Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 10:27 PM Nov 2013

These Stunning Maps Prove Just How Much the Rich Control U.S. Politics

Earlier this month, Republican donor Shaun McCutcheon argued at the U.S. Supreme Court that his First Amendment rights are being violated by current limits on the total amount of money he can contribute to federal candidates. McCutcheon and the Republican National Committee claim that the Federal Election Commission's $48,600 limit on individual campaign contributions hinders wealthy citizens' right to support as many groups or candidates as they would like. But a new campaign finance study by the Sunlight Foundation and Azavea, a Philadelphia-based geospatial analysis firm, debunks this argument.

http://assets.sunlightfoundation.com.s3.amazonaws.com/blog/azavea_maps/total.html

http://assets.sunlightfoundation.com.s3.amazonaws.com/blog/azavea_maps/pop.html

The first map above show total political campaign contributions by county, and the second shows per-capita contributions by county. This location-based analysis reveals that in several small counties, a handful of wealthy residents have an oversized political influence.

For example, individual contributions from the sparsely populated Sublette County in western Wyoming, which include donations from TD Ameritrade CEO and billionaire Joe Ricketts, amounted to about $12.8 million in 2012, or an incredible $1,234 per person. In Billings County, North Dakota, which has a population of only 905 people, political giving amounted to $55.23 per person. In comparison, contributions from Cook County, Illinois (where Chicago is located) totaled $102 million, but with a population of 5.2 million, that amounts to only $19.45 per person.

What does it mean that big donations from small counties have more “weight” than contributions from more populous regions? Big donors in sparsely populated counties are able to exert a disproportionate degree of political influence.


THE REST:

http://www.policymic.com/articles/70811/these-stunning-maps-prove-just-how-much-the-rich-control-u-s-politics
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
These Stunning Maps Prove Just How Much the Rich Control U.S. Politics (Original Post) Triana Nov 2013 OP
. blkmusclmachine Nov 2013 #1
wow those are excellent maps gopiscrap Nov 2013 #2
Yea they're interactive, so I couldn't post the images here. Triana Nov 2013 #3
K&R MichiganVote Nov 2013 #4
It's interesting that most of the money come from liberal blue regions adirondacker Nov 2013 #5
Interesting... JimboBillyBubbaBob Nov 2013 #6
Good info, THANKS!! nt 2naSalit Nov 2013 #7
At least Pima ChazII Nov 2013 #8
 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
3. Yea they're interactive, so I couldn't post the images here.
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 10:31 PM
Nov 2013

But as you found out, clicking on the links, you can see all the data!

adirondacker

(2,921 posts)
5. It's interesting that most of the money come from liberal blue regions
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 11:02 PM
Nov 2013

like LA and New York. The rich obviously love a liberal vibe.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»These Stunning Maps Prove...