General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBrian Schweitzer, Would-Be Liberal Hero, is an NRA Darling (he also supports Keystone XL)
BY SAM KLEINER
For a man who says that running for President would ruin his life, Brian Schweitzer certainly looks to be heading in that direction. Dividing his time between rancorous stump speeches in Iowa and Sunday morning talk shows, the former governor of Montana is angling to position himself as the populist alternative to Hillary Clinton. Firing shots about her tendency to shift hard right, Schweitzer is trying to position himself as the progressive for 2016. After a widely-lauded speech to the Democratic Convention in 2008, Schweitzer is hoping to follow in the footsteps of an earlier convention standout who went on to win an unexpected primary against Clinton.
Despite the hype, the reality is that Schweitzer comes with a troublingly conservative record that ought to undercut populist credentials.
<...>
The problem is that the story he is selling about his own career is based on lore, not reality. While liberals may like the bolo ties and screeds about hating Washington, Schweitzer will have a difficult time selling his conservative record on guns and the environment to a primary audience.
Becoming famous as a blue man in a red state, Schweitzer compromised on core liberal commitments to gun control and allied himself with the NRA. In his 2008 run, Schweitzer was endorsed by the NRA with an A rating and a personal visit by Wayne LaPierre for a campaign rally. Schweitzer signed an array of NRA-backed bills into law, including a 2009 stand your ground bill that the NRA called a victory.
<...>
On the environment, Schweitzer has similarly been far to the right of the Democratic Party, and he isnt sorry about it. He blamed jackasses in Washington for the delays on the building of the Keystone Pipeline. <...> He has been one of the strongest advocates for expanding coal production, with extensive plans to ship coal to China. That plan has been met with fierce resistance from groups such as the Sierra Club. Western Democrats have a rich tradition of being the vanguards of the partys environmentalist wing, but Schweitzer does not fit there.
Read more: http://www.newrepublic.com/article/116138/brian-schweitzer-2016-populist-hopeful-nra-darling
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)That's about as surprising as the Pope opposing public gay sex in Saint Peter's Square.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)But his record on the environment is pretty absurd. He supports Keystone and expanding coal production.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)We can't have that.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)the previous threads aren't enough for you guys? Got sad they were sinking?
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Like taking candy from a baby.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)Why don't you go attack some Republicans? Isn't that what you always tell 'liberal dems'??
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)He's a Republican posing as a Dem IMO.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)and you accuse the OP of hypocrisy?
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)And enough with the hyperbole - "tearing down". Oy. Where do you guys get this stuff?
baldguy
(36,649 posts)laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)Or is that only acceptable when Obama the one targeted for destruction?
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)that comment was said tongue in cheek in response to all the ZOMG!!! hyperbolic threads.
I don't really give a shit about Schweitzer as a contender...if you go have a look in an other thread, I criticize him for his gay rights stance. I just think it's highly ironic the attacks on a Dem are okay when the Dem isn't Obama. From now on, I don't want to EVER again hear, in a thread criticizing Obama POLICY "why RU attacking dEMS? Attack the repukes!" because these multiple threads today show it's not about Democrats at all - it's about one man only.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)You've been caught out.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Awesomeness.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)I thought the "company line" was to learn to love the pipeline?
I vehemently oppose the pipeline but it would seem we'll be thin on environmental stewards as options and it seems silly to bag Sweitzer on this but give Obama and Clinton a pass. Obama has put some resources into green energy, unlike his predecessors so he deserves an ovation for that though I consider it like a bucket (much more than a drop) in an endless sea and he has been pretty damned carbon friendly. Hillary appears to have her fingerprints all over this pipeline. Bill is all for it.
Who is the potential environmental candidate and would we be considered "purists" for insisting on them?
As far as the gun rights, I'm more than good with that piece of the puzzle so I see it as a feature rather than a bug, I'm not clear on how curtailing the Bill of Rights is liberal but lots seem hot and heavy on it so on this subject we just have to agree to disagree as we have a form of government argument in play, even though we agree on its role.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)How long before Greenwald is writing a glowing puff-piece.
Sid
dionysus
(26,467 posts)this from a crew who supposedly hates red state "DINOs".
smells like, hypocrisy...
anything to use as a cudgel against the evil Obama\Hillary menace, i suppose...
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)...sell out on free trade, then maybe this dude would clearly appear like the greater of all evils.
In the meantime, I'm going to enjoy some popcorn. This shit's going to get real.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Depressed at the prospects, vastly entertained at the resulting food fights/mud wrestling that ensues.