Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThese Stunning Maps Prove Just How Much the Rich Control U.S. Politics
Earlier this month, Republican donor Shaun McCutcheon argued at the U.S. Supreme Court that his First Amendment rights are being violated by current limits on the total amount of money he can contribute to federal candidates. McCutcheon and the Republican National Committee claim that the Federal Election Commission's $48,600 limit on individual campaign contributions hinders wealthy citizens' right to support as many groups or candidates as they would like. But a new campaign finance study by the Sunlight Foundation and Azavea, a Philadelphia-based geospatial analysis firm, debunks this argument.
http://assets.sunlightfoundation.com.s3.amazonaws.com/blog/azavea_maps/total.html
http://assets.sunlightfoundation.com.s3.amazonaws.com/blog/azavea_maps/pop.html
The first map above show total political campaign contributions by county, and the second shows per-capita contributions by county. This location-based analysis reveals that in several small counties, a handful of wealthy residents have an oversized political influence.
For example, individual contributions from the sparsely populated Sublette County in western Wyoming, which include donations from TD Ameritrade CEO and billionaire Joe Ricketts, amounted to about $12.8 million in 2012, or an incredible $1,234 per person. In Billings County, North Dakota, which has a population of only 905 people, political giving amounted to $55.23 per person. In comparison, contributions from Cook County, Illinois (where Chicago is located) totaled $102 million, but with a population of 5.2 million, that amounts to only $19.45 per person.
What does it mean that big donations from small counties have more weight than contributions from more populous regions? Big donors in sparsely populated counties are able to exert a disproportionate degree of political influence.
http://assets.sunlightfoundation.com.s3.amazonaws.com/blog/azavea_maps/total.html
http://assets.sunlightfoundation.com.s3.amazonaws.com/blog/azavea_maps/pop.html
The first map above show total political campaign contributions by county, and the second shows per-capita contributions by county. This location-based analysis reveals that in several small counties, a handful of wealthy residents have an oversized political influence.
For example, individual contributions from the sparsely populated Sublette County in western Wyoming, which include donations from TD Ameritrade CEO and billionaire Joe Ricketts, amounted to about $12.8 million in 2012, or an incredible $1,234 per person. In Billings County, North Dakota, which has a population of only 905 people, political giving amounted to $55.23 per person. In comparison, contributions from Cook County, Illinois (where Chicago is located) totaled $102 million, but with a population of 5.2 million, that amounts to only $19.45 per person.
What does it mean that big donations from small counties have more weight than contributions from more populous regions? Big donors in sparsely populated counties are able to exert a disproportionate degree of political influence.
THE REST:
http://www.policymic.com/articles/70811/these-stunning-maps-prove-just-how-much-the-rich-control-u-s-politics
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1384 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
These Stunning Maps Prove Just How Much the Rich Control U.S. Politics (Original Post)
Triana
Nov 2013
OP
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)1. .
.
gopiscrap
(23,760 posts)2. wow those are excellent maps
Triana
(22,666 posts)3. Yea they're interactive, so I couldn't post the images here.
But as you found out, clicking on the links, you can see all the data!
MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)4. K&R
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)5. It's interesting that most of the money come from liberal blue regions
like LA and New York. The rich obviously love a liberal vibe.
JimboBillyBubbaBob
(1,389 posts)6. Interesting...
...maps!
2naSalit
(86,607 posts)7. Good info, THANKS!! nt
ChazII
(6,204 posts)8. At least Pima
a strong blue country contributes more than Maricopa which is red.