General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFox News Pundit Says End Of Judicial Filibuster Could Lead To ‘Military Coup’
By Hayes Brown
Fox News commentator Charles W. Cooke on Thursday warned that the recent move from the Senate to end filibusters on judicial nominees could lead to a military coup.
Cooke, who is also a National Review columnist, was speaking to Fox News host Gretchen Carlson on Thursday afternoon when he made the leap of logic. I think it is fairly clear they want to distract from the Obamacare disaster, but this is something they wanted to do for awhile, Cooke said of the decision to allow for a simple majority to pass nominees through the Senate. They are very frustrated that Republicans have been blocking their nominations as they blocked Republican nominees when Bush was president.
After Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) pulled the trigger on the so-called nuclear option, President Obama addressed the press to defend the Democrats choice. Over the past five years weve seen an unprecedented pattern of obstruction in Congress thats prevented too much of the American peoples business from getting done, Obama said. The result, Obama continued, is that his nominees have languished in the Senate two and a half times as long as those put forward under the George W. Bushs administration.
Cooke did not take Obamas comments well, paraphrasing the president as having said the American business is far too important for the rules. Well, how far do you take that? Cooke pondered aloud. You could just ignore the House. You could have a military coup, you could have anything at the end of this.
Watch his comments here:
- more -
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/11/21/2980531/fox-news-pundit-says-end-judicial-filibuster-lead-military-coup/
Old name: Fox Noise.
New name: Fucks Nuts!
Senate GOP blows itself up. What the hell were they thinking?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024069959
Baitball Blogger
(46,705 posts)Initech
(100,068 posts)locks
(2,012 posts)ancianita
(36,053 posts)Johonny
(20,848 posts)by people who do not want the government to work. This is in effect exactly the thing she is worried about. The government "worked" one way for all other presidents and another way for Obama. When the rules are abused by the minority to effectively upset the daily business of the government then the frame work of the government must be changed. Anyone freaked out about this change should blame Republicans for bringing it on themselves. Once again Republicans threatened this many times under Bush even though the rules of the senate were not unusually used during his time as president. I think it sucks Democrats had to do this, but it is hard to argue they didn't have to do this. Eventually either the government functions or it doesn't and I'm blocking all work from getting done because I want a president to fail is not an acceptable reason for blocking work for being done.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)Laelth
(32,017 posts)Not surprised. Not alarmed, either. On our side, it's time to celebrate!
[font size=48 color=blue]CELEBRATE![/font]
-Laelth
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Now I have a little hangover, but it was a nice day, yesterday.
-Laelth
Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)The GOP SOB's SOP.