General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTruthOut: Mr. President: Honor Nelson Mandela's Wishes and Free Leonard Peltier
Complete article at: http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/20641-mr-president-honor-nelson-mandelas-wishes-and-free-leonard-peltier
Memorials project Mandela as a gentle elder statesman, who championed peace and reconciliation. This is true, in fact Mandela was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize- but this rosey and passive portrayal of the international icon and his life is far from complete.
Yes, Mandelas end goal was one of peace and self-determination for Africans, but he didnt strictly adhere to non-violent means. Like Malcolm X, Mandela held that there were times when armed resistance and civil disobedience were necessary to fight a subjugating colonial government.
Grandfather Mandela, named Rolihlahla (translated Troublemaker) by his father, was once a young freedom fighter Mandela. He fought in a guerilla war against apartheid, white supremacy, and the plague of colonialism that forcibly relocated Natives of South Africa from their traditional homelands and segregated and oppressed his people.
Please also see:
http://www.whoisleonardpeltier.info/index.htm
http://lakotalaw.org
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)Thousands of people signed petitions, Mandela, the Dalai Lama, and numerous other Nobel Lauriates wrote letters in support - all for nothing.
Clinton took care of his friend Marc Rich, though...
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)pscot
(21,024 posts)This president has been damned stingy with clemency and pardons. I wish I understood how his mind works. That has troubled me for years.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)the end of his term to help make up for what else he probably will do at that time.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
former9thward
(31,997 posts)If Siegleman serves his full sentence he will be out in 2017. A presidential pardon would not mean much near the end of the Obama presidency.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)OmahaBlueDog
(10,000 posts)Objectively, the case against Peltier is weak, but it is politically difficult for anyone to pardon a man convicted (even convicted wrongly) for killing two FBI agents.
OTOH, he's eligible for parole in 2024. Next year, he's 70. He's spent almost 40 years behind bars. He's likely not a threat to anyone at this point. He's widely regarded as a political prisoner. So I say there's little to be lost granting a clemency with the same conditions attached to it that a parole would have. Put another way, grant him parole now.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)Weirdly enough, this was touched upon in a West Wing episode that featured a question about whether or not to pardon a Peltier-like character. Bartlet was presented with the question, "Do you really want to deal with off-duty FBI officers picketing outside the White House?"
For Bartlet, and Clinton, the answer was clearly, "No."
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)I remember it well, I was considerably involved in the movement for clemency at that time.
Those fuckers DID march in front of the White House: http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/16/us/fbi-agents-rally-against-possible-clemency.html
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)I think it's not particularly far-fetched to believe that the organization which was J. Edgar Hoover's baby is still not above hanging threats of various sorts of exposure over politicians' heads. And I can imagine that there may well be, somewhere in the darkest corners of the FBI, a rich trove of - if not incriminating, then at least extremely embarrassing - secret files on the "Big Dog" (who, after all, DID tend to behave quite like a dog when it came to women).
Alternative non-charitable explanation: Clinton just didn't give a fuck.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)MoreGOPoop
(417 posts)Yes!
countryjake
(8,554 posts)Ruth Hopkins says it all.