Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Blue Flower

(5,446 posts)
Sun Mar 11, 2012, 04:25 PM Mar 2012

NAACP Heads to UN re: Voting Rights Suppression

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/03/11/naacp-heads-to-u-n-to-address-suppression-of-minority-voters/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story%29

NAACP leaders will challenge new voting laws in the United States at the United Nations’ Human Rights Council in Switzerland on Wednesday.

“It was in 1947 that W.E.B. Dubois delivered his speech and appealed to the world at the U.N.,” NAACP president Benjamin Todd Jealous told McClatchy Newspapers. “Now, like then, the principal concern is voting rights. The past year more states in this country have passed more laws pushing more voters out of the ballot box than any point since Jim Crow.”

The NAACP has vocally opposed restrictions on voting and hopes to use its appearance at the U.N. to publicize what it claims are efforts to suppressing the votes of minorities.

“The power of the U.N. on state governments historically is to shame them and to put pressure on the U.S. government to bring them into line with global standards for democracy, best practices for democracy, that’s where we are,” Jealous explained.. “There are plenty of examples — segregation of the U.S. to apartheid in South Africa to the death penalty here in the U.S. — of global outrage having an impact.”

more at link...
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NAACP Heads to UN re: Voting Rights Suppression (Original Post) The Blue Flower Mar 2012 OP
We're supposed t be the leading example of democracy.. socialindependocrat Mar 2012 #1
Maybe they can embarass Eric Holder pscot Mar 2012 #2
+1 Scuba Mar 2012 #3

socialindependocrat

(1,372 posts)
1. We're supposed t be the leading example of democracy..
Sun Mar 11, 2012, 04:35 PM
Mar 2012

The idea that our states are showing prejudice is an embarassment

How do the states get laws enacted when they are prejudice?
They should be identified as flawed and not even brought up for a vote.

Voter suppression
Citizen's United
Women's rights

How does any of this stuff get past the test of constitutionality?

Nice example people!!!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NAACP Heads to UN re: Vot...