Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"The China Study" has been debunked. I'm not surprised at all. (Original Post) Archae Dec 2013 OP
The author, a 25 year old English major with a BA (??) at best, is unqualified to debunk. hedda_foil Dec 2013 #1
v. Campbell, a professor of nutritional biochemistry at Cornell. The other scientists associated El_Johns Dec 2013 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author mathematic Dec 2013 #9
Shit, I've been told to give up hamburgers. Rex Dec 2013 #2
this is an article from 2010... NRaleighLiberal Dec 2013 #3
Actually, it was debunked almost as soon as it was released. jazzimov Dec 2013 #4
You must be thinking of something else. El_Johns Dec 2013 #6
Interesting. Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #5
Based on Denise Minger's findings? flvegan Dec 2013 #8
The debunker was debunked. Rebuttal in link chowder66 Dec 2013 #10

hedda_foil

(16,374 posts)
1. The author, a 25 year old English major with a BA (??) at best, is unqualified to debunk.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:25 PM
Dec 2013


College: Attended Northern Arizona University. Changed majors several times, bouncing between the sciences (to feed my brain) and the arts (to feed my soul). Eventually settled on English, because the common denominator in everything I loved to do involved writing. Enjoyed many of my classes, but felt they were more about regurgitating what the teachers wanted to hear than actually thinking critically. I found it difficult to spend any focused time studying things I wasn’t passionate about. Tried to take classes that culminated with 40-page research papers because I deeply enjoyed producing them. Walked in the December 2007 graduation with a 4.0, summa cum laude.

That about sums it up.



I have no problem with the author's position ... or yours. But she is totally unqualified to set herself up as qualified to handle this degree of medical statistical analysis
 

El_Johns

(1,805 posts)
7. v. Campbell, a professor of nutritional biochemistry at Cornell. The other scientists associated
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:46 PM
Dec 2013

with the China study have similar credentials.

Response to hedda_foil (Reply #1)

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
2. Shit, I've been told to give up hamburgers.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:53 PM
Dec 2013

One of the Worlds Greatest Threats to my belly.

1 meat to every 3 grain serving. Pretty much been my entire life diet. With too much fat intake. Unless my brain needed it, yeah let us go with that.

My brain likes peanut butter.

jazzimov

(1,456 posts)
4. Actually, it was debunked almost as soon as it was released.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:12 PM
Dec 2013

For one thing, it has very little mention of the study itself. As far as the author's "big experiment", well, judge for yourself:

1. His experiment used milk protein which as a representative of ALL animal protein.
2. He caramelized the milk protein, a process which has been shown to destroy all cancer-fighting properties of milk.
3. He fed his test mice aflatoxin, a known carcinogen. Yet, he then claimed the mice to which no caramelized milk protein was fed showed NO evidence of cancer or precancerous tumors, even after being fed huge amounts of a known carcinogen.

 

El_Johns

(1,805 posts)
6. You must be thinking of something else.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:44 PM
Dec 2013

Campbell (professor of nutritional biochemistry at Cornell) wrote his book about the results of a 20-year study of Chinese people eating as they normally did, not eating carmelized milk. And not mice.

The China–Cornell–Oxford Project was a large observational study conducted throughout the 1980s in rural China, jointly funded by Cornell University, the University of Oxford, and the government of China.[1] In 1991 The New York Times called it "the Grand Prix of epidemiology."[2]

The first two major studies were led by T. Colin Campbell, professor of nutritional biochemistry at Cornell, who summarized the results in his book, The China Study (2004). Other lead researchers were Chen Junshi, Deputy Director of Institute of Nutrition and Food Hygiene at the Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, Richard Peto of the University of Oxford, and Li Junyao of the China Cancer Institute.[3]

The study examined the diets, lifestyle and disease characteristics of 6,500 people in 65 rural Chinese counties, comparing the prevalence of disease characteristics, excluding causes of death such as accidents.[4]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China-Cornell-Oxford_Project

It looked at mortality rates from cancer and other chronic diseases from 1973 to 1975 in 65 counties in China; the data was correlated with 1983–84 dietary surveys and blood work from 100 people in each county. The research was conducted in those counties because they had genetically similar populations that tended, over generations, to live and eat in the same way in the same place. The study concluded that counties with a high consumption of animal-based foods in 1983–84 were more likely to have had higher death rates from "Western" diseases as of 1973–75, while the opposite was true for counties that ate more plant foods.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_China_Study

flvegan

(64,407 posts)
8. Based on Denise Minger's findings?
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:53 PM
Dec 2013

Okay, whatever, LOL! I'm not surprised that this found it's way onto DU.

I look forward to the "discussion" on the topic.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"The China Study&quo...