Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,078 posts)
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 06:36 PM Dec 2013

Dean Baker: Inequality: Government Is a Perp, Not a Bystander

Inequality: Government Is a Perp, Not a Bystander

Monday, 23 December 2013 10:59
By Dean Baker, Truthout | Op-Ed


In his speech on inequality earlier this month President Obama proclaimed that the government could not be a bystander in the effort to reduce inequality, which he described as the defining moral issue of our time. This left millions convinced that Obama would do nothing to lessen inequality.

The problem is that President Obama wants the public to believe that inequality is something that just happened. It turns out that the forces of technology, globalization, and whatever else simply made some people very rich and left others working for low wages or out of work altogether. The president and other like-minded people feel a moral compulsion to reverse the resulting inequality. This story is 180 degrees at odds with the reality. Inequality did not just happen, it was deliberately engineered through a whole range of policies intended to redistribute income upward.

Trade is probably the best place to start just because it is so obvious. Trade deals like NAFTA were quite explicitly designed to place our manufacturing workers in direct competition with the lowest paid workers in the world. The text was written after consulting with top executives at major companies like General Electric. Our negotiators asked these executives what changes in Mexico's law would make it easier for them to set up factories in Mexico. The text was written accordingly.

When we saw factory workers losing their jobs to imports from Mexico and other developing countries, this was not an accident. In economic theory, the gains from these trade deals are the result of getting lower priced products due to lower cost labor. The loss of jobs in the United States and the downward pressure on the jobs that remain is a predicted outcome of the deal. ...............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/20803-inequality-government-is-a-perp-not-a-bystander



4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dean Baker: Inequality: Government Is a Perp, Not a Bystander (Original Post) marmar Dec 2013 OP
K & R, we are here BECAUSE of a gov't that is no longer representative of the people. mother earth Dec 2013 #1
Quickly becoming a Baker fan here BelgianMadCow Dec 2013 #2
Surely thinking people will agree that "Inequality did not just happen, it was deliberately indepat Dec 2013 #3
K&R. No accident. El_Johns Dec 2013 #4

mother earth

(6,002 posts)
1. K & R, we are here BECAUSE of a gov't that is no longer representative of the people.
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 06:47 PM
Dec 2013

Now that you've put a name on it, Mr. President, what shall be done to correct it? Income inequality, the challenge of our times, is only indicative of our gov't serving the oligarchy.

BelgianMadCow

(5,379 posts)
2. Quickly becoming a Baker fan here
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 07:31 PM
Dec 2013

the simply insane (from an outsider perspective) US inequality doesn't look like an accident to me. The logical result of coportaions = people and money = speech.

indepat

(20,899 posts)
3. Surely thinking people will agree that "Inequality did not just happen, it was deliberately
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 07:55 PM
Dec 2013

engineered through a whole range of policies intended to redistribute income upward." Can we agree that any policy/law intended to redistribute income upward is a right-wing policy/law, that virtually everything Republicans do is intended to increase that redistribution of income upward and that a shameful number of Democrats march to that right-wing drum? The right-wing policies et al initiated by the Bush administration, but continued by this administration, should be evident to all: just remember, when a policy or law is deliberately engineered with the intent to redistribute income upward, it is a right-wing policy imo which should be vehemently opposed by every Democrat/liberal/progressive.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dean Baker: Inequality: G...