Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No one is explaining WHY B. Kelly would take it upon herself to exact political retribution (Original Post) stg81 Jan 2014 OP
nailed it warrior1 Jan 2014 #1
I find it impossible to believe she did this strictly on her own. stg81 Jan 2014 #3
Even if we were to believe she really did do it behind his back... LAGC Jan 2014 #2
The Kochs Have A Crap Load Of Money......nt global1 Jan 2014 #4
is it wrong to think something like an episode of Scandal happened in NJ yesterday? stg81 Jan 2014 #8
Nope! And Welcome to DU, stg81! calimary Jan 2014 #31
EXACTLY stg81 Jan 2014 #5
Out of the Sandy Fund, no doubt. madashelltoo Jan 2014 #7
Yes, and has she lawyered up yet? elfin Jan 2014 #6
you'd think if she didn't lie she'd sue the pants off Christie for saying she did stg81 Jan 2014 #9
she might go into a NJ psychiatric institute NJCher Jan 2014 #18
She has four kids, which might make that more difficult elfin Jan 2014 #21
he just said riverwalker Jan 2014 #10
YOU have just identified the string that, if pulled, will unravel this whole thing stg81 Jan 2014 #12
so he fired this long-standing associated without even speaking to her?? I don't buy it. stg81 Jan 2014 #23
Probably on advice from his attorneys. What if she showed up "wearing a wire"? n/t Tanuki Jan 2014 #28
he cannot ask her because he knows what she would say Skittles Jan 2014 #33
Reporter just asked him why did kelly lie to him? SummerSnow Jan 2014 #11
and she has worked for him for years, part of his "staff-family" stg81 Jan 2014 #13
Now he is saying he had no knowledge of an pursued endorsement from FT Lee mayor SummerSnow Jan 2014 #17
yes stg81 Jan 2014 #19
I wonder if Fort Lee mayor has evidence Christie DID seek an endorsement from him stg81 Jan 2014 #20
Hope there is email or a letter SummerSnow Jan 2014 #24
or was it simply understood - endorse, or else stg81 Jan 2014 #27
Sokolich said that he didn't recall a request for endorsement. Jim Lane Jan 2014 #37
Strange how he keeps making this just human error.. SummerSnow Jan 2014 #14
Evidently he didn't talk to the person who lied to him Stagecoach Jan 2014 #15
so what does Kelly get for falling her sword and keeping quiet? infoviro Jan 2014 #16
a nice severance package SummerSnow Jan 2014 #26
maybe she's afraid of Christy SodoffBush Jan 2014 #35
And THAT is the most important question to ask... truebrit71 Jan 2014 #22
woah, big Yeah... n/t K&R Whisp Jan 2014 #25
ha has no plans to ask, either. bettyellen Jan 2014 #29
For a former prosecutor, Mr.Bill Jan 2014 #30
Ehrlichman and Haldeman too had kept Nixon "in the dark" on their actions. PM Martin Jan 2014 #32
would love to see Ms. Kelly's resume Skittles Jan 2014 #34
Tacit approval. moondust Jan 2014 #36
The obvious answer, of course . . . markpkessinger Jan 2014 #38
Or why Christie didn't grill her on why before he fired her. herding cats Jan 2014 #39

stg81

(351 posts)
3. I find it impossible to believe she did this strictly on her own.
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 12:40 PM
Jan 2014

So she broke the bridge, and thought Christie would never find out??? That's NUTS.

LAGC

(5,330 posts)
2. Even if we were to believe she really did do it behind his back...
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 12:40 PM
Jan 2014

It just goes to show that she THOUGHT he'd approve.

This is his top adviser we're talking about here.

She must have been paid some serious hush-money to fall on her sword like that.

calimary

(81,261 posts)
31. Nope! And Welcome to DU, stg81!
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 03:06 PM
Jan 2014

Glad you're here! A very celebratory day around here, indeed!

Is it bad that I'm smiling?



elfin

(6,262 posts)
6. Yes, and has she lawyered up yet?
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 12:42 PM
Jan 2014

Will there be hush money? Will that be engineered by Christy's mega-bucks financier wife? A sweet job at Pox?

No reports that she has been fruitlessly contacted by press yet.

stg81

(351 posts)
9. you'd think if she didn't lie she'd sue the pants off Christie for saying she did
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 12:43 PM
Jan 2014

…unless arrangements have been made????

NJCher

(35,669 posts)
18. she might go into a NJ psychiatric institute
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 12:53 PM
Jan 2014

Last edited Thu Jan 9, 2014, 01:23 PM - Edit history (1)

Think I'm kidding? I'm not. I'm a college teacher in NJ and a couple years ago I had a student who was a psychiatric aid in one of NJ's institutions. She told me and the rest of the class that it was routine for people to come in (usually women, btw) and the staff could immediately tell they didn't belong there.

These people were taking the fall for some political figure (usually male) who had been caught with their hands in the till. They would stay until the scandal died down, usually about six months or so. My student got the impression they'd been paid off for their time and who knows what else. It's a way to keep reporters away from them by saying their are suffering "depression" or some other type of psychological illness.


Cher

elfin

(6,262 posts)
21. She has four kids, which might make that more difficult
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 12:57 PM
Jan 2014

Don't know if she is a single mom or not. No mention of a husband in articles I have read about her.

riverwalker

(8,694 posts)
10. he just said
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 12:44 PM
Jan 2014

he has not even spoken to Bridget Kelly since the emails came out ????!!!! Earlier he said he spent all day yesterday "investigating" the matter. Yet he never called Kelly to ask "WTF did you do?"

SummerSnow

(12,608 posts)
11. Reporter just asked him why did kelly lie to him?
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 12:44 PM
Jan 2014

he says he doesn't know why and he never asked her and he isn't interested in knowing and not seeking a explanation That's such a bullshit lie. Your political career is on the table and YOU don't want an explanation of their actions and betrayal? WTF.


He is getting agitated.lol

stg81

(351 posts)
13. and she has worked for him for years, part of his "staff-family"
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 12:46 PM
Jan 2014

and he hasn't even spoken to her about what happened - just took someone else's hearsay??

SummerSnow

(12,608 posts)
17. Now he is saying he had no knowledge of an pursued endorsement from FT Lee mayor
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 12:53 PM
Jan 2014

and wonders why Kelly would have a personal vendetta against him.



You're right Christie, she didn't have a personal vendetta against Ft Lee mayor, you did. lol

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
37. Sokolich said that he didn't recall a request for endorsement.
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 11:18 PM
Jan 2014

It wasn't an ordinary election campaign, though. Literally scores of elected Democrats endorsed Christie. Quite a few others either made no endorsement or gave a pro forma endorsement to Barbara Buono without lifting a finger to help her.

Under the circumstances, the absence of a formal request wasn't that big a deal. There was such a major Democrats-for-Christie movement that it was reasonable to ask, with regard to each elected Democrat, what he or she had done. A Democratic mayor wouldn't need a letter or an email to know that Christie wanted his endorsement.

SummerSnow

(12,608 posts)
14. Strange how he keeps making this just human error..
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 12:49 PM
Jan 2014

this was pre- meditated . He is so contradicting himself

Stagecoach

(528 posts)
15. Evidently he didn't talk to the person who lied to him
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 12:49 PM
Jan 2014

Since he first found out about this yesterday, and hasn't talked to her since.

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
22. And THAT is the most important question to ask...
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 12:57 PM
Jan 2014

...let's see if any of the lapdogs in the Stenographers pool think to ask it..

PM Martin

(2,660 posts)
32. Ehrlichman and Haldeman too had kept Nixon "in the dark" on their actions.
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 03:09 PM
Jan 2014

I don't believe Christie at all. The only way his staff would act in such a manner is because he wanted them to do so.

moondust

(19,981 posts)
36. Tacit approval.
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 03:58 PM
Jan 2014

Working closely with a micromanager, one tends to learn to anticipate what a despotic boss would approve of and what could get one fired.

markpkessinger

(8,395 posts)
38. The obvious answer, of course . . .
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 11:20 PM
Jan 2014

. . . is that she did it to curry favor with the boss. But that brings up a second question: why, then, would she not inform her boss that she had done so? If indeed she didn't let Christie know she had done it, then what would have been the point in the first place?

herding cats

(19,564 posts)
39. Or why Christie didn't grill her on why before he fired her.
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 11:28 PM
Jan 2014

If I were lied to, made a fool of, and suddenly in a position where my career was in jeopardy, I'd be demanding to know what exactly took place.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No one is explaining WHY ...