Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
Fri Nov 1, 2013, 11:26 AM Nov 2013

Ever-shifting rationales for an unchanging policy

Bill Gross is at it again, coming up with yet another reason for the Fed to tighten despite a still-depressed economy and inflation falling well below target. He is, of course, not alone — it has actually been amazing how wide a variety of reasons people in or close to the financial industry have come up for tight money in an economy that seems to need to opposite. Many of the people making these arguments started with dire warnings about runaway inflation; but when inflation failed to materialize, they didn’t change their policy views, they came up with new rationales for doing exactly the same thing.

This kind of behavior — ever-shifting rationales for an unchanging policy (see: Bush tax cuts, invasion of Iraq, etc.) — is a “tell”. It says that something else is really motivating the policy advocacy. So what is going on here? When I read Gross and others, what I think is lurking underneath is a belief that capitalists are entitled to good returns on their capital, even if it’s just parked in safe assets. It’s about defending the privileges of the rentiers, who are assumed to be central to everything; the specific stories are just attempts to rationalize the unchanging goal.

The thing to realize here, then, is that nothing about our current situation says that rentiers are entitled to their rent. And it’s a perversion of alleged free-market thinking to suggest otherwise.

Bear in mind where we are, economically: we are still in a liquidity trap, and we are very much in a paradox of thrift world, where hoarding — not spending — is a positive social evil...

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/10/30/rentiers-entitlement-and-monetary-policy/

http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/2013/10/29/bill-gross-capitalism-needs-carry/


2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ever-shifting rationales for an unchanging policy (Original Post) cthulu2016 Nov 2013 OP
Completely true to form. The vexing piece is why folks who should know better keep taking these TheKentuckian Nov 2013 #1
. cthulu2016 Nov 2013 #2

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
1. Completely true to form. The vexing piece is why folks who should know better keep taking these
Fri Nov 1, 2013, 11:42 AM
Nov 2013

economic ideologues seriously and pretend obvious bullshit has substantial merit if they are not actually in on the game too.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ever-shifting rationales ...