Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Quixote1818

(28,930 posts)
Sun Jan 5, 2014, 10:09 PM Jan 2014

STUDIO SHAME! Even Harry Potter Pic Loses $ Because Of WB Phony Baloney Net Profit Accounting

Interesting read. Would love to get others thoughts on this.



EXCLUSIVE: Signing a deal that makes anyone a net profit participant in a Hollywood movie deal has always been a sucker’s bet. In an era where studios have all but eliminated first dollar gross and invited talent to share the risk and potential rewards, guess what? Net profit deals are still a sucker’s bet. I was slipped a net profit statement (below) for Harry Potter and The Order of the Phoenix, the 2007 Warner Bros sequel. Though the film grossed $938.2 million worldwide, the accounting statement below conveys that the film is still over $167 million in the red. (Text continues below…)



I ran the data above by several attorneys and agents, who are so accustomed to seeing studio accounting wave magic pencils over hit movies that they weren’t surprised even a Harry Potter film that grossed nearly $1 billion would fall under the spell. Dealmakers say studio distribution fees are a killer, as are incestuous ad spends on studios’ sister company networks. They also cited the $57 million in interest charges, an enormous pushback on profitablity. Since Warner Bros didn’t invite in a co-financing partner on the Potter films, has the studio borrowed money from parent company coffers? Are they paying that interest to a bank, or to themselves? Bottom line: nearly $60 million in interest for the estimated $400 million required to make and market Harry Potter, charges carried for about two years, is a high tariff.

As one dealmaker tells me: “If this is the fair definition of net profits, why do we continue to pretend and go through this charade? Judging by this, no movie is ever, ever going to go to pay off on net participants. It’s an illusion to make writers, and lower-level actors and filmmakers feel they have a stake in the game.”

More: http://www.deadline.com/2010/07/studio-shame-even-harry-potter-pic-loses-money-because-of-warner-bros-phony-baloney-accounting/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
STUDIO SHAME! Even Harry Potter Pic Loses $ Because Of WB Phony Baloney Net Profit Accounting (Original Post) Quixote1818 Jan 2014 OP
K&R abelenkpe Jan 2014 #1
We've been approached over the movie we are shooting. The offer we were given was so full of Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #2
K&r El_Johns Jan 2014 #3
Same old, same old. zappaman Jan 2014 #4
This was news 3 years ago when this article was published. TeamPooka Jan 2014 #5
I know it's an old article, but it's the first time I have seen it and I found it fascinating Quixote1818 Jan 2014 #6
 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
2. We've been approached over the movie we are shooting. The offer we were given was so full of
Sun Jan 5, 2014, 11:21 PM
Jan 2014

poison pill clauses we had a good laugh.

Quixote1818

(28,930 posts)
6. I know it's an old article, but it's the first time I have seen it and I found it fascinating
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 12:30 AM
Jan 2014

and wanted some feedback, not to mention we all know this stuff is still going on today.

By the way, are you Irish? Curious about the Pooka part of your name?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»STUDIO SHAME! Even Harry ...