Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 06:36 AM Jan 2014

The Real Reason Evangelical Christians Are Trying to Thwart Women's Right to Birth Control

http://www.alternet.org/tea-party-and-right/are-evangelical-christians-opposed-contraception-or-just-political-tools-fight



On July 19, 2011, a report released by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recommended that all American women be provided with free contraception. Catholic charities were immediately in an uproar, knowing that this would like result in a provision for free contraception as part of the recently-passed Affordable Care Act.

In addition to Catholic institutions, evangelical organizations were also sounding the alarm bells. “Yet another untruth about Obamacare has been uncovered,” said Richard Land, head of the Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, on July 20. “HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius has recommended mandatory coverage for ‘emergency contraception,’ which is a euphemism for the morning-after pill, which often kills a newly conceived child by not allowing the embryo to implant on the wall of the mother’s womb.”

Land’s strong words mark the first major evangelical objection to the contraception mandate. By the Spring of 2012, evangelicals were the only major religious group where a majority opposed the mandate, according to a Public Religion Research Institute Poll. But the evangelical anti-contraception-mandate movement didn’t gain widespread attention until Hobby Lobby filed a lawsuit against Sebelius, announced in September 2012. Hobby Lobby founder David Green argued that his company was founded on pro-life Christian principles, and thus should be exempt from the mandate. “Being Christians, we don't pay for drugs that might cause abortions. Which means that we don't cover emergency contraception, the morning-after pill or the week-after pill. We believe doing so might end a life after the moment of conception, something that is contrary to our most important beliefs.”

The Hobby Lobby lawsuit encouraged other evangelicals to join the battle against the mandate. Lawsuits opposing the mandate, which had previously been filed mainly by Catholic groups, were now being filed by evangelical businesses and universities. Evangelical publishing giant Tyndale House sued Sebelius, followed by three Baptist universities, The American Family Association, and Guidestone Financial Resources (which provides health insurance to Southern Baptist Convention employees.)
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Real Reason Evangelical Christians Are Trying to Thwart Women's Right to Birth Control (Original Post) xchrom Jan 2014 OP
Science is not their strong suit Freddie Jan 2014 #1
I agree. (nt) PotatoChip Jan 2014 #2
Yes, it's is absolutely about control. Arkansas Granny Jan 2014 #3
Precisely.. n/t hlthe2b Jan 2014 #4
Very well said. nt LisaLynne Jan 2014 #9
If good white Christian women aren't getting pregnant and making babies NuclearDem Jan 2014 #5
Dang, I just couldn't find that passage in my Bible. safeinOhio Jan 2014 #6
check out that Bible publised by the ...devil...it is in that one...no text.. Stuart G Jan 2014 #7
I found this old post gwheezie Jan 2014 #8
If you were in the religion game, and saw liberals and others kvelling over Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #10
you get extra big points for using 'kvelling' nt xchrom Jan 2014 #11
Wait, shouldn't it have been "kvetching"? (n/t) Jim Lane Jan 2014 #12
well not the way blue was using it kvell is to: xchrom Jan 2014 #13
So the liberals wouldn't be kvelling about another anti-abortion group, they'd be kvetching. Jim Lane Jan 2014 #14
! xchrom Jan 2014 #15

Freddie

(9,281 posts)
1. Science is not their strong suit
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 07:09 AM
Jan 2014

The PTB in the Fundies have their people believing that common hormonal contraception (the Pill, ring, patch, Mirena)--you know, the kinds that are truly effective--actually "cause abortions" ie. cause fertilized eggs to fail to implant. Even though science has proven that these methods work by suppressing ovulation so there's no egg to fertilize. When you hear them go on about how the ACA "pays for abortion-causing drugs" this is what they are referring to.
I smell bullshit. Their true motive for opposing effective contraception is, of course, controlling women. A woman who has control of whether, when, and how many children she shall bear (a right that should be enshrined in the Constitution IMO) can get an education and a good job. She can be independent, or far less dependent, on her Lord and Master husband. That's the real threat contraception poses to the "submissive wife" crowd.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
5. If good white Christian women aren't getting pregnant and making babies
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 08:21 AM
Jan 2014

Then the scary darker-skinned people out there will out-breed us into extinction.

So, no birth control, ladies. Need another generation of white Christian warriors.

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
8. I found this old post
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 08:46 AM
Jan 2014

Some old white men fear the minority majority, they can't change it, they either need to accept this and learn to live like members of society or we leave them behind and they wallow in their fear. Hopefully, they die off before they do too much more damage.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021100896

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
10. If you were in the religion game, and saw liberals and others kvelling over
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 09:16 AM
Jan 2014

another player in the religion game who stridently objects to birth control and compares it to abortion, would you not consider jumping on that bandwagon? For years the Evangelicals have been considered dolts and idiots for opposing choice, now Francis has shown them that it is possible to oppose contraception, abortion and to continue attacking gay people while also being praised and lionized by folks who claim they support all of those things.
A look at recent events in religion shows us that rather than moderating their stances, if religions double down on the nutty dogma, the world will find a way to agree and to call them friend, ally, most wonderful councilor. The Evangelicals see they have done it wrong, the opposed only abortion and gays and were reviled, Francis opposed abortion, gays and contraception and he's lauded and celebrated. Who can blame the others for trying to play the same card?

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
13. well not the way blue was using it kvell is to:
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 07:47 AM
Jan 2014

kvell
k(ə vel/
verbinformal
gerund or present participle: kvelling
1.
feel happy and proud.
"my mom was kvelling—bursting with pride"


and kvetch:

kvetch
k(ə veCH,kfeCH/
informal
noun
1.
a person who complains a great deal.
verb
1.
complain.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
14. So the liberals wouldn't be kvelling about another anti-abortion group, they'd be kvetching.
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 11:36 AM
Jan 2014

The Christofascists would be kvelling but Blue was talking about what the liberals were doing.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Real Reason Evangelic...