Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(48,974 posts)
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 02:56 PM Jan 2014
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rachel Maddow's theory on GWB scandal picked up by NY Mag, Raw Story, The Wire, HuffPo, more (Original Post) highplainsdem Jan 2014 OP
I like this one. Kingofalldems Jan 2014 #1
I am very glad that this theory is getting attention Gothmog Jan 2014 #2
I read in the comment section of something yesterday about some woman Christie also had it out for. okaawhatever Jan 2014 #3
Your answer is in the OP. DURHAM D Jan 2014 #4
OK, great thanks. nt okaawhatever Jan 2014 #6
Weinberg, she blocked two early judicial appointments and heads the Dems in her district- which bettyellen Jan 2014 #7
Christie said that about Loretta Weinberg in 2011. Link to story/video at CrooksAndLiars.com: highplainsdem Jan 2014 #8
Thanks for that link. That's the first one I saw that gave the background on the story. You've gotta okaawhatever Jan 2014 #22
You're welcome! And I completely agree with what you said about Christie. highplainsdem Jan 2014 #23
DU link that has info regarding Loretta Weinberg in the 'comments', below Tx4obama Jan 2014 #20
It's a good theory worth being explored further. herding cats Jan 2014 #5
This story and the timeline make more sense...Rachel laid it out perfectly. Gin Jan 2014 #9
Thanks for posting this. I do have a question. What good does retaliation do unless people know rhett o rick Jan 2014 #10
Doubly better if someone else gets the blame for not solving the problem. efhmc Jan 2014 #16
All that matters is that the retaliatee knows it. arcane1 Jan 2014 #27
Great ! Hope it extends to those on MSNBC - Thomas Roberts acted like a Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2014 #11
If Rachel is correct on this and I do believe she is onto something, I hope she gets a Pultizer. monmouth3 Jan 2014 #12
Seems to me it doesn't have to be one or the other wryter2000 Jan 2014 #13
Not that I dispute the theory... debunkthis Jan 2014 #14
Sorry, but why should I believe this story over mayor story? Dawgs Jan 2014 #15
This theory, in essence, would make almost everything he said yesterday justiceischeap Jan 2014 #17
I found Rachel's theory a very plausible one. nt Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #18
hahahaha love The Wire florida08 Jan 2014 #19
Well the timeline is pretty damning, and it clearly shows Christie had a motive, but dorkzilla Jan 2014 #21
You cannot deny the TIMING of the Closure.. If Cha Jan 2014 #24
Heard this mentioned on NPR this afternoon as well n/t IDemo Jan 2014 #25
I heard that too..they mentioned Rachel by name, which yodermon Jan 2014 #26

Gothmog

(145,168 posts)
2. I am very glad that this theory is getting attention
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 02:57 PM
Jan 2014

Rachel did a great job last night and this theory makes sense

okaawhatever

(9,461 posts)
3. I read in the comment section of something yesterday about some woman Christie also had it out for.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 02:59 PM
Jan 2014

I think it was a state legislator. They claimed Christie said "has anyone taken a bat to this woman yet?" I believe they had a link. I'd like to figure out who that is. He is nothing but hate.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
7. Weinberg, she blocked two early judicial appointments and heads the Dems in her district- which
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 03:03 PM
Jan 2014

includes Ft Lee.

okaawhatever

(9,461 posts)
22. Thanks for that link. That's the first one I saw that gave the background on the story. You've gotta
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 05:20 PM
Jan 2014

love how he claims she's a hypocrite for claiming both a pension and a salary when scores of members of his party do it. He's using hypocrisy to claim someone else is a hypocrite. Yep, definitely Republican.

herding cats

(19,564 posts)
5. It's a good theory worth being explored further.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 03:02 PM
Jan 2014

She and her team did an excellent job putting two and two together on that one. It definitely makes more sense than that he was going after the mayor for not endorsing him.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
10. Thanks for posting this. I do have a question. What good does retaliation do unless people know
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 03:21 PM
Jan 2014

that you did it?

efhmc

(14,725 posts)
16. Doubly better if someone else gets the blame for not solving the problem.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 04:51 PM
Jan 2014

I think that was the hope.

monmouth3

(3,871 posts)
12. If Rachel is correct on this and I do believe she is onto something, I hope she gets a Pultizer.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 03:31 PM
Jan 2014

This is investigative journalism at its very best..Go Rachel.

wryter2000

(46,039 posts)
13. Seems to me it doesn't have to be one or the other
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 04:24 PM
Jan 2014

They could have decided to go after Fort Lee for both this and the lack of endorsement from the mayor.

 

debunkthis

(99 posts)
14. Not that I dispute the theory...
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 04:49 PM
Jan 2014

Last edited Fri Jan 10, 2014, 05:29 PM - Edit history (1)

However, I do feel compelled to point out the fact that here we are freely discussing a "conspiracy theory" while accounts have been banned from posting here for discussing other theories, on different topics, that have as much potential to be correct as Rachel's theory mentioned here in this case.

Any thoughts on that EarlG?

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
15. Sorry, but why should I believe this story over mayor story?
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 04:50 PM
Jan 2014

Is there actual proof for either of them?

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
17. This theory, in essence, would make almost everything he said yesterday
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 04:52 PM
Jan 2014

be the truth. Especially if you parse it like some lawyers would--because the closures weren't about the Mayor but this legislator.

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
21. Well the timeline is pretty damning, and it clearly shows Christie had a motive, but
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 05:15 PM
Jan 2014

….the only thing that doesn't make sense to me is why would they go after Fort Lee because its in Weinberg's district. What's the point unless she lives there? Wouldn't shutting down traffic Teaneck (where I think she lives) have been a clearer signal to Ms. Weinberg?

Cha

(297,184 posts)
24. You cannot deny the TIMING of the Closure.. If
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 09:08 PM
Jan 2014

there were other reasons then they will come out.

thanks Rachel.. thank you, highplainsdem

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rachel Maddow's theory on...