General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'd like to congratulate the Democratic Establishment on tonight's victory in NJ
Well, given that Christie was endorsed by dozens of prominent "Democrats", and that President Obama wouldn't endorse the Democratic candidate, I'm assuming that this was the result the "Democratic" Establishment wanted.
Well played!
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts): banghead :
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)Not trying to be argumentative, but if I am going to write letters to the DNC I need hard facts
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)and I hope they all reap the benefits when CC starts selling his soul to beg for Tea Party votes.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)And appalling.
And disheartening.
Divine Discontent
(21,056 posts)him win by 18% or whatever he ends up with.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)been practical to spend money against a popular candidate like Christie when it would be better spent somewhere else'. So not worth the effort to try to defeat a Repub.
But I bet they poured money into the Virginia race where apparently the Dem was having a hard time defeating the TBer. And see, when you pour money into a race, it WORKS.
So what is to be concluded from all of this??
THAT is the question!
JHB
(37,159 posts)Devoting the resources even in races that look hopeless just to maintain your ability to get people out there, make personal contact, and get out the vote.
But the people who make decisions like this are in a world of political consultants who earn their money off of TV ad buys. "Boots/shoes/sneakers on the ground" takes money away from things that puts money in their pockets.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Here's what I think, we should get rid of all the political consultants, operatives, think tanks and anyone whose interest is MONEY.
I have come to despise the 'political class' to the point now that if I see a candidate who is pushed on the public by obvious operatives, and it's not hard to tell who they are, they are of no interest to me.
Two of the governors who won yesterday, belong in that class. One has D the other an R after their names, one barely squeaked by with the help of the Money People, the R by getting 30% of the Dem vote.
There is far, far too much interference with our electoral system and that is why such a small % of Americans vote at all. I am beginning to understand it.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)we always find ourselves in?
I posted this in the Progressives Group. http://www.democraticunderground.com/1269141
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Once again, I like to point out that Democrat doesn't mean "liberal", no matter what Fox News claims.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Would you prefer a Democratic governor, now; or a Democratic House in 2014 and 2016, along with a Democratic President?
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Why one or the other?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)money spent on Buono (no matter how much we would like her as Governor) is money unavailable for 2014 races.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Seriously?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)in terms of money ... But then, isn't the question, really ... How much does an endorsement really count; but further, how much does an endorsement of a losing candidate cost in terms of resources (i.e., political capital)?
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Me neither.
We fight for what's right, we win.
We cower and triangulate, we lose.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)CrispyQ
(36,461 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)I agree with you that political capital is important. Obama erred early in his presidency by giving away too much to the Republicans. In those instances, as in this one, he lost political capital by creating the perception that he could be pushed around.
This fall's shutdown/debt ceiling fight marked a very welcome change. Obama finally showed he'd had enough. He basically told the Republicans to fuck off. He confronted them head-on, he beat them, and he's more powerful as a result. I hope we see him keep fighting that way for the rest of his term.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)but I would hazard to guess (based on having tracked the favorability/unfavorability and Obstructionist/Compromising polling through the shut-down) the political capital that he was losing with Democratic partisans, he was gaining with the independent and "semi-sane" republicans that Democrats need to win back the House in 2014 because of the 2010 gerrymandering.
IOW, I think this is a lesson in "When GOTV isn't enough."
I think the political calculus for winning the House in 2014 was/is/has been whether to attempt to grow Democratic support in those mostly white, mostly male, +6-10 (republican) districts (a very expensive endeavor); or to dissuade/split up the non-base vote in those districts (much less expensive).
Now ... I suspect that (and will be proven correct when/if) the Democratic party fields and spends heavy in support of "moderate" Democratic candidates (that have a shot to win those districts) in 2014 ... Likewise, the Democratic Party will spend heavy in House districts with vulnerable Democrats.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)My objection to that strategy is that it was tried and found wanting. Obama began his term by trying to appear reasonable and to appeal to those "semi-sane" Republicans you mention. This approach, however, meant that he wasn't giving his supporters enough reason to come out and vote Democratic. The falloff in turnout meant that we lost big in 2010. (Yes, those people should have voted anyway, but both major parties have some supporters who aren't very politically oriented and whose appearance at the polls can't be assumed.)
So I have more faith than you do in the GOTV strategy. One can't imagine Obama saying, as FDR did of his right-wing opponents, "I welcome their hatred," but if he had more of that spirit we'd have better electoral results.
For 2014, I would love to see Obama deploy his considerable political skills in a concerted effort to lambaste the Republican obstructionists in Congress. Even the so-called "moderates" in the GOP were complicit in the shutdown and in all other crap that Obama's had to put up with, and they should be called on it. They're all extortionists and he should use that word about them. If that alienates a few "semi-sane" Republicans, so be it -- the gains in turnout on our side would more than offset those losses.
Give 'em hell, Barack!
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)though I disagree on couple of points.
First, I think the first 2 years of President Obama's 1st term was his honest belief that the gop would play by the long established rules and, at least, put forward the appearance of wanting to govern. He learned this was not to be in 2010, when it became clear if he said "up" the modern gop would say "down."
I think where we really disagree is the the reason people stayed home in 2010. The demographics of those that stayed home were the young (and change hopeful); the independants that were tired of the lack of progress and a segment of progressives that wanted to see change, yesterday.
The reality of the political environment had it that there was nothing that President Obama could have offered this cohort, in the face of the modern gop's obstruction ... they wanted to see results ... movement ... It was then, he shifted to the appearance of reasonableness, with the expectation they would continue in their obstruction ... and he was correct.
It was then, President Obama (and his team) charted a different path ... his repeated offering up what the modern gop asked for (along with his "increased revenue" demand) that the poll numbers started working in his (Democrats) favor, despite the media's "It's both party's fault" claims. Democrats may have wanted to hear the FDR quote (though many would have waved it off as "just another pretty speech" ; but that was NOT want the American electorate wanted to hear. They/we were not ready to hear it. They/we only were prepared to hear something approaching that when the shut-down and debt ceiling thing hit.
Further, I disagree that there were the resources to flip a gerrymandered +6-8 gop district to Democratic, without first getting a critical mass of the public to see the modern gop for what they ... the Democratic votes just aren't there. The only way to pull the flip would be to get a whole bunch of republicans and republican leaning independants to stay home or vote 3rd party.
Moses2SandyKoufax
(1,290 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Oh, and btw, how would a Dem winning in NJ prevent a Democratic House in 2014 and 2016? Maybe it's me, but I'm trouble seeing the reasoning here.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I would prefer both; but Resources, i.e., money and political capital spent on Buono (no matter how much we would like her as Governor) is money unavailable for 2014 races.
And a christie governorship going into 2016 allows for a 2 1/2 year micro-screening of christie and denies him 2 1/2 years for him to scrub the memory of his governorship. He has stuff in his governing past and will no doubt provide more.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)signaled their approval of the Republican giving him 30% of the Dem vote that should have gone to the Democrat. And now people are DEFENDING supporting a Republican???
No wonder half the country doesn't vote. Did you know that the average person doesn't view elections as 'games' to be calculated based on political 'wins' and 'losses'???
This is why I am for eliminating from the electoral system ALL political operatives, think tanks, calculators, and anyone else whose mind isn't totally focused on what is good for the PEOPLE.
These are NOT horse races to decide who in the top 1% can throw the most money at the candidate of their choice. But since it appears that now there are actually people who view our system that way, we have people agreeing with it.
Take all the horse race bettors out of the system, ALL the money, and see what happens. Maybe the half of the country that isn't voting might just do so and the people's will, not the money men, might just begin to prevail.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)it was a serious question. And while true, that those aren't the only choices, it IS one of the questions to be considered, as resources are limited and important.
SDjack
(1,448 posts)and Tea Party in the campaigns for 2016 candidates. Watching Christi working over the passengers in the clown car will be fun -- provided, of course, after he accomplishes that task, he self destructs. Very demanding work. Maybe Gov. Christi will resign a la Palin and focus on presidential campaign.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)The same stuff that has the economy in such great shape?
Moses2SandyKoufax
(1,290 posts)the same stuff that will allow Chris Christie to portray himself as a moderate in a field of tea partiers when the 2016 primaries get underway.
The Democrats are really playing with fire on this one.
Chathamization
(1,638 posts)Though honestly, I think in the next few years a lot of that Sandy glow is going to wear off, and the national stage has ground up plenty of media darlings who are comfortable with local politicians.
As for Buono - it looks like Dems were giving up this race before she was even the nominee. The Democratic primary apparently consisted of only two candidates - her and "an aide to the East Orange mayor," the latter of whom managed to get a whopping 12% of the vote.
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)Despite GOP intransigence.
Which you aid every time you attack him.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)joshcryer
(62,270 posts)Realpolitik sucks.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)There's a reason Congress and even the President have such low popularity numbers right now.
JI7
(89,248 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)republicans the democrats numbers are in the toilet right now too.
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)On what did she sell out?
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)all those DC insiders, corporate lobbyists, and started compromising with republicans. No more compromising. Reaganomics is destroying this country. We need somebody with enough guts to change it.
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)He was a huge political opportunist.
JI7
(89,248 posts)and after he was elected.
Logical
(22,457 posts)joshcryer
(62,270 posts)Yours?
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)But I don't think you realize the national party is pretty damn useless.
If they weren't useless they'd get progressives elected. Good thing they got rid of Dean, eh? Man, that guy knew how to run a party.
Besides, Obama likes Christy. Christy is the only republican Evah! to hold Obama's hand. So let Obama have his love's nest with that Rpublican. Remember, politics makes for strange bedfellows and this one sure is strange!
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)They do make a fella swoon, eh? All that bling, and the sweet promises of a really good job once you get out of whoring for them in office.
Heard they tried to Tbag Dean. He said no, and that sealed his fate.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Wouldn't it suck if that happened again?
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)They had all that responsibility then. These days they don't have to work hard, because they can just cry and claim they got Tbagged, as it all goes to hell.
They be the politicians, and Dean actually made them strong. We all know, strong is what republicans do so we can't do that. Heck, just read a DUer saying that the new Virginia gov. has to be weak, so he can lead. Now that's the spirit.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)The real person who gets credit for 2006 is George W Bush.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)but of course, you see a glass half empty and then throw stones at it and say it was the Dems who broke the glass.
Pretty typical Manny world stuff.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Where Democrats endorse Democrats.
Crazy, huh?
"You may say I'm a dreamer... but I'm not the only one..."
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)you do realize this IS politics, right?
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)In case you've forgotten who he is, he's the guy wedged between the bus's tail pipe and wheel well.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)in 2014, we should go after all 50 states.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Or refused to endorse his opponent?
Has any DNC chair had even remotely as winning a record as Dr. Dean?
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)The 50 state strategy was about drafting candidates that could win local races based on their political profile. This included many blue dogs that you loathe.
It also included prioritizing money to the places where it could do most good.
Which is why Dr. Dean wouldn't have sent a dime to Buono's campaign.... How do I know this? Because his PAC sent money to McAuliffe and not Buono.
Your bastardized version of the 50 state strategy in your head has no resemblance to the actual one brilliantly done by Howard Dean.
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)Including the President
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Perfect!!
Sid
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)It sickens me to see the Third Way manipulate one of the bluest states in the nation and encourage Democrats to vote for this grotesque Repuke. I thought New Jersey voters were more savvy.
TeeYiYi
(8,028 posts)I like Buono. That whole race stinks.
TYY
TeeYiYi
(8,028 posts)TYY
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)Help me: did President Obama endorse Buono, endorse Christie, or make no endorsement?
WillyT
(72,631 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Ted Cruz-type logic: The only reason Christie won was national Democrats didn't fight hard enough.
He's making light of the logic in NJ, that is all.
It's not that deep.
Take a breath.
-p
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Perhaps they misunderstood Obama's refusal to endorse Buono? Perhaps I'm misunderstanding it, too?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)blamed every bad thing on Obama.
But then I learned there are crazy leftwingers who literally believe that economic improvement is impossible until we get rid of Obama.
And who blame local politics on him.
So, we all have our misunderstandings.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Where can one find Obama's endorsement of Buono on the internets? Thanks in advance!
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)Bottom line is that it is bad politically for a President to endorse a lost cause.
He didn't endorse Christie. He didn't endorse anyone. It was a race that was only going to go one way, so it would have been politically stupid for him to step into it.
You're smart enough to know that.... Which makes you even more disingenuous.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)I don't know WTF. Is there something in the water?? I hope it's just an isolated incident.
Seriously! Is there an air born toxin? Do brain cell's fire in reverse?...
Next on the Twilight Zone.
-p
Zorra
(27,670 posts)DLevine
(1,788 posts)RandiFan1290
(6,229 posts)Everyone knows the government runs better when the publicons are in charge and the "democrats" are subservient.
Keep buying tickets to the game!!
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
xchrom
(108,903 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)It's what Turd Way corporate asskissers do.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)At least not as much as he thinks he does.
But its not surprising that person would blame Democrats for Christie's win.
However, if you feel the need to blame some one, blame Sandy.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)They might as well have voted for Nader.