Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMichigan Lawmakers Considering Abortion Bill That Would Force Women To Buy ‘Rape Insurance’
Michigan Lawmakers Considering Abortion Bill That Would Force Women To Buy Rape Insurance
BY TARA CULP-RESSLER ON DECEMBER 4, 2013 AT 11:20 AM
Michigan lawmakers are currently deciding whether to advance a bill that would require women in the state to purchase a separate insurance policy for abortion coverage, even in cases of rape or incest. If its approved, Michigan would join a long list of other states that have attacked abortion access by preventing women from using their own insurance to pay for it.
The debate over the legislation has heated up this week, particularly since the measure would deny abortion coverage even to women who have become pregnant as a result of rape. Although the overwhelming majority of Americans believe that rape victims should have access to legal abortion services, lawmakers continue to propose policies that would have callous implications for individuals who have been sexually assaulted.
Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder (R) vetoed the proposed insurance ban last year for exactly this reason pointing out that it would require rape victims to pay for the total cost of their abortion procedure out-of-pocket, unless they had thought ahead and purchased a separate insurance rider for abortion services. I dont believe it is appropriate to tell a woman who becomes pregnant due to a rape that she needed to select elective insurance coverage, Snyder noted when he rejected the bill last December.
But Michigans anti-choice community disagrees. Earlier this year, when advocating for the proposed legislation, a prominent anti-choice leader in Michigan suggested that rape is like a car accident and its appropriate to require women to buy extra insurance to prepare for it. After Snyders veto, abortion opponents decided to simply circumvent the governor and collect enough signatures to provoke a citizen-initiated vote on the measure. That petition was successful, and the measure headed to the legislature on Tuesday.
BY TARA CULP-RESSLER ON DECEMBER 4, 2013 AT 11:20 AM
Michigan lawmakers are currently deciding whether to advance a bill that would require women in the state to purchase a separate insurance policy for abortion coverage, even in cases of rape or incest. If its approved, Michigan would join a long list of other states that have attacked abortion access by preventing women from using their own insurance to pay for it.
The debate over the legislation has heated up this week, particularly since the measure would deny abortion coverage even to women who have become pregnant as a result of rape. Although the overwhelming majority of Americans believe that rape victims should have access to legal abortion services, lawmakers continue to propose policies that would have callous implications for individuals who have been sexually assaulted.
Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder (R) vetoed the proposed insurance ban last year for exactly this reason pointing out that it would require rape victims to pay for the total cost of their abortion procedure out-of-pocket, unless they had thought ahead and purchased a separate insurance rider for abortion services. I dont believe it is appropriate to tell a woman who becomes pregnant due to a rape that she needed to select elective insurance coverage, Snyder noted when he rejected the bill last December.
But Michigans anti-choice community disagrees. Earlier this year, when advocating for the proposed legislation, a prominent anti-choice leader in Michigan suggested that rape is like a car accident and its appropriate to require women to buy extra insurance to prepare for it. After Snyders veto, abortion opponents decided to simply circumvent the governor and collect enough signatures to provoke a citizen-initiated vote on the measure. That petition was successful, and the measure headed to the legislature on Tuesday.
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/12/04/3018691/michigan-lawmakers-rape-insurance-abortion/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 660 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Michigan Lawmakers Considering Abortion Bill That Would Force Women To Buy ‘Rape Insurance’ (Original Post)
Bjorn Against
Dec 2013
OP
Beaverhausen
(24,470 posts)1. Shouldn't men have to pay for this?
frazzled
(18,402 posts)2. Yeah, I was thinking the same thing: "rapists' insurance."
You rape someone and they get pregnant, your "rape" insurance should pay for it. D'oh.
Oh, why even bother to argue with these insane people.
Scruffy Rumbler
(961 posts)3. WTF!?! nt