Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:22 PM Dec 2013

Treated like a Queen FOR Smoking at Office Christmas Party

My husband's office Christmas party was last night at an exclusive Naples, Florida, restaurant. Ok, prepare to be the Leper for smoking. I am used to it. I went into the parking lot to smoke and a waiter happened to see me, asked why I was there, and led me by the hand to tables outside the restaurant. "The owner and her son of this restaurant smoke", he said. He clearned a table for me and brought me an ashtray.

While sitting there Maria (owner in her 70s) sat down with me. It was a cold night in Florida and she ordered staff to bring a heater to our table. We chatted about many things, on and off. Damn, this is NICE! I don't have to slink around in the darkness. I was the only person in the entire company or guests who smoked. Wellness stuff, ya know.

When I happened to mention to Maria that I really liked Veal Marsala, which was not on the set company menu for the night, she called her son over and told him to make it special for me at no charge. "Anything you want I can get you, she said". When our food was brought to the table, I got my special order. How did YOU get that? Well, MARIA said I could have it. Waiter came over to me at dessert and asked if I wanted any special desert or liquore, which I didn't even ask for. Sure, can I have.......... What the HELL, everyone else was asking. ROFL

Very, very nice to be treated this way, for a CHANGE. Thank you, Maria. Let the flaming begin, by the young health nuts.

364 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Treated like a Queen FOR Smoking at Office Christmas Party (Original Post) HockeyMom Dec 2013 OP
Good for them get the red out Dec 2013 #1
Some plain facts for the smoking promoters Ernest Partridge Dec 2013 #212
I don't smoke get the red out Dec 2013 #274
Your facts yeoman6987 Dec 2013 #329
Junk food only causes the deaths of the people who eat it. EOTE Dec 2013 #336
It was a legitimate post yeoman6987 Dec 2013 #359
Legitimately silly. EOTE Dec 2013 #361
Outstanding story! yeoman6987 Dec 2013 #328
not smoking RJReynolds isn't about 'health nut'. However, I'm thrilled to hear such a nice story KittyWampus Dec 2013 #2
Smokers are the new target for hate. Th1onein Dec 2013 #3
As a smoker, I've never felt that... LanternWaste Dec 2013 #8
me either. Viking12 Dec 2013 #75
I'll go along with that. The guy I know who gets most upset about anti-smoking rules is also brewens Dec 2013 #251
If you are thoughtful about it people have no reason to hate.. SomethingFishy Dec 2013 #114
i hate smoking. my sister in law is right now awaiting roguevalley Dec 2013 #159
This message was self-deleted by its author HangOnKids Dec 2013 #173
hangonkids, I am assuming you self deleted after a moment roguevalley Dec 2013 #253
Take that up with cancer causing compamies everywhere HangOnKids Dec 2013 #278
My perspective is entirely different. BellaKos Dec 2013 #292
roguevalley, see my post #294 Hekate Dec 2013 #298
LOL, not, not really. n-t Logical Dec 2013 #10
Absolutely. All those anti-smoker hate crimes MUST STOP! Oh, wait..... Squinch Dec 2013 #18
If you forced anyone else to stand outside in Fawke Em Dec 2013 #204
Oh, the humanity! Being forced to stand outside for a cigarette!!!! Squinch Dec 2013 #207
Nobody is forcing them to stand outside. Codeine Dec 2013 #231
If you want it you should pay for it weissmam Dec 2013 #255
Seriously, and what about my rights? EOTE Dec 2013 #338
NEW, you say? NEW? trof Dec 2013 #52
Absolutely, and I'm sick of it. Th1onein Dec 2013 #116
Smoked for 52 years fadedrose Dec 2013 #273
Especially with coffee BellaKos Dec 2013 #288
Yep fadedrose Dec 2013 #291
Yep. lol n/t BellaKos Dec 2013 #293
Hey, have you ever noticed those people who COUGH when they walk by you when Th1onein Dec 2013 #313
Ask them to cover their mouths so you don't catch something fadedrose Dec 2013 #316
I was thinking along the lines of....... Th1onein Dec 2013 #317
I'm one of them. Crunchy Frog Dec 2013 #331
Ah, come on now. You know better than that, and so do I. Th1onein Dec 2013 #332
Just look at what happens in the e cig threads... awoke_in_2003 Dec 2013 #119
Rode in with the election of Bill Clinton Samantha Dec 2013 #144
you were the majority for 500 years. roguevalley Dec 2013 #254
Not defending tobacco companies nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #262
+1 nt Live and Learn Dec 2013 #296
...Believes no one, ever n/t Scootaloo Dec 2013 #79
Because YOU said so? HangOnKids Dec 2013 #174
Because reality says so Scootaloo Dec 2013 #178
Wow, anger issues ? russspeakeasy Dec 2013 #259
Well, I see something worth being angry about Scootaloo Dec 2013 #261
^This^. The histrionics among the "oppressed" here are absurd. Squinch Dec 2013 #306
Did I Say I Smoke? HangOnKids Dec 2013 #277
I believe it. Fawke Em Dec 2013 #205
Gangs of smokist skinheads roaming the streets beating people down Codeine Dec 2013 #89
There are a lot more versions of hate than killing people or smashing windows. Th1onein Dec 2013 #115
I apologize for not taking your self-declared victimhood with the seriousness Codeine Dec 2013 #125
Now you're being rude. Th1onein Dec 2013 #242
Don't you love being told you are now going to be ignored? zappaman Dec 2013 #327
"Ultra Light Kristalnacht"....okay..I laughed...nt msanthrope Dec 2013 #221
I agree mokawanis Dec 2013 #103
Only when they inflict smoke on others. WA State has just made marijuana legal eridani Dec 2013 #187
Many people seem to forget that tobacco use is a legal activity. Arkansas Granny Dec 2013 #4
Correct. Present smoker. 840high Dec 2013 #69
I agree. Fawke Em Dec 2013 #230
Maria sounds like a very nice lady. enlightenment Dec 2013 #5
Yes HockeyMom Dec 2013 #12
Yum. enlightenment Dec 2013 #16
mmmm keroro gunsou Dec 2013 #142
I DO NOT miss the days where most people smoked and could smoke anywhere. Most don't. n-t Logical Dec 2013 #6
I'm old enough to remember when smoking was allowed *inside* at this kind of event. Nye Bevan Dec 2013 #7
No kidding. It was gross. Also, on planes, in theaters. Why is this nostalgic for people? n-t Logical Dec 2013 #9
My mom smokes and I admit to going to her house less than I would like simply because I hate the Ed Suspicious Dec 2013 #24
Both my parents smoked growing up. I hated it. Both died of smoking. nt Logical Dec 2013 #28
Same here. Not Me Dec 2013 #36
Many people smoke at our company events, they step outside, I never saw anyone be rude to them. n-t Logical Dec 2013 #40
It is still allowed in a few states. Go Vols Dec 2013 #56
You're a Vols fan... Fawke Em Dec 2013 #208
Yep,I posted the same above you, Go Vols Dec 2013 #214
I live in Missouri. xmas74 Dec 2013 #210
we'd often go the cafeteria at the hospital next door for lunch and sit in the smoking section. LanternWaste Dec 2013 #11
Please quit. Nye Bevan Dec 2013 #14
What the Health Industry DOESN'T tell you HockeyMom Dec 2013 #38
Have you tried e-cigs? If not, please do. Nye Bevan Dec 2013 #42
I am a smoker and have tried the e-cigarettes. RebelOne Dec 2013 #109
You don't inhale them the same way... awoke_in_2003 Dec 2013 #120
You have the right to kill yourself smoking. No one is saying you don't. n-t Logical Dec 2013 #43
It's all a matter of statistics. You vastly improve your chances of not dying pnwmom Dec 2013 #49
As I stated in my above post, RebelOne Dec 2013 #111
You beat the odds, yay for you. eqfan592 Dec 2013 #123
Yes, I am lucky, and maybe it is because I have a good immune system. RebelOne Dec 2013 #136
Some people die of cancer related to second hand exposure. pnwmom Dec 2013 #141
Easy to take a dismissive tone until the diagnosis comes in... Surya Gayatri Dec 2013 #169
Of course, I'm sorry to hear that about your friend. BellaKos Dec 2013 #295
Thanks for the good wishes for my friend. Surya Gayatri Dec 2013 #314
Good Lord yeoman6987 Dec 2013 #330
Depends on the population you're looking at muriel_volestrangler Dec 2013 #335
Stats yeoman6987 Dec 2013 #358
As I said, half of the women in the USA live to 83 muriel_volestrangler Dec 2013 #360
Your luck is not a rational reason for anybody else to smoke. nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2013 #190
So what? Cigarettes are still a major threat to health. pnwmom Dec 2013 #137
Yes, the evil HEALTH INDUSTRY ProudToBeBlueInRhody Dec 2013 #87
I'm greatly offended by an industry that doesn't want me dying Codeine Dec 2013 #91
I wonder if the restaurant offers free cake and cookies to obese people with Type 2 diabetes ProudToBeBlueInRhody Dec 2013 #93
There's a secret Xanax menu if you ask the waiter real nice. nt Codeine Dec 2013 #94
how about crack dlwickham Dec 2013 #202
Big Health. (nt) TacoD Dec 2013 #257
Much is in a person's genetic disposition...not all, but a significant portion... yawnmaster Dec 2013 #108
if the cancer don't get ya, the increased stroke, COPD, and emphysema risk might. dionysus Dec 2013 #133
and those, as well as cancer, have a good amount of genetic association as well... yawnmaster Dec 2013 #300
Not just length but quality of life. Not just cancer but heart, circulation, lung function, taste,nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2013 #191
that is true... yawnmaster Dec 2013 #301
My dad quit smoking more than 30 years ago. Mariana Dec 2013 #113
Do you have reason to doubt them? eqfan592 Dec 2013 #124
"...that can come back to bite you many years after you quit?" Fawke Em Dec 2013 #219
It's about probability. eqfan592 Dec 2013 #249
They did the same thing to my father nilesobek Dec 2013 #260
It's sickening how abusive some people are to smokers Mariana Dec 2013 #269
The plural of anecdote is not data. eqfan592 Dec 2013 #122
And fyi BellaKos Dec 2013 #290
The throat cancer probably was from smoking. SheilaT Dec 2013 #153
Happened to me klook Dec 2013 #182
My husband quit and gained 100 pounds. Fawke Em Dec 2013 #211
All problems are math problems. In Washington, this represents a $3285 annual problem. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #96
Smoking prohibitions in bars and restaurants have been wildly successful, and are to be applauded alcibiades_mystery Dec 2013 #13
+1000! n-t Logical Dec 2013 #15
People can adapt.. SoCalDem Dec 2013 #19
Bars are still packed, though alcibiades_mystery Dec 2013 #23
Like I said.. people adapt SoCalDem Dec 2013 #32
We now go outside HockeyMom Dec 2013 #41
Going outside isn't "finding a way." It's following the law. alcibiades_mystery Dec 2013 #48
At the end of the day, few really care what you do to yourself ProudToBeBlueInRhody Dec 2013 #83
It did happen Go Vols Dec 2013 #58
As an aside.. IrishAle Dec 2013 #81
Thanks for the back-up! Fawke Em Dec 2013 #233
As I mentioned upthread, there are places in the Fawke Em Dec 2013 #222
Irrelevant alcibiades_mystery Dec 2013 #235
Six Years After Ban, Smoking Returns to NYC's Bars and Clubs Go Vols Dec 2013 #248
A friend of mine owns a very popular bar/restaurant in CA Demobrat Dec 2013 #21
After 40 years, NO HockeyMom Dec 2013 #22
ROFL alcibiades_mystery Dec 2013 #29
no shit this is hillarious.... dionysus Dec 2013 #39
This message was self-deleted by its author HangOnKids Dec 2013 #172
this puts your disdain of health care and doctors in a new light,thanks for sharing. dionysus Dec 2013 #37
My thoughts exactly. nt eqfan592 Dec 2013 #126
+1000 former9thward Dec 2013 #46
You don't often meet people who take addiction as a point of pride. Scootaloo Dec 2013 #85
I'll be honest--I wondered how well that would go over when they first brought it up. MADem Dec 2013 #34
I remember when my mom used to smoke in the grocery store. Codeine Dec 2013 #73
Yep--I remember that as well! nt MADem Dec 2013 #157
Remember people emptying the ashtrays in the parking lots? Gotta keep the car clean, after all. Hekate Dec 2013 #299
It's nice to sit in a bar or restaurant without having to breathe in the carcinogenic smoke. Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #130
Technicaly, smoking bans are regulations, not prohibition Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2013 #302
See, you anti-smokers? HockeyMom Dec 2013 #17
LOL, OK, I guess I need to start smoking to get a heater. n-t Logical Dec 2013 #27
thread win MattBaggins Dec 2013 #33
I think your glee is misplaced. Nye Bevan Dec 2013 #30
I think your glee is misplaced passiveporcupine Dec 2013 #45
you're claiming you were born with pneumonia because your mother smoked while pregnant?!!?! azurnoir Dec 2013 #55
I can't claim it as fact passiveporcupine Dec 2013 #57
yes however infection in the amniotic fluid itself could be the culprit azurnoir Dec 2013 #70
I'm not surprised passiveporcupine Dec 2013 #88
I have an agenda-really lol no agenda simple reality azurnoir Dec 2013 #107
You are positing a world-wide conspiracy to inflate statistics pnwmom Dec 2013 #143
no I posted 2 experiences from my own life azurnoir Dec 2013 #154
It would be pointless to present your "anecdotal evidence pnwmom Dec 2013 #156
but they are signifigant in this order azurnoir Dec 2013 #158
Now you're implying that public hospitals are less ethical with their patients pnwmom Dec 2013 #162
I stated that this particular hospital does have a reputation azurnoir Dec 2013 #164
you kinow what this tired really really tired azurnoir Dec 2013 #165
it's really not glee Skittles Dec 2013 #65
I'll bet those O2 cylinders are even more expensive than the cigarettes. n/t lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #97
I'd rather have my health and deal with the minor inconvenience of the chilly air... Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #131
all the restaurants i have been to have heaters outside in case it gets cold JI7 Dec 2013 #334
Old asthmatic here Warpy Dec 2013 #20
+1 nt laundry_queen Dec 2013 #112
Except lots of times, when it's outdoors, the secondhand smoke drifts wherever it wants to. raccoon Dec 2013 #184
If it's not concentrated enough to set off my asthma, it's OK Warpy Dec 2013 #193
Glad you had a nice night, but it doesn't change the fact that you have an addiction... joeybee12 Dec 2013 #25
Hope you got a photo for your family album... Tikki Dec 2013 #26
Personally, I don't believe in willingly encouraging someone to harm themselves 1000words Dec 2013 #31
I have to disagree Warpy Dec 2013 #61
former smoker here LittleGirl Dec 2013 #35
Heh, I'm with you. EC Dec 2013 #44
Make-a-wish? hedgehog Dec 2013 #47
oh shit! dionysus Dec 2013 #263
Clearly, you are a person of high intellect and quick comprehension! hedgehog Dec 2013 #264
lighten up, i missed your post onthe first read-through! dionysus Dec 2013 #265
Post removed Post removed Dec 2013 #50
Don't choke on your self-righteousness. And happy holidays to you, too. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #63
Nice story. And a nice owner. Bet she doesn't have much worry about competition. jtuck004 Dec 2013 #51
Good for you! trof Dec 2013 #53
I quit smoking 22 years ago and STILL think this is a cool story. Only on very rare Rowdyboy Dec 2013 #54
Smokers should be treated like lepers. CSStrowbridge Dec 2013 #59
Just stay far away from me. Thank you. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #62
You see it as self righteousness demwing Dec 2013 #78
I'm not being self-righteous... CSStrowbridge Dec 2013 #135
wrong approach Skittles Dec 2013 #67
That might work, if... CSStrowbridge Dec 2013 #140
HM is a classic case of hard-core addiction Skittles Dec 2013 #145
5 years on DU and you come up with this? HangOnKids Dec 2013 #170
"I don't give me any shit about personal rights" HangOnKids Dec 2013 #175
Oops. CSStrowbridge Dec 2013 #216
Are you living in this polluted world? HangOnKids Dec 2013 #281
Your post completely lacks logic. Two harms do not make a right. Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2013 #303
This message was self-deleted by its author HangOnKids Dec 2013 #308
Goody! Please go take care of the oppresssed! HangOnKids Dec 2013 #309
What are you a Democrat for? Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2013 #310
+100 darkangel218 Dec 2013 #319
Holy Shit! I despise oppresed people? HangOnKids Dec 2013 #341
309 Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2013 #342
Of Course That Is Exactly What My Post 309 Said HangOnKids Dec 2013 #345
When did you give up driving exactly? Also, I hope there is no wood burning fireplace in your house. idwiyo Dec 2013 #177
Logical fallacies are not a good argument. CSStrowbridge Dec 2013 #224
Using products that cause huge environmental damage is optional. One doesn't have to have a phone, idwiyo Dec 2013 #239
Lepers did not choose leprosy & are not infectious. Smokers chose smoking & transmit their smoke. Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2013 #304
Maybe homegirl Dec 2013 #60
The OP didn't put down anybody HangOnKids Dec 2013 #171
Smoking/not smoking is part of the same calculus of life we all deal with in our own ways. nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #64
Young health nuts? I'm a health nut because I'm not a nicotine junkie? Codeine Dec 2013 #66
I don't have a problem with going outside to smoke. janlyn Dec 2013 #68
I don't hate smokers. I just don't want them smoking around me. Someone drinking around me does.... Logical Dec 2013 #76
I'm happy you had a nice time, but I hope you will consider quitting the cigs. MerryBlooms Dec 2013 #71
Smoking stinks demwing Dec 2013 #72
I'm always impressed by what shaming is licit and what is not. malthaussen Dec 2013 #74
People aren't generally lepers by choice, Codeine Dec 2013 #77
Is that what it is? malthaussen Dec 2013 #82
I find them both disgusting on a personal level and I don't do either of them. Codeine Dec 2013 #86
Lepers don't contaminate the air from a distance Nitram Dec 2013 #84
I'm not young... Nitram Dec 2013 #80
Thanks for chiming in HangOnKids Dec 2013 #176
I'll help you out. Nitram Dec 2013 #363
My Reading Comprehension Is Fine HangOnKids Dec 2013 #364
My one regret about quitting smoking... ljm2002 Dec 2013 #90
That's the one thing I miss too dflprincess Dec 2013 #139
I agree with that assessment Skittles Dec 2013 #147
I am glad you had a good time and I dont judge smokers. rhett o rick Dec 2013 #92
No flaming Mira Dec 2013 #95
Good for them. We need more people like that who respect the rights of adults to make decisions sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #98
That's a completely goofy comparison. eqfan592 Dec 2013 #128
We as a society have to pay for those who kill people on the road every day. Having experienced sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #146
I did absolutely no such thing. eqfan592 Dec 2013 #180
Total lack of logic in your posts. Another harm does not mitigate or deny the first harm. Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2013 #192
The new ten year study on second hand smoke has finally put to rest the nonsense, never proven with sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #213
Sabrina dad sent me, almost to the ER, due to smoking nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #223
I don't want to smoke, but I don't want to stop others who want to either. sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #271
except it has not been debunked nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #272
Post it. It is incomplete & deals with only one illness. Tons of evidence linking death & passive Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2013 #226
I'd love to see a link to the new ten year study passiveporcupine Dec 2013 #268
LOL, I'm drunk too! n-t Logical Dec 2013 #266
I wonder how the waiter felt to have smoke blowing in his face? taught_me_patience Dec 2013 #99
Because that must be what happened. hughee99 Dec 2013 #105
Maria was also a very smart businesswoman HockeyMom Dec 2013 #100
People cannot smoke in businesses in my state. Codeine Dec 2013 #101
Elder person here. About the smoking roody Dec 2013 #102
+1 nt Codeine Dec 2013 #104
Nice of Maria to do that. Brigid Dec 2013 #106
Well that's a switch MadrasT Dec 2013 #110
Marijuana was originally made illegal because it was a way of keeping blacks and hispanics away Bonobo Dec 2013 #117
I don't have hatred towards smokers. I have hatred towards the industry and the habit itself. eqfan592 Dec 2013 #132
ROFLMAO... "We don't hate the sinner we hate the sin".. SomethingFishy Dec 2013 #347
I don't believe in "sin." I'm an atheist. eqfan592 Dec 2013 #348
Well you should consider that you have no idea what I have "love" for.. SomethingFishy Dec 2013 #353
So I'm guessing you have a tough time with mirrors then? eqfan592 Dec 2013 #355
Nope just with cowards who hide their hate SomethingFishy Dec 2013 #356
Please, feel free to actually attempt to highlight my "hypocrisy" in my post. eqfan592 Dec 2013 #357
Pot was made illegal to keep away blacks and Hispanics???? Beacool Dec 2013 #149
Look back to the 1920's and 1930's. nt Bonobo Dec 2013 #152
Don't you know Cirque du So-What Dec 2013 #236
Early anti-marijuana laws were very explicitly aimed at Mexicans. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #234
Thanks, I really didn't know that. Beacool Dec 2013 #250
Tobacco Industry Is Evil yellowwoodII Dec 2013 #118
I recently went into a restaurant in a state that still allowed smoking in restaurants. bluestate10 Dec 2013 #121
Pointless. nt PrestonLocke Dec 2013 #127
It's nice that you met a nice lady and that you had a nice evening! nt cry baby Dec 2013 #129
Here's hoping one day you will quit! nt Raine Dec 2013 #134
Good for Maria! She made it to the ripe old age of 70. JDPriestly Dec 2013 #138
I'm glad that you had a great time. Beacool Dec 2013 #148
I'm glad you had such a wonderful night. Jasana Dec 2013 #150
This message was self-deleted by its author russspeakeasy Dec 2013 #151
After 40 years I finally stopped. DeSwiss Dec 2013 #155
Smoker here BellaKos Dec 2013 #160
And my dad, who died at 87 nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #203
Damn it all. BellaKos Dec 2013 #279
Well you should try this anecdotal evidence you have nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #280
Funny you should mention the CDC BellaKos Dec 2013 #282
Yup, they cook all at CDC and at the Surgeon General nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #285
Well, I'm glad you're able to "chuckle." BellaKos Dec 2013 #286
Ah, I think Carl Sagan fits here, like a glove nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #315
Finally! BellaKos Dec 2013 #320
And I will now welcome you to my ignore list nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #324
nadinbrzezinski/Yes, wus out. LOL n/t BellaKos Dec 2013 #325
Welcome to the Iggy list! zappaman Dec 2013 #326
Good for you. Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #161
My favorite posts... hurple Dec 2013 #163
The OP started it by anticipating 'health nuts' posting here muriel_volestrangler Dec 2013 #181
I believe my sig line adequately expresses my sentiments. small D democrat Dec 2013 #199
ALL smokers are sisters and brothers - and some day we shall be free Douglas Carpenter Dec 2013 #166
I don't mind stepping outside to smoke Prophet 451 Dec 2013 #167
E-cigarettes - are a LOT, LOT cheaper as well. Since I quite smoking about a year and a half ago Douglas Carpenter Dec 2013 #168
I enjoyed smoking. I like vaping even better. Mariana Dec 2013 #318
I guess smokers are "persecuted" the way Christians are in this country... fujiyama Dec 2013 #179
Ever since I found out Doc Holliday Dec 2013 #183
I think it is always sweet when you find a kindred spirit, and always sweet tblue37 Dec 2013 #185
With my allergies I cannot be in a room with smokers - TBF Dec 2013 #186
Last year I was asked repeatedly if I was or were a smoker. The reason my doctors asked me .... marble falls Dec 2013 #188
Emotions cover up the point on smoking mdbl Dec 2013 #189
If I go to that restaurant, can I get treated like a queen for having unprotected sex? MNBrewer Dec 2013 #194
Congratulations on the most random comment in this thread...nt Jesus Malverde Dec 2013 #232
Well, I don't smoke, but I was wondering if other forms of self-destructive behavior MNBrewer Dec 2013 #270
LOVE THIS !!!!! Howler Dec 2013 #195
Sorry, don't agree this is a good story HelenWheels Dec 2013 #196
Erm... It appears you didn't read the story. She was outside... ScreamingMeemie Dec 2013 #198
My mother has smoked for 77 years. dinger130 Dec 2013 #197
93... Agree with the doc nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #206
Yep. That's what we used to say about my grandfather laundry_queen Dec 2013 #283
Enjoy the special treatment nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #200
nadin, I'm sure she realizes all the heath problems possible d/t smoking. polly7 Dec 2013 #215
I just pointed out the attitude nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #220
I'm really sorry about your Dad, that's a hard thing to watch. polly7 Dec 2013 #227
The last two years he was on O2 almost 24/7 nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #238
I agree that referring to people who object to smoking as young health nuts isn't polly7 Dec 2013 #241
Why the cigs are bad for you nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #247
the phrase attention whore comes to mind dlwickham Dec 2013 #201
Harsh. nt. polly7 Dec 2013 #218
And "young health nuts" is ok? Hissyspit Dec 2013 #225
wtf? polly7 Dec 2013 #229
allowing someone to poison those around her with second hand smoke is not kind dlwickham Dec 2013 #245
maybe dlwickham Dec 2013 #244
No, it doesn't. nt. polly7 Dec 2013 #246
And the jury results are in... aikoaiko Dec 2013 #252
I can't help noticing that while... TreasonousBastard Dec 2013 #209
Lots of the pubs in the UK have outdoor heaters for smoking areas dipsydoodle Dec 2013 #217
Misery likes company ann--- Dec 2013 #228
There is a great book to read. It's from an author named Alan Carr. Jesus Malverde Dec 2013 #237
I remember years ago frazzled Dec 2013 #240
you have been copycatted ... sincerest form of flattery, I hear Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2013 #243
Wow ! There a lot of self righteous and mean spirited people on this post. russspeakeasy Dec 2013 #256
The reason why has just occurred to me. BellaKos Dec 2013 #284
Are we supposed to applaud the fact that you smoke? kestrel91316 Dec 2013 #258
Why, yes you are! BellaKos Dec 2013 #287
Do you think calling DUers 'nuts' is condescension too? muriel_volestrangler Dec 2013 #307
hmmm Interesting question. BellaKos Dec 2013 #321
OK, we get that you don't understand the science muriel_volestrangler Dec 2013 #322
Well, I understand ... BellaKos Dec 2013 #323
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2013 #267
Awesome! I'm gonna start teaching my grandchildren how to smoke as soon as they start school! Zorra Dec 2013 #275
Don't care what drugs you choose to abuse RedCappedBandit Dec 2013 #276
Sounds awesome! We smokers don't receive kindness very often. Tx4obama Dec 2013 #289
Glad you enjoyed your evening out and made a new friend. My daughter started at age 12... Hekate Dec 2013 #294
If you really wanna' be scared. BellaKos Dec 2013 #297
So glad you had a lovely time! JNelson6563 Dec 2013 #305
OK ...I'm going to start smoking. Free food is a deal maker. L0oniX Dec 2013 #311
OK. pecwae Dec 2013 #312
i socially smoke and i dont think its nutty for nonsmokers to not want to be exposed La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2013 #333
I went to see my Aunt in the hospital in London last year.. HipChick Dec 2013 #337
"Your 25 inch waist and 32 inch hips put you at risk of a HEART ATTACK" HockeyMom Dec 2013 #339
Just to point out, your stories are most likely untrue, you seem to have a chip on your... Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #340
I worked for a public school district in Florida HockeyMom Dec 2013 #344
Every post you've made in this thread: Codeine Dec 2013 #349
At ease. Smoke em if you got em. Kingofalldems Dec 2013 #343
No consideration that Maria just liked your company? Barack_America Dec 2013 #346
Judging from the content and tenor of her posts Codeine Dec 2013 #350
I will agree with that HockeyMom Dec 2013 #362
Well HM you got them all going... SomethingFishy Dec 2013 #351
This thread is still around? Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #352
Well then it's a good thing you didn't post it... SomethingFishy Dec 2013 #354

get the red out

(13,468 posts)
1. Good for them
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:24 PM
Dec 2013

I don't smoke, but I rather like a touch of freedom and non-persecution to go with my broccoli.

Ernest Partridge

(135 posts)
212. Some plain facts for the smoking promoters
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:11 PM
Dec 2013

Half a million Americans die prematurely each year from smoking related illnesses. Among them, a sizable number of non-smokers who are victimized by second-hand smoke.

In one generation, anti-smoking campaigns along with increasing social sanctions have cut the number of smokers in the US approximately in half, no doubt saving hundreds of thousands of lives.

Quite frankly, someone else's tobacco smoke makes me sick. Ditto millions of others. Dining out and airline travel used to be an ordeal. No longer.

Sure enough, telling a smoker that he can't smoke in a restaurant or on a plane is a restriction on his freedom. But allowing him to do so is an assault on others, affecting their health and comfort.

It's an timeless dilemma: "your rights end where my nose begins."

In this case, the non-smoker's right to comfort and good health -- his freedom from assault -- should prevail.

get the red out

(13,468 posts)
274. I don't smoke
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 10:06 PM
Dec 2013

So I am not creating air problems for anyone. It has just rubbed me the wrong way to see people demonized for smoking. I just wish corporate polluters would be held in such low regard as individuals with a bad habit.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
329. Your facts
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:48 AM
Dec 2013

Well people who eat junk food cause more deaths and health costs than smokers. Again, I don't smoke, but the treatment they get for a legal substance is horrible.

EOTE

(13,409 posts)
336. Junk food only causes the deaths of the people who eat it.
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 04:25 PM
Dec 2013

No one has to worry about second-hand Cheetos, so the comparison is rather lame.

EOTE

(13,409 posts)
361. Legitimately silly.
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 10:16 AM
Dec 2013

It was, however, nowhere near approaching 'valid' or 'insightful'. Again, the problem with smoking in public is that it affects others. A 20 something in his basement eating Cheetos doesn't affect anyone else's health.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
328. Outstanding story!
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:46 AM
Dec 2013

Good for you. You will remember this forever. Glad you had a wonderful experience. I don't smoke, but I do see how they are treated and it is horrible to treat fellow human beings this way.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
2. not smoking RJReynolds isn't about 'health nut'. However, I'm thrilled to hear such a nice story
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:27 PM
Dec 2013

about someone doing something nice for another.

Lovely gesture.

In another century houses has "smoking rooms".

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
8. As a smoker, I've never felt that...
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:37 PM
Dec 2013

As a smoker, I've never felt or seen that... or even pretended to out of a sense of duty to melodrama.

brewens

(13,623 posts)
251. I'll go along with that. The guy I know who gets most upset about anti-smoking rules is also
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 04:31 PM
Dec 2013

the most offensive smoker I know. No etiquette at all when smoking where it's allowed. At our Eagles Lodge there are three of four along with him that smoke non-stop and make it twice as bad as it should be. He also throws butts down wherever he happens to be. Ashtrays inside, one right outside the back door and one in his car and you still see his butts all over the parking lot. Who will scream the loudest when they bad smoking in public completely? When that happens in our town part of the reason will be the mess and expense of picking up butts everywhere.

I'm a cigar and pipe smoker but even though mine are completely biodegradable, I don't throw a cigar down or dump my pipe out where it will be noticeable. The cigars are large enough to trip someone anyway!

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
114. If you are thoughtful about it people have no reason to hate..
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 10:27 PM
Dec 2013

The only place I have ever seen real hatred of smokers is DU.. The vitriol on here gets crazy sometimes. But out in the real world I am careful that my habit doesn't bother anyone else and I almost never have any problems..

The only place I ever have issues is when I'm on a loading dock. You stand there with half a dozen 18 wheelers running, 4 or 5 forklifts spewing propane and man if you try to smoke the dockmaster will likely pull your head off for ruining his health...

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
159. i hate smoking. my sister in law is right now awaiting
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 01:47 AM
Dec 2013

The verdict because she smokes. Fuck. smoking. A disgusting addiction.

Response to roguevalley (Reply #159)

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
253. hangonkids, I am assuming you self deleted after a moment
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 04:43 PM
Dec 2013

of thought. Thank you for that. Considering my circumstances I should be allowed to disagree even if I amnot waiting with dread for the news about my sister in law. A couple of things anyway...

1. I said 'fuck smoking', not smokers.

2. Smoking is an addiction like meth, booze and overeating. I feel for addicts because food was once an addiction for me. Just because it is legal doesn't change a damn thing. Its a killing addiction.

3. My sister in law is facing really bad news. That should have been enough to leave me alone. This isn't some bullshit libertarian thing for me, smoking. I lost the following people to smoking:

Uncles: 5
aunts: 2
cousins: 3 that I am currently aware of
parents: my luminously beautiful dad
grandparents: my two grandpas

I HATE SMOKING! I earned the right to say so. I also have ALWAYS had the right to have smokers blow their poison somewhere other than at me. How is it that you can have the freedom to smoke and I can't have the SAME FREEDOM to not smoke? How does it feel to be the minority? Now you understand what it has been like for non-smokers for 500 YEARS. Now you know what it feels like when smokers turned on me when I asked them not to smoke around me MY WHOLE LIFE!

I am old. I remember seeing smokers in the grocery store. I will always HATE SMOKING! I lost my family to cigarettes and the companies who made them and lied. They continue to lie too. This isn't about freedom. No addict is ever free. You are a slave to companies that make a product that kills you if you smoke.

I am entitled to be free of smoke. My compassion is always extended to addicts even if their choice of poison is legal. If you have an opinion about this and can express it freely, so the same should I without fear of being slagged. You and I will just have to agree to disagree.

I pray my sister in law isn't going to be added to my list. I HATE SMOKING! FUCK SMOKING!

 

HangOnKids

(4,291 posts)
278. Take that up with cancer causing compamies everywhere
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 12:25 AM
Dec 2013

I'm sure you will get a great response. Call Ford, Chrysler, GM, Mercedes etc. Oh and all the petrol companies. And the pesticide companies...do I need to go on. You live in a polluted cancer crazy world. If you don't want to smoke fine, but please do not get on a high horse here. Enough.

BellaKos

(318 posts)
292. My perspective is entirely different.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 03:28 AM
Dec 2013

First, please accept my condolences for the losses of your loved ones. And may I join with you in the hope that your sister-in-law is healthy.

In my family there are or were four grandparents, numerous great aunts and great uncles, fourteen pairs of aunts and uncles, thirty or so first cousins, four pairs of in-laws, a bunch of nieces and nephews, a brother, two half-sisters, a husband, daughter, and, of course, two parents.

I could make a similar list of loved ones who have died because of alcoholism. My alcoholic brother, who has never smoked in his life, nearly died at age 55 because of major heart attack. Ironically, the smokers among my clan haven't seemed to have had any ill effect from smoking. And some of whom have lived to nearly 90 and beyond.

So, from my perspective, I cannot blame smoking for the health problems that are in my family or that I have witnessed among my friends. But I do have a good reason to hate alcohol abuse.

And yes ...
Corporations, in general, are evil. And that includes the pharmaceutical industries.

Again, I hope that your sister-in-law is healthy.
Keep calm and carry on!

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
204. If you forced anyone else to stand outside in
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 01:52 PM
Dec 2013

100+ heat or negative temperatures, people would consider you a sadist. Possibly even a criminal.

Yet, that's what happens to smokers.

Why can't they have a vented room to the side?

So, yes, there is anti-smoking hate crimes.

Squinch

(51,021 posts)
207. Oh, the humanity! Being forced to stand outside for a cigarette!!!!
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 01:58 PM
Dec 2013

With no special building renovations to accommodate me!!!!

It's sadistic and criminal!!!!!

And hate-y!!!!

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
231. Nobody is forcing them to stand outside.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:36 PM
Dec 2013

They don't need to smoke. If they CHOOSE to smoke they're CHOOSING to stand outside. If they want to stay inside and be comfy and warm then they can choose to do that as well. Nobody needs to build a special vented room off to the side of every building. Go outside or don't smoke.

And there are vast numbers of people who work all goddamned day in 100+ temps and subzero temps and nobody is accusing them of being victims of "hate crimes."

A little perspective, dude.

EOTE

(13,409 posts)
338. Seriously, and what about my rights?
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 04:31 PM
Dec 2013

I try to rub one out at work and they're always telling me to do that shit at home. Smokers should have the right to smoke wherever they want just as I should have the right to masturbate wherever I want. This is not the America I know and love.

Hate crimes, really? That's got to be one of the stupidest things I've ever read here. And no one is forcing any smoker to stand outside. They just can't spew their smoke in everyone else's face in confined areas. I truly hope you're trying to be comedic with your post.

trof

(54,256 posts)
52. NEW, you say? NEW?
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 06:44 PM
Dec 2013

No, we've been targeted for over two decades.
Even here on liberal DU.
I haven;t read the rest of the comments but I'm sure there are many tsk-tsking and telling horror stories about the devastating effects of smoking and second-hand and even third-hand smoke, etc.

We are the minority that it's OK, even laudable, to insult, put down, criticize, denigrate, and even legislate against.

fadedrose

(10,044 posts)
273. Smoked for 52 years
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 09:35 PM
Dec 2013

Enjoyed every cigarette except for the first few when I didn't know how to smoke yet.

Enjoy Hockey Mom....

It's one of those pleasures I can't describe to someone who never smoked.

BellaKos

(318 posts)
288. Especially with coffee
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 02:27 AM
Dec 2013

Have you noticed that you're being ignored by the Self-Righteous around here? Worse than Church Ladies.

fadedrose

(10,044 posts)
291. Yep
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 02:47 AM
Dec 2013

In fact, it was a relief to leave them to go outside and smoke with real people who needed a break from all the perfection inside the arena.

Th1onein

(8,514 posts)
313. Hey, have you ever noticed those people who COUGH when they walk by you when
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 12:06 PM
Dec 2013

you are outside smoking? I swear to God, I'm going to say something really mean and rude to the next one who does that.

Th1onein

(8,514 posts)
317. I was thinking along the lines of.......
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 02:48 PM
Dec 2013

Yeah, your husband DID say you had bad breath, when we were in bed last night. He likes my smoky breath much better.

Crunchy Frog

(26,647 posts)
331. I'm one of them.
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 02:12 PM
Dec 2013

The smoke get's into my passages and irritates them. So sorry that my physiological responses are so annoying to you.

Th1onein

(8,514 posts)
332. Ah, come on now. You know better than that, and so do I.
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 04:04 PM
Dec 2013

We're OUTSIDE smoking in the area where we have been told to smoke in. How about you just stay the hell out of our area? WE stay the hell out of yours!

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
119. Just look at what happens in the e cig threads...
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 11:16 PM
Dec 2013

they even hate those of us who are trying to quit.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
144. Rode in with the election of Bill Clinton
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 12:17 AM
Dec 2013

I read it in his bio. He wanted to do two things when he arrived here in Washington -- get Americans to quit smoking and to quit drinking. He was pretty successful with getting a start on the first, on the second -- not so much. Apparently, the liquor lobby has a lot more influence than the tobacco lobby.

So with this slight background in mind, whenever someone criticizes you for smoking, just tell them you don't inhale.

Sam

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
254. you were the majority for 500 years.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 04:47 PM
Dec 2013

now you are the minority. it is the way things go as science advances and we find out that the companies lied about smoking all these years. if you want to continue to support that, fine. The rest of us don't. We have legit reasons and we will give them. if you want to denegrate that, fine. But you do so supporting the companies that lied about smoking when you do. Agree to disagree.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
262. Not defending tobacco companies
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 06:03 PM
Dec 2013

But if what they sold was tobacco and not crack tobacco (it is highly processed by the industry, they also add nicotine to the delivery system) it would have less health effects, including the addictive power.

I remember asking an exec of Marlboro why not try a natural line? You know like well, the Native Americans smoked? To his credit he was honest, not addictive enough. If you have ever been among people smoking tobacco, just dried, not processed, it even smells differently. I have, it is still part of Native American ceremonies.

It is, not shitting you, crack tobacco, like crack cocaine. The leaves of cocaine are pretty innocent when compared to the white powder sold in the streets of the US. Chemistry and all that.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
178. Because reality says so
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 06:28 AM
Dec 2013

Smokers are the new targets for hate, huh? Oh yes. You guys must have it so hard, what with the constant assaults, the burnings of your... what, smoking bars? Do you have those for people to burn down like they do gay clubs or synagogues or mosques or community centers? If you do, and they're getting burned, that's rough, yeah. And it's not like you can vote or run for office to change these things! Now that you're permitted housing anyway, you know; hard to vote without a district, even if you weren't barred from it! And man, growing up as a smoker! It starts in kindergarten and never lets up, does it? "Let me feel your hands, oh, they're so cold and different!" "Can you smile like normal people smile?" "I heard smokers have sideways hootchies; show me yours!" "Oh, you did very well on your paper, for someone with your... habits." It's hell, just a living hell, I'm sure. Enough to make you wish you'd not been form with a smoke hanging from your lip.

Ahem.

No. You are not "the new targets for hate." Every time - and I do mean every time - I see this claim, it is some entitled, privileged fuck who knows they have it good, and feels like they could have it better, if only they could convince everyone that they have it worse. Whatever disdain people hold for you probably stems less from your addiction, and more from your apparent belief that "No Smoking" is the new "Arbeit Macht Frei."

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
261. Well, I see something worth being angry about
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 05:54 PM
Dec 2013

There are people who are targets of hate. Entire groups of people who are abused, assaulted, violated, and maligned. men and women who have been murdered, been beaten, mutilated, and jailed simply because they are members of these groups and no other reason. Entire communities who have been driven from their homes on the basis of hatred against them, and who can't even turn to the law becuase the law is set against them as well.

For HockeyMom, or Th1onein, or whoever else, to claim that their smoking habit places them in this category, much less supplants these victims of hatred ("we're the new target of hate!&quot is in fact an effort to belittle and lessen the very real discrimination and hatred directed at numerous groups in the country and around the world. There's a poster claiming smokers are treated worse than lepers, for fuck's sake, when was the last time smokers were torn from their families and communities and thrown onto a deserted island to suffer and die alone? And why are we comparing a disease of privilege and choice, to a disease tied to poverty that no one chooses, anyway?

So yes, I am angry that a number of douchebags are pretending to be Anne Frank or Solomon Northup or Leonard Peltier or something, because they can't light up in someone else's place of business.

Squinch

(51,021 posts)
306. ^This^. The histrionics among the "oppressed" here are absurd.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 08:18 AM
Dec 2013

I was a smoker for 25 years. I would never, even when I was smoking, have compared myself to the TRUE victims of hate crimes.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
89. Gangs of smokist skinheads roaming the streets beating people down
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 08:07 PM
Dec 2013

for buying a box of Benson and Hedges -- that shit happens all the time. Soon all the smoke shops will have their windows smashed in the Ultra Light Kristalnacht.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
125. I apologize for not taking your self-declared victimhood with the seriousness
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 11:31 PM
Dec 2013

you insist it deserves.

zappaman

(20,606 posts)
327. Don't you love being told you are now going to be ignored?
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 04:18 AM
Dec 2013

It's like the person saying it somehow thinks you will be crushed in the knowledge you are being ignored.

mokawanis

(4,452 posts)
103. I agree
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 09:01 PM
Dec 2013

it's now acceptable for anyone and everyone to treat smokers with contempt. I follow all the rules and only smoke where it's allowed. Anyone who asks for more than that is talking to the wrong person.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
187. Only when they inflict smoke on others. WA State has just made marijuana legal
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 09:22 AM
Dec 2013

I don't feel the slightest bit oppressed for not being allowed to smoke it in public places.

Arkansas Granny

(31,533 posts)
4. Many people seem to forget that tobacco use is a legal activity.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:29 PM
Dec 2013

As long as you don't smoke in restricted areas, to each his own.

Full disclosure: former smoker.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
230. I agree.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:35 PM
Dec 2013

My beef is with the militant among us who seem to think smokers aren't afforded any rights in the Constitution.

I am a polite smoker - when I smoke (I don't at work - too much hassle). I smoke outside at home (we have a covered porch during inclimate weather and a beautiful back deck that, in my opinion, is the best "room" in the house) and I always "field strip" my cigs and throw the butt away when I'm out and about.

I also wish there were more options for smokers. I can understand some not wanting to go where craploads of people are smoking inside and fogging up the joint, but there should be vented areas available for smokers so they don't have to be herded outside like lepers. Actually, I kind of like our state law that allows the owners of Over 21 establishments to make their own decision. No children will be going to those places and adults can make up their own damn minds whether they want to go to the Smoking or Non-Smoking establishment. They have a CHOICE.

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
5. Maria sounds like a very nice lady.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:33 PM
Dec 2013

Was the Veal Marsala good? Did they serve it with pasta or potatoes (I prefer pasta)?

And what did you have for dessert? You didn't finish the story!

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
7. I'm old enough to remember when smoking was allowed *inside* at this kind of event.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:36 PM
Dec 2013

Clouds of smoke everywhere, and the stench that got into my clothes by the end of the evening was absolutely horrible.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
24. My mom smokes and I admit to going to her house less than I would like simply because I hate the
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:54 PM
Dec 2013

smell and what it does to my sinuses and clothing.

Not Me

(3,398 posts)
36. Same here.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 06:05 PM
Dec 2013

I hated it. But it was their choice and I honestly believe they got some enjoyment from it.
We all make our choices.

I am glad that the original poster was not made to feel as a pariah at an event that was meant to be fun.

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
40. Many people smoke at our company events, they step outside, I never saw anyone be rude to them. n-t
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 06:09 PM
Dec 2013

Go Vols

(5,902 posts)
56. It is still allowed in a few states.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 06:56 PM
Dec 2013

You can smoke in restaurants and bars here that don't allow children.In Mo. last month and could smoke everywhere.
I remember having two broken arms and in the hospital in the early '80s,I would hit the buzzer and the nurse would come in,put a cig in my mouth and light it and set an ashtray on my chest,then come back and put it out.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
208. You're a Vols fan...
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 01:58 PM
Dec 2013

You should know its still allowed in Over 21 places here in Tennessee.

Ironically, those are the most popular.

A lot of people who don't smoke regularly, smoke when they drink.

Go Vols

(5,902 posts)
214. Yep,I posted the same above you,
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:12 PM
Dec 2013

and I do only/mostly go to places that bar kids and allow smoking.

xmas74

(29,676 posts)
210. I live in Missouri.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:05 PM
Dec 2013

No statewide ban but several cities and towns have bans, including my town, and several more are in talks.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
11. we'd often go the cafeteria at the hospital next door for lunch and sit in the smoking section.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:40 PM
Dec 2013

In the early 90's, when I worked at an outpatient cancer treatment center in DFW, we'd often go the cafeteria at the hospital next door for lunch and sit in the smoking section.

Seems so... absurd now to imagine a smoking section inside a hospital, but we were pretty stupid in our dogma to smoke when and where we wanted to.

I was young at the time... obviously not a health nut still-- as I'm yet a pack a day smoker, but I recognize moderation and there is a time and a place for most things, and find rationalizing my addiction as something other than it is as more absurdity.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
14. Please quit.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:43 PM
Dec 2013

Within 20 minutes: Your blood pressure and pulse rate drops

Within eight hours: Carbon monoxide and oxygen levels in your blood returns to normal

Within 24 hours: Your chance of heart attack decreases

Within 48 hours: Your ability to smell and taste is better

Between two weeks and three months: Your circulation and lung function improves and walking becomes easier

Within one to nine months: Cilia grow again in the lungs, fatigue, coughing, sinus congestion and shortness of breath decrease

After just a year: Your risk of heart attack is less than that of smoker

After five years: Your odds of developing lung, throat, mouth and esophagus cancer drops by almost half

Between five and 15 years: Your stroke risk is reduced to that of a non-smoker

After 10 years: Your lung cancer death rate is similar to that of non-smokers

After 15 years: You have the same risk of heart disease as a non-smoker

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
38. What the Health Industry DOESN'T tell you
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 06:07 PM
Dec 2013

My SIL smoked for 10 years from age 20 to 30 and then quit. At age 40 she got throat cancer. They blamed it on her smoking. Right. Do they tell you that? I am 65 and have smoked for over 40 years and I am still ALIVE. Wow. If I quit smoking, I will live FOREVER! No, thank you, at my age I am resgined to dying sooner rather than later, for WHATEVER reason.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
42. Have you tried e-cigs? If not, please do.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 06:10 PM
Dec 2013

They are infinitely better for you and should satisfy your craving.

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
109. I am a smoker and have tried the e-cigarettes.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 09:21 PM
Dec 2013

They caused me to cough, and I have never coughed smoking cigarettes. I am 74 years old and have been smoking since I was 16.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
120. You don't inhale them the same way...
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 11:19 PM
Dec 2013

draw the vapor into your mouth, then inhale. If you inhale straight off the e cig it will give you a throat hit. I was a pack a day menthol smoker and they got me, too, until I figured it out.

pnwmom

(108,997 posts)
49. It's all a matter of statistics. You vastly improve your chances of not dying
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 06:37 PM
Dec 2013

from smoking-related cancers if you quit when you're young. But you don't eliminate the risk. Your SIL was one of the unlucky ones and you're one of the lucky ones -- so far.

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
111. As I stated in my above post,
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 09:25 PM
Dec 2013

I am 74 years old and have been smoking since I was 16. I know it will get me eventually, but I will die happy with my cigarette in my hand. When I was 44, a doctor told me that I had better quit smoking or I would die soon. That was 34 years ago and I am still here.

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
123. You beat the odds, yay for you.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 11:27 PM
Dec 2013

Many others won't, and hopefully those people won't try to use your lucky story as an excuse to slowly kill themselves.

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
136. Yes, I am lucky, and maybe it is because I have a good immune system.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 11:59 PM
Dec 2013

No telling how long my luck will hold out. I will be 75 next month, and I have outlived many friends and family members, some who smoked and some who didn't. A cousin died of lung cancer and had never smoked in his life.

pnwmom

(108,997 posts)
141. Some people die of cancer related to second hand exposure.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 12:04 AM
Dec 2013

That's what they believe happened to Dana Reeve, who was exposed as she sang in bars. Before the cigarette laws were put into place, people who worked in bars, restaurants, and airplanes were exposed to smoke for hours every day.

Even today some people live with spouses or parents who smoke in the house.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
169. Easy to take a dismissive tone until the diagnosis comes in...
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 05:10 AM
Dec 2013

A very good 85-year-old friend is in hospital struggling to swallow food and stay alive after a harrowing 50/50 operation three weeks ago.

Her stomach and half of her esophagus were removed. She was a smoker for 60 years, from the age of 15 to 75, when she finally kicked it.

Believe me, you don't want to go that way. Esophagal cancer may be the worst.
Like you, she seemed to think it couldn't happen to her--"because my blood panels are fine".

Now, the most frequent phrase out of her mouth, when she can manage to pronounce a few words: "It just snuck up on me--I was fine and then I was dying"...

BellaKos

(318 posts)
295. Of course, I'm sorry to hear that about your friend.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 04:11 AM
Dec 2013

But let's face it. At 85 anything can get you. And she's very fortunate to have lived as long as she has without any major health problems.

My aunt, for instance, was bed-ridden from complications due to a stroke for years before she died around that age. She never smoked, nor drank, and was careful about her diet. She also had breast cancer that came about during the years she was incapacitated. The family suspects that the cause of her stroke was that she fiddled with her medications in an effort to save money.

A few years after her death, her husband, my uncle, also died around that age because of an internal infection that wasn't caught in time. Of course, he was worn down for having been her primary care giver all those years she lay in bed at home. He had smoked early in his life.

My great aunt had no apparent health problems whatsoever and fell over in her yard one day at age 87. She was depressed, however, because she was very lonely and used to talk about the fact that she was "the only one left" -- meaning that all her peers were already dead. She smoked her entire adult life.

So please .... if you're going to use anecdotal evidence, then please don't leap to any conclusions about what causes a disease in an individual.

You can preach all you like -- and you have --- but let's face it. People get sick. People die. And people -- even doctors and scientists -- don't know everything.

That said, I offer my sympathies for the situation you've described. Watching a friend who is suffering is a gut-wrenching, emotionally draining experience. Please know that I do sympathize with you and, of course, hope for the best outcome for her.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
314. Thanks for the good wishes for my friend.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 01:35 PM
Dec 2013

She seems to be rallying and getting slightly stronger--still a long road back, though.

Her surgeons confirmed that the her esophageal cancer was directly related to her 60-year smoking habit and parallel poor eating habits. She basically lived on cigs and espresso coffee.
The type of cancer and its location were clear markers.

Even with asthma and emphysema, she was a picture of solid health until this hit her out of the blue. Her own mother lived to be 96.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
330. Good Lord
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 08:04 AM
Dec 2013

85? Heck the MAJORITY of people don't live that long and even (shutter) MOST non-smokers don't even live that long. Your friend is dang lucky and should be thankful to have lived so long.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,376 posts)
335. Depends on the population you're looking at
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 04:22 PM
Dec 2013

Median age of death for all women in England and Wales is now 85: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171776_292196.pdf (Table 1), so most female non-smokers probably do like beyond 85.

though in the USA it's about 83: http://www.ssa.gov/oact/NOTES/pdf_studies/study120.pdf

To find the rough difference that smoking makes, if we look at British male doctors born 1900-1930 who had made it to 60, we find that the median age of death was about 84 for those who never smoked, and 76 for those who were still smoking: http://www.bmj.com/content/328/7455/1519 (Fig. 1); so there's a fair chance that over half of American non-smoking women live to 86 or above.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
358. Stats
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 12:05 AM
Dec 2013

I highly doubt it. Plus to use Britain as an example is not even remotely right to compare to America. No way does over half the women in America live past 86.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,376 posts)
360. As I said, half of the women in the USA live to 83
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 07:00 AM
Dec 2013

and we can see that smoking can make a difference of 8 years in the median age. Therefore it's quite possible that non-smoking women have a median age of death of 86, and smokers of 80, if they were equal size groups.

What's most important to remember, both experts said, is that smoking cessation works. When people quit smoking, their health improves dramatically and their risk of dying decreases.

A second study in the same journal issue found that lifetime smokers lose an average of about 10 years of life compared to people who never smoked. But, that same study found that people who quit between the ages of 25 and 34 gain an average of 10 years of life compared to those who continue to smoke. Even if you quit at 55 to 64, you still reap an extra four years, according to the study.

The same gains aren't seen by people who just reduce the amount of cigarettes they smoke, Thun noted. "The real benefit comes from quitting," he said. "You're never too old to quit."

http://health.usnews.com/health-news/news/articles/2013/01/23/womens-smoking-deaths-at-all-time-high-in-us

pnwmom

(108,997 posts)
137. So what? Cigarettes are still a major threat to health.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 12:00 AM
Dec 2013

You are one of the lucky exceptions. So far.

So was my husband's uncle . . . till he got esophageal cancer, at about your age. It didn't kill him then, but he lost his voice to a little computerized voice box, that he had to use till he died of cancer ten years later.

He didn't die happily with a cigarette in his hand, by the way. The new voice box was the end of that. And neither did his wife, who died unhappily of lung cancer. She couldn't smoke with the oxygen tank she was constantly attached to.

They were alive, at least, to attend their son's wedding: with his implanted voice box and her oxygen tank. Fortunately, their son never became a smoker. But it sure hurt him to see what had happened to his parents.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
87. Yes, the evil HEALTH INDUSTRY
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 08:03 PM
Dec 2013

Clearly profiting from all the non-smokers who come down with emphysema and lung cancer compared to the amount who smoke and develop it.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
91. I'm greatly offended by an industry that doesn't want me dying
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 08:08 PM
Dec 2013

with my lungs full of liquid and cancer. Those assholes.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
93. I wonder if the restaurant offers free cake and cookies to obese people with Type 2 diabetes
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 08:14 PM
Dec 2013

That sounds like a nice thing to do as well. Who are we to judge?

yawnmaster

(2,812 posts)
108. Much is in a person's genetic disposition...not all, but a significant portion...
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 09:18 PM
Dec 2013

about 86% of smokers will not get cancer.
The 14% that do is 10x the non-smoking population of smokers.
And there is a population of that 14% that may have a genetic mutation that makes them about 2x as likely to get cancer than those without the mutation.
Chance probably does still play a role...with smoking increasing the chance of a mutation.
Some people have a higher chance of a bad mutation because of their genetics.
(similar to the brca genes increasing the risk for a type breast cancer)

Here is an interesting article:
http://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/genes-smoking-and-lung-cancer-804

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
133. if the cancer don't get ya, the increased stroke, COPD, and emphysema risk might.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 11:50 PM
Dec 2013

and the general ability to not breathe well, to boot.

yawnmaster

(2,812 posts)
300. and those, as well as cancer, have a good amount of genetic association as well...
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 06:22 AM
Dec 2013

depending on one's genetics the risk will go up or down.
In all cases, of course, there is a greater risk than not smoking at all.

yawnmaster

(2,812 posts)
301. that is true...
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 06:26 AM
Dec 2013

With all the other diseases there is still a genetic factor that will vary the risk.
There is always more risk than non-smoking.

Quality of life, at least in my opinion, is more important than length of life (although I'd like to live a long life of quality!)

That said, if one gets much enjoyment from something such as smoking, they have to weigh this in the quality of life equation, and it is different for each person.

A higher risk than smoking, obesity, etc..is stress.
but that would be another topic

Mariana

(14,861 posts)
113. My dad quit smoking more than 30 years ago.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 10:18 PM
Dec 2013

Couple years back he got bladder cancer, and they blamed it on his smoking.

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
124. Do you have reason to doubt them?
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 11:30 PM
Dec 2013

I mean, besides your not understand how smoking works and may affect the body, and how that can come back to bite you many years after you quit?

And did they say "it was the smoking" or did they say "smoking likely contributed to it?"

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
219. "...that can come back to bite you many years after you quit?"
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:16 PM
Dec 2013

Then why quit?

If you're "doomed" if you ever smoked - ever, why risk gaining weight or stopping the pleasure of the dopamine hit?

I'm confused. Are you arguing for or against quitting?

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
249. It's about probability.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 03:45 PM
Dec 2013

The longer and more you smoke, the more likely you are to develop issues at some point.

I'm very much a proponent of quitting.

nilesobek

(1,423 posts)
260. They did the same thing to my father
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 05:50 PM
Dec 2013

when he was getting a life threatening surgery. I couldn't believe my ears when the 30ish nurse was lecturing him right before surgery. I waited until he was under anesthesia then railed into her, upbraiding her right and left relentlessly until other hospital staff dragged me away. My father's smoking, which was a totally accepted practice, certainly could be described as a character flaw. However, is the deathbed of a family member the place for such rhetoric? Smoke Nazis need to learn when to shut their fucking mouth. If I'm blowing smoke in your face you certainly have the right to slap me verbally and order me to put the cancer stick out. But if I'm on my own turf spare me the lectures, as I'm in better physical condition at 50 than most of the non-smokers around me and I have outlived a whole bunch of them.

Mariana

(14,861 posts)
269. It's sickening how abusive some people are to smokers
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 07:17 PM
Dec 2013

even after they've quit! Good grief, go read any thread about e-cigs and see how rotten some posters are to the people who have STOPPED smoking. There's some very serious hate going on with some of them.

I'm glad you tore into that nurse, because she was way out of line. I don't think my dad was given a hard time for having been a smoker decades ago.

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
122. The plural of anecdote is not data.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 11:26 PM
Dec 2013

That's something you seem to have a really tough time with. Nobody says smoking will instantly kill you. It's about increasing the odds of something happening to you.

10 years of smoking does a lot of damage, damage that can come back to bit you in the ass even years after you quit. My dad now deals with seasonal asthma due to the 20 years he smoked when he was younger. I'll probably have some issues down the road from the 7 years I smoked.

Smoking is bad for your health and the health of those around you, and all the hand waving in the universe won't change that.

BellaKos

(318 posts)
290. And fyi
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 02:29 AM
Dec 2013

Data is not information. Information is not knowledge. And knowledge is not wisdom.
I'm not mentioning this for the sake of any argument, I just thought that was kewl.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
153. The throat cancer probably was from smoking.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 01:14 AM
Dec 2013

And while not every smoker gets cancer or heart disease or COPD or any of the other delightful things smokers often get, something like 90% of all lung cancers are from smoking. And yeah, I've known people who never smoked get lung cancer and die. Sucks, big time. Come to think of it, any kind of cancer, no matter what the cause, sucks big time.

But I noticed many years ago that smokers simply got minor illnesses more readily than smokers. Their colds seemed to last longer. And so on.

I never cease to be amazed at how defensive smokers are. I'm your age, both parents smoked. Dad died from it at age 60. Mom, after a false lung cancer scare, stopped smoking when she was about 50 and lived to be 82. And in good health right down to the end.

We do all die eventually, that's for sure. None of us get out of here alive. And we generally don't get to choose how we go.

klook

(12,170 posts)
182. Happened to me
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 08:40 AM
Dec 2013

and I thank myself every day for giving up cigarettes.

Thank you for sharing the positive benefits of being an ex-smoker. Maybe it won't help this poster, but it could resonate with somebody else and trigger a new kind of craving -- the craving to improve their health.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
211. My husband quit and gained 100 pounds.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:09 PM
Dec 2013

We went out last night and he had to park a mile or so away from our destination.

I was in very high heels and smoking. I walked the course without so much as a whimper - I walk several miles daily and eat healthy. He was huffing and puffing and red.

Who's more healthy?

P.S. I also have lowish to regular blood pressure. My only complaint is allergies, but I think that has more to do with where I live because, when I travel, they diminish.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
96. All problems are math problems. In Washington, this represents a $3285 annual problem.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 08:38 PM
Dec 2013

That's more than my property taxes.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
13. Smoking prohibitions in bars and restaurants have been wildly successful, and are to be applauded
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:42 PM
Dec 2013

Whenever anyone mentions that "prohibitions never work," just point them to the almost universal adoption of smoking bans in a (relatively short) period. They have produced almost no problems at all, and massive benefits. They are a model of a successful prohibition. None of the claims of their opponents have come to pass at all. Anyone arguing against smoking bans in bars and restaurants ten years ago looks like an absolute fool today. their entire series of arguments were belied by reality. I'm glad they worked so well. I'm glad people had the courage to put them into place.

They finally got me to stop smoking, after 22 years. I stopped being a slave and sucker for southern Republican cigarette executives.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
19. People can adapt..
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:49 PM
Dec 2013

and "house parties" (around here anyway) are now back in vogue.. Many people (smokers) who used to waste money at bars for sporting events, now order them on tv and have BYOB get-togethers..

Now, if we could only get congress/municipal/state legislatures to get heavy with big-time polluters ....cars/trucks/factories

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
23. Bars are still packed, though
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:53 PM
Dec 2013

Where's the massive drop off in business predicted by the opponents of smoking bans?

Nowhere. It never happened, anywhere. It was bullshit.

Agreed that we need the same focus on other kinds of polluters. We've made good progress on car exhaust, and we need to really hit other people (and industries) making toxic the common air for their own selfish purposes.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
41. We now go outside
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 06:10 PM
Dec 2013

You will see smokers outside in the snow and below freezing temps. It is the same as with Prohibition. People will find ways.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
48. Going outside isn't "finding a way." It's following the law.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 06:29 PM
Dec 2013

The prohibition isn't against smoking. It's against smoking inside bars and restaurants. You want to present going outside as "finding a way," as if people who go outside are defying the prohibition! They're not. They're following the prohibition; they're following the law. Indeed, there is almost no defying of the prohibition against smoking in bars and restaurants - it's working nearly perfectly. Yes, you go outside. That's exactly where you should go to smoke. That's what the law says. I'm glad you're following the law and complying with the prohibition.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
83. At the end of the day, few really care what you do to yourself
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 07:57 PM
Dec 2013

Most people do not want to light up with you indoors. Sorry.

Go Vols

(5,902 posts)
58. It did happen
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 07:05 PM
Dec 2013
Where's the massive drop off in business predicted by the opponents of smoking bans?

Nowhere. It never happened, anywhere. It was bullshit.


Three restaurants in my small town of 10k tried no smoking when the law went into effect,within a month they changed back to smoking because alot/most of their patrons went to the two places that didn't enforce the ban/didn't allow children.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
233. Thanks for the back-up!
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:38 PM
Dec 2013

I didn't know you had posted this when I posted my missive below!

BTW, I'm wearing an orange Tennessee sweatshirt at the moment.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
222. As I mentioned upthread, there are places in the
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:25 PM
Dec 2013

country that allow smoking in Over 21 establishments. My state is one of them.

And business DID drop for restaurants and other establishments that no longer could allow smoking. Before the ban, many people would stay at the restaurants after dinner and drink and smoke at the bar. After the ban, patrons moved to Over 21 clubs where they could smoke, so the restaurant missed out on all that high-dollar alcohol revenue. So, yes, it did happen. I can no longer find the article since it was published back in 2008, but it did happen. It wasn't bullshit and many restaurants opted to go "Over 21" on the weekends to side-step the law.

The most popular bars here are also those that allow smoking.

The reason "bars are still packed" in other parts of the country is, quite simply, that people still drink, BUT, if most of the rest of the country had options that a handful of states do regarding whether the OWNER wants to allow smoking or not in Over 21 clubs, I'm willing to bet that the smoking ones would be more popular, as they are here.

In fact, a quick search of local nightclubs who DO NOT allow smoking netted only two, plus a comedy club and, LOL, the local strip joint.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
235. Irrelevant
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:44 PM
Dec 2013

We were told that if a full smoking ban were put into effect, people would shun the bars - they'd fail, oh woe!

Bullshit. It simply never materialized. Go the the bar areas in NYC, in Chicago. No smoking. Period. Not, oh, there's smoking here but not there: no smoking. The bars are packed. The restaurants are packed. There was no drop off.

The arguments of the pro-smoking contingent were plainly and simply false. The ban has hurt nobody.

It's telling that both people denying the success of these smoking bans end up referencing municipalities that allowed these 21 Club and similar loopholes. You simply have no leg to stand on when it comes to municipalities that put FULL smoking bans into place. They have been completely successful, and none of the negative consequences predicted by their opponents have materialized AT ALL. San Francisco. Los Angeles. New York. Chicago. (Notably, some of these even have some minor "cigar club" loopholes - taken up by almost nobody, because they don't need to). No smoking. No problem. The opponents were wrong.

Go Vols

(5,902 posts)
248. Six Years After Ban, Smoking Returns to NYC's Bars and Clubs
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 03:23 PM
Dec 2013
The worst kept secret in New York nightlife is that smoking is now allowed in numerous nightspots...

From what operatives here have witnessed, It's obvious that the smoking ban is failing on a number of levels. Numerous lounge and club owners are turning a blind eye to their smoking customers breaking the law as they realize that the likelihood of the City catching them in the act is almost zilch.


http://ny.eater.com/archives/2009/11/the_return_of_smoking.php


Demobrat

(8,995 posts)
21. A friend of mine owns a very popular bar/restaurant in CA
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:52 PM
Dec 2013

When the smoking ban passed he was terrified he would lose his business because nobody would go out anymore. Within weeks he was telling me story after story about people coming in who never did before because of the smoke - and how all his old regulars were still there - they just stepped outside to smoke without complaint.

His business is better than ever.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
22. After 40 years, NO
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:52 PM
Dec 2013

For Maria after 50 years, NO. BTW, I am from NY and Maria is my Italy. SOUTHERN Republcians? Sorry, but as two OLD FARTS, WE both say, the hell with YOU.

22 years? lol We have children OLDER than that. Slave to who? HEALTH INDUSTRY.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
29. ROFL
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:58 PM
Dec 2013

You're so mad you forgot how to read.



Like I said, slave to the southern Republican tobacco executives. Sad, really.

You're owned.

Response to alcibiades_mystery (Reply #29)

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
85. You don't often meet people who take addiction as a point of pride.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 08:00 PM
Dec 2013

But please. Go on with your bad self, telling us how the health conspiracy is turning smokers into the new segregated class, and your treatment is measurable against Jim Crow.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
34. I'll be honest--I wondered how well that would go over when they first brought it up.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 06:03 PM
Dec 2013

Now, it's hard to imagine that there were ever "smoke filled rooms" where people had to WORK, never mind visit for a meal or a drink....

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
73. I remember when my mom used to smoke in the grocery store.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 07:50 PM
Dec 2013

Everyone did it -- and ground their butts out on the floor. So nasty.

If someone tried to smoke in my store now I'd probably deck them.

Hekate

(90,837 posts)
299. Remember people emptying the ashtrays in the parking lots? Gotta keep the car clean, after all.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 05:10 AM
Dec 2013

Ah the memories: my parents would flip their still-smoldering butts out the car windows, and at night they'd leave a pretty trail of red-gold sparks as they flew away down the freeway. They were polite: unlike some, they always ground out their butts on the floor or sidewalk when shopping in town, instead of leaving them still smoldering.

 

Vashta Nerada

(3,922 posts)
130. It's nice to sit in a bar or restaurant without having to breathe in the carcinogenic smoke.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 11:47 PM
Dec 2013

I love smoking bans.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,045 posts)
302. Technicaly, smoking bans are regulations, not prohibition
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 07:50 AM
Dec 2013

A ban against smoking in a bar does not prohibit a person from smoking or make the substance illegal. It is a regulation about where it can be consumed. It is not a prohibition.

All the same, the thrust of your post and the facts in it are good.

Regulation works. I support regulation, within reason when it is not de facto prohibition (say, for example, a "regulation" that tobacco can only be consumed above altitudes of 10,000 feet).

Prohibition does not work. I do not support prohibition.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
17. See, you anti-smokers?
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:48 PM
Dec 2013

The owner and I were outside but at a table with a HEATER. If you non-smokers were outside there, you would not have had a heater!!!! LOL Would you get anything you wanted on the menu TOO?????? Would you even go to a restaurant where you SAW the onwer smoking? Probably not. Just seeing smoking will give you not only cancer, but a HEART ATTACK.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
30. I think your glee is misplaced.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:58 PM
Dec 2013

Have you ever seen old ladies coughing and wheezing while trundling around those oxygen cylinders that they have to be permanently hooked up to because their emphysema is so bad? If you are able to give up smoking, even at this time of your life, it will be one of the best things you ever did. At least consider giving e-cigs a try.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
45. I think your glee is misplaced
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 06:12 PM
Dec 2013

I could not have said it better.

Another asthma sufferer here, whose mom smoked while pregnant with me. I was born with pneumonia and had bronchial/pneumonia problems my whole childhood...and now athsma all my adult life (I've never smoked). Thanks to those smokers who understand what their secondhand smoke does to many people, and how many families have lost loved ones to cigarette smoke (first or secondhand).

I have no problem with anyone I don't care about smoking...but I have to admit I'm concerned about those I care about, whether it's an addiction to nicotine or drugs or alcohol. None of which are healthy for you at addiction levels.

But I do have a problem with smokers sharing their smoke with those who do not smoke. At least when you drink or do drugs, you aren't sharing it with anyone involuntarily.

Just wanted to add, I think what the restaurant owner did was very sweet. No one should be ostracized and that is not my intent in asking smokers to keep their smoke to approved areas only.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
55. you're claiming you were born with pneumonia because your mother smoked while pregnant?!!?!
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 06:51 PM
Dec 2013

you should realize pneumonia is caused by fluid (amniotic in this case?) in the lungs, albeit seeing that unborn babies do 'breath' in the same manner as they do post birth it was most likely swallowed

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
57. I can't claim it as fact
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 06:57 PM
Dec 2013

But I was definitely dealing with serious lung issues all through my childhood (up through high school), and my young years were spent in a home with two smokers who had no idea smoking was dangerous. So I was exposed to plenty of secondhand smoke.

Can't prove a thing, but there is a lot of evidence that children born to smokers and living with smokers have a higher incident of lung issues and asthma.

From everything I've read on-line, neonatal pneumonia is caused by infection, not swallowing fluid. You do know that pneumonia causes fluid in the lungs, right?

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
70. yes however infection in the amniotic fluid itself could be the culprit
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 07:47 PM
Dec 2013

sorry I wasn't more clear about that, moreover having had pre-congenital pneumonia can lend itself to similar problems through out childhood and even into adulthood, also I have experienced anecdotal evidence that some of the stats concerning smoking risks are being artificially enhanced one such incident took place while my son was an infant- he had an middle-ear infection common enough in infants (he was 11 months) took him in to the clinic he was being seen at all went as expected I was given a script for amoxicilllin 2 weeks standard stuff- then like an after thought the resident asked if there was a smoker in the home-I said yes and he asked for the script back and left the room, the one that was brought to me by the CMA working him was the same save the course of treatment was one week rather than 2 as in the original when I asked why she said something about "guidelines" -needless to say the ear-infection returned shortly after he finished the course of antibiotics, I found another Dr private clinic as opposed to public he was treated properly end of ear-infection not another childhood ear infection, but what came out some months after my initial visit was an announcement that children of smokers have more frequent middle-ear infections- remembering the first visit and mysterious script change I called the clinic and asked if they provided stats to the CDC and cancer society and guess what-they did
There is more where deaths from COPD are concerned too in a number of places when an elderly person dies of unknown causes and no autopsy is preformed even when evidenced that there is another cause-if they ever smoked or in some cases even lived with a smoker COPD is listed as cause of death even when the person was never diagnosed with it, my sister who works as county registrar in Indiana confirmed this, and the death of our mother form what appeared to be a cerebral accident of some sort also pointed to that COPD was listed as cause of death even though she had not smoked for years was never diagnosed with COPD and had been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer

I'm not saying that smoking is harmless by any means but the stats are IMO being exaggerated

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
88. I'm not surprised
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 08:06 PM
Dec 2013

having a smoker in the family (you?) means you have an agenda to read things that way. Just like I have an agenda, after writing a college paper on the dangers of cigarette smoke (and doing tons of research) to give me the idea that my health issues may have been exacerbated by my Mom's smoking.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
107. I have an agenda-really lol no agenda simple reality
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 09:18 PM
Dec 2013

the antismoking campaign has gotten so full of itself that almost anything can be claimed, evidence can be obtained via unscrupulous means and no one questions it, time for such practices to stop my child was endangered because a public clinic was looking to enrich itself, they made beaucoup $$$$ off of selling stats and unless those stats were what the buyers desired ........

pnwmom

(108,997 posts)
143. You are positing a world-wide conspiracy to inflate statistics
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 12:16 AM
Dec 2013

on smoking related illnesses, by such methods as withholding correct prescriptions from babies and falsifying death certificates.



azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
154. no I posted 2 experiences from my own life
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 01:18 AM
Dec 2013

if you need to make fatuous weird claims about a "a world-wide conspiracy" to fit your own belief systems then be my guest

pnwmom

(108,997 posts)
156. It would be pointless to present your "anecdotal evidence
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 01:24 AM
Dec 2013

that some of the stats concerning smoking risks are being artificially enhanced" unless you were implying that the two cases you claim are significant. And they couldn't be significant unless studies across the world were also being falsified in similar ways.

The results are consistent, everywhere. Smokers and second-hand smokers are at risk for serious smoking related illnesses.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
158. but they are signifigant in this order
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 01:33 AM
Dec 2013

In the case of my Mother-my sister works as a county registrar in the same county-when I expressed surprise at the cause of death she told me point blank when there is a past history of smoking and no autopsy or other official cause of death listed COPD is a catch all reason stated on death certificates

in the case of son the hospital clinic he was being seen at is also one that provides stats for the studies, is this widespread honestly I do not know, however I do work in the medical field and this particular hospital has a reputation for being less than ethical in its dealings with patients-as I said its a public hospital


pnwmom

(108,997 posts)
162. Now you're implying that public hospitals are less ethical with their patients
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 03:15 AM
Dec 2013

than private, for-profit hospitals.

"I do work in the medical field and this particular hospital has a reputation for being less than ethical in its dealings with patients-as I said its a public hospital"


Based on what? Your anecdotal evidence?

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
164. I stated that this particular hospital does have a reputation
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 03:49 AM
Dec 2013

Last edited Sat Dec 14, 2013, 07:11 AM - Edit history (2)

with both the public and quietly among those in the medical field in my area for being unethical another example drug testing pregnant women as part of prenatal care-they do not tell women that is what they're doing you get sent to the lab with orders for specific tests often patients do not know the specific tests that are being done- I learned this because I looked at my own chart when it was left in the room with me-the resident snatched it out of my hands when he came back and told me point blank I had no right to read it-when I disagreed he told me I had the right to specific entries upon written request but not to read it as a whole!

The results of these tests are again sold as stats however they can not be used as a guideline or in any way as part of the womens prenatal care unless there is a court order to do so-same at one point with HIV testing only then you were asked if they could do this but were told you would not be given the results-again stats

this is also a teaching hospital it works in conjunction with several other area hospitals including of course the university hospital residents rotate through the various hospitals as part of their training and notice in every case with this hospital I said resident as opposed to staff MD because the public hospital like many in larger urban areas is stretched to the limit the ratio of residents to staff MD's to patients is different than in private hospitals or university ones less staff MD's more patients in the public hospitals

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
165. you kinow what this tired really really tired
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 03:55 AM
Dec 2013

you keep inflating what I've said to suit your own purposes-not playing anymore if wish or need to believe I'm being dishonest go ahead, but give me a reason I would do this-I found the things I enumerated quite disturbing you wish to dismiss it seems

 

Vashta Nerada

(3,922 posts)
131. I'd rather have my health and deal with the minor inconvenience of the chilly air...
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 11:48 PM
Dec 2013

than smoke and get a heater.

JI7

(89,276 posts)
334. all the restaurants i have been to have heaters outside in case it gets cold
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 04:22 PM
Dec 2013

otherwise people would not want to sit there and they would lose business if they didn't have enough space inside.

it seems like a common sense thing people who want to open a restaurant with outdoor seating would do.

Warpy

(111,359 posts)
20. Old asthmatic here
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:49 PM
Dec 2013

but if you set fire to that thing outdoors, we'll get along just fine.

I don't give a shit if anybody smokes. I just give a shit when it's indoors and around me. It's like trying to breathe underwater.

raccoon

(31,126 posts)
184. Except lots of times, when it's outdoors, the secondhand smoke drifts wherever it wants to.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 08:46 AM
Dec 2013

Where nonsmokers are trying to breathe.



Warpy

(111,359 posts)
193. If it's not concentrated enough to set off my asthma, it's OK
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 12:14 PM
Dec 2013

I'm a grownup. I can put up with nasty stinks.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
25. Glad you had a nice night, but it doesn't change the fact that you have an addiction...
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:55 PM
Dec 2013

And a deadly one at that.

Tikki

(14,559 posts)
26. Hope you got a photo for your family album...
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:55 PM
Dec 2013

You sitting there with a pack of ciggies, a bit of smoke curling out of your mouth, all dressed up for Christmas...


Tikki

 

1000words

(7,051 posts)
31. Personally, I don't believe in willingly encouraging someone to harm themselves
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 05:59 PM
Dec 2013

Go ahead, smoke ... your choice. Just don't expect to be accommodated in an activity that is proven to be not only a killer, but a drain on public resources. Of course, just about everything can be argued as harmful to your health, and I'm sure numerous examples are forthcoming from the good people of DU, but most things haven't qualified for the dubious distinction of having to have a label specifically warning of its health risks.

Warpy

(111,359 posts)
61. I have to disagree
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 07:21 PM
Dec 2013

Adults are free to choose any self destructive behavior they want to. They just don't get to take unwilling people along with them.

Adults outgrew nannies a long time ago. I think putting a heat lamp outdoors in the smoking area would be a very nice thing for this particular restaurant to do.

I don't infantilize homeless people when I give them the odd dollar by telling them what they can spend it on. I don't infantilize smokers, either.

I just can't coexist with them in confined spaces.

LittleGirl

(8,291 posts)
35. former smoker here
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 06:05 PM
Dec 2013

I'm glad to see that smokers aren't always treated like lepers. One of the many reasons I quit. Happy Holidays!

EC

(12,287 posts)
44. Heh, I'm with you.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 06:12 PM
Dec 2013

I quit smoking a couple years ago, but I still go outside at restaurants to cool off and it is nice to meet people.

Response to HockeyMom (Original post)

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
51. Nice story. And a nice owner. Bet she doesn't have much worry about competition.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 06:41 PM
Dec 2013

Too many nannies out there anyway - not enough nice. And nice, respectful of others circumstances and experiences, will change more behavior than judgmental ever will.

Just an aside from someone who smoked cigs for 42 years, I recently shelled out $75 for an e-cig (ego-cc from cignot.com, and some juice, though there are a LOT of choices out there. I have just learned to trust the women who run that site).

At first it didn't seem to be all that different, but I found that I had gotten too little nicotine in the e-juice. Went into another store where they sold me tobacco flavored 36 mg strength in a 30 ml bottle, and I mixed that with some Mango flavored 24 mg).

After that my pack laid on the table for a week, never even thought about it.

So I got a safer alternative and have ended the practice of sucking on carbon monoxide and the tars, and got a lower temp for the chemical that is in there. It is in a suspension of vegetable glycerin (kinda like the oil we cook with) and propylene glycol, which is in cosmetics food, is given you by your doctor to drink b4 a colonoscopy (shudder <G&gt . It's also used as pet-safe anti-freeze, so it is in the exhaust that many cars spew out into the air anyway (though most use the more harmful ethylene glycol and spew that out instead. I have already found that I can taper down the amount of nicotine, so I have a lcear path ahead.

Back in the early years b4 all the anti-smoking people decided that being jack-booted thugs about the whole thing was the proper way to address it, there was a lot of talk about finding safer alternatives, and that has been proposed by everyone from the American Cancer Society to Surgeon Generals. But a lot of people would rather see people die than start changing what they can, so we don't hear about it as much.

Good article here that addresses some of that - http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/09/opinion/the-case-for-tolerating-e-cigarettes.html?_r=0

(Phooey on 'em, btw. It's about you, and they really, really don't care about anyone but themselves anyway. All that "it's about you, it's about the children, it's about..." junk is just a dodge. For the vast majority of them it's about there own ego that they care about the most).

In any event, I know you didn't ask, but it has been my experience that many smokers try and fail to quit (they don't tell you just how bad the rates are for the various programs - people making too much money). This is just something to tuck away in your thinking if you decide that you want to do something different.

Thank you for the post.




Rowdyboy

(22,057 posts)
54. I quit smoking 22 years ago and STILL think this is a cool story. Only on very rare
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 06:49 PM
Dec 2013

occasions has smoking been so strong as to bother me.

Bet the restaurant gets repeat business from you!

CSStrowbridge

(267 posts)
59. Smokers should be treated like lepers.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 07:12 PM
Dec 2013

Smokers should be treated like lepers. Hell, they should be treated worse than lepers, because second hand smoke kills a lot more people than leprosy does.

I don't give me any shit about personal rights. Smoking has never been about personal rights, because smoking always negatively affects those around you. If you smoke while others are around, you are a selfish asshole.

CSStrowbridge

(267 posts)
135. I'm not being self-righteous...
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 11:59 PM
Dec 2013

I'm not being self-righteous, I'm looking at the damn fact. Smoking kills. It doesn't just kill the smoker, it kills those around the smoker as well. It should be treated as drunk driving.

Skittles

(153,202 posts)
67. wrong approach
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 07:42 PM
Dec 2013

hounding and trashing people is not the best approach - but many smokers have quit due to the civil reminders and concerns they heard from their non-smoking friends and family.....the absolute WORST is those people who have never smoked and like to say how they just CANNOT understand how anyone could have EVER started smoking, how people who smoke are losers, etc - they have NO idea how addictions work or how to get people to stop smoking and come across as sanctimonious assholes

CSStrowbridge

(267 posts)
140. That might work, if...
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 12:02 AM
Dec 2013

That might work, if the smoker knows how much damage they are doing to others. If they are annoyed by people treating them objectively better than they should be treated, they are not going to be convinced by kind words. Hell, I seriously doubt HockeyMom will be convinced to stop smoking if she developed lung cancer.

CSStrowbridge

(267 posts)
216. Oops.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:14 PM
Dec 2013

I meant to say, "AND don't give me any shit about personal rights."

Smoking isn't about personal rights. Smoking isn't a personal thing. When you smoke, you harm all of those around you.

If you think you have the right to harm all of those around you, then all of those around you have the right to harm you to make you stop.

 

HangOnKids

(4,291 posts)
281. Are you living in this polluted world?
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 12:37 AM
Dec 2013

Care to post your weight? Because if you answer NO to those questions you have NO right to criticize any other person unless they are smoking in your face in your house.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,045 posts)
303. Your post completely lacks logic. Two harms do not make a right.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 08:03 AM
Dec 2013

Just because polluters harm us with pollution does not make it right for smokers to harm non-smokers by smoking in public places.

Body weight has nothing to do with the need to regulate public smoking for the safety of children and adult non-smokers.

Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #303)

idwiyo

(5,113 posts)
177. When did you give up driving exactly? Also, I hope there is no wood burning fireplace in your house.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 06:12 AM
Dec 2013

Never mind eating meat, using batteries, electronics, plastics, etc, etc, etc.

CSStrowbridge

(267 posts)
224. Logical fallacies are not a good argument.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:27 PM
Dec 2013

Logical fallacies are not a good argument. What you just committed is the Tu quoque fallacy. I could be a chain smoker and my argument would still be correct. If I were a chain smoker, I would have to admit I was part of the problem.

By the way, I don't drive, nor do I have a fireplace. Last year I didn't even turn the furnace on once during winter. (This year there was a three-day cold snap where it dropped to -14 Celsius, but it is off now.)

The things you talk about can be described as necessary. You need to eat, although you can be environmentally responsible with your choices. (I only buy locally grown chicken and occasionally pork, but never beef, for instance.) All the batteries a have are rechargeable, hell, my flashlight is wind-up. I bought my cell phone used, so not only

On the other hand, smoking is 100% optional. Well, until you are addicted. But you started out smoking for purely selfish reasons. You harmed those around your for purely selfish reasons. When you are addicted, you continue to harm those around you for purely selfish reasons.

idwiyo

(5,113 posts)
239. Using products that cause huge environmental damage is optional. One doesn't have to have a phone,
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:52 PM
Dec 2013

TV, electronics, etc, etc, etc. You can perfectly live without it. Buying second-hand doesn't erase the damage that was done to produce the product to start with. Do you use electricity? Have you checked what coal plants do to the air you breeze? Public transport is great but it still contributes to the pollution that affects us all. I can go on, and on, and on.

Smoker who smokes outside away from you is no worse than you are, unless you manage to leave such life that doesn't add to the general pollution that affects us all.

BTW, my original post had nothing to do with approving or condemning smoking, just pointing out to you that you yourself are guilty of the same offence you accuse a smoker of.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,045 posts)
304. Lepers did not choose leprosy & are not infectious. Smokers chose smoking & transmit their smoke.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 08:09 AM
Dec 2013

Smoking is a right, but the right to clean air is a higher right because of the health issue.

Leprosy is (as I understand it) very hard to transmit. I presume you mean the metaphor of "treated like lepers" in the older uncompassionate sense and not with modern understanding of the disease.

homegirl

(1,434 posts)
60. Maybe
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 07:13 PM
Dec 2013

you and Maria can get a daily double special price on coffins. And for the record, nobody cares if you choose to kill yourself smoking. You are a big girl and can make your own choices. But you shouldn't put down those who choose a different lifestyle.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
64. Smoking/not smoking is part of the same calculus of life we all deal with in our own ways.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 07:34 PM
Dec 2013

How many people who criticize smoking drink a bit more than they should? Or have a weakness for high-fat, high-sodium foods or sugary soft drinks? Or live a sedentary lifestyle, albeit perhaps not entirely by choice?

Full disclosure: I'm not a heavy smoker and never have been, except for pot, which certainly doesn't cause anywhere near the respiratory or cardiovascular issues cigarette smoking does. But I do have my own vices to say the least.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
66. Young health nuts? I'm a health nut because I'm not a nicotine junkie?
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 07:42 PM
Dec 2013

And veal is just plain fucking evil, btw.





janlyn

(735 posts)
68. I don't have a problem with going outside to smoke.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 07:45 PM
Dec 2013

I don't even smoke in my own home. It leaves nicotine on everything and it stinks. If I smoke outside I smell less like an ashtray and, I always wash my hands after. Also I don't want to bother non-smokers.
That being said, I do have an issue with people who have never smoked a day in their life, looking at us smokers while we stand outside in any kind of weather to get that fix and say " Just quit "
It is scientifically proven to be more addictive than heroin. And addicts can get rehab for just about anything other than tobacco!
I am not suggesting that non-smokers should put up with smoking from us but, simply understand that if it was so easy we would "Just quit ".
It just seems to me that alcoholics and drug users get more understanding of the severity of their addiction.

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
76. I don't hate smokers. I just don't want them smoking around me. Someone drinking around me does....
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 07:52 PM
Dec 2013

not impact me unless they are drunk and obnoxious. Then I would have an issue.

I don't know anyone who is rude to smokers.

And I know how hard quitting is. My mom smoked as she was dying of emphysema.

MerryBlooms

(11,773 posts)
71. I'm happy you had a nice time, but I hope you will consider quitting the cigs.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 07:47 PM
Dec 2013

I had quit for 10 years then started again when my husband died. After smoking again for 8 years, I quit again when I remarried (we quit together), and now I'm smoke-free for almost 3 years. I used the lozenges, he used the patch-- I tried the patch, but had an allergic reaction. I'm not really a health nut, but honestly, if you have people in your life that want you to quit-- give it a try, out of respect and love for them and yourself. If you have a buddy to quit with, it's a little easier. End of lecture. Take care.

malthaussen

(17,217 posts)
74. I'm always impressed by what shaming is licit and what is not.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 07:51 PM
Dec 2013

Smoking has definitely become near to leprosy, as you point out. Ironically, we wouldn't treat lepers today the way we treat smokers. Funny, that.

-- Mal

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
77. People aren't generally lepers by choice,
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 07:53 PM
Dec 2013

and nobody ever filled up a room with a stinking-ass cloud of leprosy, or littered the beach with chunks of their cast-off leper skin.

malthaussen

(17,217 posts)
82. Is that what it is?
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 07:57 PM
Dec 2013

Tolerable argument, anyway. But why then, do you suppose, is drinking not even more abhorrent and universally condemned than smoking? I've rarely heard of a smoker killing four people while driving smoking, but it is rather frequent with drunks. But aside from a vocal minority, drinking is winked at, encouraged, and a viable excuse for misbehavior. And drinking is arguably as repellant as smoking, and creates as objectionable litter.

-- Mal

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
86. I find them both disgusting on a personal level and I don't do either of them.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 08:03 PM
Dec 2013

However, a person can drink responsibly and have no impact on the roomful of people around them. Someone enjoying a glass of wine at dinner while seated next to me doesn't affect me in any way, while the same cannot be said for a smoker.

Nitram

(22,892 posts)
84. Lepers don't contaminate the air from a distance
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 07:58 PM
Dec 2013

Lepers don't ruin the smell and taste of a delicious meal.

Nitram

(22,892 posts)
80. I'm not young...
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 07:56 PM
Dec 2013

...and I'm not a health nut. But I do believe the scientific evidence on the health effects of passive smoke. I grew up with a father who smoked, and I experienced it. You portray yourself as such a sad victim.

 

HangOnKids

(4,291 posts)
176. Thanks for chiming in
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 06:06 AM
Dec 2013

Over 3 years on DU and THIS is what you post on. Where does the OP call herself a victim?

Nitram

(22,892 posts)
363. I'll help you out.
Wed Dec 18, 2013, 09:34 AM
Dec 2013

Your reading comprehension apparently leaves something to be desired. The following SCREAMS victimhood:

"Very, very nice to be treated this way, for a CHANGE. Thank you, Maria. Let the flaming begin, by the young health nuts."

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
90. My one regret about quitting smoking...
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 08:08 PM
Dec 2013

...(over 13 years ago now), is the social aspect. Particularly in the workplace, where the smokers are relegated to one or two outside doorways, and since the smokers come from all echelons in most companies, that's where you get in on all the gossip and underground news.

Oh well, nice story! Good for you. It's nice to turn the tables once in awhile. Although I'd still suggest you quit...

dflprincess

(28,082 posts)
139. That's the one thing I miss too
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 12:01 AM
Dec 2013

finding out what's going on in the rest of the company. And, you get to meet more people both at work and like the OP did with the restaurant owner.

Other than that, I'm glad I quit (just over 6 years). Chantix was a miracle drug for me.

Now if I could just lose the weight I gained. Note to younger smokers, especially females, try to quit before you get to 40 and for sure don't wait until after menopause like I did. Your metabolism slows down enough as it is, without throwing the exsmoker's weight gain into it.

Skittles

(153,202 posts)
147. I agree with that assessment
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 12:38 AM
Dec 2013

I quit smoking long ago but I find many smokers and ex-smokers much more pleasant to be around than the militant non-smokers

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
92. I am glad you had a good time and I dont judge smokers.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 08:11 PM
Dec 2013

I do have to say that a close friend of mine quit after many years. He said if smoking just shortened his life, he would have continued. But when he saw the, sometimes long drawn out, terrible deaths that some smokers suffered, he decided to quit.

And I am not very sympathetic of smokers having to take their smoke outside. I remember many years of having to take my young family to restaurants that were smoke bongs. I remember one time we asked for non-smoking and the waitress walked to a table in the smoking section and removed the temporary "smoking" sign that was sitting on the table. Also, I remember standing with a crowd of other non-smokers waiting for an opening in the small non-smoking section while the larger smoking section was half filled. Honest, I am not bitter. Just sayin.

(note: Santa is yellow)

Mira

(22,380 posts)
95. No flaming
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 08:29 PM
Dec 2013
(I smoked over 30 years, 2 packs on a good day, I know what it's like to be the only one... and to feel like you are a holdout and one of the "new American Homeless", the smokers in front of their own doors, on balconies, in back yards...)

Admit it, you'd rather be a happy adjusted non-smoker. Instead you're making a big deal about an unusual experience, afforded you by another person ostracized for the same reason, no matter what she says.

I'm not a health nut, nor am I young. But smoking cigarettes was the dumbest, most destructive thing I ever did to myself. And I knew it while I was doing it, and I suspect you know it as well.

If you are a person who can manage 5 or so cigarettes in a 24 hr. period, I take it back.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
98. Good for them. We need more people like that who respect the rights of adults to make decisions
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 08:42 PM
Dec 2013

for themselves.

I'll believe the anti-smoking crowd cares about harm being done by a whiff of smoke, when they become anti AUTOMOBILES and ALCOHOL also.

Meantime they are best ignored imho.

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
128. That's a completely goofy comparison.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 11:40 PM
Dec 2013

Automobiles serve a useful purpose and can do so without doing serious harm to the drivers and those around them (especially hybrids). Alcohol, when used in moderation, can have demonstrable health benefits.

Smoking does not have either of these qualities going for it. And mind you, I'm not questioning a persons right to slowly kill themselves with cigarettes, but given how many such people eventually develop medical complications down the road that we, as a society, will end up paying for to some degree (and that they may spread those complications to other people around them through their smoking) I reserve the right to call them out on their bullshit when they try to hold up their smoking as some sort of anti-healthcare industry badge of honor.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
146. We as a society have to pay for those who kill people on the road every day. Having experienced
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 12:32 AM
Dec 2013

someone using their automobile irresponsibly causing the death of a loved one, I know first hand what a lethal weapon an automobile can be. I have never lost anyone due to someone having a cigarette. Our family has also experienced the loss of loved ones due to alcohol abuse, as have untold numbers of others, not to mention the other effects of alcohol, domestic abuse, economic disaster, legal problems that affect entire families.

But your comment is exhibit #1 of what I meant regarding the anti-smoking crowd. I know of no family that has suffered death, domestic abuse or economic problems due to smoking,

You just dismissed the horrific effects of alcohol abuse, it is estimated that one alcoholic adversely affects on average, six other people, including children, multiplying the devastation of alcohol in the lives of everyone associated with it.

Death by automobile averages approximately 25,000 human beings every year.

Thanks for dismissing all those precious lives and for proving my point an my reason for ignoring the anti-smoking crowd.

No smoker has ever killed another human being. If you drive a car you are contributing to the foul air we are all forced to breathe in every day. If you drink, or do drugs, or are addicted to prescription drugs, you are a threat to society. The least threat to society of all the personal choices people make, are smokers, by the numbers.

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
180. I did absolutely no such thing.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 07:04 AM
Dec 2013

Last edited Sat Dec 14, 2013, 07:57 AM - Edit history (2)

Never once did I dismiss automobile and alcohol related deaths, I simply pointed out that both of them are not good comparisons to smoking.

And don't even attempt to lecture me. Cancers related both to alcohol and smoking have killed more family members than I like to think about, and I've seen the deviation of alcohol abuse up close.

No smoker has ever killed anyone? I know for a fact that's incorrect. Ignoring smokers who've just directly murdered, I'm guessing you've never heard of the dangers of second hand smoke?

Nothing you said invalidated my point. Cars can and are regularly used safely, and many produce little to no air pollutio. And alcohol, when used in moderation, can have positive health benefits. Neither of these things can be said of cigarettes.

I suggest you try sticking with facts and not self righteous indignation.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,045 posts)
192. Total lack of logic in your posts. Another harm does not mitigate or deny the first harm.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 12:00 PM
Dec 2013

1) Just because you lost someone from a car crash, it has nothing, nothing, to do with the harm that smoking causes and the societal costs.

2) Automobiles have powerful important economic purposes. Smoking has none. The pleasure that it gives to a few people is not an economic purpose.

3) The economic benefit of automobile usage greatly (vastly) outweighs the economic loss due to automobile deaths and injuries. Similarly for airplane usage. Only a fool would even hint at banning automobiles by attempting to equate their usage with cigarette usage.

4) When you say you'll "believe the anti-smoking crowd cares about harm being done by a whiff of smoke, when they become anti automobiles and alcohol also" that makes as little sense (i.e. no sense) as saying "we'll believe the anti-automobile crowd cares about harm being done by a Sunday drive, when they become anti internet" because after all the internet harms many people in many ways (but on balance is enormously more useful than harmful).

5) Lots of smokers have killed other human beings. Just because you don't believe the science of second-hand smoke increasing death rates doesn't make your assertion true.

6) Just because you personally do not know in your limited experience of families where nutritious food and health care is sacrificed because the parent(s) needs to pay for their nicotine drug addiction doesn't mean that they doesn't exist.

7) Addiction to nicotine is a bigger threat and cost to society than addiction to all other drugs combined (with the exception of alcohol), including heroin, cocaine, meth, and prescription drug addictions. Simply read the studies that add up all the costs involved.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
213. The new ten year study on second hand smoke has finally put to rest the nonsense, never proven with
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:11 PM
Dec 2013

actual facts, that second hand smoke has anything to do with lung cancer. Most sane people never believed their so-called 'claims' which they have never proven, so hopefully this will put an end to the insanity.

So, go right ahead and post your proof that smokers have 'killed other human beings'. We've seen it all over the years and none of it ever proved as a scientific fact that this was true.

And now we have the science proving it was all hogwash.

The rest of your post has been rendered irrelevant by the latest findings.

Dead is dead, it doesn't matter to loved ones how someone dies, but automobiles and alcohol and drugs, not to mention the foul air people are breathing every day, are the real killers of human beings. But pointing fingers elsewhere so we don't worry about all these other killers, WAS a nice distraction, until now.

Now the facts are in, and yes, the anti-smoking crowd doesn't care about lives, as proven by their very own comments, their dismissal of other proven causes of death, which the ONLY reason I mentioned them, and as expected, saw once again, how little actual lives matter to the anti-smoking crowd.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
223. Sabrina dad sent me, almost to the ER, due to smoking
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:27 PM
Dec 2013

I ended up at the docs with a pretty nasty asthma attack. They had the debate about the ER. Thankfully it responded at the docs. The ER was down the door anyway.

So try to sell that hogwash to someone else.

As to your idea that it does not cause problems from second hand, again tell that to those who have gotten a variety of cancers due to it, not just lung cancer. I guess CDC is in the conspiracy. They have kept the data all these years.

Look, if you want to smoke, fine by me. Do it at your home, or away from me...pretty simple. I am not intruding in your rights to die slowly. I would like to keep my right to clean air and breath thank you very much.

Oh one more thing, ten year vs thirty is hardly equal in morbidity and mortality.

Oh and one last thing, you might want to correct the US Surgeon General on their misguided views

http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/secondhandsmoke/chapter7.pdf

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
271. I don't want to smoke, but I don't want to stop others who want to either.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 09:31 PM
Dec 2013

People who have respiratory problems are likely to respond adversely to many things in the environment. Should everyone stop driving cars because of people, like someone I know, who cannot breathe in those fumes without choking?

Don't tell me to believe something that not only has never been proven, it has now been debunked.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
272. except it has not been debunked
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 09:34 PM
Dec 2013

the study you refer to is not REPLICATED, that is basic in science.

The study you refer to does not say ZERO RISK, it says LESS risk.

And the study you refer to goes against so much science it probably has a design error somewhere. We do know second hand smoke, from fifty plus years of epidemiological data does have an effect, a significant effect.

Now as I said, go ahead and smoke, just not around me, thank you very much.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,045 posts)
226. Post it. It is incomplete & deals with only one illness. Tons of evidence linking death & passive
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:29 PM
Dec 2013

Post it, if you can. If it is the one I saw that was presented in June and published in December, then your conclusions are again illogical.

1) It only covers one disease: lung cancer. It does not cover heart disease, heart attacks, pulmonary diseases, or asthma.

2) It shows "low risk", not "no risk".

3) It is contradicted by many careful peer-reviewed studies that do show that second hand smoke (passive smoke) does kill.

4) The tobacco industry and the Cato Institute and conservative think tanks promote your line, with more evidence than you provide. You may have more luck searching there.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
268. I'd love to see a link to the new ten year study
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 06:41 PM
Dec 2013

you are referring to. I googled and came up with nothing but links to proof of the dangers of secondhand smoke.

 

taught_me_patience

(5,477 posts)
99. I wonder how the waiter felt to have smoke blowing in his face?
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 08:48 PM
Dec 2013

...creating a hazardous working condition.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
105. Because that must be what happened.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 09:02 PM
Dec 2013

Waiters don't smoke, they are always offended by the smell of smoke, and all smokers blow their smoke into people's faces.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
100. Maria was also a very smart businesswoman
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 08:48 PM
Dec 2013

Remember, this is Florida. When the tourists and snowbirds leave, business depends on LOCALS to keep their restaurants running, and not just NON-SMOKERS. She asked me where I lived and if I was a permanent resident. I was a potential YEAR ROUND customer. She did not care, and probably liked, that I was a smoker. If she treated me nice, I would come back and bring other local people with me.

If you own a business, do you SHUN smoking customers to the detriment of your business?



 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
101. People cannot smoke in businesses in my state.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 08:59 PM
Dec 2013

In that respect I suppose we all "shun" them, but in reality nobody "shuns" smokers. Only paranoiacs and the delusional think that way.

Brigid

(17,621 posts)
106. Nice of Maria to do that.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 09:16 PM
Dec 2013

But I think I'll skip the veal marsala, the heater, and the rest of it in exchange for the benefits of not smoking.

MadrasT

(7,237 posts)
110. Well that's a switch
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 09:23 PM
Dec 2013

I do not understand the level of hatred people express toward smokers. I never minded the smell. To this dad, it reminds me of mom and dad.

The slef righteousness can be a little over the top sometimes.



Oh well, some things drive me nuts that nobody else understands.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
117. Marijuana was originally made illegal because it was a way of keeping blacks and hispanics away
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 10:56 PM
Dec 2013

I sometimes wonder if all the viciousness against smokers is starting to be a similar thing.

Smokers tend to be poor, minorities, etc. in higher proportions.

How much of the vicious anti-smoking rhetoric is coming from well-fed, privileged people who have an unexamined disdain for the underclass?

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
132. I don't have hatred towards smokers. I have hatred towards the industry and the habit itself.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 11:49 PM
Dec 2013

As well as what the habit may eventually do to them. Because in the end, we, as a society, are flipping the bill for it.

Listen, if you want to smoke, fine, but don't try and bullshit me about how it isn't all "that bad" and how you know so and so who smoked a billion cigarettes and they lived to be 109385093218509285 years old! Denial of reality is just not acceptable in my book. Own what you are doing to yourself and others around you if you're going to do it.

I smoked for 7 years, and I never once tried to chalk it up as anything more than a disgusting habit that I got into at a low point in my life and that I was addicted to, both mentally and physically.

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
348. I don't believe in "sin." I'm an atheist.
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 09:57 PM
Dec 2013

But if you have nothing but love for an industry that did its best to get as many folks addicted to its product as humanly possible, as well as suppress information on the harm of that product for decades, then that's your prerogative.

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
353. Well you should consider that you have no idea what I have "love" for..
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 10:08 PM
Dec 2013

But that I know bullshit when I see it.

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
355. So I'm guessing you have a tough time with mirrors then?
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 10:09 PM
Dec 2013

Or looking at screens with your own posts on them?

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
356. Nope just with cowards who hide their hate
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 10:15 PM
Dec 2013

behind a wall of caring.

You may be an atheist but you certainly learned the lessons of Christian hypocrisy quite well. Congratulations, and enjoy your evening.

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
357. Please, feel free to actually attempt to highlight my "hypocrisy" in my post.
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 10:23 PM
Dec 2013

And the only coward I see is the one who is lashing out with vehemence against an internet poster with one vitriol filled post after another, making one unsupported assertion after another.

Beacool

(30,253 posts)
149. Pot was made illegal to keep away blacks and Hispanics????
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 12:45 AM
Dec 2013

Funny, because most of the pot smokers that I know happen to be white.

Cirque du So-What

(25,989 posts)
236. Don't you know
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:46 PM
Dec 2013

that history extends no further than personal experiences? Dontcha know nuttin? Historical context? Meh!

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
234. Early anti-marijuana laws were very explicitly aimed at Mexicans.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:41 PM
Dec 2013

And proto-drug czar Harry Anslinger targeted black jazz musicians as reefer vectors.

Support for marijuana legalization began growing when it started becoming a white, middle-class thing.

Beacool

(30,253 posts)
250. Thanks, I really didn't know that.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 04:10 PM
Dec 2013

I found something I didn't know about McCarthy while researching Anslinger.

Harry Anslinger later claimed that he had witnessed a scene that affected his life. When he was 12, he heard the screams of a morphine addict that were silenced only by a boy returning from a pharmacist to supply the addict with more morphine. Anslinger was appalled that the drug was so powerful and that children had ready access to such drugs. (However, the experience did not stop Anslinger, while acting as the Commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, from authorizing a druggist near the White House to fill a morphine prescription for an addicted Senator Joseph McCarthy) as part of an effort to help the Senator end his heroin addiction.

yellowwoodII

(616 posts)
118. Tobacco Industry Is Evil
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 11:01 PM
Dec 2013

My father died of a smoking related illness.
I hate the tobacco industry and all that it stands for. We remember the way that they manipulated young people into smoking. Movie makers were paid to have their popular actors smoke. Glamorous, you know. They gave cartons of cigarettes to servicemen. They paid doctors to advertise "light" cigarettes.
Only young people start smoking. Once they get past a certain age, they aren't tempted.
It's pitiful.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
121. I recently went into a restaurant in a state that still allowed smoking in restaurants.
Fri Dec 13, 2013, 11:25 PM
Dec 2013

I could smell the smoke. At first most of the dinners didn't smoke, but one group showed up and sat near me that did smoke. I discreetly moved, the waitress was ok with me moving and made a comment about she wished people wouldn't smoke because it destroyed the taste of meals for many of her customers.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
138. Good for Maria! She made it to the ripe old age of 70.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 12:00 AM
Dec 2013

I am 70, and a disproportionate percentage of my friends who smoked or shared a house with a smoker are gone. Dead. And I miss them.

Smoking is not a good idea no matter how well Maria treated you. Better enjoy that meal while you can. The truth is that smoking very often reduces your lifespan.

Beacool

(30,253 posts)
148. I'm glad that you had a great time.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 12:38 AM
Dec 2013

No flaming, but I have always hated cigarettes. I don't think that I could live with a smoker. The stench gets on everything, clothing, hair, furniture, etc. I was a happy person when they banned smoking in most public places.

Jasana

(490 posts)
150. I'm glad you had such a wonderful night.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 12:48 AM
Dec 2013

I'm the type who prefers quality over quantity... as long as my quality time doesn't hurt anyone else.

Response to HockeyMom (Original post)

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
155. After 40 years I finally stopped.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 01:21 AM
Dec 2013
- But I refuse to be an asshole about it! Smoke 'em if you got 'em is what I always say!!!

K&R

BellaKos

(318 posts)
160. Smoker here
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 01:52 AM
Dec 2013

Alcohol is far worse than cigarettes. Not only is there a danger when impaired while driving or even bar hopping, but also alcoholism kills. I've seen the damage from alcohol consumption in my own family. The disease ranges from psychological dysfunction to brain damage and causes the more familiar physical conditions like liver impairment.

There are two types of people who become afflicted. The first is the one with a genetic predisposition to become addicted almost immediately. The other is the one who gradually becomes addicted after a number of years (varies) of "social drinking." Neither type considers drinking to be a problem. Both deny their impairment, regardless of degree.
And there are three stages of alcoholism. So, if you are the person who looks forward to "partying" on the weekend a little more than one who doesn''t drink, then you're probably in Stage One. (Think about your plans for New Year's Eve or the Super Bowl.) Stage Two -- You miss a Monday at work because of a hangover -- which gradually progresses to Stage Three when an intervention with immediate hospitalization at a Rehab facility is the only solution. Even then, the alcoholic will resist until he is shamed or forced to go -- or he winds up destitute on the streets.

Ironically, no studies about the damage alcoholism does to people (and their families) physically and psychologically or stats about the cost in regard to lost productivity, long-term health issues, or even the danger on the highways has been put forward to the public to the same *extent* as smoking. Consequently, non-smoking drinkers sit back in their bubbles of self-righteous delusion -- happily criticizing, denigrating, and shunning smokers. They are not apt to realize that their lifestyle of bourbon and steak or beer and barbeque is bound to cause infirmity in their old age. They, the self-righteous, don't realize that even statistics can't reveal the future, much less guarantee outcomes.

At the same time, I have not seen people damaged by smoking in my family. My grandfathers died at ages 87 and 93, respectively. Both smoked. One of my aunts also died at age 87 -- peacefully, with no overt health problems. She smoked Kents most of her life. Interestingly, another aunt died at age 87. She never smoked -- or drank -- or even ate the "wrong" foods. Maybe, an objective observer might say, as Lewis Black has said, that people are like snow-flakes. No two are alike. Or as a doctor from Greece told me once: Statistics are not meant to be applied en masse. And that's especially pertinent when prescribing medication. (Think about that.)

So ... I am of two minds. It would be more convenient, more socially acceptable, and less costly to quit smoking, but I enjoy it. It helps me think. On the other hand, if I didn't smoke, I might just start-- just to piss off The Smug" in this world. I would enjoy that, too.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
203. And my dad, who died at 87
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 01:46 PM
Dec 2013

While on Oxygen and still smoking developed COPD and asthma.

Oh for sure he was going to beat the odds until, well...he did not.

I know many smokers and ex smokers with several grades of lung dysfunction. A couple with actual lung cancer. Try that BS somewhere else. And yes, alcoholism is not nice either. Both are addictions.

BellaKos

(318 posts)
279. Damn it all.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 12:27 AM
Dec 2013

Nadinbrzeinski -- I'm fine with your anecdotal remarks that attribute various lung conditions to smoking. That's okay, but I do not accept your characterization of my observations as BS. My dad died of liver failure as a result of alcoholism at age 62, so what's your point?

The so-called "luck" that the smokers in my family experienced is not all that unusual, demonstrating that perhaps there are more factors involved with the science of disease than are apparent today. After all, just look at the news reports about margarine vs. butter, eggs, milk or recent reports about pharmaceuticals to see that medical conclusions *change* over time and quite dramatically. And by the way, the fourth leading cause of death in this country comes from the pharmaceutical industry. From your perspective, I suppose that warrants an all-out campaign against prescription drugs. Also, there is another little known fact to consider when analyzing the causes of lung disease. It is the fact that the most dangerous carcinogen of all that can be inhaled is a minute element in rocket fuel. The second most dangerous is in jet fuel.

Also, I want to make clear that alcohol abuse is widespread, universally prevalent, promoted in most social settings, and a genuinely dangerous practice. But unlike smoking, the dangers of alcohol abuse are not being publicized as a health threat. Nor is there any effort to educate the public about how easily one can drift from "social drinking" to alcohol abuse to alcoholism.

From my perspective ... I'm just sick and tired -- fed up -- with puritanical, judgmental, self-righteous, condescending, and smug attitudes about people's choices concerning their own private business. Whether it's coming from the Right or the Left, it's the same kind of thing.

Oh and ... word to the wise: Don't live downwind of an airport if you can help it.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
280. Well you should try this anecdotal evidence you have
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 12:30 AM
Dec 2013

with the CDC and the US Surgeon General who have epidemiological data that supports my informal observations going back 50 years at least.

As to airports, yes, well known and your point? Same for industrial areas. Both are supported by the same kind of research and data gathering you are poopoing.

I prefer science, not this crap.

Have a good day.

BellaKos

(318 posts)
282. Funny you should mention the CDC
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 12:58 AM
Dec 2013

My oldest friend in the world just retired from the CDC. He's the one who told me about the dangerous element in rocket fuel and jet fuel twenty years ago. He also reviewed the original studies about smoking and concluded that they were not trustworthy. And upon the original faulty conclusions, all the rest is based.
He had already told me that many health studies were calibrated to suit the agenda of those behind the funding of said studies. Or, that studies usually *conformed* to that which was acceptable to the particular cohort of professional peers. In other words, unfortunately, science research today is confined within the parameters of monied interests or that which is politically acceptable.

I also have had conversations with a former family member who is a scientist at the CDC. He has worked on the AIDS virus beginning in the early 1980s. Guess what? All about AIDS is *not* public knowledge.

So, I guess I shoulda told you that I actually knew people who worked at the CDC and that there is plenty that they don't know and/or that they don't make public.

As for me, I'm quite at ease with the fact that I don't know everything. I believe in the old adage: "He who knows not that the knows not, knows not."

I prefer thoughtful consideration, healthy skepticism, and understanding to being an a$$ to people just because I disagree with their choices.


 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
285. Yup, they cook all at CDC and at the Surgeon General
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 01:39 AM
Dec 2013

I knew it!!!!!!

And the planet earth is flat, and that Apollo 11 was a great stage effect in the Mojave desert. Next you will tell me that the cannals in Mars are real and the Hubble effect is not real either.

Chuckle.

BellaKos

(318 posts)
286. Well, I'm glad you're able to "chuckle."
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 02:03 AM
Dec 2013

I had the impression that you were some sort of fanatic who was so wedded to his hardened perspective that he allowed himself to be self-righteous, condescending, intolerant, mean-spirited, and just plain asinine to random posters whom he doesn't know from Adam's house cat.
But now I see that you're so warm-hearted in your attitude that "chuckles" just bubble up from the depths of your soul for no apparent reason atoll. Glad to know that.

Meanwhile. I'm tired this, aren't you? I can see that I'm being persistently misunderstood. And gawd forbid that you should learn something. I know you don't believe what I've said. Don't care. And I don't care that you cannot be persuaded to consider anything whatsoever outside of your own belief system.

(And there are many studies that show that even knowledge, scientifically vetted, is merely a belief system and that human beings aren't even capable of understanding the whole of life, the universe and everything. Pardon me. I digress. I had attempted to inform you of something that perhaps you hadn't known before. Gosh. Haven't I learned not to try that? Oh well.)

Meanwhile. it's been lots o' fun engaging you in the context of contradictory perspectives.
Keep calm and chuckle on. See ya'.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
315. Ah, I think Carl Sagan fits here, like a glove
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 01:49 PM
Dec 2013
We live in a society absolutely dependent on science and technology and yet have cleverly arranged things so that almost no one understands science and technology. That's a clear prescription for disaster.


Have a good day

BellaKos

(318 posts)
320. Finally!
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 07:23 PM
Dec 2013

Something you and I can agree completely.
Also, I wanted to compliment you on your ability to comment without being asinine. See, you can do it! Congratulations.

zappaman

(20,606 posts)
326. Welcome to the Iggy list!
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 04:16 AM
Dec 2013

See you this Friday, where you can join hundreds in the Friday Holiday Poker tournament.

 

Vashta Nerada

(3,922 posts)
161. Good for you.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 01:56 AM
Dec 2013

I'll keep my health and hang with the "uncool" kids inside.



Edit: If I saw the owner of the restaurant smoking outside while I was walking in, I would have turned around and left. That's just gross. I've done that when I saw waiters smoking outside before.

hurple

(1,306 posts)
163. My favorite posts...
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 03:30 AM
Dec 2013

Are the ones that start out with, "I've never known of anyone being rude to a smoker" and then go on in the very next sentence to be rude to the OP.

You're right, there are some really horrible, rude, nasty people on here in regards to this subject.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,376 posts)
181. The OP started it by anticipating 'health nuts' posting here
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 08:23 AM
Dec 2013

"there are some really horrible, rude, nasty people on here" - like people who start a thread to call others 'nuts'?

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
166. ALL smokers are sisters and brothers - and some day we shall be free
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 04:47 AM
Dec 2013

I have not actually physically smoked in a year and a half - but in my heart I will always be a smoker.....

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
167. I don't mind stepping outside to smoke
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 04:47 AM
Dec 2013

I still smoke, still enjoy it but, for the sake of everyone's health, I don't mind stepping outside. I just wish every place would provide something to sit on. I have to walk with crutches and standing for more than a minute or so is incredibly painful for me so it would be nice to have something to sit on (no, I'm not going to quit). The anti-smoking people who used to post pictures of diseased lungs on any thread that mentioned smoking annoyed the piss out of me, reminded me of pro-lifers.

My other half keeps trying to get me to try e-cigarettes. I keep meaning to try them, it just slips my mind. And I'm a bit dubious of them because I actually enjoy smoking.

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
168. E-cigarettes - are a LOT, LOT cheaper as well. Since I quite smoking about a year and a half ago
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 05:04 AM
Dec 2013

Last edited Sat Dec 14, 2013, 05:37 AM - Edit history (1)

I don't really need E-cigarettes - but out of curiosity - when a coworker brought his little device to work - I thought I would just try it to see how it feels - it definitely gives the old nicotine rush just like a real cigarette - If one cannot quit smoking altogether - then maybe E-cigarettes are a good stepping stone.

Mariana

(14,861 posts)
318. I enjoyed smoking. I like vaping even better.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 04:02 PM
Dec 2013

I've had people ask me when I'm going to quit using the e-cig. The answer is, probably never. I'm using nicotine-free liquids and have been for some time, so there's no active addiction to nicotine going on anymore. I just really enjoy it. I vape in public all the time and no one pays any attention. It's great.

fujiyama

(15,185 posts)
179. I guess smokers are "persecuted" the way Christians are in this country...
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 07:02 AM
Dec 2013

ROFL. Yeah, Bill O'Reilly can write a book about the "war on smokers" like the "war on Christmas".

I say that as an occasional smoker myself (the kind that bums one from a friend when I step outside with them when at a bar). But I am really glad about the smoking bans indoors. It's really nice not having my clothes smell like an ash tray after I get home. It's also nice to have to breathe it constantly.

Now, I agree some cities may be going too far in their restrictions (I believe if you want to stink up your own house - and you own the place, go ahead). But overall, it's nice to go to a bar or restaurant and not have to worry about where you are seated...

Doc Holliday

(719 posts)
183. Ever since I found out
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 08:43 AM
Dec 2013

that having unprotected sex with the wrong person could kill me, lung cancer doesn't seem like such a big scary thing.

Having said that, I'm a recent convert to vaping. At first, I was using it as a supplement when in a place where smoking was prohibited. But it has its own inertia....I've cut down from nearly two packs a day to less than half a pack. I see the day coming when I will be vaping only, no "real" tobacco involved. I have already noticed the benefit of less tobacco in my diet, and at my age (59) it's a nice reward. Cheaper, too.

tblue37

(65,490 posts)
185. I think it is always sweet when you find a kindred spirit, and always sweet
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 08:54 AM
Dec 2013

when someone goes out of his/her way to be nice to someone else.

I don't smoke, and of course smoking is bad for you, and if course no one should have to breathe secondhand smoke. But most smokers would quit if they could, just aas most overweight people would like to diet successfully. If it were easy, everyone would be perfect. Just because smokers should not pollute the air of nonsmokers in enclosed spaces, that doesn't mean that nonsmokers should act like jerks toward smokers.

I am glad you ended up having a particularly lovely evening instead of having it spoiled by those who would treat you like a criminal.

TBF

(32,102 posts)
186. With my allergies I cannot be in a room with smokers -
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 09:02 AM
Dec 2013

but I am recc'ing this story because it is nice to see someone have a decent work Christmas party story. Ha! How often does that happen? Glad you had a good time!

marble falls

(57,275 posts)
188. Last year I was asked repeatedly if I was or were a smoker. The reason my doctors asked me ....
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 10:09 AM
Dec 2013

this was because of some blood in my urine and they were trying to figure out why that was. No kidney problems. No injury. My brother was a long distance runner and he had some blood in his urine as a result and some people do naturally have blood in their urine. Finally after an MRI they find a spot in my bladder.
And after a procedure to look in my bladder they find the cancer.

I worked for forty years in restaurants. One of the first things I learned was how to remove and replace ashtrays. I must have placed 10,000 or more ashtrays on tables. I never believed second hand smoking caused cancer. I never smoked tobacco but I always felt smokers were more generous than nonsmokers. Bladder cancer is a smokers cancer.

Its also a second hand smokers cancer. Thanks for the generous tip and thanks for the cancer. Go smoke in the parking, please.

mdbl

(4,976 posts)
189. Emotions cover up the point on smoking
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 11:27 AM
Dec 2013

I smoked for 25 years - 2-3 packs a day. I smoked in the car, in restaurants, in my kids room, in my bedroom, in my bathroom in my garage. Had one hanging out of my mouth while doing heavy lifting work. Had one as soon as I awoke, and one right before going to bed. I met great people who were also smokers. We looked great, felt great and loved to smoke. After I quit, my realization was this: I was addicted. What does that mean? It means the my brain felt it needed the nicotine from cigarettes the same as it needed air, water and nourishment. My brain thought it needed nicotine to think. It made up every reason to light up it could think of. Addictions become an uncontrollable part of your personality. Addictions make you think you look great, feel great and work better while you are feeding them. Your brain can't tell the difference other than it needs you to feed that addiction to feel normal. Unfortunately, the brain goes into complete denial about the harm the cigarettes inflict on it's own body. It will kill you either way. The tar will deprive your body of oxygen slowly killing off organ function, or the nicotine could cause a cancer because it messes with your body's cell reproductions. It could happen fast, it could happen slow. It will happen. I love smokers and non smokers. I thank the non smokers for their tolerance of my smoking. I thank the smokers for their fellowship in my addiction. Eiher way, though, you are a slave to an addiction. When you come to terms with that, you at least can quit arguing about all the other particulars which are truly as meaningless as the tea party.

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
270. Well, I don't smoke, but I was wondering if other forms of self-destructive behavior
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 07:26 PM
Dec 2013

were similarly rewarded at that restaurant.

HelenWheels

(2,284 posts)
196. Sorry, don't agree this is a good story
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 12:52 PM
Dec 2013

Smoking has no right to be done indoors. If this woman sat next to me at that restaurant and smoked and got a free meal for polluting the air I would deserve a free meal for having to sit in that pollution. Ugh!

dinger130

(199 posts)
197. My mother has smoked for 77 years.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 01:05 PM
Dec 2013

She is now 93 and smokes over a pack a day. All these years she has spun the roulette wheel her and won. In her small hometown in Kentucky, there are a couple of restaurants where smoking is allowed. Of course, that is where she wants to go to eat out. Her diet is terrible. She lives mostly on junk food, and anything chocolate. Hates fruits and most vegetables, but her diet is high in dairy products. She has always kept her weight down though. I scratch my head.

Went to the doctor last week for her checkup, and her oxygen level was 99. He told her that if anyone tells her to quit smoking, tell them to go to hell.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
206. 93... Agree with the doc
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 01:55 PM
Dec 2013

She would get an extra week. As we used to say with my dad in the last five in particular, let him enjoy if it it gives him pleasure. It ain't gonna do much more damage any how.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
283. Yep. That's what we used to say about my grandfather
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 01:26 AM
Dec 2013

who lived to be 97 and only quit smoking the last few months of his life when he was in a long-term care facility that didn't allow smoking. By the time he was in his 80's, we figured it was pointless to bother him about it.

He did suffer from smoking though - he lost circulation in one leg and had to have it amputated when he was 77 (while in a rehab facility he quit smoking for a year, then promptly started back up when he went home). He lived through several blood clots in his lungs that destroyed his lungs and landed him on oxygen 24/7 (likely he also had COPD in addition to that). He also had a heart attack in his late 80's. But by the time he was in his 90's he insisted on smoking and we just let him be. He even smoked on his oxygen (no one could convince him to turn it off so he could smoke) and blew up his face a few times. Which, oddly, rendered his face curiously wrinkle free which led my wrinkly and hilarious great aunt to remark that she found an alternative to a face lift...she was going to buy an oxygen tank and take up smoking...

My grandfather died from mild pneumonia in compromised lungs.

He was also an alcoholic into his 80's and obese. We wanted to donate his body to science to see if they could figure out his longevity gene. We do wonder how long he would've lived if he would've had a healthier lifestyle. I mean, how many people who start smoking at age 11 live to 97? At the very least, he'd have had a happier life...he hated his artificial limb and that's when he refused to keep travelling...his last 20 years could've been filled with a lot more and smoking too a lot away from him.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
200. Enjoy the special treatment
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 01:34 PM
Dec 2013

I just hope, for your sake, you never develop the asthma and COPD I saw my dad develop. Being short of breath, even with oxygen, I guess would be worth it. Yup, he had a pretty invisible attitude, none of that is gonna happen to me until it did.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
215. nadin, I'm sure she realizes all the heath problems possible d/t smoking.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:14 PM
Dec 2013

No disrespect, but it's no ones's business but hers, really, as long as she's not subjecting others to it, and I'm one of those who thinks this really is a story more about compassion and empathy than anything else.

Glad to see you back, btw.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
220. I just pointed out the attitude
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:19 PM
Dec 2013

Since I lived it.

It is empathy and compassion, but also it is this attitude among addicts (to substance here) that this is not going to happen to them.

As to back, somewhat.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
238. The last two years he was on O2 almost 24/7
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:47 PM
Dec 2013

He smoked his last the day he died. I guess an hour or so before he slipped quietly in his sleep, still hooked to the O2. He had to be reminded not to smoke while on Oxygen, a common accident among smokers on O2.

He was told thirty years before and forty as well, that it be good to quit. My brother, an MD by training, told him as well. He laughed. It was never, ever going to happen to him. What did doctors know anyway? Well, it did.

He did quit for seven months after open heart, triple cabbage, but it is so damn addictive...he was back on it.

The last five years, none told him anymore. He was too old, and quitting might add a few months. So we let him enjoy his cigs (and whiskey). But he had that same attitude, the "young health nuts" in the OP is that attitude.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
241. I agree that referring to people who object to smoking as young health nuts isn't
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 03:02 PM
Dec 2013

probably the wisest phrasing to use, but I understand that a lot of smokers are subjected to some pretty horrible treatment. Being called 'disgusting', 'filthy', etc. is probably the reason some are a bit resentful. You've stated it well ...... it's an addiction. We seem to try to understand drug addictions, alcoholism ... with none of the same stigma as smoking.

I've worked in nursing homes where residents' only desire in life ........ honest to god, they've lost all family, friends, possessions, contact with the outside world as a result of being moved to the home - was to go out for a cigarette. It pissed me off to no end to see some of the RN's make them wait for hours before they'd dole out the resident's own locked up at the nurses' station, cigarette. In our health districts we don't get the volume of calls in rural areas to justify paying full time EMS, so we'd work in the home during the day and leave if called out. I vividly remember one man, who'd come in to the home with no family or support and who'd had a hell of a hard life, outside scouring the ashtrays for butts because he wasn't allowed his own cigs more than once an hour. We took him by ambulance to Regina that night, where he died. I always wondered just wtf it would have hurt to let him do the only thing left in his life he enjoyed. It still hurts to think of that ride up.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
247. Why the cigs are bad for you
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 03:19 PM
Dec 2013

Stopped. Except for one. After he fell and broke his hip, and almost sent me to the ER with a bad asthma attack. (O2 sat was down to 79 at the docs, but responded to treatment or I would have been taken to the ER down the door, clinic was at the hospital). After that we confined his smoking to one place, once he could walk out, to the porch.

dlwickham

(3,316 posts)
201. the phrase attention whore comes to mind
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 01:45 PM
Dec 2013

bragging about smoking

poor thing-being an outcast for poisoning your body and the people around you




polly7

(20,582 posts)
229. wtf?
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:33 PM
Dec 2013

I personally find the words 'attention whore' harsh ... when someone was merely relating a story involving someone doing something kind.

Young health nuts - not nearly as nasty. imhfo.

aikoaiko

(34,184 posts)
252. And the jury results are in...
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 04:43 PM
Dec 2013

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
At Sat Dec 14, 2013, 01:35 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

the phrase attention whore comes to mind
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4176693

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

OTT not necessary

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Dec 14, 2013, 01:37 PM, and the Jury voted 2-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Oh I think hockeymom can receive as good as she gets. She can handle herself.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Flaming she asks for, flaming she expects, flaming she gets -- if you'll pardon the expression.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: Editorializing is, in this case, superfluous.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: I agree with alerter.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
209. I can't help noticing that while...
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:02 PM
Dec 2013

we can't "slut shame" or rag on the overweight, or dig into a lot of others for what they might do or be, smokers are still fair game.

The "but it hurts others" excuse doesn't work because damn near everything we do has an effect on others one way or another. Ragging on smokers is just another Puritanical way to feel superior to lesser people no matter how it's excused and rationalized.

No smoking rules are OK because it cleans the place up and makes it nicer, maybe even healthier, but smokers are still human beings, and little stories like this are pretty cool.



dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
217. Lots of the pubs in the UK have outdoor heaters for smoking areas
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:15 PM
Dec 2013

Some have warm wraps / blankets too.

 

ann---

(1,933 posts)
228. Misery likes company
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:32 PM
Dec 2013

People who ignore the health risks of smoking aren't the ones who deserve special treatment, especially when YOUR habit harms others who are in your presence while you harm yourself.

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
237. There is a great book to read. It's from an author named Alan Carr.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:46 PM
Dec 2013

"The easy way to stop smoking". This is a great book for smokers who love to smoke. This book encourages you to continue to smoke while you read it. Consider it veal marsala for your head.

http://www.amazon.com/Allen-Carrs-Easy-Stop-Smoking/dp/0615482155/

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
240. I remember years ago
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 02:55 PM
Dec 2013

It must've been, like, 1994 or 95, because it was the height of the "culture wars," we were invited to a benefit to raise money to hire a lobbyist to advocate for the arts in Washington. It was in someone's back yard. So after an hour or so of milling around, I needed some nicotine, and I sneaked around to the front steps of the house, sat down, and lit a cigarette--hiding, so no one at the event would see.

Lo and behold ... who comes and sits down next to me on the steps? Garrison Keillor. And he says how sorry he is that I have to sneak around like a criminal, and that he used to smoke, and would if he could ... but he can't because he has to protect his radio voice. He was so sweet and understanding ... even supportive! I smile still remembering how someone took pity on an evil smoker and tried to make her feel better.

BellaKos

(318 posts)
284. The reason why has just occurred to me.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 01:29 AM
Dec 2013

When social parameters are repeated often enough, it then becomes socially acceptable to denigrate those who do not conform to the prescribed behavior.

We can see this same mental defect among "Dittoheads" on the Far Right, but we can't see it among us tolerant, understanding, open-minded, truth-seeking liberals, can we? After all, our own mean-spirited condescension is for "their own good."

(Unfortunately, Group-Think is an ailment infecting both the Right and the Left -- and especially the White House Press Corps.)

It's just human nature that people get angry and allow themselves to lash out when their hardened perspectives are challenged.

BellaKos

(318 posts)
287. Why, yes you are!
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 02:16 AM
Dec 2013

I expect applause, deference, and even an occasional "Bravo," each and every time I light up.

Seriously, all I would prefer is that self-righteous condescension be confined to one's own family and only at large family gatherings during the winter.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,376 posts)
307. Do you think calling DUers 'nuts' is condescension too?
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 10:38 AM
Dec 2013

Because that's what the OP does. It calls people who recognise 60 years of health information about how smoking kills 'health nuts'. When you start a controversial OP, calling other DUers names, you have to expect something in return. Especially if you are ignoring 60 years of science.

BellaKos

(318 posts)
321. hmmm Interesting question.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 08:07 PM
Dec 2013

I wouldn't exactly call the term, "health nut," something derogatory.
I guess what aggravates me is the judgmental and self-righteous attitude that I've seen directed at smokers on this thread. And that snugness is displayed elsewhere around here, too. That irritates me regardless of the topic at hand.

And I've battled Fundamental Christians on forums in the past when I've seen the same kind of thing. The conflict boils down to this: They tell me that I know nothing about the Bible and that I'm going to hell, in so many words. I tell them that I do indeed know about the Bible and they can kiss my a$$, in so many words. Their attitude is laced with self-righteous condescension and it drives me crazy.

The truth is that I see the same kind of attitude among the Left in regard to other subjects. Smoking, being one among many. Naturally, I'm apt to respond. Caint hep it.

From my perspective, smoking has not shown to be a factor in the general health of my huge clan. Whether it be my grandfather who smoked and lived to be 93, without any remarkable health issues, or a Great Aunt who died at 87, who was active until she fell over in her yard. The thoughtful response should be, "Wow. That's remarkable." And given this particular cohort that contradicts accepted science, a researcher would or should wonder if there could be other factors that contribute to disease and health or are mitigated by stress-management, environment, diet, genetics, or something that hasn't been thought about yet.

The thoughtless response, on the other hand, is what I've seen here, which is basically, "You smoke, therefore, you shall die a horrible and lingering death, so sayth the Lord of Conventional Wisdom." And delivered with a tinge of the most repulsive smugness imaginable.

And from experience, I am justified in leaping to the conclusion that all of those who plan on getting drunk on New Year's Eve are probably at Stage One alcoholism and therefore shall surely drift to Stage Two and perhaps even Stage Three. At which point, they will surely die a horrible and lingering death, so sayth the Lord of What I've Seen With My Own Eyes. But, you know, I don't do that.

So, it's that attitude of self-righteous condescension and narrow-mindedness that aggravates me. I really don't care if people smoke or even drink too much. Outcomes in health and in life are never as predictable as we would like. People should be aware of that, because it is the one fact that we can all depend upon. And democrats and liberals should be especially aware, because they profess to be the truth-seekers and the truth-tellers of this world and are remarkably apt to condemn anyone *else* they see as narrow-minded and wedded to a hardened perspective. Hypocrisy aggravates me, too. Caint hep it.




muriel_volestrangler

(101,376 posts)
322. OK, we get that you don't understand the science
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 10:18 PM
Dec 2013

because you say "a researcher would or should wonder if there could be other factors that contribute to disease and health or are mitigated by stress-management, environment, diet, genetics, or something that hasn't been thought about yet."

It has been incredibly heavily researched. In many countries, over many decades. Smoking causes lung cancer, and other cancers, and causes heart disease and bronchitis. This is one of the most obvious realities of medicine we have discovered since WW2. It's not inevitable; the figure I remember from years ago is that about a quarter of smokers die from it, but that may have been revised. More suffer health problems, such as heart attacks, that don't actually kill them. So, yes, it's quite possible for one person to know several smokers who didn't die from it. But no, your anecdotes don't mean any researcher should be rushing back to do yet more studies.

A product that addicts its users, and kills a significant percentage of them, and makes more ill, is not something to be celebrated, or even excused.

Again, I don't think you understand that alcohol has also been researched. It has dangers, but you can't go from "people I know have died from alcohol abuse" to "getting drunk at New Year's leads to ...". A lot of people get drunk at one New Year's or another; not that many end up alcoholics, comparatively. People aren't basing what they say about smoking just from their friends and family's health; they're using the statistics. And you should do the same for alcohol. Going against Conventional Wisdom doesn't automatically make you right, or righteous, even if you capitalise it.

BellaKos

(318 posts)
323. Well, I understand ...
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 11:45 PM
Dec 2013

I understand far more than I can convey here. But the simple logic is this: If smoking causes lung cancer, then it follows that everyone who smokes will get lung cancer. That is not true, because everyone does not get lung cancer, even those who have smoked for decades. Even major populations of smokers in France and Japan. From that alone -- that simple fact -- is it illogical to wonder if there are more factors involved in this health issue? That's all I was attempting to say.

Now about alcoholism. It is apparent that you know very little about it. Can you please accept the fact that I know far more than the average person about it? Not only have I lived with the effects of alcoholism in my family for decades, but also I've been reading about the subject for decades. And I'll tell you this: A person who *plans* to get drunk on New Year's Eve is, in fact, exhibiting an indicator of Stage One. And from there, it is easy to slip into Stage Two without even realizing it. Keep in mind, denial and psychological dysfunction are parts of the disease.

So, you and I agree on this, however:
"A product that addicts its users, and kills a significant percentage of them, and makes more ill, is not something to be celebrated, or even excused."

And yet, alcohol is celebrated in almost every social setting from New Year's Eve and Christmas parties to Memorial Day picnics to lunch with colleagues and so on. It is delusional to assume that alcohol abuse is not dangerous. And from my perspective, based on experience, observations, and general knowledge, more dangerous than smoking. Yet, people who drink are celebrated and encouraged, while smokers are shunned.

But the point of my comments were not to go against The Church of Conventional Wisdom, but rather to suggest that perhaps there's more to discover about these health issues. And I wanted to point out that the attitude of its devotees is just as condescending as those of Christian fundamentalists. My hope is that The Smug around here can see that quality of self-righteousness in themselves and realize how hypocritical it is chastise and condemn others who assert a different point of view.

But noooooo .... That won't happen, because, instead, I will be misunderstood again and accosted with more statistics and accused of being scientifically illiterate.

Response to HockeyMom (Original post)

RedCappedBandit

(5,514 posts)
276. Don't care what drugs you choose to abuse
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 10:26 PM
Dec 2013

so long as you don't blow it in my face and throw your butts everywhere.

Hekate

(90,837 posts)
294. Glad you enjoyed your evening out and made a new friend. My daughter started at age 12...
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 03:37 AM
Dec 2013

Last edited Sun Dec 15, 2013, 04:43 AM - Edit history (1)

... which means that by now she has been smoking probably a pack a day for 26 years. The wrongheaded rebellion of a child has ended up being the stubborn addiction of an adult, and she defends it just like an addict.

My daughter smoked through all her pregnancies. She's had some significant issues with pregnancy .... and so did my late mother, who also smoked.

I inhaled second-hand smoke from my conception till my mid-to-late 20's when suddenly there was a sea-change in the culture and my friends volunteered to go outside to smoke. All through college and beyond I used to carry matches for my pals; I always had one ashtray in my apartment. When I moved at the age of 31 I realized I could leave those things behind.

Do you notice I'm not flaming you? Judging you? I'm not a "young health nut" -- I'm in my mid-60s. I didn't join any of the anti-smoking campaigns, but as an asthmatic I'm grateful for the change in the culture. I reserve my anger for Big Tobacco and the millions they spent luring children my daughter's age in with Joe Camel. One of my deepest fears is that I might outlive my daughter, as my friend outlived her sister.

End of sermon.

BellaKos

(318 posts)
297. If you really wanna' be scared.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 04:37 AM
Dec 2013

Watch the documentary, "Forks and Knives." It's on Netflix.

Then, you will realize that it's hopeless. Our Corporate Masters are out to kill us all, smoker and non-smoker alike.

But then again, you're not gonna' get out of here alive.

And HockeyMom. I salute you for being so brave -- recounting a pleasant restaurant experience in the presence of The Church of The Self-Righteous and The Fearful Whiners.
Happy Holidays and carry on!

pecwae

(8,021 posts)
312. OK.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 11:50 AM
Dec 2013

108 recs for a post in support of and applause for a health destroying addiction, public health nuisance and, by extension, a corporation making millions off enabling a costly habit that adds absolutely nothing to society. How bizarre.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
333. i socially smoke and i dont think its nutty for nonsmokers to not want to be exposed
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 04:10 PM
Dec 2013

to smoke in restaurants/bars and work/school

its not like the smoke is good for them and they are being irrational. the smoke is legitimately not good for their health. (unlike the anti-vaccination nuts, who reject something that is good for them and for the world overall)

HipChick

(25,485 posts)
337. I went to see my Aunt in the hospital in London last year..
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 04:29 PM
Dec 2013

I am a secret smoker, and slung off outside the hospital to have a cig..patients were out there smoking with their drips, breathing tanks and god knows what else...had to laugh..love dem Brits

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
339. "Your 25 inch waist and 32 inch hips put you at risk of a HEART ATTACK"
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 05:26 PM
Dec 2013

because a coworker was APPLE shaped at 4"10 and 90 lbs. Lose weight?????? Even these "health experts" didn't dare say that. Go to a GYM and workout!!! This woman was 60 years old and lifted children in and out of wheelchairs to change their diapers all day. She needed MORE exercise? She told the company health coaches after her day at work, and her age, working out at gym WOULD give her a heart attack. At 5"1 and 100 lbs,I told them to suck an egg. You aren't measuring ME. BTW, your BMI is old hat and your WHR is a better indicator of if you will have a heart attack. Even at 90 lbs. Right.

It is not going to end with smoking; not for the overweight people, or otherwise. The health industry is a big business and feeds on FEAR to make their money by gullible people; smokers, diets, and otherwise.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
340. Just to point out, your stories are most likely untrue, you seem to have a chip on your...
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 05:33 PM
Dec 2013

shoulder about something to do with modern medicine, you seem to hate the idea that it actually works to improve people's lives, and your posts seem to become increasingly unintelligible the longer you post.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
344. I worked for a public school district in Florida
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:44 PM
Dec 2013

They self-insured and went on a "wellness kick". Hired 4" Health Coaches" to the tune of over $1M. Yes, part of that was to penalize smokers (blood tests for all employees), questionnaires, height/weight, and waist/ hip measurements. Your "coach" would even take your GROCERY SHOPPING! They told female employees that the AMA "recommends" having your first baby before age 30 or you risk health problems for both yourself and your baby. YOUNG, unmarried teachers were crying over this. I couldn't make this up if I tried. One of the questions on that questionnaires was "What sunscreen do you use?" I wrote down a ROOF and 4 WALLS. I HATE the sun and don't go outside unless it is absolutely necessary. Do I need sunscreen going to and from my car grocery shopping? This was totally INSANE. Come on, have a baby before age 30 as part of "Your Health, Your Choice"? They found any reason they could to get control, and penalized you monetarily if you didn't "Comply" (their words).

Yeah, it started before but I saw what this Wellness Crap can do, and it sent me over the edge.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
362. I will agree with that
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 12:59 PM
Dec 2013

Smoking gave us a chance to meet, but we did have other things in common. She was from Italy. I am of Italian heritiage. She was in her 70s. I am in my 60s. She lived in NJ for 30 years. I lived in NY for 58 years. We also talked quite a bit about cooking, obviously.

It went beyond smoking. She was a nice woman. As the owner of the restaurant, she certainly could have just kept to herself and not sat down with a customer to just talk.

Treat others as you would wish to be treated yourself. Merry Christmas.

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
351. Well HM you got them all going...
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 10:06 PM
Dec 2013

Funny how a thread on how you were treated nicely turned into the hate fest that everyone claims doesn't exist.

Here are some of the words used in this thread to describe smokers, who at this point aren't even allowed near anyone to smoke:

Assholes, Selfish, Disgusting, Slave, Sucker, Addict... and all of those things were said with great love because they just "love the sinner but hate the sin".

One day, I'm going to meet all these terrible smokers. You know, the ones who light up inside, who walk around blowing their smoke right in everyones face, who use their habit to hurt others. They must exist, this thread speaks of them often..

Have a great holiday HM!

 

Vashta Nerada

(3,922 posts)
352. This thread is still around?
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 10:07 PM
Dec 2013

I'd be embarrassed if I posted something like this. And then have it get over 350 posts.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Treated like a Queen FOR ...