Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 11:45 PM Nov 2013

I'd like to congratulate the Democratic Establishment on tonight's victory in NJ

Well, given that Christie was endorsed by dozens of prominent "Democrats", and that President Obama wouldn't endorse the Democratic candidate, I'm assuming that this was the result the "Democratic" Establishment wanted.

Well played!


94 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'd like to congratulate the Democratic Establishment on tonight's victory in NJ (Original Post) MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 OP
+ 100000000000000000000 russspeakeasy Nov 2013 #1
can you tell me who those prominent Democrats are, or give me a link? lostincalifornia Nov 2013 #2
Added to the OP. nt MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #5
Thanks Manny lostincalifornia Nov 2013 #7
amen DonCoquixote Nov 2013 #3
It's so disgusting. Arugula Latte Nov 2013 #4
yep. CC's viewpoints and policies go in direct assault of NJ's majority. So, it's sickening to see Divine Discontent Nov 2013 #8
And Buono, the Democrat, received no help from the DNC, who stated their reasons as 'it wouldn't sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #56
There's something to be said for maintaining party infrastructure JHB Nov 2013 #75
There's also something to be said for having consistent principles and fighting for them. sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #86
A sort of related question: What can the left do about the "lesser of evils" situations rhett o rick Nov 2013 #88
Yep... WillyT Nov 2013 #6
Who the Hell endorses a bully like Christie? Kelvin Mace Nov 2013 #9
Question ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2013 #10
This is a trick question, right? MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #11
Resources ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2013 #13
How much does an endorsement cost? MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #16
Very little ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2013 #20
Integrity. MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #21
okay n/t 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2013 #22
Remember Dr. Dean's losing 50-State Strategy? MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #23
Okay n/t 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2013 #27
+1! -nt CrispyQ Nov 2013 #85
Obama has LOST political capital with this New Jerseyan by not standing up for Buono. Jim Lane Nov 2013 #68
I can understand ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2013 #81
You've correctly summarized Obama's and the Democratic Party's strategy during his first term. Jim Lane Nov 2013 #83
I understand where you're coming from ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2013 #89
What the fuck does that have to do with the OP? n/t Moses2SandyKoufax Nov 2013 #12
A lot. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2013 #14
I would prefer both. How about you? sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #57
Yes ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2013 #77
I don't agree with you at all. Buono btw, isn't the only Dem who could have run but too bad Dems sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #87
That cant be a serious question. Those arent the only two choices. nm rhett o rick Nov 2013 #65
Yes ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2013 #79
Strategic politics by National DEMs? Use Christi as a self-driving wedge to split right-center GOPs SDjack Nov 2013 #15
More 11ty-dimensional chess? MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #17
Yep, Moses2SandyKoufax Nov 2013 #19
Christie winning with such a large margin is also useful if he wants to go further Chathamization Nov 2013 #61
The economy is 100 times better than on Jan 20, 2009 scheming daemons Nov 2013 #94
I think you are correct n/t 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2013 #82
Oh Manny, you'd never succeed politically. joshcryer Nov 2013 #18
if what politics is what it is today who the hell would want to be in it? You lose your soul. liberal_at_heart Nov 2013 #24
when was it better ? JI7 Nov 2013 #25
Congressional approval ratings have never been lower and although democrats fare better than liberal_at_heart Nov 2013 #29
It takes a special type. joshcryer Nov 2013 #28
Are you insinuating that Senator Warren sold out? MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #32
Nope. joshcryer Nov 2013 #33
Then what was the purpose of that picture? nt MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #42
I just hope she is stronger than Obama. Obama looked like a liberal until he started listening to liberal_at_heart Nov 2013 #36
Obama never looked like a liberal. joshcryer Nov 2013 #39
Obama is the same as he has always been, in 2004, in 2008 as candidate JI7 Nov 2013 #52
And your credentials are??? Logical Nov 2013 #26
Armchair political observer. joshcryer Nov 2013 #31
I know this is a backhanded slap from you, Manny RobertEarl Nov 2013 #30
They both share mutual friends on Wall Street n/t Oilwellian Nov 2013 #38
I seen them hookers on Wall Street RobertEarl Nov 2013 #54
Under Dean, Democrats won the House, the Senate, and the Presidency MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #45
See? They went too far. RobertEarl Nov 2013 #50
You're giving Howard Dean credit for Obama winning the White House? geek tragedy Nov 2013 #59
I'd rather thank them for taking an actually WINNABLE seat in Virginia Pretzel_Warrior Nov 2013 #34
"Manny world" MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #40
here's an interesting read for you Pretzel_Warrior Nov 2013 #44
Yes, and... ? MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #46
it was over before it began. nothing to gain politically for ANYONE to endorse her Pretzel_Warrior Nov 2013 #49
What did you think of Dr. Dean's 50-State Strategy? MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #51
I thought it was the key to victory in 2006 and 2008. Pretzel_Warrior Nov 2013 #53
Would Dr. Dean have endorsed Christie? MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #55
You're joking, right? scheming daemons Nov 2013 #92
That's rich coming from you... The way you constantly bash many Democrats scheming daemons Nov 2013 #91
"Manny World"!... SidDithers Nov 2013 #72
Buono calls out Democratic political bosses Oilwellian Nov 2013 #35
She's right... TeeYiYi Nov 2013 #47
So, wtf? Dems went to the polls and voted for Christie?... TeeYiYi Nov 2013 #37
Obama didn't endorse the Democratic candidate? How is that possible? n/t Smarmie Doofus Nov 2013 #41
Christie touts 50th Democratic endorsement Oilwellian Nov 2013 #43
Thanks. But I can't find an answer to my question in the link. Smarmie Doofus Nov 2013 #74
HUGE K & R !!! WillyT Nov 2013 #48
So you're blaming the national party for what 50 local NJ Democrats did? geek tragedy Nov 2013 #58
No. Phlem Nov 2013 #62
The NJ Democrats went rogue? MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #63
And I thought only Teabaggers geek tragedy Nov 2013 #64
Please, do enlighten us Oilwellian Nov 2013 #67
You can't stand Obama, and you consider him a negative... Yet you are upset he didn't endorse? scheming daemons Nov 2013 #93
Manny your killing me! Phlem Nov 2013 #60
Scumsucking centrist traitors. Reagan "Democrats" sell us out again. nt Zorra Nov 2013 #66
Nothing surprises me anymore. nt DLevine Nov 2013 #69
Aww relax RandiFan1290 Nov 2013 #70
... SidDithers Nov 2013 #71
! xchrom Nov 2013 #73
Color me, unsurprised. 99Forever Nov 2013 #76
And Democrats don't come much more prominent than the Mayor of Palmyra (nt) Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #78
Some one knows very little about NJ politics. JoePhilly Nov 2013 #80
They'll be writing a new book "What's The Matter With New Jersey?" B Calm Nov 2013 #84
It's the lefty liberal bases fault! boston bean Nov 2013 #90

lostincalifornia

(3,639 posts)
2. can you tell me who those prominent Democrats are, or give me a link?
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 11:47 PM
Nov 2013

Not trying to be argumentative, but if I am going to write letters to the DNC I need hard facts

Divine Discontent

(21,056 posts)
8. yep. CC's viewpoints and policies go in direct assault of NJ's majority. So, it's sickening to see
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 11:50 PM
Nov 2013

him win by 18% or whatever he ends up with.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
56. And Buono, the Democrat, received no help from the DNC, who stated their reasons as 'it wouldn't
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 12:49 AM
Nov 2013

been practical to spend money against a popular candidate like Christie when it would be better spent somewhere else'. So not worth the effort to try to defeat a Repub.

But I bet they poured money into the Virginia race where apparently the Dem was having a hard time defeating the TBer. And see, when you pour money into a race, it WORKS.

So what is to be concluded from all of this??

THAT is the question!

JHB

(37,159 posts)
75. There's something to be said for maintaining party infrastructure
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 08:18 AM
Nov 2013

Devoting the resources even in races that look hopeless just to maintain your ability to get people out there, make personal contact, and get out the vote.

But the people who make decisions like this are in a world of political consultants who earn their money off of TV ad buys. "Boots/shoes/sneakers on the ground" takes money away from things that puts money in their pockets.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
86. There's also something to be said for having consistent principles and fighting for them.
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 02:10 PM
Nov 2013

Here's what I think, we should get rid of all the political consultants, operatives, think tanks and anyone whose interest is MONEY.

I have come to despise the 'political class' to the point now that if I see a candidate who is pushed on the public by obvious operatives, and it's not hard to tell who they are, they are of no interest to me.

Two of the governors who won yesterday, belong in that class. One has D the other an R after their names, one barely squeaked by with the help of the Money People, the R by getting 30% of the Dem vote.

There is far, far too much interference with our electoral system and that is why such a small % of Americans vote at all. I am beginning to understand it.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
88. A sort of related question: What can the left do about the "lesser of evils" situations
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 03:27 PM
Nov 2013

we always find ourselves in?

I posted this in the Progressives Group. http://www.democraticunderground.com/1269141

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
9. Who the Hell endorses a bully like Christie?
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 11:51 PM
Nov 2013

Once again, I like to point out that Democrat doesn't mean "liberal", no matter what Fox News claims.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
10. Question ...
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 11:52 PM
Nov 2013

Would you prefer a Democratic governor, now; or a Democratic House in 2014 and 2016, along with a Democratic President?

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
13. Resources ...
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 11:57 PM
Nov 2013

money spent on Buono (no matter how much we would like her as Governor) is money unavailable for 2014 races.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
20. Very little ...
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 12:07 AM
Nov 2013

in terms of money ... But then, isn't the question, really ... How much does an endorsement really count; but further, how much does an endorsement of a losing candidate cost in terms of resources (i.e., political capital)?

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
23. Remember Dr. Dean's losing 50-State Strategy?
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 12:20 AM
Nov 2013

Me neither.

We fight for what's right, we win.

We cower and triangulate, we lose.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
68. Obama has LOST political capital with this New Jerseyan by not standing up for Buono.
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 07:09 AM
Nov 2013

I agree with you that political capital is important. Obama erred early in his presidency by giving away too much to the Republicans. In those instances, as in this one, he lost political capital by creating the perception that he could be pushed around.

This fall's shutdown/debt ceiling fight marked a very welcome change. Obama finally showed he'd had enough. He basically told the Republicans to fuck off. He confronted them head-on, he beat them, and he's more powerful as a result. I hope we see him keep fighting that way for the rest of his term.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
81. I can understand ...
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 08:45 AM
Nov 2013

but I would hazard to guess (based on having tracked the favorability/unfavorability and Obstructionist/Compromising polling through the shut-down) the political capital that he was losing with Democratic partisans, he was gaining with the independent and "semi-sane" republicans that Democrats need to win back the House in 2014 because of the 2010 gerrymandering.

IOW, I think this is a lesson in "When GOTV isn't enough."

I think the political calculus for winning the House in 2014 was/is/has been whether to attempt to grow Democratic support in those mostly white, mostly male, +6-10 (republican) districts (a very expensive endeavor); or to dissuade/split up the non-base vote in those districts (much less expensive).

Now ... I suspect that (and will be proven correct when/if) the Democratic party fields and spends heavy in support of "moderate" Democratic candidates (that have a shot to win those districts) in 2014 ... Likewise, the Democratic Party will spend heavy in House districts with vulnerable Democrats.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
83. You've correctly summarized Obama's and the Democratic Party's strategy during his first term.
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 09:03 AM
Nov 2013

My objection to that strategy is that it was tried and found wanting. Obama began his term by trying to appear reasonable and to appeal to those "semi-sane" Republicans you mention. This approach, however, meant that he wasn't giving his supporters enough reason to come out and vote Democratic. The falloff in turnout meant that we lost big in 2010. (Yes, those people should have voted anyway, but both major parties have some supporters who aren't very politically oriented and whose appearance at the polls can't be assumed.)

So I have more faith than you do in the GOTV strategy. One can't imagine Obama saying, as FDR did of his right-wing opponents, "I welcome their hatred," but if he had more of that spirit we'd have better electoral results.

For 2014, I would love to see Obama deploy his considerable political skills in a concerted effort to lambaste the Republican obstructionists in Congress. Even the so-called "moderates" in the GOP were complicit in the shutdown and in all other crap that Obama's had to put up with, and they should be called on it. They're all extortionists and he should use that word about them. If that alienates a few "semi-sane" Republicans, so be it -- the gains in turnout on our side would more than offset those losses.

Give 'em hell, Barack!

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
89. I understand where you're coming from ...
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 10:44 PM
Nov 2013

though I disagree on couple of points.

First, I think the first 2 years of President Obama's 1st term was his honest belief that the gop would play by the long established rules and, at least, put forward the appearance of wanting to govern. He learned this was not to be in 2010, when it became clear if he said "up" the modern gop would say "down."

I think where we really disagree is the the reason people stayed home in 2010. The demographics of those that stayed home were the young (and change hopeful); the independants that were tired of the lack of progress and a segment of progressives that wanted to see change, yesterday.

The reality of the political environment had it that there was nothing that President Obama could have offered this cohort, in the face of the modern gop's obstruction ... they wanted to see results ... movement ... It was then, he shifted to the appearance of reasonableness, with the expectation they would continue in their obstruction ... and he was correct.

It was then, President Obama (and his team) charted a different path ... his repeated offering up what the modern gop asked for (along with his "increased revenue" demand) that the poll numbers started working in his (Democrats) favor, despite the media's "It's both party's fault" claims. Democrats may have wanted to hear the FDR quote (though many would have waved it off as "just another pretty speech&quot ; but that was NOT want the American electorate wanted to hear. They/we were not ready to hear it. They/we only were prepared to hear something approaching that when the shut-down and debt ceiling thing hit.

Further, I disagree that there were the resources to flip a gerrymandered +6-8 gop district to Democratic, without first getting a critical mass of the public to see the modern gop for what they ... the Democratic votes just aren't there. The only way to pull the flip would be to get a whole bunch of republicans and republican leaning independants to stay home or vote 3rd party.


sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
57. I would prefer both. How about you?
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 12:51 AM
Nov 2013

Oh, and btw, how would a Dem winning in NJ prevent a Democratic House in 2014 and 2016? Maybe it's me, but I'm trouble seeing the reasoning here.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
77. Yes ...
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 08:18 AM
Nov 2013

I would prefer both; but Resources, i.e., money and political capital spent on Buono (no matter how much we would like her as Governor) is money unavailable for 2014 races.

And a christie governorship going into 2016 allows for a 2 1/2 year micro-screening of christie and denies him 2 1/2 years for him to scrub the memory of his governorship. He has stuff in his governing past and will no doubt provide more.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
87. I don't agree with you at all. Buono btw, isn't the only Dem who could have run but too bad Dems
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 02:16 PM
Nov 2013

signaled their approval of the Republican giving him 30% of the Dem vote that should have gone to the Democrat. And now people are DEFENDING supporting a Republican???

No wonder half the country doesn't vote. Did you know that the average person doesn't view elections as 'games' to be calculated based on political 'wins' and 'losses'???

This is why I am for eliminating from the electoral system ALL political operatives, think tanks, calculators, and anyone else whose mind isn't totally focused on what is good for the PEOPLE.

These are NOT horse races to decide who in the top 1% can throw the most money at the candidate of their choice. But since it appears that now there are actually people who view our system that way, we have people agreeing with it.

Take all the horse race bettors out of the system, ALL the money, and see what happens. Maybe the half of the country that isn't voting might just do so and the people's will, not the money men, might just begin to prevail.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
79. Yes ...
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 08:21 AM
Nov 2013

it was a serious question. And while true, that those aren't the only choices, it IS one of the questions to be considered, as resources are limited and important.

SDjack

(1,448 posts)
15. Strategic politics by National DEMs? Use Christi as a self-driving wedge to split right-center GOPs
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 11:59 PM
Nov 2013

and Tea Party in the campaigns for 2016 candidates. Watching Christi working over the passengers in the clown car will be fun -- provided, of course, after he accomplishes that task, he self destructs. Very demanding work. Maybe Gov. Christi will resign a la Palin and focus on presidential campaign.

Moses2SandyKoufax

(1,290 posts)
19. Yep,
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 12:06 AM
Nov 2013

the same stuff that will allow Chris Christie to portray himself as a moderate in a field of tea partiers when the 2016 primaries get underway.

The Democrats are really playing with fire on this one.

Chathamization

(1,638 posts)
61. Christie winning with such a large margin is also useful if he wants to go further
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 01:05 AM
Nov 2013

Though honestly, I think in the next few years a lot of that Sandy glow is going to wear off, and the national stage has ground up plenty of media darlings who are comfortable with local politicians.

As for Buono - it looks like Dems were giving up this race before she was even the nominee. The Democratic primary apparently consisted of only two candidates - her and "an aide to the East Orange mayor," the latter of whom managed to get a whopping 12% of the vote.

 

scheming daemons

(25,487 posts)
94. The economy is 100 times better than on Jan 20, 2009
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 11:06 PM
Nov 2013

Despite GOP intransigence.

Which you aid every time you attack him.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
24. if what politics is what it is today who the hell would want to be in it? You lose your soul.
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 12:20 AM
Nov 2013

There's a reason Congress and even the President have such low popularity numbers right now.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
29. Congressional approval ratings have never been lower and although democrats fare better than
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 12:24 AM
Nov 2013

republicans the democrats numbers are in the toilet right now too.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
36. I just hope she is stronger than Obama. Obama looked like a liberal until he started listening to
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 12:26 AM
Nov 2013

all those DC insiders, corporate lobbyists, and started compromising with republicans. No more compromising. Reaganomics is destroying this country. We need somebody with enough guts to change it.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
30. I know this is a backhanded slap from you, Manny
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 12:24 AM
Nov 2013

But I don't think you realize the national party is pretty damn useless.

If they weren't useless they'd get progressives elected. Good thing they got rid of Dean, eh? Man, that guy knew how to run a party.

Besides, Obama likes Christy. Christy is the only republican Evah! to hold Obama's hand. So let Obama have his love's nest with that Rpublican. Remember, politics makes for strange bedfellows and this one sure is strange!

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
54. I seen them hookers on Wall Street
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 12:45 AM
Nov 2013

They do make a fella swoon, eh? All that bling, and the sweet promises of a really good job once you get out of whoring for them in office.

Heard they tried to Tbag Dean. He said no, and that sealed his fate.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
45. Under Dean, Democrats won the House, the Senate, and the Presidency
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 12:34 AM
Nov 2013

Wouldn't it suck if that happened again?

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
50. See? They went too far.
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 12:41 AM
Nov 2013

They had all that responsibility then. These days they don't have to work hard, because they can just cry and claim they got Tbagged, as it all goes to hell.

They be the politicians, and Dean actually made them strong. We all know, strong is what republicans do so we can't do that. Heck, just read a DUer saying that the new Virginia gov. has to be weak, so he can lead. Now that's the spirit.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
59. You're giving Howard Dean credit for Obama winning the White House?
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 01:00 AM
Nov 2013

The real person who gets credit for 2006 is George W Bush.

 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
34. I'd rather thank them for taking an actually WINNABLE seat in Virginia
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 12:25 AM
Nov 2013

but of course, you see a glass half empty and then throw stones at it and say it was the Dems who broke the glass.


Pretty typical Manny world stuff.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
40. "Manny world"
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 12:28 AM
Nov 2013

Where Democrats endorse Democrats.

Crazy, huh?

"You may say I'm a dreamer... but I'm not the only one..."

 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
49. it was over before it began. nothing to gain politically for ANYONE to endorse her
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 12:40 AM
Nov 2013

you do realize this IS politics, right?

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
51. What did you think of Dr. Dean's 50-State Strategy?
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 12:42 AM
Nov 2013

In case you've forgotten who he is, he's the guy wedged between the bus's tail pipe and wheel well.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
55. Would Dr. Dean have endorsed Christie?
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 12:45 AM
Nov 2013

Or refused to endorse his opponent?

Has any DNC chair had even remotely as winning a record as Dr. Dean?

 

scheming daemons

(25,487 posts)
92. You're joking, right?
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 10:58 PM
Nov 2013

The 50 state strategy was about drafting candidates that could win local races based on their political profile. This included many blue dogs that you loathe.

It also included prioritizing money to the places where it could do most good.

Which is why Dr. Dean wouldn't have sent a dime to Buono's campaign.... How do I know this? Because his PAC sent money to McAuliffe and not Buono.


Your bastardized version of the 50 state strategy in your head has no resemblance to the actual one brilliantly done by Howard Dean.

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
35. Buono calls out Democratic political bosses
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 12:25 AM
Nov 2013
http://videos.nj.com/star-ledger/2013/11/spirited_barbara_buono_concede.html

It sickens me to see the Third Way manipulate one of the bluest states in the nation and encourage Democrats to vote for this grotesque Repuke. I thought New Jersey voters were more savvy.
 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
74. Thanks. But I can't find an answer to my question in the link.
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 08:18 AM
Nov 2013

Help me: did President Obama endorse Buono, endorse Christie, or make no endorsement?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
58. So you're blaming the national party for what 50 local NJ Democrats did?
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 12:58 AM
Nov 2013

Ted Cruz-type logic: The only reason Christie won was national Democrats didn't fight hard enough.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
63. The NJ Democrats went rogue?
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 01:07 AM
Nov 2013

Perhaps they misunderstood Obama's refusal to endorse Buono? Perhaps I'm misunderstanding it, too?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
64. And I thought only Teabaggers
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 01:17 AM
Nov 2013

blamed every bad thing on Obama.

But then I learned there are crazy leftwingers who literally believe that economic improvement is impossible until we get rid of Obama.

And who blame local politics on him.

So, we all have our misunderstandings.

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
67. Please, do enlighten us
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 02:29 AM
Nov 2013

Where can one find Obama's endorsement of Buono on the internets? Thanks in advance!

 

scheming daemons

(25,487 posts)
93. You can't stand Obama, and you consider him a negative... Yet you are upset he didn't endorse?
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 11:05 PM
Nov 2013


Bottom line is that it is bad politically for a President to endorse a lost cause.

He didn't endorse Christie. He didn't endorse anyone. It was a race that was only going to go one way, so it would have been politically stupid for him to step into it.

You're smart enough to know that.... Which makes you even more disingenuous.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
60. Manny your killing me!
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 01:04 AM
Nov 2013

I don't know WTF. Is there something in the water?? I hope it's just an isolated incident.

Seriously! Is there an air born toxin? Do brain cell's fire in reverse?...

Next on the Twilight Zone.

-p

RandiFan1290

(6,229 posts)
70. Aww relax
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 07:23 AM
Nov 2013

Everyone knows the government runs better when the publicons are in charge and the "democrats" are subservient.

Keep buying tickets to the game!!




JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
80. Some one knows very little about NJ politics.
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 08:33 AM
Nov 2013

At least not as much as he thinks he does.

But its not surprising that person would blame Democrats for Christie's win.

However, if you feel the need to blame some one, blame Sandy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'd like to congratulate ...