Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

snot

(10,524 posts)
Sat Dec 21, 2013, 04:10 AM Dec 2013

So about that gargantuan new facility the NSA built . . .

If the Obama admin adopts the recs of the NSA spying commission (a big if, judging by Obama's slowness in embracing them), the NSA won't any longer be needing that gargantuan new facility they built, will they?

Which kind of brings up the question of, assuming we didn't know of and approve of their massive over-reaching before, why did we think they needed this massive new facility, again?

And so if the Obama admin adopts the recs of the NSA spying commission, is the NSA going to transfer that facility to AT&T? Because the NSA won't be needing it, will they?

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So about that gargantuan new facility the NSA built . . . (Original Post) snot Dec 2013 OP
It's just the thing for Google and Amazon. TreasonousBastard Dec 2013 #1
There's always the private contractors. merrily Dec 2013 #2
Of course the NSA will still need it. Android3.14 Dec 2013 #3
They sure are not going to just walk away... woo me with science Dec 2013 #4
Since it was intended to provide cloud services for other government agencies... Recursion Dec 2013 #5
They will still WANT it for spying. nt woo me with science Dec 2013 #6
The lack of it hasn't been hampering them Recursion Dec 2013 #7
LOL. "I don't see how it would help them to spy." woo me with science Dec 2013 #8
You apparently missed my "this one is really serious" conversion Recursion Dec 2013 #9

merrily

(45,251 posts)
2. There's always the private contractors.
Sat Dec 21, 2013, 04:43 AM
Dec 2013

As big as the Utah facility is, it was never intended to house all the operations.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
3. Of course the NSA will still need it.
Sat Dec 21, 2013, 06:54 AM
Dec 2013

The NSA will just agree to stop doing it and do it anyway. The only thing that will work on with this situation is court action and sustained criticism from the masses.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
4. They sure are not going to just walk away...
Sat Dec 21, 2013, 07:28 AM
Dec 2013

Last edited Sat Dec 21, 2013, 08:00 AM - Edit history (1)

I predict manipulations, faux "reforms," and eventually a big "FU, we're doing it anyway."

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
5. Since it was intended to provide cloud services for other government agencies...
Sat Dec 21, 2013, 07:41 AM
Dec 2013

... they will still want it.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
7. The lack of it hasn't been hampering them
Sat Dec 21, 2013, 07:47 AM
Dec 2013

I don't see how it would help them to spy; they need distributed facilities for that.

But, anyways, no: they actually want it to provide cloud services, because that's something else the NSA does.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
8. LOL. "I don't see how it would help them to spy."
Sat Dec 21, 2013, 07:49 AM
Dec 2013

From the full-time poster who also repeatedly claims they haven't really been spying on us anyway....

Carry on with the absurd advertisements. Just know that the propaganda, at this point, is as credible as a Nigerian scam letter and not nearly as entertaining.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
9. You apparently missed my "this one is really serious" conversion
Sat Dec 21, 2013, 08:14 AM
Dec 2013

about the NSA's tap on the internal networks of providers.

Anyways, if you want to explain how this makes spying easier for them than it already is, go for it. Also how they'll provide the cloud services they're tasked with rolling out, if they use this for something else.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So about that gargantuan ...