General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPope Francis Can Finish What Occupy Wall Street Started
So when Pope Francis issued his World Day of Peace message on Thursday attacking the "widening gap between those who have more and those who must be content with the crumbs," Americans listened. This is the same pope who in September criticized the global economic system for worshipping "a god called money" and said that "we want a just system that helps everyone." It's the same pope who denounced "trickle-down" economics and warned that the "idolatry of money" would lead to a "new tyranny."
While the Occupy Wall Street movement that began in 2011 deserves credit for bringing income inequality to the political front-and-center, it's Pope Francis who can actually keep it there. A big part of the reason for that is his popularity. Occupy Wall Street never had anything like the pope's approval numbers. A month after the movement began in fall 2011, more Americans approved of Occupy than disapproved by a slim margin, 39 percent to 35 percent.
But a vastly larger number of Americans supported the ideas behind the Occupy movement. A December 2011 Pew Research poll found that while Occupy at that point had just a 44 percent approval rating, 77 percent of Americans believed that "too much power in the hands of a few rich people and corporations," and 61 percent believed that the U.S. economic system was unfair and favored the wealthy.
The ideas about inequality expressed by Occupy in 2011 and by Francis today are not uncommon among Americans. But the pope is an infinitely more powerful conduit to carry and champion them. And he can be that champion without suddenly ditching the papacy and accepting a policy gig at the White House. The pope, with his infallibility and his U.S. base of over 75 million American Catholics, is already standing atop one of history's largest soapboxes. It makes sense that, in a recent speech on economic fairness, President Obama quoted Francis, asking "How can it be that it is not a news item when an elderly homeless person dies of exposure, but it is news when the stock market loses two points?"
http://www.nationaljournal.com/economy/how-pope-francis-can-finish-what-occupy-wall-street-started-20131212
villager
(26,001 posts)This should get interesting.
starroute
(12,977 posts)So Occupy is to be patted on the head and told that it was nice of them to bring inequality to everyone's attention but now they should go back to the playroom and let the grownups handle things?
Whoever wrote this doesn't have any clue about what Occupy really means. It's not about making the tax code more progressive or shoring up the social safety net. And suggesting that the pope could "finish" what Occupy started is beyond ludicrous.
Brainstormy
(2,381 posts)when you consider that the Pope is head of what is arguably the wealthiest institution on the planet.
Johonny
(20,895 posts)You know when John Paul II spoke about ending third world debt and against middle east wars... neither does anyone else. That's how effective the Pope is in influencing American politics.
1000words
(7,051 posts)Fail