General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsProfessor: Christie Hired Legal Team To DETERMINE What’s PRIVILEGED In GWB Investigation

Gov. Chris Christie has hired his own legal team to assist with document retention and production in the investigation into the George Washington Bridge lane closures. Seton Hall Associate Political Science Professor Robert Pallitto told NJTV News Anchor Harry Martin that damaging information is more likely to come out during the legislative investigation process. Pallitto said that the governor hiring his own legal team means that Christie wants to be sure about what is releasable in the investigation and what he can properly claim as privileged or not releasable.
As for the use of executive privilege, Pallitto said that it is more commonly used in federal law, concerning the president and the federal executive branch. An example he used as the most famous case of using executive privilege is the President Nixon case, where Nixon tried to keep certain records when he was being investigated, saying that they fell under executive privilege because they were part of the process of getting advice from counselors, so he didnt have to divulge the records to the court.
Pallitto said there are differences between the New Jersey Constitution and the Federal Constitution, but the powers of the legislature and the executive branch are the same. The legislature has a power to inquire through commission like Congress does and the executive has the power to carry out his or her duties and those are the two constitutional provisions that usually clash in executive privilege cases. The New Jersey courts have sometimes addressed executive privilege or the power of the executive to keep documents secret. Its just that the law is not as well developed and since its not as well developed, theres more discretion for the courts, Pallitto said.
Executive privilege is simply a creation of the courts and the courts theoretically could take it away or restrict it, Pallitto said. He said New Jersey has the Open Public Records Act (OPRA) and it creates the presumption that public records belong to the public, so they should be released to the public. But there are exceptions.
cont'
http://www.njtvonline.org/news/video/pallitto-says-damaging-info-will-come-during-legislative-investigation-of-gov-christie/
Berlum
(7,044 posts)Hide as much shit as you can from the public.
"It's, um, you know, privileged shit because we are Republicons and, um, Republicons are special. IOKIYAR."
- Gov. Christie (R - Occultist)
Ptooey on Republicon Occultism.
%3Fw%3D490
Segami
(14,923 posts)Berlum
(7,044 posts)Repubbies got their War on Women, their War on Gays, their War on Blacks, their War on the Poor, War on Science, War on Climate Change Reality, and of course their ongoing epic gawdforsaken, darkside War on the Truth. All of which they are losing. The only things they are competent at are FAIL & FUDGE.
![]()
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)rurallib
(64,688 posts)government action than re-routing traffic. Can't even imagine what if anything could possibly be ruled private in a decision to reroute traffic.
Historic NY
(40,037 posts)Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Matters not, one or more of his underlings is going to be the torpedo that sinks the S.S. Christie.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/randy-mastro-christie-bridge
Player in NJ Bridge Scandal Will Talk for Immunity
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024345850
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Because the facts of the case will be pounding any defense he will try to muster.
Baitball Blogger
(52,353 posts)The answer is, nothing is privileged. Not even the notes of the lawyer.
flamingdem
(40,898 posts)the truth will out, mostly.
spanone
(141,630 posts)i'm sure they'll be massive
Segami
(14,923 posts)librechik
(30,957 posts)you are being investigated in
COI, anyone?
Solly Mack
(96,944 posts)"Without a doubt we will cooperate with all appropriate inquiries..."
And I took that to mean that he will be the one that determines what is and isn't an appropriate inquiry.
Attempting to prevent disclosure of records is part and parcel to that.
Ask for info he doesn't want to give out? Well, that's an inappropriate inquiry.