General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow big of difference do you think there is between the two major parties?
Last edited Wed Nov 20, 2013, 06:31 PM - Edit history (1)
5 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited | |
An enormous difference – One is fundamentally progressive and fundamentally rational. – The other is fundamentally reactionary and fundamentally irrational. | |
1 (20%) |
|
Not as much difference as they would like us to think. The differences are exaggerated by the rhetoric and the partisan maneuvering. When it comes down to actual policy the differences are simply not anywhere near as significant as the rhetoric and the maneuvering would lead us to believe. | |
3 (60%) |
|
The differences are for the most part not so much on major issues of economy or the fundamental direction of foreign policy – But when it does get down to specifics – those nuanced differences and the moral tone set by the language and rhetoric does add up to a significantly different direction the two different parties would take the country. | |
1 (20%) |
|
I prefer savory dinner crepes to sweet dessert crepes. | |
0 (0%) |
|
1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)rather than in baseline economic issues.
Even some of the Dem policies against which the national Republicans are posturing are in fact essentially Republican positions--health care being the most immediately prominent case in point.
LuvNewcastle
(16,844 posts)Both parties are dominated by almost laissez-faire capitalism. The Democrats desperately need to change economic policies. Economic policies are the backbone of a party's platform. If the economic policies are essentially like the GOP's, the Democrats have a RW party.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)making multiple menu substitutions and are likely to stiff their wait person.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)Take for example the Supreme Court decision allowing Texas to maintain it's Draconian abortion laws as an example of just how different the two parties can be.
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/11/supreme-court-texas-abortion-law-100093.html
Anybody that equates the current Democratic and Republican parties needs to think of the following:
Roberts John (R)
Alito Sam (R)
Sotomayor Sonia (D)
Kagan, Elena (D)
If you don't think that outcome would have been different had shrubbo not occupied the White House for eight years you're just not using your brain.
LuvNewcastle
(16,844 posts)The GOP is so radical RW that the Democrats should be demonstratively different on just about any issue. The GOP doesn't have any good ideas. If you compromise with extreme RWers, you still end up with RW policies. To even get policies to be middle-of-the-road, we would have to be very radical socialists before compromising. Therefore, I'd say that there isn't nearly as much difference as there needs to be.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)"The differences are for the most part not so much"
to
"Not as much difference as they would like us to think"
to
"An enormous difference"
?
That's a pretty leading poll you set up. The span between not so much, and not so much, to and enormous difference has a gap wide enough for an elephant.
How about, "An enormous difference politically but not so much on a personal level" or "A big difference in social terms but less politically" or "A huge difference in determining facts but we're all human". There are a lot more possibilities in that chasm between the first two.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)On economic issues, not so much.
RC
(25,592 posts)Both are too far to the Right to govern effectively for "We the people..."
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)To scare people into voting for them.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)It seems like a way of saying that words speak louder than words or some such to my eyes.
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)Political parties - extremely far apart.
Populace - not too far apart.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)renegade000
(2,301 posts)I'd say:
Option 1 for domestic social issues.
Option 2 for domestic economic policy.
Option 3 for foreign policy.