Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(113,297 posts)
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 09:55 PM Jan 2014

Audrie's Law (a bill to be put before the CA legislature, named after Audrie Potts.

This bill is the result of the suicide of Audrie Potts, who killed herself eight days after being sexually assaulted and cyberbullied, Two of her three attackers received THIRTY DAY sentences, to be served on weekends (goddess forfend it should interfere with THEIR lives) and the oldest got a FORTY-FIVE DAY sentence)

Audrie's Law, which Allard said will be introduced in the Legislature this month by state Sen. Jim Beall, has four key points:

• Sexual assault involving penetration of any kind would become a felony for both juveniles and adults.

• The judge would be given discretion for serious crimes to disclose a minor's name and records publicly. The juvenile would be listed as a sex offender, which would give parents and school administrators the right to know the juvenile's identity.

• Equal protection under the laws relating to sexual assault would be afforded to unconscious victims.

• It would be an automatic felony to disseminate photographs depicting the commission of any sexual assault.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/01/16/girl-assauled-suicide/4504359/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Audrie's Law (a bill to be put before the CA legislature, named after Audrie Potts. (Original Post) niyad Jan 2014 OP
I wonder if my question Ilsa Jan 2014 #1
Is being raped with an object any different than being raped by a penis? Sheldon Cooper Jan 2014 #3
Not necessarily. It might be Ilsa Jan 2014 #4
Good. historylovr Jan 2014 #2
. . . niyad Jan 2014 #5

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
1. I wonder if my question
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 12:20 AM
Jan 2014

is necessary, but should there be a minimum age for this kind of juvenile? I mean, a younger juvie might not be able to commit rape except with an object, but I question treating all juvies the same as adults, even for this crime.

The punishment for those teens was wholly inadequate. That needs to be addressed, including treatment for these sex offenders to get them to stop.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
4. Not necessarily. It might be
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 09:53 AM
Jan 2014

Less medically risky, no STD or pregnancy risk, but my point was to raise the question about potentially treating children as adults in the criminal justice system, even when a heinous crime is committed.

Generally, liberals are against this concept due to the immaturity of the teen's brain. In particular, the idea that a child is too young to rape with his penis might be too young to be fully aware of the nature of his assault.

The case prompting the discussion reflects a needs for more advanced punishment and treatment of juvenile offenders. I think the proposed changes might work, as long as there is still a difference between sentencing and treatment for adults and children.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Audrie's Law (a bill to b...