Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malaise

(268,968 posts)
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 10:02 PM Jan 2014

In Case you weren't sure that Margaret Thatcher wasn't an evil scumbag

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/jan/03/margaret-thatcher-secret-plan-army-miners-strike
<snip>
Margaret Thatcher was secretly preparing to use troops and declare a state of emergency at the height of the miners' strike – out of fear Britain was going to run out of food and grind to a halt, government papers released today reveal.

The 1984 cabinet papers, released to the National Archives, show that Thatcher asked for contingency plans to be drawn up to use troops to move coal stocks, despite official government policy ruling out the use of service personnel. A plan involving the use of 4,500 service drivers and 1,650 tipper lorries was considered capable of moving 100 kilotonnes a day of coal to the power stations.

A separate contingency plan, codenamed Operation Halberd, to use troops in the event of a dock strike, had also been drawn up.

The files show that there were two moments during the government's bitter year-long struggle with the miners when Thatcher and her ministers "stared into the abyss" and glimpsed the possibility of defeat.

The first came in July 1984, when Britain's dockers joined the miners on strike. The Downing Street papers show that Norman Tebbit, then Thatcher's employment secretary, wrote her a "secret and personal" letter warning that "I do not see that time is on our side".
---------------------
That was one evil woman
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Case you weren't sure that Margaret Thatcher wasn't an evil scumbag (Original Post) malaise Jan 2014 OP
Indeed. No friend of the working class, that one. NYC_SKP Jan 2014 #1
"The kind people, have a wonderful dream ... 1000words Jan 2014 #2
When I was a kid I had a poster that read orpupilofnature57 Jan 2014 #3
Scargill's demands were pretty unreasonable. Nye Bevan Jan 2014 #4
I never had any doubt n/t dflprincess Jan 2014 #5
I've been certain all along. Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #6
Yep, Thatcher and Reagan, too, peas in the same scummy pea pod suffragette Jan 2014 #7
I'm personally indifferent to her however how does having plans drawn up = evil? cstanleytech Jan 2014 #8
Yeah, "evil" would be planning to have the strikers murdered in extermination camps. Nye Bevan Jan 2014 #10
just a very good example of a conservative woman thinking quinnox Jan 2014 #9
A strike that would shut down a country's ability to generate electricity? badtoworse Jan 2014 #11
That wasn't going to happen. progressoid Jan 2014 #14
Elvis Costello said it best: Freddie Jan 2014 #12
She was joined at the hip to reagan. That alone tells me everything I need to know. calimary Jan 2014 #13
They were both just actors for the 1%, let's remember who sent them. harun Jan 2014 #15
Yeah, but that's just it. The 1% looks for appealing, seemingly innocuous frontmen and frontwomen. calimary Jan 2014 #16
You are right abour Christie, I don't think Hillary is any better though harun Jan 2014 #17
Point taken. But would you rather have a CON making the Supreme Court selections calimary Jan 2014 #18
No, I've always known she was an evil person. Rex Jan 2014 #19
Just in case anyone is wondering what a "Tipper Lorry" is... A HERETIC I AM Jan 2014 #20

cstanleytech

(26,290 posts)
8. I'm personally indifferent to her however how does having plans drawn up = evil?
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 11:41 PM
Jan 2014

After all isnt it the job of any government to investigate and setup varies plans for things?

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
10. Yeah, "evil" would be planning to have the strikers murdered in extermination camps.
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 11:48 PM
Jan 2014

Making contingency plans to ensure that people have access to food does not seem especially "evil".

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
9. just a very good example of a conservative woman thinking
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 11:45 PM
Jan 2014

I would take Reagan over Thatcher any day, at least Reagan had that "sunny optimism" thing going for him.

 

badtoworse

(5,957 posts)
11. A strike that would shut down a country's ability to generate electricity?
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 11:59 PM
Jan 2014

Last edited Fri Jan 3, 2014, 10:42 AM - Edit history (1)

Do you seriously believe that ANY head of state would tolerate that? There is a level of power that a labor union should not have and shutting off the country's electricity is well beyond that.

progressoid

(49,988 posts)
14. That wasn't going to happen.
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 02:06 AM
Jan 2014
the Thatcher government had prepared against a repeat of the effective 1974 industrial action by stockpiling coal, converting some power stations to burn heavy fuel oil, and recruiting fleets of road haulers to transport coal in case sympathetic railwaymen went on strike to support the miners.[18]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/bradford/sense_of_place/miners/miners_strike.shtml

Freddie

(9,265 posts)
12. Elvis Costello said it best:
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 12:00 AM
Jan 2014

I hope I live long enough to savor
That when they finally put you in the ground
I'll stand on your grave
And tramp the dirt down

calimary

(81,238 posts)
13. She was joined at the hip to reagan. That alone tells me everything I need to know.
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 12:14 AM
Jan 2014

She was his ideological kin. Which defines her as one of the "bad guys."

calimary

(81,238 posts)
16. Yeah, but that's just it. The 1% looks for appealing, seemingly innocuous frontmen and frontwomen.
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 12:54 AM
Jan 2014

Who then charm their way into power like wolves in sheeps' clothing, and then bring all the lice and fleas and vermin and filth in with them. The 1% hide behind appealing, smooth-talking, presumably harmless "aw-shucks" types, or media darlings who can ride in on the electrifying historic firsts as Miz Maggie did - first woman prime minister. Everybody falls in love with the idea, swoons, oh-she's-SOOO-refreshing!, votes for her party so she's carried into 10 Downing Street. And NOBODY looks beneath the surface where the meanness and cold-heartedness and imperiousness and other assorted rot is. chris christie's another one. BEWARE!!!!! But his "appeal" is the common-man plain-talking no-bullshit "real" schtick, and it's nothing but a veneer. He's a bully of the first order. Loudmouthed, in-yer-face, nasty, pugnacious, mean-spirited. He doesn't fool me or many others of us here for a minute, but a lot of other people ARE fooled. So many people think he's just adorable with that schtick of his. I freakin' hate it.

harun

(11,348 posts)
17. You are right abour Christie, I don't think Hillary is any better though
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 10:06 AM
Jan 2014

Need candidates for the 99% from the Dem's.

calimary

(81,238 posts)
18. Point taken. But would you rather have a CON making the Supreme Court selections
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 12:57 PM
Jan 2014

or a Dem doing it? Would you rather have the kind of vermin a CON tends to bring in with him, or a Dem and friends? Hillary has, at least, spoken many times about how she and Bill believed government to be a force for good. I remember those words. Sure there'd be Wall Streeters coming in. It is hard to remove them from anywhere near the top of the zigurrat. They're deeply imbedded because they want to back the winning side - and since they're never sure, they always spread their bets around to both sides. But also, with Hillary anyway, there'd be a few who'd be looking to advance the cause of women everywhere - which she loudly and publicly and consistently over the years has championed. There'd be more of an interest in education and the poor than you'd find among the rapacious CONS who care about nothing but money money money (and punishing their enemies).

There's no question in my mind. And frankly, our side has been so full of sitting ducks I think I'd rather like a shrewd one for a change.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In Case you weren't sure ...