Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MrScorpio

(73,631 posts)
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 12:55 AM Dec 2013

Striking Photos Will Change The Way You See The Average American



What does the average American look like? As time goes on, the answer to that question is becoming more and more complicated.

The country is living up to its melting pot reputation as American faces become less homogenous and more diverse, a phenomenon that renowned photographer and portrait artist Martin Schoeller captured for the October 125th anniversary issue of National Geographic magazine.

The images, which are coupled with the individual's "self ID" and the box he or she checked to indicate race as specified on the 2000 and 2010 census, are a striking reminder of Americans' complex cultural and racial origins.

The 2000 U.S. Census presented the question of race differently, allowing respondents the option of selecting more than one racial category, with nearly 7 million Americans identifying as members of two or more races. The 2010 census included changes to more clearly distinguish Hispanic ethnicity as not being a race, with data revealing that whites would no longer be the majority in the country by 2043.

Schoeller's photographs capture "the changing face of America," a trend that is no doubt picking up speed with the increase of both interracial marriages and the births of biracial babies. The images also challenge traditional ideas of identity, providing evidence for the fluidity of racial and ethnic classification, which is explored more deeply in the magazine: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/01/national-geographic-changing-face-of-america-photos_n_4024415.html


17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Striking Photos Will Change The Way You See The Average American (Original Post) MrScorpio Dec 2013 OP
Posting a better link- Straight to the source, National Geographic (loads fast) NYC_SKP Dec 2013 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Luminous Animal Dec 2013 #2
Twin flash diffusers or reflectors used in each shot by same photographer. NYC_SKP Dec 2013 #3
But why? It seems to give a commonality of "white" to every subject. Luminous Animal Dec 2013 #5
I think it was a poor choice, hard to say if it was purposeful or not. It's his schtick. NYC_SKP Dec 2013 #6
They don't all look white to me. ohheckyeah Dec 2013 #7
Are you kidding? Every single pupil every of eye is bracketed by white. Luminous Animal Dec 2013 #8
No, they don't look white skinned to me. ohheckyeah Dec 2013 #9
Dude. Their eyes. Pupils. Bracketed by white. Each and every one. Luminous Animal Dec 2013 #10
So? I don't understand the problem ohheckyeah Dec 2013 #11
I noticed it, too, especially at the national geographic site. Flash reflected in eyes. NYC_SKP Dec 2013 #12
Definitely more distraction in darker eyes ohheckyeah Dec 2013 #14
A photographer can choose the reflection. Normal people do not have their Luminous Animal Dec 2013 #13
I see your point to an extent.... ohheckyeah Dec 2013 #15
Yes. The photographer chose to use a white reflection. That is his shtick. Luminous Animal Dec 2013 #16
Cool. Thanks! Luminous Animal Dec 2013 #4
I have the same problem with Huff Post. Takes forever to load. I never go there. enough Dec 2013 #17
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
1. Posting a better link- Straight to the source, National Geographic (loads fast)
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 01:24 AM
Dec 2013

I like the front page better, too. Huffpost loads really slow for me.

http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2013/10/changing-faces/schoeller-photography

Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #1)

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
3. Twin flash diffusers or reflectors used in each shot by same photographer.
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 01:36 AM
Dec 2013

The white is re reflection of these elements, one on each side of the camera which provide even symmetrical lighting on the subjects.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
5. But why? It seems to give a commonality of "white" to every subject.
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 01:41 AM
Dec 2013

As if white is the standard. Are you looking at the changing face of the U.S. through a white lens?

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
6. I think it was a poor choice, hard to say if it was purposeful or not. It's his schtick.
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 01:49 AM
Dec 2013

Martin Schoeller, the photographer, it's his style:

How close do you have to get to the subject?
I’m about four or five feet away. I’m not that close because I’m using a fairly long lens to make sure that the face is not being distorted.

At the risk of getting too technical, how do you do it?

I use a medium format camera that takes roll film. I light them with these light banks. Fluorescent light. Basically they look like fluorescent light bulbs but their color temperature is daylight color temperature. They’re called Kino Flos. They’re mainly used in the film industry, because it’s not a strobe light, so it’s not actually that bright. I mean they’re bright to look at because they’re much brighter than the flashing strobe obviously. But they’re for a very shallow depth of field and a very narrow depth of field which kind of also emphasizes what I’m trying to do with bringing out the eyes and the lips, where most of the expression in a person’s face is all about the eyes and the lips. I try to get my focus right so the eyes and the lips are the focus. Everything falls away so quickly because of the shallow depth of field. Everything else becomes secondary. So not only am I focusing on just the face, I’m even concentrating it more by having everything else look like it’s out of focus.



http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/aroundthemall/2009/09/the-technique-behind-martin-schoellers-photography/

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
7. They don't all look white to me.
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 01:54 AM
Dec 2013
Diffusers help eliminate harsh light and shadows and can help leave your photos looking more natural.


http://digital-photography-school.com/using-flash-diffusers-and-reflectors

Using the diffusers and/or reflectors actually give a more realistic photo of the subject.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
8. Are you kidding? Every single pupil every of eye is bracketed by white.
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 01:59 AM
Dec 2013

It is the single commonality of every photo.

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
11. So? I don't understand the problem
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 02:12 AM
Dec 2013

with that. It's a reflection and most people have reflections in their eyes when lighting or flash are used so it's normal that they would all have the same type of reflection given the same type of lighting was used for each photo.

Many photographers go out of their way to get those reflections.

PS I'm not a dude and your original answer was a little confusing the way it was written.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
12. I noticed it, too, especially at the national geographic site. Flash reflected in eyes.
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 02:24 AM
Dec 2013

It's distracting and it's not common in all portrait photography, it's something that Martin Schoeller was using for a while and certainly in this series, with every single subject, the diffusers' reflections are pronounced.

And distracting, an unnecessary (Schoeller on left) :



ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
14. Definitely more distraction in darker eyes
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 02:30 AM
Dec 2013

than in lighter eyes, but it really doesn't bother me given the advantages to not having shadows on the face. I see your point though.

I don't think it's an artistic choice I would make but I think they are stunning portraits.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
13. A photographer can choose the reflection. Normal people do not have their
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 02:27 AM
Dec 2013

pupils bracketed by white light.

There was a choice here to have diversity presented with a white commonality. With white being the standard to judge our differences.

I'm not a dude either. I just call people dude.

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
15. I see your point to an extent....
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 02:32 AM
Dec 2013

I don't see it as a white commonality personally, to me it's just a reflection of light. I have an angular face that casts all kinds of shadows and that was the first thing I noticed - lack of shadows on the face.

Each to his/her own.



Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
16. Yes. The photographer chose to use a white reflection. That is his shtick.
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 02:40 AM
Dec 2013

And a poor choice to illustrate diversity.

enough

(13,259 posts)
17. I have the same problem with Huff Post. Takes forever to load. I never go there.
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 09:17 AM
Dec 2013

Thanks for the link.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Striking Photos Will Chan...