your best polls yet, Manny.

Reply to this post

Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)

Thu Oct 31, 2013, 02:30 PM

Rex (65,616 posts)

5. Nope.

The future is unknown.

Reply to this post

Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)

Thu Oct 31, 2013, 02:34 PM

William769 (52,908 posts)

6. Manny, Manny, Manny.

Reply to this post

Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)

Thu Oct 31, 2013, 02:36 PM

BKH70041 (961 posts)

7. Indubitably

Reply to this post

Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)

Thu Oct 31, 2013, 02:38 PM

KamaAina (78,249 posts)

9. Other: "You will be assimilated."

Reply to this post

Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)

Thu Oct 31, 2013, 11:46 PM

MADem (135,425 posts)

10. You mad, bro?

Sure seems that way, between this post and the one with this diatribe contained within:

MannyGoldstein (23,626 posts)

Elizabeth Warren is *Ready For Hillary* - Are YOU?

Last edited Fri Nov 1, 2013, 12:17 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Dear Friends and Liberals:

Yesterday, Elizabeth Warren gave her full backing to Hillary's ascension America's helm, stating that... well, she didn't actually state anything, but someone knows someone who said they saw a secret letter that Barbara Boxer wrote suggesting to Hillary that she run and said that Sen. Warren's signature was on it, too. So Sen. Warren's endorsement are indisputably belong to Hillary, as we politically-savvy types know.

And this full-throated endorsement makes total sense: Warren and Hillary have very the same interests at the top of their lists: income inequality, banks, free trade, and war. And while their opinions on each of these might be totally different, they are certainly interested in the same topics. No doubt about it.

In preparation for her historic endorsement of Hillary-is-45, Warren firmly ruled out a presidential run of her own a few weeks ago, saying she's "not interested". Of course, President Obama also said the same thing right before he threw his hat in the ring, but - and I mean no disrespect here - while Obama plays amazing 11ty-dimensional chess even while asleep, Warren ain't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. She's just not smart enough to change her mind. Even the press is complaining that she "asks the most obvious question ever". The good people of Massachusetts certainly were gracious in showing charity towards that woman, and I admire that. Look at the wonderful way they are accepting of that silly baseball team with the dumb beards! Very charitable people, those Mass moonbats, but the rest of Americans want results, not charity.

In any case, it is settled. Warren's not running and her full support is behind Hillary.

She's ready!

Now, how about you? You ready to play with the in crowd? Or will you be Left Behind?

It's time to choose.

Best regards,

Moderate-Democrat Manny
Now! 50% less confrontational!

You're just going to have to get over it...Elizabeth Warren has made her decision, and she doesn't want to run. You'll just have to accept that and ....er.... MOVE ON, as it were....instead of engaging in repeated fits of pique. It's unseemly.

Reply to this post

Response to MADem (Reply #10)

Thu Oct 31, 2013, 11:56 PM

MannyGoldstein (34,589 posts)

11. Bu... Bu... But I can't.

I just can't.

It's just not fair.

I guess I should be thankful for people like you who know how the world *really* works... but I'm so damned sad...

Reply to this post

Response to MannyGoldstein (Reply #11)

Fri Nov 1, 2013, 12:01 AM

MADem (135,425 posts)

12. Don't look to me, look to Elizabeth Warren. She's told you how the world "really" works as far as

she is concerned when it comes to the Presidency. Several times, too.

So dry your eyes, buck up like a big kid, and ... move on. Smartly.

Divisiveness doesn't earn you any points--all the Democratic women in the Senate could tell you that.

Reply to this post

Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)

Fri Nov 1, 2013, 12:58 AM

Demo_Chris (6,234 posts)

13. Whoever it is, it will be more of the same. nt

Reply to this post

Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)

Fri Nov 1, 2013, 01:09 AM

Samantha (9,314 posts)

14. Maybe not ....

I agree with Budowsky, but there seems to be more than one group publicly saying this:

http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/brent-budowsky/176329-al-gore-for-president

I would absolutely run to the polling station to vote for Al Gore for President in 2016.

Sam

Reply to this post

General Discussion (Forum)