Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 08:48 PM Nov 2013

Serious Question: About The ACA Website Problems... Why Doesn't The Administration...

Dump it right back in the laps of the Republicans?

Unless what I've been reading is incorrect...

The blue states who have supported and set up their own exchanges are having record sign-ups, with little difficuty...

Even the red state of Kentucky has had good reviews because of that Republican Governor standing in support.

It seems, from this viewer, that the problem comes from the rest of the country, from red states, trying to access the ACA all at the same time because THEIR STATES do not support it.

Yes... the fed site might have anticipated this better... but I'd turn the tables on the red states.

Particularly with the 2014 elections coming up in less than a year.

Anybody ???


5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Serious Question: About The ACA Website Problems... Why Doesn't The Administration... (Original Post) WillyT Nov 2013 OP
The reason why, is because the administration really wants it to work for everyone lostincalifornia Nov 2013 #1
The states had no obligation to set up their own exchanges. DesMoinesDem Nov 2013 #2
Not My Argument At All... (And Thanks For Putting Word In My Mouth)... WillyT Nov 2013 #4
That does seem to be to your argument. DesMoinesDem Nov 2013 #5
Not quite, Oregon for example hasn't been able to sign up a single person on their website PoliticAverse Nov 2013 #3
 

DesMoinesDem

(1,569 posts)
2. The states had no obligation to set up their own exchanges.
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 09:23 PM
Nov 2013

The federal government does have an obligation to set up an exchange for those states. Your argument is basically that the law is bad and shouldn't have been set up like that.

 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
4. Not My Argument At All... (And Thanks For Putting Word In My Mouth)...
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 09:30 PM
Nov 2013

California has been kicking butt... why is that ???


 

DesMoinesDem

(1,569 posts)
5. That does seem to be to your argument.
Sat Nov 30, 2013, 12:22 AM
Nov 2013

You want to blame the states. But you can't blame the states for not setting up an exchange that they didn't have to set up. The federal government was the only one required by law to set up an exchange and they failed. California just shows how badly the federal government screwed up their exchange.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Serious Question: About T...