Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
Sun Jan 5, 2014, 04:15 PM Jan 2014

Aww, C'mon. Bloomberg wasn't THAT bad.

You're right. He was much, much WORSE.

We were treated to relentless apologia and revisionism in the pages of the NYT and the.... ugh.... WSJ as the year drew to a close. Not to mention in Murdoch's NY Post and the ever-amiss NY Daily News. Billionaire media types are known to have a squishy-soft spot for billionaire media types. Esp when the latter decide to RUN ....as opposed to simply OWN ....the government.

Now Raging Horse assesses the *actual* damage.

>>>Bloomberg: Good Riddance to the Corruptor And All He Stands For
January 1, 2014


The seemingly interminable mayoralty of Michael R. Bloomberg has at last come to an end. Bloomberg, it should be recalled, arrived on the scene as a political novice and ran on the notion that his business savvy was just what the city needed and that immense wealth would keep him above the corruption which had periodically stained other administrations, most recently that of the now sanctified Ed Koch. A rich man, so the thinking went, was beyond corruption. An immensely rich man, such as Bloomberg, was that much the more above corruption. That may or may not be true. But what is certainly true is just as riches might place one beyond the temptations of more traditional forms of corruption – financially enriching oneself — it simultaneously provides the means to corrupt others and to bend them to your will with promises of a life on permanent Easy Street in exchange for implementing ones policies, even if such policies bear only a nominal relationship to previous ways of doing things. All you needed to do was surrender your principles, sell your soul and submit to the will of Mike Bloomberg.

Many did.

Bearing that distinction in mind, I submit with no fear of contradiction that Bloomberg, who, as the plutocrat politician is something new and horrific in the American political reality, is far and away the most corrupting mayor in the history of New York City. Indeed, as most clearly evidenced in the disgraceful machinations that led to his third term, machinations that ignored the will of millions of New Yorkers who twice voted for term limits and revealed much of the City Council to be Bloomberg’s valets, corrupting was Bloomberg’s modus operandi. And a highly effective method at that.

more: http://raginghorse.wordpress.com/2014/01/01/bloomberg-good-riddance-to-the-corruptor-and-all-he-stands-for/


The method was most effective and most evident in Bloomberg’s radical restructuring of the public school system, meant to lead, intrinsically, to a radical reconfiguration of labor relations.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

malaise

(268,980 posts)
1. I heard he left a $2B deficit
Sun Jan 5, 2014, 04:17 PM
Jan 2014

I never liked him but when he broke the rules and ran again, that was the last straw not to mention his racist stop and frisk policies.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
2. I don't live in NYC so it's not for me to pass judgment, but a few observations....
Sun Jan 5, 2014, 04:30 PM
Jan 2014

Stop and frisk is just a non-starter...what a way to make "some of us" not part of the scene, because the police do profile.

The Disneyfication of Times Square is unfortunate. When it was a shithole, it wasn't very nice, and it was unsafe, too, but there's gotta be a happy medium.

I do notice when I visit that there are WAY fewer panhandlers, the ones that do panhandle often do so surreptitiously (and often get chased off nonetheless, by doormen and what-have-you), and the homeless are far less "visible." Makes me wonder where they're hiding...

I wish the new mayor success, and I hope his time leading the city results in both prosperity and and a cultural renaissance.

 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
3. I live in the Bronx. I encounter at least one pan-handler every single time I walk...
Sun Jan 5, 2014, 04:47 PM
Jan 2014

>>>I do notice when I visit that there are WAY fewer panhandlers, the ones that do panhandle often do so surreptitiously (and often get chased off nonetheless, by doormen and what-have-you), and the homeless are far less "visible." Makes me wonder where they're hiding...>>>

... the one and 1/2 block from my house to the small local commercial strip .

The Bx is an outer-borough.... but every bit as much a part of NYC as Times Square.

Most citizens... and most taxpayers... live in the outer-boroughs.

How is moving pan-handlers from midtown to the outer boroughs a quantifiable improvement?

MADem

(135,425 posts)
4. I didn't say it was a "quantifiable improvement."
Sun Jan 5, 2014, 05:00 PM
Jan 2014
I didn't even say it was an improvement of any kind.

I simply noted that there were fewer of them that I saw, and I wondered where they went--obviously, they went to the Bronx, from what you're telling me.

I am usually downtown or in Queens, and I don't see much of that happening where I go. The reduction downtown, from, say, back in the seventies, is STARK. It's obvious enough for the occasional visitor like myself to notice.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Aww, C'mon. Bloomberg was...