Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOne ‘Entitlement’ Really Does Need Trimming
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/11/24-4Americas corporate CEOs feel entitled to pensions that pay out $86,000 monthly. To protect their entitlement, theyre attacking ours: Social Security
A new report neatly exposes the monumental hypocrisy of Americas most politically active corporate leaders.
Not too long ago, pensions also used to deliver real retirement security. But the nations biggest corporations have cut back on traditional pensions. In 1980, 89 percent of Fortune 100 companies guaranteed workers a defined benefit at retirement. By last year, only 12 percent offered that level of security.
Companies have replaced traditional pensions with 401(k)s, and many giant firms like Walmart dont even offer a guaranteed match on employee 401(k) contributions. The predictable result? Among Americans between 50 and 64, the bottom 75 percent by wealth average just $26,395 in retirement assets.
Overall, says Boston Colleges Center for Retirement Research, the nations retirement deficit the difference between what Americans have saved up for retirement and what they need to maintain their standard of living once retired now totals $6.6 trillion.
So, amid all this retirement insecurity, who actually thinks that cutting Social Security would be a good idea? The most relentless pushing for cutting Social Security has been coming from the nations corporate statesmen.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1982 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (53)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One ‘Entitlement’ Really Does Need Trimming (Original Post)
xchrom
Nov 2013
OP
JimboBillyBubbaBob
(1,389 posts)1. No cuts,
no time, no place, no amount!
progressoid
(49,990 posts)2. Rec!
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)3. Raise SS payments, don't cut them--
raise the cap, and apply it to ALL income, not just payroll.
trof
(54,256 posts)4. K&R My company went bankrupt. The federal government now 'owns' my pension.
I get about $1500 a month.
Under our original negotiated union contract it would have been around $5000 a month.
That was not money the company just said they'd 'give' us when we retired.
It was 'deferred compensation'.
We took less in pay each month, and that money was put into our retirement fund which was supposed to be invested and grow for us to receive after we could no longer work.
I was an airline pilot and when I retired we had mandatory retirement (FAA reg) at age 65.
Now our pension is in the hands of the Pension Benefits Guarantee Corporation (PBGC).
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)5. K&R, thanks xchrom. n/t