Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Sat Nov 30, 2013, 03:25 PM Nov 2013

The Environmental Disaster You’ve Never Heard Of

Albuquerque’s Kirtland Air Force Base jet fuel spill
BY DAVID CORREIA

The fighter jets and military planes that blast into the skies each day above Albuquerque’s Kirtland Air Force Base (KAFB) consume millions of gallons of jet fuel each year. In order to serve this fleet, the Air Force stores enormous amounts of fuel and distributes it throughout the base via a network of tanks, pipes and pumps. In the early 1950s, the base replaced leaking tanks and aging pipelines with a new fuels facility it promised would modernize and make more safe the handling and distribution of jet fuel. The facility received its first trainload of jet fuel and aviation gas in 1953. Almost immediately, and for the next 45 years, it has leaked jet fuel into the surrounding soil.

The “leak” continued, undetected, until 1992 when workers observed a huge surface plume in the soil surrounding the fuel facility. The Air Force largely ignored requests by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to investigate the plume’s source and extent and instead, in 1994, gave itself a waiver from conducting military-mandated tests of the facility pipeline. Under pressure from the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED), the Air Force finally conducted pressure tests of the pipelines in 1999. They failed spectacularly. The added pressure blew massive holes in the pipeline. The test appeared to prove the pipes were leaking. In a comic/tragic, nothing-to-see-here moment in May 2000, Mark Holmes, a civilian project manager for Kirtland’s environmental unit, told the Albuquerque Journal that everything was fine: The 100,000 gallons of missing fuel could be explained by a simple accounting error. NMED staffer Dennis McQuillan, however, told the Journal that if it were a 100,000 gallon spill, it “would be a big spill, one of the biggest” in state history.


They were both wrong. In 2006 an Air Force contractor drilled an exploratory well in southeast Albuquerque’s Bullhead Park, just outside the base's northern boundary. He found four feet of jet fuel floating on top of the aquifer. Additional monitoring wells found a plume of jet fuel slithering northeast from the original spill location and well beyond the northern boundary of the base. Kirtland estimated the plume at between one and two million gallons, but NMED raised that estimate to eight million gallons. Two years later, with more monitoring and evidence of the true scale of the spill, NMED revised the estimate dramatically to 24 million gallons, an amount 240 times larger than the 2000 estimate.

For comparison's sake, the KAFB spill is larger than the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill, which dumped more than 12 million gallons of crude oil into Alaska’s Prince William Sound, killing an estimated quarter-million seabirds, 3,000 otters, hundreds of harbor seals and bald eagles and nearly two dozen killer whales. The KAFB jet fuel spill—the Air Force calls it a “leak”—is the largest toxic contamination of an aquifer in US history, and it could be twice the size of the Exxon Valdez disaster.

more

http://alibi.com/feature/45896/The-Environmental-Disaster-Youve-Never-Heard-Of.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Environmental Disaster You’ve Never Heard Of (Original Post) n2doc Nov 2013 OP
Conclusion: The Air Force has an air of entitlement which allows it to make decisions Baitball Blogger Nov 2013 #1
I just flew back from Albuquerque today. alittlelark Nov 2013 #2
what is...an R/O system? please. dixiegrrrrl Nov 2013 #3
That would be reverse osmosis BelgianMadCow Nov 2013 #4
Kick on my way out BelgianMadCow Nov 2013 #5
Ummm . . . . flammable? annabanana Dec 2013 #6
Sheeeeeeeeeee-it Art_from_Ark Dec 2013 #7

Baitball Blogger

(46,705 posts)
1. Conclusion: The Air Force has an air of entitlement which allows it to make decisions
Sat Nov 30, 2013, 03:38 PM
Nov 2013

which are criminal.

alittlelark

(18,890 posts)
2. I just flew back from Albuquerque today.
Sat Nov 30, 2013, 05:19 PM
Nov 2013

My family and friends live w/in 1 mile of the spill zone. The tap water makes me physically ill. Everyone I know has an R/O system, but some use tap water to make coffee - that will also make me physically ill.

BelgianMadCow

(5,379 posts)
4. That would be reverse osmosis
Sat Nov 30, 2013, 07:07 PM
Nov 2013

where you pressure water + contaminants through a membrane that only allows the water particles to pass. A common yet rather expensive purification technique.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Environmental Disaste...