Rush Limbaugh names his source - "an article"

[underpants]

It is at his site (not linking to it on DU) from yesterday's show. I heard this and cracked up. He does later (see below) mention the RW rag but "an article"????





Drive-Bys Declare Website Fixed -- and Help the Hero of Their Story Rebrand Obamacare

Health and Human Services is now saying the site's up 95% of the time. Big whoop. Up? What about functioning? "Up" means that you can just log into it. The industry standard in the private sector is for websites to be up 99.9% of the time. Anything below that's considered a failure. 95.1% in the private sector is a disaster. This is from an article about all of this. 95.1%'s a disaster. And it is. And they're trying to cover it up. And they're trying to mask it with new stories, new words, new assurances.

You know what they're doing? It's real simple. They're just saying it's fixed. That's all they're doing. Nothing's changed, really. They're just saying it's fixed. They got the media out there applauding, "Oh, right, it's fixed! They did it. It's up and running, and now will Obama be able to convince people who previously had doubts? Will our hero be able to escape the current role he's playing of villain. Can we help?" I don't know what you call it. They're just saying it's fixed. It isn't. It's more insecure than ever. It's as dysfunctional as ever. It's a Washington Examiner story, and I think we talked about it last week.

[SummerSnow]

1. He needs an enema real bad...lol

[marble falls]

2. He gives "He did it to himself" a bad name. No excuses. He's found the Glen Beck way:

get a tiny, tiny niche of 1,000,000 people to send you $10 per month to get on the website and buy gold coins while selling gold bullion. And write stupid books.

[Blue Owl]

3. An article you could read on the terlit