Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 04:35 PM Jan 2014

U.S. rhino hunt auction winner fears for his safety

DALLAS (AP) — A U.S. man who paid $350,000 for the right to hunt an endangered African black rhino says he fears for his safety.

Corey Knowlton says that after being revealed as the winner of a controversial Dallas Safari Club auction, he's received death threats and has hired full-time security. He told Dallas television station KTVT that some people "are wanting to burn my house down."

The Safari Club auctioned the permit to raise money for efforts to protect the black rhino.

The club says the Namibian rhino in question is older, male and nonbreeding, and that the animal was likely to be targeted for removal anyway because it was becoming aggressive.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/01/16/us-rhino-hunt-auction-winner-fears-for-his-safety/4517427/

109 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. rhino hunt auction winner fears for his safety (Original Post) The Straight Story Jan 2014 OP
why would anyone pay that much to slaughter an old nearly dead animal? CBGLuthier Jan 2014 #1
To kill an old and nearly dead rhino would be just like a canned hunt. n/t RebelOne Jan 2014 #19
how ya think that rhino feels? NightWatcher Jan 2014 #2
I checked this thread to see how far down this comment was, Coyotl Jan 2014 #95
distasteful but from a utilitarian perspective this looks positive. geek tragedy Jan 2014 #3
I'm rooting for the rhino mokawanis Jan 2014 #4
Me too! BuelahWitch Jan 2014 #8
Me three. n/t Doremus Jan 2014 #13
Yep. He should be kept alive and speared on his horn for a good amount of time. Arugula Latte Jan 2014 #38
You want someone to be mutilated simply because they're going to hunt an animal? Larsonb Jan 2014 #41
In this case, yes mokawanis Jan 2014 #43
That's sickening. Hunting a game animal is a perfectly moral and honorable activity. Larsonb Jan 2014 #47
"perfectly moral and honorable" WTF? Gidney N Cloyd Jan 2014 #50
You have it all wrong, but that's ok mokawanis Jan 2014 #51
I suppose the difference between myself and some on this thread is that I don't wish harm on those Larsonb Jan 2014 #53
You don't wish harm on anyone but you think killing is an acceptable hobby. LeftyMom Jan 2014 #63
News flash: rhinos aren't people, and we treat them differently than we do humans. Larsonb Jan 2014 #64
Nobody's trying to give them the right to vote. But killing them means you're a terrible person. LeftyMom Jan 2014 #65
A sociopath? Really? Larsonb Jan 2014 #68
You have to go out and kill something to get the gun humper vote. LeftyMom Jan 2014 #70
What actions have I taken that need to be justified? Larsonb Jan 2014 #72
LOL! flvegan Jan 2014 #52
Hunting an endangered species is moral? In what universe? kwassa Jan 2014 #61
The one is which the particular member being hunted is older, male, nonbreeding, and likely to Larsonb Jan 2014 #66
I read the OP. kwassa Jan 2014 #67
Oh, for the love of God. You can't "murder" a rhino, any more than you can "murder" a sardine. Larsonb Jan 2014 #69
Call it killing, then. It makes no difference. Killing an endangered species for sport. How moral. kwassa Jan 2014 #71
Yes, I'm a hunter. So what? Larsonb Jan 2014 #73
So you just kill things because it is fun? kwassa Jan 2014 #75
Yes, hunting is fun. If you don't enjoy it, I suggest you don't hunt. Problem solved, yes? Larsonb Jan 2014 #78
So, animals are supposed to die for your entertainment? Sounds pretty sick to me. kwassa Jan 2014 #82
So don't hunt. Ain't choice grand? Larsonb Jan 2014 #84
I disapprove of your choice, of course. That is why we root for the rhino. kwassa Jan 2014 #88
It appears our fundamental difference is that I don't hope for the maiming of those with whom I Larsonb Jan 2014 #89
This isn't controlled hunting. This is a psychologically warped publicity stunt. kwassa Jan 2014 #90
"This isn't controlled hunting." How is it not? Larsonb Jan 2014 #91
Actually, yes it is nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #96
I'm rooting for all the animals the poster hunts down. Arugula Latte Jan 2014 #93
I never claimed that hunting made one "big" or "macho". Larsonb Jan 2014 #102
Enjoy your stay. (nt) Paladin Jan 2014 #77
Of course. Unless somebody auctions off the rights and transfers them to the rhino, LeftyMom Jan 2014 #62
What a disgusting post. Arugula Latte Jan 2014 #92
"Can't type what I'm thinking about you ..." Who's stopping you? Larsonb Jan 2014 #99
Yeah, I don't feel like getting banned over your bloodlust issues, thanks anyway. Arugula Latte Jan 2014 #100
Again illustrating the difference between myself and some on this thread. Larsonb Jan 2014 #103
The best hunt, is a troll hunt. flvegan Jan 2014 #106
Unashamedly. Codeine Jan 2014 #46
Me too Politicalboi Jan 2014 #55
Absolutely! t Raine Jan 2014 #79
Does he now? TBF Jan 2014 #5
Couldn't 300K had been donated directly to conservation effort? Earth_First Jan 2014 #6
These rich people don't care about conservation BuelahWitch Jan 2014 #10
That may be the case, but auctioning this hunt off is smart Drahthaardogs Jan 2014 #20
It would be sporting to capture the old dude alive and relocate him... hunter Jan 2014 #22
I am a TOTAL bleeding heart liberal..but I agree... angstlessk Jan 2014 #25
Where did you get that the "rhino will be put down no matter what" WHERE??? joeybee12 Jan 2014 #32
I posted a LINKED ARTICLE from CNN nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #97
Apologist BS...Nature does a much better job of culling than phucked up joeybee12 Jan 2014 #28
You do realize that what you're saying about this rhino is what the Hunting Club is saying... joeybee12 Jan 2014 #31
I have enough ecology courses to know the loss of one Drahthaardogs Jan 2014 #34
And in this case add the old male nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #60
I think the thought process is that they were going to kill it anyway The Straight Story Jan 2014 #11
It's NOT a thought process or reasoning...The Hunting club is the group joeybee12 Jan 2014 #30
No, the government is saying that, as well as scientists nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #59
Aw, poor baby. Iggo Jan 2014 #7
Boo-fucking-hoo, safari boy. Paladin Jan 2014 #9
So do the Rinos get the red out Jan 2014 #12
Besides the 'thrill' of the hunt, I'm sure there are dollar signs involved. Doremus Jan 2014 #14
Oh dear, does he feel "hunted?" Eom elfin Jan 2014 #15
Well what do these idiots expect? hamsterjill Jan 2014 #16
Better call the KamaAina Jan 2014 #17
"You're looking for a Rhino you say?" tkmorris Jan 2014 #18
I'm against vigilantism. Nye Bevan Jan 2014 #21
An older song about this kind of thing Shandris Jan 2014 #23
Other threats include... Lancero Jan 2014 #24
Who specifically, and without chance of misinterpretation, is defending LanternWaste Jan 2014 #36
You should probably stop defending them then. Iggo Jan 2014 #45
Sounds like he may get a chance to wrongly kill someone based on SYG before he has a chance to kill Baitball Blogger Jan 2014 #26
I'm going to piss everyone off in this thread DragonBorn Jan 2014 #27
Hey, you're right...re-read the article THE HUNTING CLUB says the rhino would LIKELY joeybee12 Jan 2014 #29
From a Nambian news paper: The Straight Story Jan 2014 #33
Much as the Koch brothers are above criticism as they've given more than $600 million in pledged or LanternWaste Jan 2014 #37
Maybe know he's beginning to understand the position LanternWaste Jan 2014 #35
... Ellipsis Jan 2014 #39
Managed hunting is probably the best chance these animals have to avoid extinction Taitertots Jan 2014 #40
True. Poaching, on the other hand... Lizzie Poppet Jan 2014 #81
No argument whatsoever. Larsonb Jan 2014 #86
Instant karma, bitch! He probably should be more afraid than he is. TheKentuckian Jan 2014 #42
The Safari Club auctioned the permit to raise money for efforts to protect the black rhino. wtf? spanone Jan 2014 #44
And the rhino is now a problem nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #49
Those wishing harm on someone for hunting an animal are reacting emotionally, not rationally. Larsonb Jan 2014 #54
Hunting animals for sport is a rational activity? Or an emotional activity? kwassa Jan 2014 #83
Of course it's rational. Taking pleasure from an activity is a perfectly rational act. Larsonb Jan 2014 #85
Taking pleasure from killing is a perfectly rational act? kwassa Jan 2014 #87
From killing a game animal? Certainly, for some. "Some" meaning "tens of millions" in this case. Larsonb Jan 2014 #98
Oh I get it! Democrats who hunt. Kingofalldems Jan 2014 #101
"Taking pleasure from an activity is a perfectly rational act." kwassa Jan 2014 #105
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2014 #109
What of the other 4 that will be killed? flvegan Jan 2014 #108
I have no pity for Mr. Knowlton. Vashta Nerada Jan 2014 #48
What a pathetic excuse for a human being. liberalmuse Jan 2014 #56
Corey Knowlton's $350,000.00 Target for Practice. democratisphere Jan 2014 #57
He could always not kill the animal, but still give the money. Lunacee_2013 Jan 2014 #58
Good. Now he knows how the animals feel. Myrina Jan 2014 #74
feedback for the alerter CreekDog Jan 2014 #76
What a ridiculous alert. Arugula Latte Jan 2014 #94
It would seem... NCTraveler Jan 2014 #80
Announce the money as a donation, oldandhappy Jan 2014 #104
Well then he was very stupid or naive about the world. Rex Jan 2014 #107

CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
1. why would anyone pay that much to slaughter an old nearly dead animal?
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 04:37 PM
Jan 2014

Wonder how he treats his lovers and family. Guess some guys need to do a lot to get the lead in their pencil. Poor bastard.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
2. how ya think that rhino feels?
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 04:38 PM
Jan 2014

If you want to hunt and feel a rush, go hunt people. Become a bounty hunter. Go track criminals who will shoot back at you.

Dipshitz

 

Larsonb

(40 posts)
47. That's sickening. Hunting a game animal is a perfectly moral and honorable activity.
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 10:03 PM
Jan 2014

Wishing for someone to be mutilated for engaging in such an activity...not so much. Shame on you.

mokawanis

(4,440 posts)
51. You have it all wrong, but that's ok
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 10:12 PM
Jan 2014

I'm not here to change your frame of mind, but you aren't going to get me to feel shame for my long-held belief that hunting for sport is immoral and unethical. Killing an animal because it's "fun" is twisted. Nothing moral or honorable about it.

 

Larsonb

(40 posts)
53. I suppose the difference between myself and some on this thread is that I don't wish harm on those
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 10:18 PM
Jan 2014

who disagree with me about hunting, but many here do.

 

Larsonb

(40 posts)
64. News flash: rhinos aren't people, and we treat them differently than we do humans.
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 12:02 AM
Jan 2014

Is that really such a hard concept to grasp?

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
65. Nobody's trying to give them the right to vote. But killing them means you're a terrible person.
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 12:05 AM
Jan 2014

They're an endangered species and there is absolutely nothing to be gained but "entertainment" and if you kill something for no reason but because you enjoy it then you're a sociopath.

 

Larsonb

(40 posts)
68. A sociopath? Really?
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 12:19 AM
Jan 2014


I can guarantee you that the man pictured here didn't need to kill that duck for food. He did it for one reason, and one reason only: because it was, for him at least, fun.

Is he a sociopath?

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
70. You have to go out and kill something to get the gun humper vote.
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 12:26 AM
Jan 2014

You have to threaten to bomb a few countries too (to impress the same people, which should tell you something.) The system demands you do five immoral things before breakfast.

edit: By the way, your mom should have told you this before you were out of short pants: "He did it too!" is not an excuse. Be an adult, justify your own actions and don't deflect blame onto others.

 

Larsonb

(40 posts)
72. What actions have I taken that need to be justified?
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 01:30 PM
Jan 2014

Enquiring minds want to know!

You have to go out and kill something to get the gun humper vote. You have to threaten to bomb a few countries too (to impress the same people, which should tell you something.)

So when President Clinton was hunting, he was committing what is normally, by your definition, a sociopathic act...but because he did it for crass political reasons he was simply being...practical?



 

Larsonb

(40 posts)
66. The one is which the particular member being hunted is older, male, nonbreeding, and likely to
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 12:10 AM
Jan 2014

attack other rhinos. It was going to be targeted to be killed in any case.

Did you not read the OP?

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
67. I read the OP.
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 12:17 AM
Jan 2014

Being older, male, and non-breeding doesn't create a moral case for murder. It doesn't create a case for anything at all.

The "becoming aggressive" part is questionable, and even if true, is natural.

 

Larsonb

(40 posts)
69. Oh, for the love of God. You can't "murder" a rhino, any more than you can "murder" a sardine.
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 12:23 AM
Jan 2014
The "becoming aggressive" part is questionable, and even if true, is natural.

So if a rhino kills another rhino, that's just peachy...because it's "natural"...but if we intervene and kill the older rhino, making the species as a whole more likely to thrive, that's murder!



And on that note, I'm calling it a night.

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
71. Call it killing, then. It makes no difference. Killing an endangered species for sport. How moral.
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 12:29 AM
Jan 2014

Sounds like murder to me.

You have a very skewed sense of values and morals, to consider this a moral activity.

What makes something a game animal? Because you want to kill it? Are you a hunter, too?

 

Larsonb

(40 posts)
73. Yes, I'm a hunter. So what?
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 01:32 PM
Jan 2014
What makes something a game animal?

From Webster's: An animal made legitimate quarry by state or other law

Do you wish to contest the definition?

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
82. So, animals are supposed to die for your entertainment? Sounds pretty sick to me.
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 08:30 PM
Jan 2014

I suggest you don't hunt, and leave the animals alone.

As I've said repeatedly, your sense of morals and values is quite skewed.

 

Larsonb

(40 posts)
84. So don't hunt. Ain't choice grand?
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 08:44 PM
Jan 2014
I suggest you don't hunt, and leave the animals alone.

I am now going to take your suggestion under advisement. Let me think...



No.

As I've said repeatedly, your sense of morals and values is quite skewed.

From your point of view, that certainly seems to be the case...but then, morals and values aren't exactly objective, are they? From my point of view, there's nothing wrong with recreational hunting, and anyone who wants to prevent others from participating in it is a moralistic busybody who needs to mind their own business.

Mind you, if you're simply ranting that you don't like it and don't want to take any steps to prevent others from engaging in recreational hunting, I don't have the slightest problem with you...I just disagree with you, and that's fine.

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
88. I disapprove of your choice, of course. That is why we root for the rhino.
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 08:55 PM
Jan 2014

A choice you found abhorrent, but perfectly rational from those of us who value endangered species over the emotional needs of people who need to kill animals for fun.

 

Larsonb

(40 posts)
89. It appears our fundamental difference is that I don't hope for the maiming of those with whom I
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:02 PM
Jan 2014

disagree, whereas you (apparently) do.

And in any case, I am valuing the endangered species as a whole, since controlled hunting has been to shown time and again to help game animals prosper.

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
90. This isn't controlled hunting. This is a psychologically warped publicity stunt.
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:08 PM
Jan 2014

The antithesis of what it claims to represent. Hence, the blow back.

 

Larsonb

(40 posts)
91. "This isn't controlled hunting." How is it not?
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:30 PM
Jan 2014

He's going to shoot one specific rhino, at a specified time and place. Frankly, it's hard to imagine a hunt that would be more controlled.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
96. Actually, yes it is
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:38 PM
Jan 2014

and the rhino would (will be) removed by Namibian authorities regardless since the rhino is an older adult, who has killed breeding bulls, and is not a breeding bull. In this situation they are getting money that funds further conservation efforts.

There is SCIENCE behind this.

Oh and before you attack me, I don't hunt, it is not something that is attractive to me, but IF I DID, I would consume the whole animal.

Seriously, are you a vegetarian? If you are not, inform yourself in our animal raising methods.

Oh and by the way, hunting is ESSENTIAL to managing what otherwise would be out of control white deer populations. There are days I wonder about some folks here.

Emotion is not ecology 101

 

Larsonb

(40 posts)
102. I never claimed that hunting made one "big" or "macho".
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:47 PM
Jan 2014

You don't like hunting? Don't hunt.

Choice. It's a good thing.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
62. Of course. Unless somebody auctions off the rights and transfers them to the rhino,
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 11:54 PM
Jan 2014

because apparently money makes otherwise unacceptable things okay.

If 300K is enough to kill a member of a highly endangered species maiming an especially douchetastic example of an overpopulated one has to be what, pocket change?

 

Larsonb

(40 posts)
99. "Can't type what I'm thinking about you ..." Who's stopping you?
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:45 PM
Jan 2014

Please don't hold back for fear of hurting my delicate feelings...!

 

Larsonb

(40 posts)
103. Again illustrating the difference between myself and some on this thread.
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:49 PM
Jan 2014

I don't think ban-worthy thoughts about those with whom I disagree about the pros and cons of hunting. You do.

I think that says a lot more about you than it does me...

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
55. Me too
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 10:34 PM
Jan 2014

Especially when the dog does it. I have no sympathy for this asshole who feels like a big man to shoot an innocent animal just living it's life. I would laugh if him and his whole crew got creamed by a wild stampede.

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
6. Couldn't 300K had been donated directly to conservation effort?
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 04:42 PM
Jan 2014

Seems that the attention this has garnered could have been prevented.

I fail to see how the benevolence of this 'donation' needs to be rewarded by killing something...

There's a bit of irony to this that's exquisite.

BuelahWitch

(9,083 posts)
10. These rich people don't care about conservation
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 04:45 PM
Jan 2014

They want the trophy on their wall. They WANT to kill the animals.

Drahthaardogs

(6,843 posts)
20. That may be the case, but auctioning this hunt off is smart
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 05:38 PM
Jan 2014

The bull is old and aggressive. He cannot breed but he will likely prevent other younger bulls from breeding. He is also a danger to calves and cows. There is limited habitat, the old bull is going one way or another. Why not auction it off and get a million dollars to help other rhinos?

Not to sound Machiavellian, but this old bull has lived a long life and no longer benefits the herd. The last thing he can do as an individual is provide much needed money (from someone stupid enough to pay for it) that helps his species. Maybe even his offspring. I see it kind of like selling your body for science.

hunter

(38,311 posts)
22. It would be sporting to capture the old dude alive and relocate him...
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 05:54 PM
Jan 2014

... to someplace he can stay out of trouble.

Maybe put some of his DNA on ice while they are at it.

If this species survives they'll need all the genetic input they can get.

A big animal species is rarer than a lighthouse and we've relocated those...



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cape_Hatteras_Light

angstlessk

(11,862 posts)
25. I am a TOTAL bleeding heart liberal..but I agree...
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 06:31 PM
Jan 2014

This Rhino will be put down no matter who does it...and that the price to put him down contributes to the well being of the rest of the Rhinos...I have no problem with...

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
32. Where did you get that the "rhino will be put down no matter what" WHERE???
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 06:50 PM
Jan 2014

The article attributes the rhino in question's description and traits to the hunting club...the assholes who are doing this, not some legitimate source.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
97. I posted a LINKED ARTICLE from CNN
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:39 PM
Jan 2014

citing Namibian authorities. You might want to go search that now. I did that AFTER a post of yours.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
28. Apologist BS...Nature does a much better job of culling than phucked up
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 06:44 PM
Jan 2014

assholes with too much money.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
31. You do realize that what you're saying about this rhino is what the Hunting Club is saying...
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 06:48 PM
Jan 2014

Not some conservation group...they even used the word "likely" to be removed...they ahve no fucking clue...they're making shit up to mkae themselves out to be victims and do-good-ers.

Drahthaardogs

(6,843 posts)
34. I have enough ecology courses to know the loss of one
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 07:08 PM
Jan 2014

Old male in a breeding population is likely irrelevant. The park has limited resources. This is basic ecology.

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
11. I think the thought process is that they were going to kill it anyway
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 04:46 PM
Jan 2014

and auctioned off who got to do it (if they did it themselves it would net them nothing as far as funds).

The end result is the same and probably wouldn't have gotten any press had they simply performed the action (ie, no one would probably have cared or known, let alone be discussing the whole issue).

Would I do it? No. But I can see their reasoning.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
30. It's NOT a thought process or reasoning...The Hunting club is the group
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 06:47 PM
Jan 2014

saying the rhino would LIKELY have been removed anyway...they're pulling that out of their asses to justify this...they're making shit up.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
59. No, the government is saying that, as well as scientists
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 10:50 PM
Jan 2014
Knowlton's supporters say this conservation strategy is based in smart science. The International Union for Conservation of Nature supported the Dallas Safari Club's black rhino hunting permit auction.

The union says its mission is to work with governments and conservation groups around the world to find "practical solutions" to conservation efforts around the world.

It also says "trophy hunting is a fundamental pillar of Namibia's conservation approach and instrumental in its success." And that "well-managed recreational hunting and trophy hunting" have had a positive impact in "stimulating population increases for rhino."


http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/20/us/omaha-plant-fire/index.html?iref=allsearch

Believe this or not, but we do this as well in the US with far from threatened species such as the white tail deer. You want to tell me where the population would be right now if we did not hunt it? (Hint, there are no natural hunters of the species in the environment right now in sufficient numbers, such as wolves)

I would not engage in hunting. It is not something I would like to do or appeals to me, but godamit, there is solid science to this idea of population management. So you would rather leave a non breeding bull in the wild that is killing BREEDING BULLS? How is that going help the population to recover exactly? I will be over there in the corner, sitting down, waiting for THAT ANSWER.

Paladin

(28,254 posts)
9. Boo-fucking-hoo, safari boy.
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 04:44 PM
Jan 2014

Gotta love the new detail about the targeted rhino: not only is he older, male and non-breeding, which we already heard about---in addition to all that, he's supposedly "becoming aggressive"! I mean, that rhino is just ASKING FOR IT! The Republican Party better pray that those same criteria are never utilized against their membership---talk about thinning a herd.....

Doremus

(7,261 posts)
14. Besides the 'thrill' of the hunt, I'm sure there are dollar signs involved.
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 05:14 PM
Jan 2014

How much could someone sell a rare endangered rhino head mount for these days? I'm going to guess that if he finds the right buyer, this fucker might actually walk away with a profit.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
21. I'm against vigilantism.
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 05:41 PM
Jan 2014

Having said that, if you don't want many, many people to hate you, don't do stuff like shooting rhinos.

 

Shandris

(3,447 posts)
23. An older song about this kind of thing
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 05:57 PM
Jan 2014

From 1992's Symphony of Destruction. One of the better quasi-political metal albums of its time. Check out 'Foreclosure of a Dream' for another good sample. But back on-topic...



Lancero

(3,003 posts)
24. Other threats include...
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 05:58 PM
Jan 2014

I'm going to murder your children.

Many more of similar kind, and some that are worse.

Pretty sad that we are willing to defend the people who are saying "we're going to kill your children".

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
36. Who specifically, and without chance of misinterpretation, is defending
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 07:27 PM
Jan 2014

Who specifically, and without chance of misinterpretation, is defending those allegedly posting threats?

DragonBorn

(175 posts)
27. I'm going to piss everyone off in this thread
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 06:40 PM
Jan 2014

but .....

This guy has done more for conservation in Africa than probably all of you combined. Where do you think the 350K is going? Its used to pay for park rangers, and maintain the habitats for these animals. That one hunt alone probably paid the entire operating budget for a year for a conservation area.

I don't like the fact that the only way to raise this money is to auction off hunting passes. I think endangered animals should be able to live our their natural lives unless its a unusual situation and the animal is a direct threat to human life but unless you're donating 300k dollars to conservation efforts you should probably stop talking trash about this hunter.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
29. Hey, you're right...re-read the article THE HUNTING CLUB says the rhino would LIKELY
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 06:46 PM
Jan 2014

to be removed anyway...THE HUNTING CLUB said this, not some conservation agency, and they used the word LIKELY...they have no fucking clue whether that would have happened.

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
33. From a Nambian news paper:
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 06:53 PM
Jan 2014

This was reiterated by Deputy Minister of Environment and Tourism, Pohamba Shifeta, this week who said that the government was not violating any laws.

He also said government would stick to its programme because it is being done in a sustainable manner, which brings money for future conservation initiatives.

“Rhinos are our resources and we not violating any laws. They must just understand that we will continue doing what we are doing and they should also know that with our rhino population growing, harvesting is part of our programme,” he said.

...

The Ministry of Environment and Tourism announced last year that they obtained a five-year approval from Cabinet to sell five black rhinoceros yearly for trophy hunting.

http://www.namibian.com.na/indexx.php?id=7843&page_type=story_detail#sthash.w5ZI2RDP.dpuf
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
37. Much as the Koch brothers are above criticism as they've given more than $600 million in pledged or
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 07:36 PM
Jan 2014

"unless you're donating 300k dollars to conservation efforts you should probably stop talking trash about this hunter..."

Much as the Koch brothers are above criticism as they've given more than $600 million in pledged or donated money to arts, education, and medical research?

(Insert distinction without a difference here)




"I don't like the fact that the only way to raise this money is to auction off hunting passes..."

What specifically leads you to believe this is the only way to raise money?

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
35. Maybe know he's beginning to understand the position
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 07:25 PM
Jan 2014

Maybe know he's beginning to understand the position that many people won't really give trust to anyone who kills for entertainment.

Although I certainly don't agree with alleged death threats, neither do I agree with killing for joy and fun...

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
40. Managed hunting is probably the best chance these animals have to avoid extinction
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 10:22 PM
Jan 2014

It is almost ironic that the vast majority of the people complaining on the internet about this haven't donated $350,000 combined.

spanone

(135,830 posts)
44. The Safari Club auctioned the permit to raise money for efforts to protect the black rhino. wtf?
Sat Jan 18, 2014, 12:37 PM
Jan 2014

you can kill a black rhino to protect them??? some fucked up logic there.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
49. And the rhino is now a problem
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 10:05 PM
Jan 2014

I know.

I read this thread and I went. are people that ignorant of science? This is done every year regardless and the population is starting to bounce back.

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
83. Hunting animals for sport is a rational activity? Or an emotional activity?
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 08:32 PM
Jan 2014

I think you are on thin, or no, ice here.

 

Larsonb

(40 posts)
85. Of course it's rational. Taking pleasure from an activity is a perfectly rational act.
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 08:48 PM
Jan 2014

Would you argue that because people listen to music for pleasure, that it's an emotional activity without a rational basis? Please....

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
87. Taking pleasure from killing is a perfectly rational act?
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 08:52 PM
Jan 2014

How interesting. By the way, pleasure is an emotion, not a thought.

Are you sure you are in the right discussion group?

 

Larsonb

(40 posts)
98. From killing a game animal? Certainly, for some. "Some" meaning "tens of millions" in this case.
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:43 PM
Jan 2014

And that's just in the good 'ole USA.

By the way, pleasure is an emotion, not a thought.

When did I say otherwise?

Are you sure you are in the right discussion group?

I like guys like this, all of whom kill animals for pleasure:







If they posted here, would they be in the wrong group?



kwassa

(23,340 posts)
105. "Taking pleasure from an activity is a perfectly rational act."
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 12:31 AM
Jan 2014

No, it is a perfectly emotional act.

You confuse the words "rational" and "emotional" rather easily. Over and over.

And I don't care if any famous Democrat hunts. Most show up in camouflage to get the good ol' boy vote, and don't hunt on any regular basis. I wonder if either Bill or Jimmy ever fired a shot at an animal. Looks like photo-op time.

I think killing animals for pleasure is sick. You clearly don't.

If a rhino runs you down, I will not mourn. You are not more important.

Response to kwassa (Reply #105)

flvegan

(64,407 posts)
108. What of the other 4 that will be killed?
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:10 AM
Jan 2014

Nobody's talking about THAT science, ignorance be damned.

The western black is recently EXTINCT. Fuckofa bounce back, I tell you. 8 million years and then along came morons needing help in bed, among other things.

But hey, so long as we kill a few each year, regardless of the number, they'll be fine soon. I swear.

Right, science.

liberalmuse

(18,672 posts)
56. What a pathetic excuse for a human being.
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 10:38 PM
Jan 2014

As are all people who hunt endangered animals for whatever stupid excuse. What is the glory in shooting such a creature? People like this deserve nothing but contempt and derision. Fuck him. And I'm not talking about impoverished people who hunt to survive. I'm talking about rich assholes who pay to hunt down endangered, aged and even penned animals for sport or a skin trophy so they can pretend they are "real men" or "real women". Again, fuck them!

Lunacee_2013

(529 posts)
58. He could always not kill the animal, but still give the money.
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 10:50 PM
Jan 2014

Not saying that threatening him is right either, just saying.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
76. feedback for the alerter
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 02:19 PM
Jan 2014
On Tue Jan 21, 2014, 01:08 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Good. Now he knows how the animals feel.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4366974

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

This poster just endorsed a death threat.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Jan 21, 2014, 01:14 PM, and the Jury voted 1-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Unjustified alert. The poster is merely expressing anger at the hunter's willingness to slaughter a rare beast of the wild, not "endorsing a death threat." It's no different than "Serves him right," or "As you sow, so shall you reap." I really think this is a chickenshit alert. SAY something to the poster if you think the comment was OTT. Don't hit the alert button for shit like this. No difference between this comment and the one in post 4.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: there's nothing here to complain about, lol
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: And?
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't think the post is endorsing a death threat, but is making a generic statement that his fears are warranted given his actions.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
80. It would seem...
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 02:41 PM
Jan 2014

It would seem the people in charge of maintaining the Namibian rhino have a problem on their hands and need a rhino killed. Instead of killing it and dumping it in a hole or burning it they found an American with more money than sense. Win win all the way around.

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
104. Announce the money as a donation,
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 10:16 PM
Jan 2014

which it is anyway, take the tax deduction, take a team of videographers to Africa with you, shoot an educational film on the rhino, and come back in glory.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion» U.S. rhino hunt auction ...