General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWell that didn't take long. Cloture invoked on nominee Patricia Millett 55-43!
60 votes no longer needed!
https://twitter.com/DSenFloor/status/403588609703706625
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Immediately, if not sooner.
They did it under Bush 2 with a group of nuts. Even it out. Elections have consequences.
malaise
(268,966 posts)Go Dems!!
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)but young progressives who will be on the bench a looooooong time.
malaise
(268,966 posts)Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Politicub
(12,165 posts)riversedge
(70,204 posts)our opening opportunity.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)The great Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun came in as a conservative and became a liberal lion on the bench. Brennan was a conservative entering and became the leading liberal justice of the century that he served and likely beyond. Potter Stewart was a conservative and became a liberal. John Paul Stevens, a great liberal justice came in as a conservative-moderate.
mdbl
(4,973 posts)visited thomas, scalito and scalito yet. I see no evidence so far that they think that we should live "a wonderful life".
Gore1FL
(21,130 posts)Bandit
(21,475 posts)You are just talking about one court. There are federal courts in every state and a huge backlog of vacancies.
malaise
(268,966 posts)DWinNJ
(261 posts)While judicial appointments have more impact over a longer time I don't even recall the number of vacancies in federal agencies because of the republicans.
JHB
(37,159 posts)brush
(53,771 posts)Don't know if they are all judges but I did hear that number on satellite radio yesterday.
mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)If we have a dynamic candidate we should be able to keep the White House. But just incase. Find some 40 year olds to put on those benches.
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)they are in with republicans' playing thermonuclear war games over court appointments for the last 15 or so years ...
Who knows how the senate is going to break a year from now, so the A LOT of holes to fill and make up for them playing tackle football on this while the dems played flag football.
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)markpkessinger
(8,395 posts). . .That phrase has a really troubled history, dating back to FDR's threat to expand the number of justices on the Supreme Court in order to create a majority that was more favorable to his policies. It was a rather scandalous thing of FDR to even consider.
What's more, accusing the President of trying to "pack the courts" is precisely the language the GOP is using. Filling court vacancies as they arise is in no wise "packing the courts." If anything, the phrase is more appropriately applied to what Republicans have been trying to do with the Second Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, namely, to control the ideological balance of the court by altering the number of seats. The only difference is, they want to eliminate seats rather than add them, but the net effect is the same.
HenryWallace
(332 posts)"Pack" implies that Obama is doing something underhanded or unconstitutional!
The Judiciary lands where it lands by design. If there are more liberal judges than conservative, its a reflection of the will of the people as manifested by elections. Democrats have realized this in the past and reserved filibusters for only the most extreme of nominees.
"Sandbagging" every nominee is "underhanded or unconstitutional." If Republicans no longer have the opportunity to object to "the most extreme of nominees," it is there own fault!
The reality of this situation is that Obama will not nominate ideologues the way that Bush did; he is a judicial moderate.
If this results in a liberal/conservative imbalance, it is just further evidence that we are not a "center-right" nation.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,599 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)MineralMan
(146,288 posts)Skidmore
(37,364 posts)of the creepy froggy that grinned to show a mouthful of human teeth?
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)It was her signature pic.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)I knew it was a female name but the memory doesn't work so well anymore. That frog would give you nightmares but it was in the Hall of Fame for DU avatars, like the dancing underpants and the smiley thay mooned you as it climbed over something. I think the smiley may have belonged to matcom. Sure miss matcom's perspectives.
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)Owl
(3,641 posts)juajen
(8,515 posts)Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)sheshe2
(83,750 posts)MineralMan
(146,288 posts)Thanks!
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)she is more than qualified. The only reason the pukes are pissed is that it's going to change the balance away from the kochsuckers put there by shrubbo.
Ms. Toad
(34,066 posts)for one that isn't a homonym for a homophobic taunt.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_judges_appointed_by_Barack_Obama
The highlighted ones are out of committee waiting for full senate vote
the one NOT highlighted and not yet confirmed have to have a committee vote.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)... regarding the nominees that are still at the Senate Judicial Committee level and this will affect all future nominees...
Here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024071026
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)All they need to change the rules is a simple majority, right?
Problem solved?
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)They won't just continue to boycott the committee, it would look really bad for fundraising.
I'm betting this is just a pout.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Just like they supported the GOP for shutting down the government and all the other BS the GOP does.
They will say they are standing on principle and they probably will even fund-raise on it.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)sheshe2
(83,750 posts)K&R..................
polichick
(37,152 posts)Obama's choices are conservadems.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)... so the list of nominees in the red states (that have two republican senators) come from GOP conservatives.
polichick
(37,152 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Some folks say that Obama could attempt to put together a list on his own to pick folks from - but that would start World War III
polichick
(37,152 posts)Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Bring it the fuck on already.
I'm sick of the reactionary right-wing. They need a punch to the face and a kick to the groin. Enough with the playing nice bullshit.
CFLDem
(2,083 posts)We need to get as much done now any way we can so if we happen to lose the next round of elections, they won't have enough time to undo our progress.
MatthewStLouis
(904 posts)Good news for a change!
Cha
(297,180 posts)kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Whooyah!
brush
(53,771 posts)That was part of the hold up.
I'm glad Reid made sure it would pass.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)[font size=48 color=blue]CELEBRATE![/font]
-Laelth
PM Martin
(2,660 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)nolabear
(41,960 posts)alfredo
(60,071 posts)Lew Millett was a Congressional Medal of Honor recipient for his daring bayonet charge during the Korean war. His unit went up against a force six times the size of his. http://www.pbs.org/weta/americanvalor/stories/millett.html
He was my commander up at Fort Devens when at the ASA training school. He knew how to lead.
Left Coast2020
(2,397 posts)A bit nieve of how the courts are set up and processes, but I'm just wondering if she gets on the bench, is it something that can thwart some of the crap that the previous squatter did?
Is this also a life appointment?
What other courts/legislation can Reid get through?
I concur with previous poster, but my feeling is just shove it back down their f-ing throats.
Show the scumbags we have steeltoe'd boots too. And can stomp some ass in em.
My hope is to overturn some of the major damage that has been done in the form of rulings that hurt the less fortunate--who deserve some justice. And that comes from the heart.
last1standing
(11,709 posts)Most government agencies are sued in the DC Circuit so the constitutionality of many regulations are decided there. That makes this Circuit arguably the most powerful court in the country outside the SCOTUS. And yes, they are lifetime appointments.
This is why the nuclear battle was so important; the DC Circuit has the power to fundamentally change how government works and how effective it can be.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Enough is enough.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)great white snark
(2,646 posts)Please Senate more of the same.
calimary
(81,222 posts)Let's get him in there! And more like him!