Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 04:51 PM Nov 2013

How big of difference do you think there is between the two major parties?

Last edited Wed Nov 20, 2013, 06:31 PM - Edit history (1)


5 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
An enormous difference – One is fundamentally progressive and fundamentally rational. – The other is fundamentally reactionary and fundamentally irrational.
1 (20%)
Not as much difference as they would like us to think. The differences are exaggerated by the rhetoric and the partisan maneuvering. When it comes down to actual policy the differences are simply not anywhere near as significant as the rhetoric and the maneuvering would lead us to believe.
3 (60%)
The differences are for the most part not so much on major issues of economy or the fundamental direction of foreign policy – But when it does get down to specifics – those nuanced differences and the moral tone set by the language and rhetoric does add up to a significantly different direction the two different parties would take the country.
1 (20%)
I prefer savory dinner crepes to sweet dessert crepes.
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How big of difference do you think there is between the two major parties? (Original Post) Douglas Carpenter Nov 2013 OP
I would say that most of the differences are in the "social issues" Jackpine Radical Nov 2013 #1
Yes. LuvNewcastle Nov 2013 #7
Yep. nt raouldukelives Nov 2013 #12
Bingo. Scuba Nov 2013 #10
Democrats order from the menu and tip well. Republicans insist on ... 11 Bravo Nov 2013 #2
Different Enough sharp_stick Nov 2013 #3
Not as much as I would like there to be. LuvNewcastle Nov 2013 #4
How can you go from defacto7 Nov 2013 #5
I would say on social/"moral" issues, they're worlds apart. Blue_In_AK Nov 2013 #6
Somewhere between #2 and #3 RC Nov 2013 #8
The Democrats stay just enough to the left of the Republicans NuclearDem Nov 2013 #9
I don't really grasp option #3 to well. TheKentuckian Nov 2013 #11
Two answers joeglow3 Nov 2013 #13
another kick for more results Douglas Carpenter Nov 2013 #14
Depends on the issue renegade000 Nov 2013 #15

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
1. I would say that most of the differences are in the "social issues"
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 05:02 PM
Nov 2013

rather than in baseline economic issues.

Even some of the Dem policies against which the national Republicans are posturing are in fact essentially Republican positions--health care being the most immediately prominent case in point.

LuvNewcastle

(16,844 posts)
7. Yes.
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 05:14 PM
Nov 2013

Both parties are dominated by almost laissez-faire capitalism. The Democrats desperately need to change economic policies. Economic policies are the backbone of a party's platform. If the economic policies are essentially like the GOP's, the Democrats have a RW party.

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts)
2. Democrats order from the menu and tip well. Republicans insist on ...
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 05:03 PM
Nov 2013

making multiple menu substitutions and are likely to stiff their wait person.

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
3. Different Enough
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 05:03 PM
Nov 2013

Take for example the Supreme Court decision allowing Texas to maintain it's Draconian abortion laws as an example of just how different the two parties can be.

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/11/supreme-court-texas-abortion-law-100093.html

Anybody that equates the current Democratic and Republican parties needs to think of the following:

Roberts John (R)
Alito Sam (R)

Sotomayor Sonia (D)
Kagan, Elena (D)

If you don't think that outcome would have been different had shrubbo not occupied the White House for eight years you're just not using your brain.

LuvNewcastle

(16,844 posts)
4. Not as much as I would like there to be.
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 05:08 PM
Nov 2013

The GOP is so radical RW that the Democrats should be demonstratively different on just about any issue. The GOP doesn't have any good ideas. If you compromise with extreme RWers, you still end up with RW policies. To even get policies to be middle-of-the-road, we would have to be very radical socialists before compromising. Therefore, I'd say that there isn't nearly as much difference as there needs to be.

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
5. How can you go from
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 05:11 PM
Nov 2013

"The differences are for the most part not so much"

to

"Not as much difference as they would like us to think"

to

"An enormous difference"

?

That's a pretty leading poll you set up. The span between not so much, and not so much, to and enormous difference has a gap wide enough for an elephant.

How about, "An enormous difference politically but not so much on a personal level" or "A big difference in social terms but less politically" or "A huge difference in determining facts but we're all human". There are a lot more possibilities in that chasm between the first two.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
8. Somewhere between #2 and #3
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 05:33 PM
Nov 2013

Both are too far to the Right to govern effectively for "We the people..."

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
11. I don't really grasp option #3 to well.
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 07:26 PM
Nov 2013

It seems like a way of saying that words speak louder than words or some such to my eyes.

renegade000

(2,301 posts)
15. Depends on the issue
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 07:35 PM
Nov 2013

I'd say:

Option 1 for domestic social issues.
Option 2 for domestic economic policy.
Option 3 for foreign policy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How big of difference do ...