Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 09:11 PM Jan 2014

Palace reshuffle as the Queen passes more royal responsibilities to Prince Charles

Nicole Morley

A merging of palace staff has begun, which sees Prince Charles' aide become the media chief for the entire Royal household.

The heir to the throne will also accompany his mother to the beaches of Normandy later this year.

The trip is to mark the 70th anniversary of the D-Day landings, Charles accompanying the Queen on the trip further adds to speculation that it may be the monarch's final engagement overseas.

A French government official, who was involved with organising the D-Day anniversary events, revealed that: "We have been told this will probably be the Queen's last official foreign visit."

http://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/454775/Palace-reshuffle-as-the-Queen-passes-more-royal-responsibilities-to-Prince-Charles

God save the Queen and God bless her.

46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Palace reshuffle as the Queen passes more royal responsibilities to Prince Charles (Original Post) hrmjustin Jan 2014 OP
She's been queen for almost 62 years now herding cats Jan 2014 #1
I think she will stay to death but I think she realizes she can't do as much as she did. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #2
You're probably right and make a good point. herding cats Jan 2014 #5
and she would not want to be away if her husband is ill SoCalDem Jan 2014 #16
What was Victoria's secret for longevity? jberryhill Jan 2014 #40
lingerie. n/m Morning Dew Jan 2014 #41
Not much, really - she died aged 81; it was that she became queen aged 18 muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #43
Victoria wasn't older, she just became queen at a younger age. herding cats Jan 2014 #44
She is probably just tired of it all and wants to semi-retire. The Prince will do fine...n/t monmouth3 Jan 2014 #3
I agree. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #4
Isn't it time junior got a real job anyway? n/t Cleita Jan 2014 #6
lolz. I wonder what the Republicans would say about a 'taker' like Prince Charles. Gov't housing, okaawhatever Jan 2014 #39
giving the queens consort a rest too. pansypoo53219 Jan 2014 #7
I am sure he might like retirement. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #14
Prince Charles-"he is the longest serving heir apparent in British history.... Kaleva Jan 2014 #8
And then he might decide to let his son do it. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #13
Get rid of the parasitic institution altogether. Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #17
Makes too much money for them. The British people want it. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #18
What kind of money? Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #25
Tourism. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #26
Tourists never get to see the royals. Only the buildings. Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #27
I think the fairy tale story is what gets some to come. The brits will never get rid of them. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #28
Hire actors. It would be cheaper. And I know plenty of "Brits" who would like to see them gone. Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #29
I am not Swoony for the royals. I just have a respect for the UK. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #30
What have the royals done to garner your respect? Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #33
I said I have respect for the UK. The Monarchy is their tradition. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #34
What, specifically, has the UK done to garner your respect? Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #35
Why? hrmjustin Jan 2014 #36
Why what? You claimed the UK deserves your respect. Why? Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #37
Mainly for their ability to survive WW2. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #38
You should admire the Russians more FarCenter Jan 2014 #45
It must suck to be Chuck bklyncowgirl Jan 2014 #9
Literally born to do! polichick Jan 2014 #11
Yeah that has got to be hard on him. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #15
Poor little rich boy. Always a prince. Never a king. Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #19
He got the shaft, for sure. 1000words Jan 2014 #20
I would not want the job. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #22
It's not like you can be sacked 1000words Jan 2014 #23
I think you can. I think there is a mechanism put in after the civil war. Not too sure. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #24
Yes indeed. Waving from balconies. A trot out in your carriage once or twice a year Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #31
my arm might get tired. Besides I am Gay band they don't seem that gay friendly. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #32
don't forget cutting ribbons Rosa Luxemburg Jan 2014 #42
I suspect Camilla has been a deterrent to his ascension nt LiberalEsto Jan 2014 #46
This message was self-deleted by its author polichick Jan 2014 #10
"We mean it, man ..." 1000words Jan 2014 #12
! Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #21

herding cats

(19,564 posts)
1. She's been queen for almost 62 years now
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 09:28 PM
Jan 2014

I kind of thought at this point she'd go all in and try to out stay Victoria's record of just over 63 & 1/2 years.

I hope she's well and there's not some health concern.

herding cats

(19,564 posts)
5. You're probably right and make a good point.
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 09:39 PM
Jan 2014

She's 87 now I believe, I'm sure the required traveling of her position must be exhausting to her at times.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,311 posts)
43. Not much, really - she died aged 81; it was that she became queen aged 18
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 07:32 AM
Jan 2014

Elizabeth is already the longest lived British (or English or Scottish) monarch at 87.

herding cats

(19,564 posts)
44. Victoria wasn't older, she just became queen at a younger age.
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 09:57 AM
Jan 2014

Victoria was 18 and Elizabeth was 26 when they became queens.

okaawhatever

(9,461 posts)
39. lolz. I wonder what the Republicans would say about a 'taker' like Prince Charles. Gov't housing,
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 12:49 AM
Jan 2014

gov't health care doesn't work full time. They'd surely have a problem with him.

Kaleva

(36,298 posts)
8. Prince Charles-"he is the longest serving heir apparent in British history....
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 11:21 PM
Jan 2014

having held the position since 1952.[3] He is also the oldest heir to the throne since 1714."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles,_Prince_of_Wales

It's quite possible Queen Elizabeth could reign for another 10 years or so with Prince Charles taking on more and more duties.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
27. Tourists never get to see the royals. Only the buildings.
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 12:20 AM
Jan 2014

Ousting them from the buildings would save money and, perhaps, be even more lucrative. Once their gone, the interiors of those buildings would be wide open to tourist exploitation.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
29. Hire actors. It would be cheaper. And I know plenty of "Brits" who would like to see them gone.
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 12:30 AM
Jan 2014

By the way... what makes you so swoony.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
35. What, specifically, has the UK done to garner your respect?
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 12:43 AM
Jan 2014

Their stiff upper lips? Benny Hill? Their brutal and parasitical treatment of their colonies?

bklyncowgirl

(7,960 posts)
9. It must suck to be Chuck
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 11:34 PM
Jan 2014

I mean here he is, a man close to retirement age waiting for his mother to die so he can finally do the job he was born to do. Talk about conflicted.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
31. Yes indeed. Waving from balconies. A trot out in your carriage once or twice a year
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 12:34 AM
Jan 2014

to wave to your minions. Noticing the made forgot to dust the crown jewels. Such a burden.

Response to hrmjustin (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Palace reshuffle as the Q...